Louisiana lawmakers file bill to cap growth of government
Published 1:49 pm Tuesday, April 22, 2025
By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square
The Louisiana Legislature has introduced a bill to limit the growth of the government, an increasingly popular move among states.
In November, the House of Representatives passed an identical bill, but once it arrived to the Senate it was amended significantly, which included various exceptions to the expenditure limit such as funds from the federal government or statutorily dedicated funds.
Email newsletter signup
The one currently before the Legislature removes those exceptions and more.
'What the bill does is it limits the amount of recurring general fund… that can be appropriated for recurring expenses and restricts the use of the revenues above that limit,' Rep. Phillip Tarver, R-Calcasieu, explained. 'We'll create a government growth limit.'
Louisiana's state spending has increased by over $22 billion since 2016, largely driven by health care and educational spending. Those two spending categories have increased in large part due to the state's expansion of Medicaid. Enrollment in Medicaid has increased to 44% of the population and ballooning healthcare spending to 40% of the state budget, according to the Pelican Institute.
Spending on education has risen. Through the Minimum Foundation Program, spending on education has grown even as student enrollment declines, bringing the state's spending on education to over $11 billion.
'Louisiana's budget is highly constrained by a variety of constitutional and statutory requirements that earmark significant portions of state revenue for specific purposes. This limits lawmakers' discretion in allocating funds to address current priorities or fiscal emergencies,' the Pelican Institute wrote. 'Nearly one-quarter of the state's tax revenues are automatically set aside for specific purposes before lawmakers even begin drafting the budget.'
The growth limit would be calculated using the previous year's general fund appropriation as a base, multiplied by a growth factor that reflects population changes and inflation — specifically, the Consumer Price Index and medical care inflation. If revenues exceed the cap, they could only be used for non-recurring expenses, such as infrastructure or paying down debt.
'The growth limit cannot exceed the expenditure limit,' Tarver said. 'And if the revenues exceed the growth limit, but are under the expenditure limit, the revenues can only be appropriated for non-recurring expenditures.'
The new rule wouldn't apply to one-time or emergency spending, and certain expenditures would be excluded from the cap. But any recurring revenue collected above the new growth limit would be off-limits for ongoing expenses and could only be used for nonrecurring purposes like infrastructure projects or paying down debt.
The proposal also includes a mechanism for lawmakers to change the growth limit through a two-thirds vote.
The bill advanced out of committee without objection and without any major amendment.
Featured Local Savings
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ted Cruz Wants Democratic Wipeout in Texas Over Newsom's California Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz proposed that Texas extend the state's Republican advantage in the U.S. House of Representatives to a full Democratic wipeout if California Governor Gavin Newsom goes through with his plan to gerrymander seats. Newsom, a Democrat, has threatened to proceed with redistricting California so that his party has a majority in the U.S. House, and he urged President Donald Trump to stop Republican-governed states from redistricting, such as in Texas. Texas Democrats are thwarting a redistricting effort by state Republicans that, based on the previous election's results, could add five seats for the GOP in the U.S. House. They fled Texas to prevent the necessary quorum in the state legislature. "If California gerrymanders from its current 43-9 Dem advantage (83%) to a 52-0 Dem advantage (100%)... ...then Texas should go from a 24-14 GOP advantage (63%) to 38-0 (100%)," Cruz, a Republican, posted to X on Thursday morning. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Illinois judge rejects Texas' request to enforce arrest warrants in map row
A judge in Illinois on Wednesday denied Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's request to enforce civil arrest warrants for Democrats who fled the Lone Star State. Pool File Photo by Justin Lane/UPI | License Photo Aug. 14 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Illinois has rejected Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's request to enforce arrest warrants for Democrats who fled the Lone Star State earlier this month to block Republican redistricting plans. Paxton has filed a slew of lawsuits in the nearly two weeks since state Democrats left Texas early this month to deny Republicans quorum to pass controversial redistricting maps that will give the GOP five extra seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The Democrats went to Democratic strongholds, including Illinois, and Texas state House Speaker Dustin Burrows issued civil arrest warrants to force their return to Texas. On Aug. 7, Paxton and Burrows filed a lawsuit seeking Illinois to enforce the return of the Democratic lawmakers. In his ruling Wednesday, Illinois Judge Scott Larson rejected the Texans' request, stating it is outside his court's jurisdiction to compel the Democrats' return. "This Illinois circuit court, under a petition to show cause, does not have the inherent power to direct Illinois law enforcement officers, or to allow the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives of the State of Texas, or any officers appointed by her, to execute Texas civil Quorum Warrants upon nonresidents temporarily located in the State of Illinois," Larson said in his ruling, which was obtained by Democracy Docket and a portion of which was published on BluSky. The warrants issued by the Texas House of Representatives are "geographically limited," Larson said. Paxton and Burrows have yet to comment on the ruling, which marks a blow in their efforts to compel Democrats to return to the state. Congressional redistricting generally occurs every decade following the publication of U.S. Census Bureau data. Texas has taken the unusual step to redraw its maps at the urging of President Donald Trump ahead of midterm elections next year The maps are expected to produce an additional five GOP districts in the U.S. House of Representatives where the Republicans hold a narrow 219 to 212 majority. Critics and Democrats accuse the Republicans of conducting a power grab in an attempt to rig control over the ongressional branch, and have backed their Texas colleagues who have left their home state to prevent the passing of the maps during the special session. Democrats in other states have also come to their support, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to respond by redistricting his state to produce an additional five Democratic seats to neutralize those GOP seats being created in Texas.
an hour ago
Clinics hope to get blocked Medicaid funds restored as they sue Trump admin over cuts
PORTLAND, Maine -- A network of clinics that provides health care in Maine is expected to ask a judge Thursday to restore its Medicaid funding while it fights a Trump administration effort to keep federal money from going to abortion providers. President Donald Trump's policy and tax bill, known as the ' big beautiful bill,' blocked Medicaid money from flowing to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. The parameters in the bill also stopped funding from reaching Maine Family Planning, a much smaller provider that provides health care services in one of the poorest and most rural states in the Northeast. Maine Family Planning filed a federal lawsuit last month seeking to restore reimbursements. Lawyers and representatives for Maine Family Planning say its 18 clinics provide vital services across the state including cervical cancer screenings, contraception and primary care to low-income residents. They also say the funding cut occurred even though Medicaid dollars are not used for its abortion services. 'Without Medicaid, MFP will be forced to stop providing all primary care for all patients — regardless of their insurance status — by the end of October,' the organization said in a statement, adding that about 8,000 patients receive family planning and primary care from the network. It also said many Maine Family Planning clinics 'provide care in very rural areas of the state where there are no other health care providers, and around 70% of their patients rely exclusively on MFP and will not see any other health care provider in a given year.' In court documents, Anne Marie Costello, deputy director for the Center for Medicaid & CHIP Services, called the request to restore funding 'legally groundless' and said it 'must be firmly rejected.' 'The core of its claim asks this Court to revive an invented constitutional right to abortion — jurisprudence that the Supreme Court decisively interred — and to do so in a dispute over federal funds,' Costello said. While advocates of cutting Medicaid for abortion providers focused on Planned Parenthood, the bill did not mention it by name. Instead it cut off reimbursements for organizations that are primarily engaged in family planning services — which generally include things such as contraception, abortion and pregnancy tests — and received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023. The U.S. Senate's parliamentarian rejected a 2017 effort to defund Planned Parenthood because it was written to exclude all other providers by barring payments only to groups that received more than $350 million a year in Medicaid funds. Maine Family Planning asserts in its legal challenge that the threshold was lowered to $800,000 this time around to make sure Planned Parenthood would not be the only entity affected.
