Father speaks out after son critically injured in crash allegedly involving 5-time impaired driver
Riz Arshad, father of Gabriel Arshad, 21, said he would like people to reach out to their MPs to demand bail reform.
Peel Regional Police said the accused, 58-year-old Koushal Kasiram of Mississauga, was released on bail on the condition that he not drive a motor vehicle. At the time of the crash on July 5, police said, he had five previous impaired driving convictions dating back to 2010 and was on three separate lifetime driving bans.
Arshad said he couldn't believe Kasiram was released on bail. He said what happened to his son was terrible enough but when he learned about the bail, he felt it added "insult to injury" because Kasiram most likely shouldn't have been on the road.
"I don't understand what the thinking there was. My son's going to be here for probably months, if we're lucky. And this guy was out the next day, enjoying his family, doing what he does every day and potentially putting his little incident behind him. We were very disappointed," he said.
"We are very angry that he had this opportunity to potentially do it again. It's very discouraging."
"We need to keep these guys in jail and show them that we're serious. This is a serious thing that they are doing. They are taking people's lives in their hands ... The justice system has to realize that by letting this guy out, he's putting other people at risk now."
Kasiram has been charged with one count of impaired driving causing bodily harm, one count of driving with excess blood alcohol and three counts of prohibited driving.
Under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, accused people in Canada have the right to bail unless there is a very compelling reason to keep them in custody. Granting them bail means they can remain out of jail, often with specific conditions, while their case moves through the justice system — a process that can take many months.
Several provincial governments and police associations have been calling upon the federal government to re-examine and revise the bail system. Advocates have pointed out the vast majority of people in Ontario jails have been denied bail and are awaiting trial.
Victim likely to have 'life-altering injuries': police
Gabriel has been at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre since the crash. He was driving on Highway 50 between Brampton and Bolton when he was struck. The crash, involving four vehicles, happened at the intersection of Highway 50 and Coleraine Drive around 4:15 p.m.
In a news release on July 10, Peel Regional Police said Gabriel is likely to have "long-term life-altering injuries." Two other people were injured.
Arshad said he is hoping for the best and his son remains in a coma and has had three surgeries already to fix the damage to his stomach.
"But he's still got a bunch of stuff to go. He's got a bunch of broken bones and, unfortunately, some serious head injury that he has to try to get overcome."
Arshad said his son, his third child, is a "good kid" with lots of friends and a generous person. He was a volunteer soccer coach and has dreams of being a plumber.
"Hopefully, he's going to get to live some of those dreams he had. I hope he gets his second and third chance as well."
The family meanwhile is still in shock, said Arshad. He said the first two days were "very, very scary," but Gabriel's condition seems to have slightly improved. He said he and his wife have been by his son's side in the intensive care unit every day. Gabriel has two older sisters and a younger brother.
"I strongly feel I'm going to take my son home. You know, it's not going to happen overnight... but I feel like we're going to take him home," he said.
'Some people shouldn't be released,' MADD Canada says
Steve Sullivan, CEO of MADD Canada, said on Monday the decision to release Kasiram was "quite surprising" to the organization.
"The assumption is always that people will get bail because everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but we do know, practically, that some people shouldn't be released," he said.
In Canada, it's up to police and prosecutors to make the case against granting bail, although murder and certain other offences have a "reverse onus," meaning the accused has to convince the court to release them.
In early 2024, the federal government's amendments to bail provisions under the Criminal Code came into effect, focusing on repeat violent offenders who used weapons. The changes also broadened the reverse onus targeting repeat offenders of intimate partner violence, but did not focus on offenders repeatedly convicted of impaired driving. According to the government's website, however, the changes do "require courts to state on the record for any bail decision that they have considered the safety and security of the community in relation to the alleged offence, thereby increasing accountability to the public."
Sullivan said it is a challenge for the criminal justice system to deal with individuals who keep repeating behaviour that puts others at risk.
"Sadly, allegedly in this case, we've now seen this person continue his behaviour until he's caused someone else serious harm, again respecting the right to be presumed innocent. This is what you don't want to happen," he said.
"I think our system struggles sometimes with those people who you just can't get the message through and how do you deal with that ongoing risk?"
Sullivan said he assumes the accused has a drinking problem and hopes he has been offered rehabilitation.
He said better solution to a lifetime driving prohibition is the installation of a lifetime ignition interlock device — a screening device that can prevent an engine from starting if it detects a driver has alcohol in their system.
It is illegal in Canada for a driver to operate a vehicle if impaired by alcohol, drugs or both. Drivers with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 per cent are considered impaired under the Criminal Code and subject to potential charges. For young, novice or commercial drivers, no alcohol can be present in the system while operating a vehicle.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police watchdog clears Edmonton officer who hit man multiple times during 2023 arrest
Alberta's main police oversight agency has cleared an Edmonton police officer who punched a man multiple times during an arrest in 2023. The man had tried to punch the officer after they spoke for a moment, so the seven punches the officer landed were reasonable to defend himself and make the arrest, according to a decision by Matthew Block, assistant executive director of the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT), that was released Tuesday. As a result, Block found there are no reasonable grounds to believe an offence was committed, the decision says. An Edmonton Police Service (EPS) spokesperson issued a statement Tuesday, thanking ASIRT for the review and its findings. A video of the incident, which triggered the investigation, lacked context, the statement said. But EPS appreciates that ASIRT found evidence that "provided this context and subsequently confirmed there are no reasonable grounds to believe that an offence was committed." ASIRT investigates incidents where police may have caused serious injury or death, as well as "serious and sensitive" allegations of police misconduct, such as sexual assault, fraud and obstruction of justice. Its investigation into this incident, which occurred Feb. 22, 2023, started after EPS learned a video of the arrest was circulating online and then informed the Alberta director of law enforcement. According to the ASIRT decision, police had caught the man speeding significantly and ignored speed bumps. Video shows a white vehicle parking smoothly into a parking spot. A police cruiser parks behind it seconds later. A man gets out of his vehicle and walks toward the cruiser. The officer behind the wheel, who was the subject of the ASIRT investigation, gets out too. They appear to talk with each other. WATCH | Video of Edmonton police officer's use of force during 2023 arrest: The decision notes that, at this point, the man and police officers provided conflicting accounts. The man, during an interview with ASIRT just over a year after the incident, said he approached the vehicle calmly, asking what was going on and how he could help, before the officer ordered him to return to his vehicle. The officers told ASIRT that the man was confrontational and told them to leave the property. The subject officer declined an interview, as is his right, but supplied ASIRT with multiple reports and his notes. The witness officer did an interview and provided her notes and reports. The video shows the man return to his vehicle. The decision says he told ASIRT he was taking the keys out of the ignition. But the subject officer, who followed him, said the man seemed to be reaching under the seat or console, which led him to believe he may be getting a weapon or hiding something. The officer put his hand on his gun and ordered the man to show his hands, the ASIRT decision says. He said the man complied but kept acting aggressively, so he told him that they had to discuss the driving pattern. The man eventually steps away from the officer again until he is hidden in the frame by a pillar. Another officer steps out of the cruiser. The man had told ASIRT that the first officer permitted him to leave, and he didn't hear the officer tell him to stop. But the officer said he had told the man he was not allowed to leave, the decision says. When the man reappears in the video, he is walking away. The first officer jogs up to him. According to the decision, the officer then grabs the man's left arm and spins him video shows a struggle, during which the man puts his hands up, either to punch the officer or to shield himself. The officer then lands at least four punches before the man drops to the ground. He hits him four more times before he and his partner make the arrest. The man's injuries included a concussion and marks on his face, a left-shoulder injury, cuts from the handcuffs and post-traumatic stress disorder, the decision says. Man swung first: ASIRT Whether or not the man tried to punch the police officer was a major factor in this investigation, said Block, from ASIRT, in the decision. Under the Criminal Code of Canada, police officers have the right to use as much force as is necessary to perform their duties, and that force must be reasonable and proportionate given the perceived threat. Officers, like anyone else, also have the right to defend themselves. The man and officer accused each other of throwing the first punch, according to the decision, and the witness officer told ASIRT she may have missed that part of the conflict while reaching for her stun gun. Block found, however, that the video showed the man took what "appears to be a fighting stance" and clearly tried to punch the officer at least once, the decision says. He also noted that the officer's punches happened within several seconds. As a result, the reasons for using such force would likely succeed in this case, the decision says. So there is no reason to believe the officer committed an offence. Lawyer disagrees The man's lawyer Heather Steinke-Attia, however, disagrees with Block's assessment. "It determines — and focuses on — my client reaching his arm out in front of him, and determining that that was an attempted punch at the officer," Steinke-Attia told CBC News. "He instinctively put his arms up in anticipation that he was about to get punched — which anyone would do — and ASIRT refused to give any consideration to that possibility," she said. The man was charged with obstruction and assaulting a police officer, and issued two traffic tickets — although the charges were withdrawn on Jan. 12, 2024, the decision says. Steinke-Attia felt the decision unfairly weighed the length of time between the incident and when her client spoke with ASIRT. He likely would have been instructed by his then-lawyer to exercise his right to remain silent until the charges were withdrawn, she said. The EPS professional standards branch will review the decision and determine next steps, per the provincial Police Service Regulation, its statement said. Shortly after the incident, the officers' duty status was under review. An EPS spokesperson confirmed Tuesday that they are both on active duty.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince George RCMP investigate whether 2nd weigh scale arson and graffiti targeted at traffic officer
The Prince George RCMP is investigating whether a suspected arson at a highway weigh scale was targeted at one of their own. Police say they gathered evidence to suggest a fire at a Highway 97 North weigh scale Saturday night was intentionally set and found orange spray-paint graffiti located on a shipping container nearby that read, "Good job McCreadie." It was the same orange spray paint and phrase discovered at a suspected arson that occurred on Dec. 24, 2024, at the Highway 97 South weigh scales, just outside the city. Police are investigating whether these arsons are connected to RCMP Const. Keith McCreadie, a traffic enforcement officer who has received multiple awards for his work stopping impaired drivers. "We believe there are links because of some of the graffiti that was left behind at both scenes. It reads, 'Good job McCreadie,' who is one of our traffic services officers," said RCMP media relations officer, Cpl. Jennifer Cooper. "We're kind of looking into what might have motivated someone to commit these acts of arson and how that's related to our traffic services officer." While investigating the 2024 arson at the Highway 97 South scales, the RCMP said they believed it may have been related to several recent impaired driving investigations and that the graffiti and the arson are connected. Const. McCreadie's Alexa awards Const. McCreadie received an Alexa Award that year, which is given to officers who work to remove drivers impaired by either alcohol or drugs from the road either by an immediate roadside prohibition or a Criminal Code investigation. He earned the top award for removing 152 impaired drivers from the roads throughout 2023. "I think our investigative services team is looking into a lot of different areas that this could be related to," said Cooper. "Const. McCreadie did happen to win the Alexa Award this year. He's won it several years in a row. We did talk about that, I think, right around the same time that this arson happened." She says whether or not it's related specifically to any impaired driving investigations is yet to be determined. Cooper said she could not comment as to why the weigh scales in particular were targeted as the investigation is ongoing, but is hopeful the public will be able to provide more information. "What we're really focusing on is anyone that happens to be driving past the northern weigh scales just before the arson happened, maybe around 9:30 or 9:45 at night, or if anyone saw anything," said Cooper. She says investigators are hoping that someone passing by that section of the highway might have dash camera footage that caught people or vehicles approaching or leaving the area in the time before the fire was reported to police. "What we're trying to remind the public of is that it might not have seemed suspicious at the time, but anything that you might have seen could potentially move our investigation forward." Commercial vehicle safety officers also concerned Commercial Vehicle Safety and Enforcement (CVSE) officers — who are members of the B.C. General Employees' Union (BCGEU — are also raising serious safety concerns over the two suspected arsons. The union says the Highway 97 North site was closed at the time, and no CVSE officers were present during the incident, but in recent years, CVSE workers across the province have consistently reported their vehicles and worksites being targets of violent acts. "Our union has been raising the alarm about the dangers CVSE officers face on the job, and this weekend's incident is another troubling reminder that the government must act urgently to improve safety and working conditions," said BCGEU president Paul Finch, in a news release. The BCGEU is also asking the RCMP to enhance its investigative efforts and share findings transparently with affected workers. "CVSE officers play a vital role in keeping our roads and transportation systems safe by enforcing commercial traffic laws," Finch added. "They should never be subjected to violence or put in harm's way simply for doing their jobs." Police are asking anyone with information related to the investigation to call the Prince George RCMP non-emergency line at 250-561-3321 to speak with an investigator.
Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Idaho victims' families to address killer directly at Kohberger sentencing
BOISE, Idaho – It's judgment day for Bryan Kohberger, the former aspiring criminologist who killed four University of Idaho students in a 4 a.m. home invasion ambush in November 2022. The 30-year-old was studying for a Ph.D. at Washington State University in Pullman when he drove about 10 miles to the off-campus rental house at 1122 King Road, just across the state line, in Moscow, Idaho. At a change of plea hearing July 2, he admitted to killing four young people inside: Madison Mogen, 21, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20. But he did not give a motive or explain anything other than admit his guilt. Their families are expected to address him directly in court today with victim impact statements in a sentencing hearing expected to take all day. Mogen and Goncalves, who were best friends, were killed in a third-floor bedroom. Kohberger's key mistake — the only publicly known physical evidence tying him to the crimes — was a Ka-Bar knife sheath he left under Mogen's body. Police found his DNA on the snap. On the second floor, Kernodle was awake, having received a DoorDash delivery minutes earlier. Kohberger killed her, then turned his knife on her sleeping boyfriend, Chapin, who was spending the night. A surviving roommate told police she heard crying and a man's voice say something to the effect of, "It's OK. I'm going to help." Then she saw a masked man with "bushy eyebrows" leave out the back door. For whatever reason, he didn't attack her. The victims' families have been split over the plea deal, which required Kohberger to waive his right to appeal and to forfeit his right to seek a sentence reduction under Idaho law. Some of the families, but not all, are expected to deliver victim impact statements in a proceeding court officials predicted would run for the full day. It remains unclear what, if anything, Kohberger will say. While the plea deal specifically didn't require Kohberger to explain his actions at the July 2 hearing, Goncalves' father and many others, including President Trump, have said they hope he is required to give greater detail at sentencing. Chapin's parents and the mothers of Kernodle and Mogen have all voiced support for the plea deal, which will spare them from years of appeals and the trauma of a trial. In exchange for his guilty plea, Kohberger avoids the death penalty and is expected to receive the maximum punishment of four consecutive life prison sentences with no possibility of parole, plus another 10 years. His sentencing begins Wednesday at 9 a.m. Mountain Time, 11 a.m. Eastern.
