NYC Mayor Eric Adams launches reelection bid as independent
By Christian Martinez
(Reuters) -New York City's incumbent Mayor Eric Adams launched his reelection campaign on Thursday following the surprise upset of progressive candidate Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary earlier this week.
The mayor did not name Mamdani during the event held on the steps of New York City Hall, but he alluded to some of the self-described Democratic socialist's positions and background.
"This election is a choice between a candidate with a blue collar and one with a silver spoon," Adams said. "A choice between someone who delivered lower crime, the most jobs in history and the most houses built in decades and an assembly member who did not pass a bill."
Adams, who ran and won as a Democrat in his first mayoral bid in 2021, saw his popularity plummet following his indictment on corruption charges and the subsequent decision by President Donald Trump's Justice Department to drop the case. In April, he announced that he would run for reelection as an independent, avoiding the Democratic primary that included Mamdani and former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.
Since Mamdani's win, Adams has criticized the 33-year-old state assemblyman from Queens, saying he lacked experience and was campaigning on policy proposals he could not deliver.
"He's a snake oil salesman," Adams said Wednesday in an interview with Fox News.
Mamdani's victory in the primary and potential win in the general election has prompted strong reactions from progressives, who have cheered his campaign's upbeat tone and focus on economic issues, as well as conservatives and some in the business community, who have criticized his democratic socialist policies.
Trump, a native New Yorker, called Mamdani a "100% Communist Lunatic" in a post Wednesday on social media.
Billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who supported Trump in the 2024 election, offered to financially back a challenger.
"New York City under Mamdani is about to become much more dangerous and economically unviable," Ackman said Wednesday in a post on X.
Ackman, a major shareholder in real estate development company Howard Hughes Holdings, said he has "a superb candidate who I can believe can win" but added "if I were to say his name or even reach out to him, it would have a negative effect on his candidacy, as I am a supporter of President Trump..."
Ackman instead offered to crowdsource "the best centrist candidate."
"If someone is ready to raise their hand, I will take care of the fundraising," Ackman said.
The Republican candidate this fall will be Curtis Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels. Jim Walden, a former federal prosecutor, is running as an independent, as well. Cuomo also retains the ability to run as an independent, though he has not yet decided whether to do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Former Supreme Court Justice Warns Freedom and Democracy 'At Risk'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Amid an uptick in threats to judges, former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy warned that the current hostility in America's political discourse imperils freedom and democracy. Why It Matters Rhetoric by President Donald Trump, including calls on social media for the impeachment of judges who have ruled against his policies, has triggered urgent warnings from current and former members of the Supreme Court about the stability of the country's legal systems. These attacks, which have included labeling judges as "troublemakers" and "monsters" in public posts, have raised concerns about undermining the independence of the judiciary, an institution considered essential to protecting American democracy. Current Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, a Republican appointee, also referenced the public attacks on judges in a rare statement, saying, "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose." What To Know In a virtual forum on Thursday for the event "Speak Up for Justice," with other judges from around the world, Kennedy said that "We should be concerned in this country about, as I've already indicated, the tone of our political discourse," according to Reuters. The Ronald Reagan appointee continued: "Identity politics are used so that a person is characterized by his or her partisan affiliation. That's not what democracy and civil discourse is about." Kennedy noted that the rest of the world seems to monitor how things operate in the United States "to see what democracy ought to be." "And if they see a hostile, fractious discourse, if they see a discourse that uses identity politics rather than to talk about issues, democracy is at risk," the retired justice said. "Freedom is at risk." He urged for judges and their families to have protection, and said they are best protected "when the public and our nation realize how central they are to our discourse." Kennedy did not mention Trump by name during the event, Reuters reports. Former U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy speaks at the World Law Congress at U.N. headquarters in New York City on July 21, 2023. (Photo by YUKI IWAMURA/AFP via Getty Images) Former U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy speaks at the World Law Congress at U.N. headquarters in New York City on July 21, 2023. (Photo by YUKI IWAMURA/AFP via Getty Images) Trump has sharply criticized jurists who have ruled against his administration's key policies—most notably U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg—whom he described as a "troublemaker and agitator" while calling for his impeachment after the judge blocked usage of the Alien Enemies Act for deportation flights. According to Politico, U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, whose family was targeted in a fatal attack in 2020, noted during the same virtual event that the U.S. Marshals Service has recorded over 400 threats against federal judges so far this year. Salas attributed the rise to disinformation and inflammatory rhetoric "from the top down." What People Are Saying Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in May on threats to judges, in part: "The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law." Trump, during his 100th day in office speech in Michigan, in part: "We cannot allow a handful of communist radical left judges to obstruct the enforcement of our laws and assume the duties that belong solely to the president of the United States. Judges are trying to take away the power given to the president to keep our country safe ... it's not a good thing." Former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg, to Newsweek when asked if Kennedy's comments were a poke at Trump: "It's clearly a poke at the President, especially because Justice Kennedy's exit from the Court allowed Trump to shift it to the right with the appointment of Justice [Brett] Kavanaugh." What Happens Next As threats continue to be tracked by law enforcement, congressional debate and judicial responses are expected to intensify as the Supreme Court approaches the conclusion of its current term.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Hitting snags, Trump pushes Senate to pass his big tax bill before July 4
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's first order of business after returning from an overseas trip: shore up support for a tax bill he's been pushing to have on his desk by July 4. Trump's administration said it still expected Congress to meet the ambitious timeline, even as the bill ran into hurdles in the Senate that could delay its potential passage. 'We hope so,' the president told reporters, as he left an East Room event. The president's arrival in Washington after attending a NATO Summit in Europe capped a two-week period in which Trump's focus was on foreign affairs. But with tensions in the Middle East abating and his tax bill teetering, Trump turned his attention back to the legislation he's nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The legislation would increase the child tax credit, create investment accounts for kids, increase the estate tax exemption, boost border security and allow residents of high-tax states to write off more of their income. It would also add restrictions to Medicaid and food stamps. Trump sought to rally support for the legislation at an event with workers his administration said would benefit from measures such as no taxes on tips or overtime. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a daily briefing that meetings and direct conversations with senators about the bill had been taking place behind the scenes. 'I saw some senators rolling out of the Oval Office the other day, and the president remains on the phones talking to his friends in the Senate when necessary,' she said. 'And when they call, he picks up the phone.' She declined to say which senators Trump was trying to convince. But the president spoke this week with Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, a key Republican holdout on the bill. Johnson said they met at the White House on June 23, which was a day before Trump left for Europe. Trump previously hosted members of the Senate Finance Committee at the White House and has met multiple times over the last month with Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Bernie Moreno of Ohio attended his event at the White House. Tax bill latest: GOP senators negotiate Trump budget bill in hopes of improving its polling Vice President JD Vance has also urged his former Senate colleagues to vote yes on the bill. He attended Senate Republicans' weekly luncheon last week and met with Johnson at the Capitol on June 10, a person familiar with the conversation said. The White House says it is optimistic it can get Johnson to a yes. He is one of several senators who have said they are worried the legislation, which extends tax cuts and expands breaks Trump signed into law in 2017, will add trillions to the federal deficit. Other lawmakers in the president's party say that cuts to Medicaid in the bill run too deep. Trump can only afford to lose three senators and still be able to pass the bill. Trump chides GOP 'grandstanders' The president directed Republican lawmakers to stay in town, and skip a planned recess heading into the July 4 holiday if they must, in order to get the bill to his desk on his preferred timeline. 'To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK. Work with the House so they can pick it up, and pass it, IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE,' he said on social media. At his afternoon event on June 26, the president spoke out at 'grandstanders' who were derailing his agenda, without chiding any specific Republican lawmaker by name. "I shouldn't say this, but we don't want to have grandstanders where one or two people raise their hand, 'we'll vote no.' And they do it to grandstand,' he said. 'Not good people. They know who I'm talking about. We don't need grandstanders.' The event was largely focused on everyday Americans the White House brought on stage to put a human face on the proposed policies. One of them was Maliki Krieski, a DoorDash driver from Ripon, Wisconsin, who works for the food delivery service to supplement her income and provide care for her son, a Type 1 diabetic. The 46-year old gift shop owner said she had previously shared her story with White House staff. 'No tax on tips is huge,' Krieski told USA TODAY after the event. 'Being able to put that money back into our pockets and be able to help our families be able to really grow the economy is extremely important.' Tax bill hits another roadblock Lawmakers are relying on a complicated budgeting mechanism to push the bill through without triggering a Democratic filibuster. Senators had to revise a House-passed version of the bill on June 26 after the chamber's parliamentarian, Elizabeth McDonough, ruled that provisions of the bill that were critical to winning over conservative hardliners in the House would have to come out. Among the provisions that were ruled out of bounds were several pertaining to Medicaid, a federal healthcare program for low-income and disabled individuals. Another roadblock: Trump, Senate GOP face big setback on tax bill's Medicaid overhaul Republicans in the lower chamber then said they would oppose the bill if areas of the bill were adjusted. 'I love President Trump and I really want to vote to pass his agenda in the Big Beautiful Bill when it comes back to the House from the Senate, but between the far left Senate Parliamentarian stripping out many of our good provisions and the special interest lobbyists sneaking in dirty poison pills like 10 year state moratoriums on AI, I'm currently a NO,' Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said in a post on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that his chamber would work around the clock to meet Trump's deadline. 'It doesn't make it easier, but you know me, hope springs eternal,' Johnson said.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Federal judge weighs whether Alabama's anti-DEI law threatens First Amendment
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Professors and students at the University of Alabama testified on Thursday that a new an anti-diversity, equity and inclusion law has jeopardized funding and changed curriculum, as a federal judge weighs whether the legislation is constitutional before the new school year begins. The new state law, SB129, followed a slew of proposals from Republican lawmakers across the country taking aim at DEI programs on college campuses. Universities across the country have shuttered or rebranded student affinity groups and DEI offices. The law prohibits public schools and universities from using state funds for any curriculum that endorses or compels assent to viewpoints about eight 'divisive concepts' related to race, religion, gender identity and religion. Instructors are also prohibited from encouraging a person feel guilt because of those identities. Schools are still allowed to facilitate 'objective' discussions on those topics, according to the law. Dana Patton, a political science professor at the University of Alabama, was one of six professors and students who sued the school and Republican Gov. Kay Ivey in January, arguing that the law violates the First Amendment by placing viewpoint-based restrictions on educators' speech. The lawsuit also argued that the law unconstitutionally targets Black students because it emphasizes concepts related to race and limits programs that benefit Black students. Shortly after the law took effect in October, Patton said that school officials told her that five students had made complaints suggesting that the interdisciplinary honors program she administered had potential conflicts with the new legislation. The program focuses on social justice and community service. University officials said a 'powerful person' in the state Capitol was behind the five student complaints, Patton testified. The complaints alleged the program 'promoted socialism' and focused on 'systematic racism" and 'producing engaged global citizens as opposed to patriotic Americans,' according to evidence presented at the hearing. The complaints also said students 'feel unsafe' because 'the leadership of the program has a clear view of the world from a divisive perspective." 'I was completely shocked, stunned," Patton said. After weeks of meetings where Patton exhaustively laid out the content of her courses to administrators, she said she was introduced to Alabama Republican Rep. Danny Garrett at a school football game. Garret told her that 'we need compromise here' because the legislators involved in the complaints are 'tenacious' and 'not going to let this go.' He then sent her links to work he had done with Black Democratic state legislators after the death of George Floyd to address racial tension. Patton said the conversation 'very much felt like a threat' because Garrett is the chair of the Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee, which is one of two legislative committees that oversees the university's funding. The tenured professor said she has since removed some course material from her syllabus and is no longer posting slides of her lectures online, out of fear that her lessons might be misinterpreted. Garrett declined to comment on the pending litigation. University lawyer says law hasn't caused harm Jay Ezelle, the defense attorney for the University of Alabama Board of Trustees, said the school had an obligation to investigate if students complain about being tested on an opinion, not on a performance. 'If that's violated, the university has to investigate, correct?' Ezelle asked during cross-examination. He added that the law had not created any measurable harm against the plaintiffs, because no faculty had been terminated or formally disciplined, and school administrators had sourced private funding for some affinity groups, who still have access to campus facilities. Professors said they had to remove class assignments Other professors testified that they felt compelled to pull class assignments or stop offering classes altogether based on Patton's experience, as well as formal instruction from the university about the 'risks' of testing students on divisive concepts. Rising senior Sydney Testman said she lost her scholarship because it was tied to her job at the Social Justice Advocacy Council, which was terminated after the anti-DEI legislation went into effect. 'No one wants to say it's disproportionately affecting Black people,' she said. 'The vibes are kind of 'everyone fend for yourselves.'' Federal U.S. Chief Judge R. David Proctor said the case will largely hinge on whether classroom speech is protected under the First Amendment and whether the state has a right to influence curriculum. Proctor will also consider if the six students and professors who brought the lawsuit against the University of Alabama have been harmed by the new law. ___
