logo
Positives and negatives: is it better to learn to drive in an electric or a petrol vehicle?

Positives and negatives: is it better to learn to drive in an electric or a petrol vehicle?

The Guardian7 hours ago
Not long ago, the choice was between manual and automatic. One, demanding mastery of gear stick, accelerator and clutch – greater control at the risk of stalling – the other offering a simpler ride.
These days the debate has moved on. The majority of new cars are automatic and an increasing share are electric.
New data from the Electric Vehicle Council shows sales of electric vehicles continue to climb in Australia, with 12% of new sales between January and June being battery electric or plug-in hybrids – up from 9.6% in the same period last year.
As a new generation approaches their Ls and Ps, a new dilemma arises – is it better to learn in an electric or a petrol vehicle?
There are now 350,000 electric cars on Australian roads, says the Electric Vehicle Council's chief executive, Julie Delvecchio. Of those, about 43% are driven in outer suburban Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane – often households with solar panels, off-street parking and longer commutes – and 18% in the regions, she says.
'Given that the future of driving is electric, it just makes sense that we'd be teaching our kids on the cars that they'll be actually using in the years ahead.'
In most states, learners can drive any light car, so long as they are supervised by someone with a full Australian drivers licence.
Once on their probationary licence – in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia – young drivers are banned from getting behind the wheel of anything classed as a high-powered vehicle. The restriction applies to any vehicle with a power-to-weight ratio higher than 130 kilowatts per tonne, which rules out some popular electric models like Tesla's Model Y, according to EV Central.
When it comes to motorcycles, many states still require learners to start with a petrol vehicle, says Dr Chris Jones, president of the Australian Electric Vehicle Association.
'If you're going to learn how to ride a motorcycle and you want to get your open bike license – which means unrestricted power-to-weight – you do need to do that on a petrol bike with gears and a clutch. You can't do that on an EV motorcycle,' he says.
Students can take their test in an electric car, according to state and territory transport departments. Although restrictions on the use of driver support systems vary, so it's worth checking the rules for your state or territory beforehand.
For example, in NSW driver support features such as self-parking, speed assist and cruise control must be turned off during the driving test, while in Queensland they can still be used.
Some jurisdictions require the car to have a centre-mounted park brake – electric or lever – to be accessible from the front passenger seat.
Tarik Menzies from No Yelling Driving School, who manages a fleet of driving instructors across Queensland and Victoria, says occasionally parents will request their child learns in a petrol car.
For some it's about manual transmission, he says, a feature rarely found in electric vehicles. 'They think their child learning manual is a useful skill – like doing maths without the calculator.'
Learning in a manual is increasingly uncommon, however. Transport for NSW data shows in 2024 the number of manual driving tests (28,392) was a 10th of those testing for automatic (289,426).
Others are not yet ready for the change in technology, Menzies says. Even though when it comes to automatic cars, there's very little difference between learning in an electric versus a petrol car.
Kathryn Collier, who manages METEC Driver Training, says there's a couple of small differences for learners to be aware of. Electric cars often have better torque, and can be quicker off the mark, she says.
'Also be aware that your car may well be silent. So be extra vigilant in looking out for vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists because they won't hear you.'
The road safety organisation, which provides school driver programs for more than 80 schools in Melbourne and Victoria, has a range of vehicles for students to learn in, including a Nissan Leaf, to give young people the experience of driving an electric vehicle.
Parents switching to a shiny new electric car might be tempted to hold on to their older model for their teenagers to learn in.
But Collier recommends young drivers learn in 'the safest car you can afford', ideally one with a five-star Ancap rating.
'A lot of young people tend to get the hand-me-down vehicles from other members of the family,' she says. 'We would argue that the most vulnerable driver should really be in the safest car possible.'
Jones says the learning process is a good opportunity to share tips about the 'non-driving bits' of driving an EV – how to use a public charger, charging etiquette and scheduling your home charging to make the most of cheap energy.
'In our experience learner drivers (and drivers generally) adapt pretty quickly when it comes to EVs', the Electric Vehicle Council's Julie Delvecchio says. 'Often, once they get in an EV … they never want to go back to petrol and diesel, because it's so smooth, so quiet and easy to drive.'
Regardless of what car they learn in, Menzies says learning to drive is an empowering experience for most young people. 'We see the joy that it brings, as well as the disappointment when they fail.'
'In our culture, getting your licence is somewhat of a right of passage for the young person becoming a big person.'
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

He predicted the Chinese electric vehicle boom a year ago. Now, STEPHEN JOHNSON reveals how BYD destroyed Tesla in Australia - and the up-and-coming brands that are even better
He predicted the Chinese electric vehicle boom a year ago. Now, STEPHEN JOHNSON reveals how BYD destroyed Tesla in Australia - and the up-and-coming brands that are even better

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

He predicted the Chinese electric vehicle boom a year ago. Now, STEPHEN JOHNSON reveals how BYD destroyed Tesla in Australia - and the up-and-coming brands that are even better

Back in the late '90s, a fledging Chinese battery maker bought Australian-made Holden Commodore wagons that had been crudely modified. In a very strange chapter of motoring history, BYD had only been around for two years when it bought some outdated VN Commodores in 1997 that had been sent to China and converted into slow EVs, with the catchy name of BJ6490.

Fed-up locals in 'overcrowded' suburb slam the hundreds of units being built on their doorstep - warning the area is already at breaking point
Fed-up locals in 'overcrowded' suburb slam the hundreds of units being built on their doorstep - warning the area is already at breaking point

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fed-up locals in 'overcrowded' suburb slam the hundreds of units being built on their doorstep - warning the area is already at breaking point

Sydneysiders living in a suburb set to receive hundreds of new units have voiced their anger at the pressure on their already 'overcrowded' and under-resourced community. Construction giant Meriton has proposed 620 new units in Carlingford, 22km north-west of the CBD, with the first stage under construction promising seven luxury residential towers, soaring to 29 levels. The development on 18 Shirley Street and 263–273 Pennant Hills Road, which boasts the tallest towers in the area, has been met with backlash from locals who feel the area is already overcrowded. Parramatta Council reluctantly supported Meriton's proposal for the new development in 2023, citing fears the area could have lost out on community infrastructure if they didn't back the plans. 'We feel like our hands are tied because we're going to get the developments anyway,' Councillor Michelle Garrard said at the time. Meriton's new development, which temporarily shut down last week after construction worker Paulo Mau'u died on site and another was left fighting for his life, includes plans for a community centre, library and a supermarket. However, locals claim there isn't sufficient infrastructure in the area such as schools and hospitals to support the already overcrowded community. Carlingford resident Claudine told Daily Mail the development is 'driven by money and very little thought'. 'They need to fix the roads first before they start moving more people in, that's the biggest thing,' she said. 'The traffic is already really s**t around here. It would be nice if they had a plan for that too.' She stressed the need for more local schools and hospitals adding: 'I was in hospital recently in ED and there were people waiting for almost 48 hours to be seen because there's too many people.' Young couple James and Amelia voiced their concerns that the new development will be unaffordable for local families. One-bedroom apartments in the development are on the market starting from $595,000 while at the other end of the scale four-bedrooms are priced up to $1,895,000. 'People are being pushed further and further west,' James said. 'No one can afford to live where they've grown up. 'I know families that have grown up here but they've had to move all the way out west because everything has shot up in price or been turned into apartment blocks they can't afford.' The couple, who live about 6km away in West Ryde, said new high-rise developments have 'blocked off the view' and fear the same for Carlingford. Sandra (pictured), who moved to Sydney in 1972, said the new apartments represent the 'changing face of Australia' 'There's so many new developments being built but there's no infrastructure to support it,' James added. 'People out here are already struggling to get jobs locally.' Sandra, who moved to Sydney in 1972 for a working holiday and decided to stay, said the new apartments represent the 'changing face of Australia'. 'I don't like it, it's so sad,' she said. 'We came here in the 70s and there were so many wonderful, fabulous opportunities for everybody, but it's all changed now. 'I wouldn't tell anybody to emigrate here anymore and if I was rich, I'd go back home, but I'm not. 'There's too many units being put up everywhere. It's horrible how the city is changing.' Victor, who recently moved to Carlingford from Brighton-Le-Sands, said he feels there's 'too many people for such a small area'. 'I only moved in three weeks ago and I can feel it's growing so fast - it feels full,' he added. Local resident Alina said the area was in desperate need of more 'shops, cafes and restaurants'. A spokesperson for Meriton said they 'worked closely with council to ensure the project addresses local concerns such as traffic, parking, and infrastructure needs'. The proposal 'went through an extensive planning process, including assessment by independent planning and design review panels, referrals to key government agencies such as the Department of Education and Transport for NSW, and thorough community consultation. 'The proposal was endorsed by Council in July 2024 following a comprehensive assessment report. 'In addition to housing, the project will deliver over 5,000m² of new public open space, interactive children's playgrounds, upgraded pedestrian links, on-site childcare, specialty and service based retail shops, a national supermarket, and a new 2,500m² Community Hub featuring a library and multiple community facilities, bringing improved and lasting benefits to both residents in the local Carlingford community and beyond. 'Importantly, the development will contribute significantly to NSW's critical housing supply, with 90 per cent of apartments at The Carling priced well below Sydney's median house price of $1.5million. 'To further support home buyers, Meriton is offering Australia's lowest two-year fixed home loan rate of just four per cent, making purchasing more affordable than renting for many. 'The apartments have been well received by the market and are selling strongly.'

The ultra-wealthy have exploited Australia's tax system for too long. It's time to ensure everyone pays their fair share
The ultra-wealthy have exploited Australia's tax system for too long. It's time to ensure everyone pays their fair share

The Guardian

time7 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The ultra-wealthy have exploited Australia's tax system for too long. It's time to ensure everyone pays their fair share

Unions want to tackle intergenerational inequality by reforming Australia's tax system. For the first time in living memory, younger Australians risk facing lower living standards than those before them. This is not acceptable to the union movement, so our one big idea is to rebalance the tax system so that productivity gains are fairly shared, housing becomes more affordable, and essential services are properly funded. Australia's current tax system is exploited by big business and the ultra-wealthy, entrenching intergenerational inequality and placing affordable housing out of young workers' reach, which threatens the services and infrastructure we all rely on. We need a minimum 25% tax on gas export revenues, a minimum 25% tax for trust funds and individuals earning more than $1m, and a one investment property limit for negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount benefits, with the grandfathering of current arrangements for five years. These changes have a simple intention: to make sure everyone pays their fair share, so productivity gains flow across society fairly. These proposed reforms would help restore fairness and opportunity for young Australians to get ahead in their lives. For the past 25 years, productivity increases have gone back into company profits, shareholder dividends, share buybacks and executive bonuses. Working people know that every time they check their bank accounts, there is no 'direct debit system' where the extra profits generated by increased productivity are automatically shared with them. Australia is a rich country but, for decades, as the 'economic pie' has got bigger, corporations have not just taken their own bigger slice, they have been eating into ours. The way to stop this is to make sure workers have strong rights at work to get the pay rises they deserve and to make sure our tax system ensures everyone – not just the ordinary worker – pays their fair share of taxes. There are flaws in our tax system that disadvantage younger Australians and reinforce inter-generational inequity. Just 1% of taxpayers own 25% of investment properties, fuelling house prices, skyrocketing rents and putting home ownership out of reach. House prices have gone up at twice the rate of wages in the last 25 years. The result? Workers can no longer afford to live near their jobs, while young people face high rents and are priced out of buying homes. It is true that housing supply needs to increase, but the tax system is adding to the affordability problem and that needs to change. The loudest complaints will come from those who have gamed the system to accumulate enormous economic and political power. Australia's economy is dominated by an artificially inflated property market, in addition a small number of large companies in a small number of industries. Claims that working people will automatically be better off if productivity increases are wrong. Dr Jim Stanford's recent paper on productivity shows that if real wages had grown at the same rate of productivity since 2000, average wages would be 18% – or $350 per week – higher than they are now. What you won't hear from big business is the real reason productivity growth in Australia has been slow: they have prioritised distributing profits rather than investing in capital, research and people. Workers' rights are not 'red tape', they are the way we get pay rises and limits on working hours. They are essential to workers benefiting from the productivity gains our hard work creates. If we take them away, workers will get even less. Our proposed reforms are targeted and achievable. These are simple changes that close loopholes and restore balance, because we recognise that the problem isn't everyday investors who are looking to build a nest egg with a housing investment, the problem is that the current tax system rewards investing in housing as an asset class so the richest mega-investors are accumulating a large number of properties, tying up capital that could be invested in things that contribute to productivity growth and forcing property prices up beyond what any ordinary working person can afford. Working people pay their fair share of tax, we just want everyone else to as well. Ninety-one people with an income over $1m paid no income tax in 2022-23. Not one cent! When the very wealthy pay less tax than a bus driver or an aged care worker, something is very wrong. Trust funds have also become tax minimisation schemes for rich people, and mega-profitable resource companies are also getting away with paying little or no corporate tax. Our proposals are about ensuring the economy works for those who actually keep it running: working people. Sally McManus is a trade unionist and political activist who has served as the secretary of the Australia Council of Trade Unions since 2017

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store