Taung man gets 12 years for blowing up sewerage infrastructure
An act of sabotage that blew up a vital sewerage transformer — and left the perpetrator injured — has landed a 23-year-old man from Taung behind bars for 12 years.
On Thursday, 29 May, the Taung Regional Court sentenced 23-year-old Karabo Mocumi of Dithakwaneng Village to 12 years' direct imprisonment after he pleaded guilty to damaging essential infrastructure.
Cost of sabotage
Mocumi's ill-advised decision to cut a copper cable connected to a sewerage transformer on 06 April 2024 in Reivilo, near Taung, backfired spectacularly when the transformer exploded, injuring him and disrupting vital community services.
According to the NPA, residents who rushed to the scene found Mocumi still at the wreckage scene. Emergency services were called and the injured saboteur was taken to hospital before being arrested and released on R500 bail.
In court, Mocumi pleaded guilty. State prosecutor Rebaona Mokgopa argued that crimes such as these weren't just reckless; they were rampant and fuelled South Africa's infamous energy crisis — load shedding — which had wreaked havoc on service delivery and the economy.
Magistrate Bhuti Zulu echoed the sentiments, stressing the heavy toll such offences took on communities and the need for sentences that packed a punch.
Welcoming the verdict, Dr Rachel Makhari, Director of Public Prosecutions in North West, praised everyone involved in securing the conviction. 'This sentence underscores the NPA's commitment to fighting crime and upholding the rule of law. It sends a clear message: tampering with essential infrastructure will not be tolerated,' she said.
Daily Maverick asked the NPA for statistics on infrastructure damage cases that had ended up in court this year. The NPA confirmed that while it did not maintain official records on such cases, this was only the second it was aware of to come before a court this year, though the true number of incidents was likely to be higher.
Mocumi's case shines a light on a wider challenge facing South Africa: the urgent need to protect and upgrade critical infrastructure amid persistent threats from theft, vandalism and ageing assets. DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
NPA to oppose Magudumana's latest bid over her deportation
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) says it will oppose disgraced celebrity doctor Nandipha Magudumana's latest court bid to challenge her deportation from Tanzania. On 16 May, the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed Magudumana's application to declare her deportation from Tanzania unlawful. Magudumana was arrested with her lover and convicted criminal Thabo Bester in Arusha, Tanzania, in April 2023 after fleeing South Africa. The South African previously reported that in June 2023, Bloemfontein High Court Judge Phillip Loubser dismissed Magudumana's application for her arrest and deportation from Tanzania in April 2023 to be declared unlawful and set aside. Loubser dismissed her application with costs, saying he is not convinced that the case has a prospect of success and that a different court might come to a different conclusion. Magudumana had alleged South African police in Tanzania abducted her and contended that since her arrest was unlawful, the criminal proceedings against her in the Bester escape case were null and void, and she should be released from the Bizzah Makhate Correctional Centre in Kroonstad where she is held. On Friday, 16 May, Supreme Court Justice Tati Makgoka said the matter is dismissed with costs. NPA national spokesperson advocate Mthunzi Mhaga told the SABC that they still have to meet with their legal team and confirmed that they will file an opposition within 10 days. 'We take the view firmly so that the process of deporting Dr Nandipha Magudumana from Tanzania in April 2023 to South Africa was a seamless and above board process. There's no untoward conduct on the part of the team that escorted her. We are very much aware that there was a minority judgement that ruled in her favour, however, the majority judgement is in our favour,' Mhaga said. Magudumana's lawyer, Machini Motloung, also told the SABC that they are confident regarding their latest legal challenge, as they are of the firm view that there are prospects of success in their application for leave to appeal the SCA ruling. Motloung said that another court, in this case, the Constitutional Court, may as well arrive at a different conclusion. 'We will remain confident on the merits of our case,' he said. Regarding his client. Motloung said she remains resolute and confident in the justice system as they are following due processes. 'As I always say, she might be dismayed but not despondent. She's prepared and ready to see that justice ultimately gets done in the case. She firmly believes that there was unlawfulness in the manner in which she was handed over to the South African authorities, and hence she's pursuing this route,' he added. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
NPA says overturned Cholota extradition will not affect Ace Magashule trial
The National Prosecuting Authority is considering its options after Moroadi Cholota's extradition was overturned Image: Supplied The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said the judgment by the Bloemfontein High Court in upholding Moroadi Cholota's special plea of lack of jurisdiction will not impact the trial of the rest of the accused. It will meanwhile consider its options, including possibly appealing against the judgment. 'The NPA will specifically consider options to appeal considering the potential impact of the judgment in respect of the case against Ms Cholota, and broader extradition processes,' NPA spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga said. He explained that it should be noted that this judgment has no bearing on the trial against the other accused that is expected to resume on Wednesday (June 4) as Cholota was an accused person and not a state witness. The NPA remains confident in the strength of its case against the accused in this matter and is ready to proceed when the trial resumes. 'The members of the prosecuting team always acted with the highest standards of ethical conduct, guided by the evidence and information available at any given time,' Mhaga said. The court found on Tuesday that it has no jurisdiction to try the former Free State premier Ace Magashule's personal assistant in the R255-million asbestos case, as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The judge upheld her special plea regarding the asbestos removal tender following a trial-within-a trial to ascertain whether Cholota's extradition process by the South African authorities was done lawfully. While a Free State director of Public Prosecutions applied for Cholota's extradition, Judge Philip Loubser found that this power lies with the Justice Minister and with the National Prosecuting Authority. Thus, he said, the extradition was not done lawfully and it is not valid. 'This court does not have the power to try you. You are free to leave,' the judge told Cholota. Cholota was one of the 18 accused in the high-profile trial where the accused are facing a host of charges relating to alleged fraud, corruption and money laundering. All of the accused had pleaded not guilty and vehemently denied any involvement in the allegations against them. Cholota was studying in the USA at the time of her extradition and at first regarded as a state witness, before it was decided to add her as accused no 17 to the criminal trial. In challenging her extradition, Cholota claimed that the State had lied or misrepresented to the US authorities that there was a case for her to answer in South Africa. In delivering his judgment, Judge Loubser said there was no need to go into these arguments, as he found the extradition process was wrong in law. The only two witnesses who testified during the extradition challenge were Hawks officials. The Cholota camp did not call any witnesses.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
NPA ‘taken aback' over Moroadi Cholota extradition ruling, hints at appeal
Judge Phillip Loubser ruled that Ace Magashule's former personal assistant was 'free to leave'. Moroadi Cholota ( former PA to former Free State premier Ace Magashule) appears at Bloemfontein High Court on 5 May 2025. Picture: Gallo Images/Mlungisi Louw The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) says it will return to the drawing board after Moroadi Cholota's extradition from the United States (US) was declared unlawful. On Tuesday, the Free State High Court in Bloemfontein ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to try Cholota on corruption charges, stating that the administrative processes behind her extradition had not been followed in accordance with the law. Judge Phillip Loubser ruled that she was 'free to leave'. Cholota was one of 18 co-accused in the R255 million asbestos corruption case involving former Free State premier Ace Magashule. The main trial is scheduled to resume on Wednesday. NPA reacts to judgment on Moroadi Cholota's extradition NPA national spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga expressed the authority's surprise at the court's decision, emphasising the state was of the view that Cholota's special plea was a disguised appeal. 'We really are taken aback by the judgment itself because you'll recall the view that we held that it was more of an appeal in South Africa on a foreign state judgment in circumstances where they had not utilised or explored the appeal processes in the United States,' he told the media. Mhaga confirmed that the prosecution team would review the court's ruling and consider further legal steps. 'At the moment, we'll have to regroup as a team and reflect on the judgment and see if we can identify grounds upon which the judgment could be appealed, given its impact.' ALSO READ: Free State asbestos trial: State accused of ruining life of Magashule's ex-PA Moroadi Cholota He maintained that the state remained confident in the integrity of its prosecution efforts. 'The feeling from the team was that the conduct was above board in the allegations that were made against the investigating officers. 'Unfortunately, the judge found otherwise and, therefore, it is one of the issues that we have to reflect on,' Mhaga said. Asbestos Judgment (trial within a trial) Free State High Court June 3, 2025 'If we find a basis which allowed so that the judgment could be appealed, that determination will be informed by that process. 'What is important for now is to reflect on it, process it because it is a judgment that has the effect of a final order because we cannot charge her now unless the decision is overturned by a higher court in the event that we take a decision to appeal it,' he explained. NPA challenges SCA ruling Mhaga also addressed the court's finding that the state had made 'misrepresentations' to US authorities. 'If you're saying we must take accountability for the findings made by the judge in circumstances where I make it clear that we will still reflect on the judgment and see if there are grounds to appeal it, it's not fair.' He also noted that Loubser referenced a 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment concerning the extradition of South Africa-born artist Johnathan Schultz. The SCA found that the NPA lacked the legal authority to request extradition, as that power resides with the Minister of Justice. Mhaga revealed that the NPA has already moved to challenge that ruling. 'For the record, we have filed an application for leave to appeal against it in the Constitutional Court, albeit on limited grounds. The NPA stated that it will consider the technicality to determine how much it influences the decision on whether or not to appeal the judgment. NOW READ: 'What if she went on holiday': Hawks investigator grilled on 'surprise' US trip for Magashule's ex-PA
