Elon Musk leaves White House but says Doge will continue
INA- sources
Elon Musk has said he is leaving the Trump administration after helping lead a tumultuous drive to shrink the size of US government that saw thousands of federal jobs axed.
In a post on his social media platform X, the world's richest man thanked Trump for the opportunity to help run the Department of Government Efficiency, known as Doge.
The White House began "offboarding" Musk as a special government employee on Wednesday night, the BBC understands.
His role was temporary and his exit is not unexpected, but it comes a day after Musk criticised the legislative centrepiece of Trump's agenda.
"As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending," Musk wrote on X.
"The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government."
The South African-born tech tycoon had been designated as a "special government employee" - allowing him to work a federal job for 130 days each year.
Measured from Trump's inauguration on 20 January, he would hit that limit towards the end of May.
But his departure comes a day after he said he was "disappointed" with Trump's budget bill, which proposes multi-trillion dollar tax breaks and a boost to defence spending.
The SpaceX and Tesla boss said in an interview with BBC's US partner CBS that the "big, beautiful bill", as Trump calls it, would increase the federal deficit.
Musk also said he thought it "undermines the work" of Doge.
"I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful," Musk said. "But I don't know if it could be both."
Musk, who had clashed in private with some Trump cabinet-level officials, initially pledged to cut "at least $2 trillion" from the federal government budget, before halving this target, then reducing it to $150bn.
An estimated 260,000 out of the 2.3 million-strong federal civilian workforce have had their jobs cut or accepted redundancy deals as a result of Doge.
In some cases, federal judges blocked the mass firings and ordered terminated employees to be reinstated.
The rapid-fire approach to cutting the federal workforce occasionally led to some workers mistakenly being let go, including staff at the US nuclear programme.
Musk announced in late April that he would step back to run his companies again after becoming a lightning rod for criticism of Trump's efforts to shake up Washington.
"Doge is just becoming the whipping boy for everything," Musk told the Washington Post in Texas on Tuesday ahead of a Space X launch.
"Something bad would happen anywhere, and we would get blamed for it even if we had nothing to do with it."
Musk's time in government overlapped with a significant decline in sales at his electric car company.
Tesla sales dropped by 13% in the first three months of this year, the largest drop in deliveries in its history.
The company's stock price also tumbled by as much as 45%, but has mostly rebounded and is only down 10%.
Tesla recently warned investors that the financial pain could continue, declining to offer a growth forecast while saying "changing political sentiment" could meaningfully hurt demand for the vehicles.
Musk told investors on an earnings call last month that the time he allocates to Doge "will drop significantly" and that he would be "allocating far more of my time to Tesla".
Activists have called for Tesla boycotts, staging protests outside Tesla dealerships, and vandalising the vehicles and charging stations.
The Tesla blowback became so violent and widespread that US Attorney General Pam Bondi warned her office would treat acts of vandalism as "domestic terrorism".
Speaking at an economic forum in Doha, Qatar, on Tuesday, Musk said he was committed to being the leader of Tesla for the next five years.
He said earlier this month he would cut back his political donations after spending nearly $300m to back Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Oil finishes down on possible OPEC+ output hike
Shafaq News/ US crude futures fell on Friday as traders expected OPEC+ would decide on Saturday to boost oil output for July beyond previous forecasts. Brent crude futures settled down 25 cents, or 0.39%, at $63.90 a barrel. US West Texas Intermediate crude finished down 15 cents, or 0.25%, at $60.79 a barrel, having earlier dropped more than $1 a barrel. The Brent July futures contract is due to expire on Friday. The more liquid August contract was down 71 cents, or 1.12%, at $62.64 a barrel. At these levels, the front-month benchmark contracts were headed for weekly losses over 1%. Prices dipped into negative territory after Reuters reported that OPEC+may discussan increase in July output larger than the 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) rise that the group decided on for May and June. "What OPEC+ is planning doesn't look particularly supportive for the oil market," said Matt Smith, Kpler's lead analyst for the Americas. The potential OPEC+ output hike comes as the global surplus has widened to 2.2 million bpd, likely necessitating a price adjustment to prompt a supply-side response and restore balance, said JPMorgan analysts in a note, adding that they expected prices to remain within the current range before easing into the high $50s by year-end. Phil Flynn, a senior analyst with Price Futures Group, said an online post on Truth Social by US PresidentDonald Trumpthat seemed to threaten more changes in tariff levels for Chinese imports also put pressure on crude prices. "Trump's Truth Social message on China failing to observe a truce on tariffs also combined with the Reuters headline to push prices down," Flynn said. Trump's tariffs were expected to remain in effect after a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated them on Thursday, reversing a trade court's decision a day earlier to put animmediate blockon the sweeping duties. US energy firms this week cut the number of oil and natural gas rigs operating for a fifth week in a row to the lowest since November 2021, energy services firm Baker Hughes(BKR.O), opens new tabsaid in its closely followed report on Friday. It was the first time since September 2023 that the number of rigs declined for five straight weeks. Baker Hughes said this week's decline put the total count down by 37 rigs, or 6%, from this time last year. Oil rigs fell by four to 461 this week, their lowest since November 2021, the company said. Gas rigs rose by one to 99.
Memri
13 hours ago
- Memri
Russia's War In Ukraine: The Hot Summer Of 2025
In a few days summer will arrive – and it will most probably be a very hot summer, at least on the Russia-Ukraine frontline. It seems now that Russian President Vladimir Putin – after all the efforts that the West invested in another attempt at pacifying Russia – has decided not to accept ceasefire proposals made by the Ukrainians in Istanbul in mid-May. The reasons look clear: since both the United States and Ukraine consider Russia's claims on four regions unacceptable,[1] the Kremlin has decided to continue its war until all these claims become tolerable (as Vladimir Medinsky, the head of the Russian delegation, was quoted: "If you do not agree with giving us four regions, next time we will talk about six").[2] The Russian "Führer" seems to be firmly convinced by his aides that Russia's economy and military are now in a condition that will allow him to advance against the Ukrainian troops until the end of 2025, at least. (Source: X) Putin Does Not Care About Western Leaders, As He Considers Them Impotent I would argue that Putin is right – but only if one assumes that all the other parties continue to behave as they do these days. I have said many times that the Russian economy can provide Putin with all the necessary means – both money to pay his mercenaries and arms producers as well as resources needed for industrial production – for continued fighting.[3] All those experts, who have argued for years that the Russian arms-producing capacities are running out of steam, have proven to be wrong.[4] These days even Western sources have begun to agree that Russia manufactures much more drones and missiles than was previously expected,[5] as the attacks on Ukrainian cities and military facilities have become more intense than ever before.[6] Hence, I would once again reiterate that at least until the end of this year – and no one can nowadays look much further – the Russian forces may try to move forward, and they will, first and foremost because Ukraine's Western allies in fact have encouraged Putin to do so with most of their démarches made in recent weeks. All that the U.S. and the European leaders have done since at least mid-February, when Trump first called Putin, was in fact a kind of encouragement for the Kremlin's leader. Trump has been repeatedly saying that he wishes to establish good business relations with Russia. He even exempted both aggressor countries, Russia and Belarus, from his tariff hikes.[7] Moreover, he several times torpedoed the tightening of international sanctions imposed on Moscow,[8] which led to a kind of rupture between the U.S. and Europe,[9] and to a ban on lowering the oil price cap, which the Europeans tried to bring down from $60 to $45/barrel.[10] European leaders, on their part, after announcing an €800-billion military reinforcement package,[11] have limited it quite soon to a much smaller €150-billion fund,[12] which is not yet filled by money, and proclaimed an "ultimatum" to Putin in Kyiv on May 10,[13] which was almost forgotten a week later. Being only an outsider observer to the process, I would say that Putin is right as he believes that both Trump and all the members of the "Coalition of the Willing" will never move from talking to doing. I should just mention a recent story that tells much more about Putin's attitude to the Western leaders than anything else. On May 27, a Moscow court delivered a ruling sentencing an opposition activist, Ms. Anastassia Burakova,[14] to seven and a half years in prison because she once said that "Mr. Putin has lost his mind as he destroys [entire] cities in Ukraine." Hopefully, she will never serve her term since she has been residing in Europe since 2022.[15] On the very same day, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Trump had an "emotional overload,"[16] after writing on Truth Social about Putin: "He has gone absolutely CRAZY! He is needlessly killing a lot of people, and I'm not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever."[17] The Kremlin's comment about Trump's post shows that it is more concerned about the words of a young Russian female activist than it is by the thoughts of an aging U.S. president. Putin simply does not care what the Western leaders are doing these days because he considers them completely impotent. A Global Military Conflict Looms Larger Than It Was Before Trump Started His Appeasement Attempt Looking at what is happening now at and around the frontline, one can notice that Russia is using a dual tactic: On the ground it tries to advance by any means, even neglecting heavy losses. I had already mentioned that it seems that Russia has assembled enough forces for the summer.[18] This week, the first Russian region has once again raised the premiums for the contract soldiers after a half-year break when not one of the governors had attempted to do so.[19] At the same time, Russians are preparing even more drones and missiles to use against targets behind the front. I would argue that they will target the cities and towns even more since Ukraine is quite quickly running out of U.S.-made air defense missiles. In addition, France has already not sent any of their missiles for 15 months[20] and Germany just promised some old-fashioned PAC-2 missiles for Patriot air defenses to be delivered in coming months.[21] And while Ukrainian policymakers may be happy that Moscow's major airports are shutting down for an hour or two almost every day,[22] Ukrainian drones inflict almost no damage to the Russian infrastructure, since the Russian military has become much more professional in intercepting them.[23] Therefore, in the coming weeks, Russian forces will launch both a large-scale ground offensive and intensify their attacks on Ukrainian cities – while neither Trump nor the European leaders will respond with anything that might seriously disturb Putin (the very idea of imposing 500 percent duties on U.S.-bound exports by those countries who buy Russian oil or Russian uranium is seriously unlikely – not only because the United States itself continues to issue waivers to its companies for the purchase of uranium products from Russia[24] but also because, the U.S. administration, which cannot keep 145 percent tariffs on China, certainly cannot afford to impose three-times-higher duties on India, UAE, Turkey, and at least a dozen other nations.[25] So, what would I expect from the new Russian offensive? Two aspects seem of interest here. On the one hand, an important issue is how strong the Russian blow would be and in what directions it aims. Most probably, this time, Russian forces will try to attack not so much some well-reinforced positions in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, but rather launch an attack on the Sumy and Kharkiv regions just to send a signal that this time they are really claiming six regions rather than four. Russian forces will also attempt to crush the Ukrainian defense in those portions of the front where the enemy does not have the necessary troops. The less serious the Western response, the sooner and more powerful the offensive will be. Both Americans and Europeans have made many assertions in recent weeks stating that they condemn Russia and stand behind Ukraine in case they fail to respond aggressively to a Russian offensive (and, I guess, they will). If they fail to respond, the Kremlin might feel that it is a clear victor and therefore may use all the force it has assembled to try to break the Ukrainian defense. If the Western powers react in a more forceful manner, Putin may use even more powerful warfare to prove his seriousness. Hence, a global military conflict looms now much larger than it was two or three months ago before Trump has started his appeasement attempt.[26] A More Potent Putin On the other hand, what we can see these days is a complete failure of the West's peacebuilding effort – the major powers have done their best, and Putin walked out of the negotiating room (or, rather, never appeared there). Yet, what the West has already done was a lot of tricky concessions – such as Trump's readiness to recognize the occupied Crimea as a part of Russia.[27] By that move, the U.S. President had de facto legitimized the change of international borders by sheer force – which might be applied to, and reproduced in, other parts of the world. I argued some time ago that Beijing seems to be Russia's strongest backer, but at the same time is very interested in its relations with the West. Hence, it may be that the only option for fostering a diplomatic resolution to the Ukrainian conflict is to bring China into the equation. The West can trade an improvement in China-West relations for Beijing's pressure on Russia, which has become its vassal state during this war.[28] I realize how problematic, especially vis-à-vis Taiwan, and even humiliating such a perspective might look. Why do I think that China's involvement looks inevitable these days? For years, Putin has been addressing the Western powers with his warnings. In 2007, he argued that Russia's "reasonable interests" are ignored.[29] In 2018, he warned that if the West does not listen to Russia, the global order may be at risk.[30] By the end of 2021, he proposed a system of treaties between Russia and both the U.S. and NATO,[31] promoting his vision of "spheres of influence" that should be respected and honored. Nothing of this was taken into account by the Western leaders – and nowadays no one should believe that Putin's efforts in Ukraine are aimed either at taking four (six, eight) regions or even at conquering all of Ukraine (as Trump had finally realized last week).[32] Even while Mr. Putin is still not ready to engage in a war with NATO, he wishes for the world to be divided into parts with some of it given into Russia's control (this is what he calls "the fundamental causes of the conflict" that should be addressed prior to any serious negotiations).[33] Therefore, there is no chance for a U.S.-planned Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit to happen – either in Geneva or anywhere else.[34] Putin has no intention of meeting Zelensky at all – and if he wants to meet Trump, it would be to talk with him not about Ukraine but rather about Europe, NATO, or global issues. One may say that these assumptions are crazy, but this is what Putin is thinking about these days as, after three and a half years of war, he sees Ukraine exhausted and the West divided. The "hot summer of 2025" has arrived almost unexpectedly, and it came in a way that was facilitated by the failure of Western diplomacy. The fear of either a Russian attack on NATO or of a nuclear escalation has made Western powers too cautious to be serious opponents of the Kremlin.[35] After years wasted and hundreds of thousand lives lost, the West faces not less, but a more potent Putin reflecting on his 2025 actions...
Shafaq News
a day ago
- Shafaq News
Oil set for second weekly decline as market eyes another OPEC+ output hike
Shafaq News/ Oil prices were on track for a second consecutive weekly decline on Friday, weighed down by expectations of another OPEC+ output hike in July and fresh uncertainty after the latest legal twist kept U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs in place. Brent crude futures slipped 31 cents, or 0.48%, to $63.84 a barrel by 0424 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude fell 31 cents, or 0.51%, to $60.63 a barrel. The Brent July futures contract is due to expire on Friday. Both contracts have fallen 1.5% so far this week. The downward trajectory largely stemmed from the prospect of rising supplies as investors priced in another hike by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, when eight of its members meet on Saturday. "The stage is set for another bumper production increase," Westpac's head of commodity and carbon research Robert Rennie said in a note, potentially higher than the 411,000 barrels per day hike decided on at the previous two meetings. The potential hike comes as the global surplus has widened to 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd), likely necessitating a price adjustment to prompt a supply-side response and restore balance, said JPMorgan analysts in a note. They expect prices to remain within current ranges before easing into the high $50s by year-end. In the U.S., Trump's tariffs were to remain in effect after a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated them on Thursday, reversing a trade court's decision on Wednesday to put an immediate block on the most sweeping of the duties. The block had sent oil prices falling more than 1% on Thursday as traders weighed its effects. Analysts said uncertainty would remain as the tariff battles worked their way. Oil prices have lost more than 10% since Trump announced his "Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2. On the demand front, recession worries fuelled by the tariff war have clouded the outlook. Adding to U.S.-China trade tension, Washington ordered a broad swathe of companies to stop shipping goods, including ethane and butane, to China without a license and revoked licenses already granted to certain suppliers. Global oil demand improved from the previous week, driven by a rebound in U.S. oil consumption with robust travel over the Memorial Day long weekend, JPMorgan analysts noted. That said, the monthly expansion in global oil demand is tracking at approximately 400,000 bpd as of May 28, 250,000 bpd below expectations, they said.
