Populist frontrunner in Romania's cancelled election to step back from politics
Calin Georgescu, the populist whose bid for Romania's presidency last year resulted in the annulment of an election in the European Union and Nato member country, has announced he is stepping away from political life.
Mr Georgescu upended Romania's political landscape last November when he ran as an independent and unexpectedly surged to frontrunner in the first round of the presidential election, going from an obscure candidate to beating the incumbent prime minister.
'I choose to be a passive observer of public and social life,' the 63-year-old said in a video posted online late on Monday.
'I choose to remain outside any political party structure … I am not affiliated with any political group in any way.'
Calin Georgescu, centre, upended Romania's political landscape last November (Vadim Ghirda/AP)
Despite denying any wrongdoing, Mr Georgescu was barred from the tense election rerun held in May, won by pro-EU candidate Nicusor Dan, who was officially sworn in on Monday.
Mr Dan, a mathematician and former Bucharest mayor, beat the hard-right nationalist George Simion, who became Mr Georgescu's nominal successor.
Mr Georgescu said he had made his decision to take a step back following the conclusion of the presidential race, which for him indicated 'the sovereignist movement has come to a close'.
'Even though this political chapter has ended, I am convinced that the values and ideals we fought for together remain steadfast,' he said.
'My dear ones, I have always said that we would make history, not politics.'
The outcome of Mr Georgescu's success in last year's chaotic election cycle sent shockwaves through Romania's political establishment. It also left many observers wondering how most local surveys had put him behind at least five other candidates.
Mr Georgescu was barred from the tense election rerun held this month (Andreea Alexandru/AP)
Despite what appeared to be a sprawling social media campaign promoting him, Mr Georgescu had declared zero campaign spending.
A top Romanian court then made the unprecedented move to annul the election after allegations emerged of electoral violations and Russian interference.
In February, prosecutors opened criminal proceedings against Mr Georgescu, accusing him of incitement to undermine the constitutional order, election campaign funding abuses, and founding or supporting fascist, racist, xenophobic, or antisemitic organisations, among other charges.
He was due to appear at the prosecutor's office in Bucharest on Tuesday.
Once a member of Mr Simion's hard-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians, Mr Georgescu left the party in 2022 after a period of infighting. He was accused by colleagues of being pro-Russian and critical of Nato, the US-led military alliance to which Romania belongs.
He sparked controversy for describing Romanian fascist and nationalist leaders from the 1930s and 1940s as national heroes. He has also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin in the past as 'a man who loves his country' and has questioned Ukraine's statehood, but he claims not to be pro-Russian.
The presidential election was won by pro-EU candidate Nicusor Dan (Andreea Alexandru/AP)
After Romania's decision to cancel the election last year, Mr Georgescu became a cause celebre among nationalists, with support coming from figures such as US vice president JD Vance and tech billionaire Elon Musk — who both criticised Romania for annulling the vote.
Mr Georgescu has argued the election was 'cancelled illegally and unconstitutionally', and after he was barred from the May rerun, he accused the authorities of 'inventing evidence to justify the theft' of the elections.
Earlier this year, thousands of protesters took to the streets of Bucharest in a show of support for Mr Georgescu, who cemented his status as a persecuted anti-system candidate, railing against a corrupt political class.
'I deeply understand what many of you have gone through: you suffered, you were harassed, humiliated, wronged, and marginalised,' Mr Georgescu said on Monday, adding that he might return to politics 'if a serious opportunity arises that could bring real benefits to Romania and the Romanian people'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
34 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
A look at what happens to Trump's tariffs following federal court ruling
A federal court in New York handed US President Donald Trump a big setback on Wednesday, blocking his audacious plan to impose massive taxes on imports from almost every country in the world. A three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade ruled that Mr Trump overstepped his authority when he invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPPA) to declare a national emergency and justify the sweeping tariffs. The tariffs overturned decades of US trade policy, disrupted global commerce, rattled financial markets and raised the risk of higher prices and recession in the United States and around the world. The US Court of International Trade has jurisdiction over civil cases involving trade. Its decisions can be appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington and ultimately to the Supreme Court, where the legal challenges to Mr Trump's tariffs are widely expected to end up. -Which tariffs did the court block? The court's decision blocks the tariffs Mr Trump slapped last month on almost all US trading partners and levies he imposed before that on China, Mexico and Canada. A person walks in front of an electronic stock board showing Japan's Nikkei index at a securities firm in Tokyo (Eugene Hoshiko/AP) On April 2, Mr Trump imposed so-called reciprocal tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States runs a trade deficit and 10% baseline tariffs on almost everybody else. He later suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries time to agree to reduce barriers to US exports. But he kept the baseline tariffs in place. Claiming extraordinary power to act without congressional approval, he justified the taxes under IEEPA by declaring the United States' longstanding trade deficits 'a national emergency'. In February, he had invoked the law to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, saying that the illegal flow of immigrants and drugs across the US border amounted to a national emergency and that the three countries needed to do more to stop it. The US Constitution gives Congress the power to set taxes, including tariffs. But lawmakers have gradually let presidents assume more power over tariffs — and Mr Trump has made the most of it. The tariffs are being challenged in at least seven lawsuits. In the ruling on Wednesday, the trade court combined two of the cases — one brought by five small businesses and another by 12 US states. The ruling does leave in place other Trump tariffs, including those on foreign steel, aluminium and autos. But those levies were invoked under a different law that required a Commerce Department investigation and could not be imposed at the president's own discretion. The legal challenges to Mr Trump' tariffs are widely expected to end up in the Supreme Court (Evan Vucci/AP) -Why did the court rule against the president? The administration had argued that courts had approved then-president Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in a 1971 economic and financial crisis that arose when the United States suddenly devalued the dollar by ending a policy that linked the US currency to the price of gold. The Nixon administration successfully cited its authority under the 1917 Trading With Enemy Act, which preceded and supplied some of the legal language later used in IEPPA. The court disagreed, deciding that Mr Trump's sweeping tariffs exceeded his authority to regulate imports under IEEPA. It also said the tariffs did nothing to deal with problems they were supposed to address. In their case, the states noted that America's trade deficits hardly amount to a sudden emergency. The United States has racked them up for 49 straight years in good times and bad. -So where does this leave Mr Trump's trade agenda? Wendy Cutler, a former US trade official who is now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, says the court's decision 'throws the president's trade policy into turmoil'. She said: 'Partners negotiating hard during the 90-day day tariff pause period may be tempted to hold off making further concessions to the US until there is more legal clarity. 'Likewise, companies will have to reassess the way they run their supply chains, perhaps speeding up shipments to the United States to offset the risk that the tariffs will be reinstated on appeal.' The trade court noted that Mr Trump retains more limited power to impose tariffs to address trade deficits under another statute, the Trade Act of 1974. But that law restricts tariffs to 15% and only for 150 days with countries with which the United States runs big trade deficits. For now, the trade court's ruling 'destroys the Trump administration's rationale for using federal emergency powers to impose tariffs, which oversteps congressional authority and contravenes any notion of due process', said Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University. 'The ruling makes it clear that the broad tariffs imposed unilaterally by Trump represent an overreach of executive power.'
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
WFP: 'Hordes of hungry people' stormed Gaza warehouse
Thousands of Palestinians have stormed a United Nations warehouse in central Gaza, with the World Food Programme reporting two possible deaths in the disorder as Israel and the UN traded blame over the deepening hunger crisis. The humanitarian situation in Gaza, where aid has finally begun to trickle in after a two-month blockade, is dire following 18 months of devastating war. Food security experts say starvation is looming for one in five people. AFP footage showed crowds of Palestinians breaking into a WFP warehouse in Deir Al-Balah and taking bags of emergency food supplies as gunshots rang out. "Hordes of hungry people broke into WFP's Al-Ghafari warehouse in Deir Al-Balah, central Gaza, in search of food supplies that were pre-positioned for distribution," WFP said in a statement on X. "Initial reports indicate two people died and several were injured in the tragic incident," WFP said, adding that it was still confirming details. Israel accused the United Nations yesterday of seeking to block Gaza aid distribution, as the global body said it was doing its utmost to facilitate distribution of the limited assistance greenlit by Israel's authorities. The issue of aid has come sharply into focus amid starvation fears and intense criticism of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private US-backed aid group that has bypassed the longstanding UN-led system in the territory. Israel's UN ambassador Danny Danon told the Security Council that aid was entering the enclave by truck - under limited authorisation by Israel at the Kerem Shalom crossing - and via a "new distribution mechanism developed in coordination with the US and key international partners". Mr Danon was referring to the GHF operation, which he accused the UN of "trying to block", saying it was "using threats, intimidation and retaliation against NGOs that choose to participate in the new humanitarian mechanism". . A Palestinian medical source reported at least one death. Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, reiterated the world body's opposition to coordinating with GHF. "We will not participate in operations that do not meet our humanitarian principles," Mr Dujarric told AFP. He said the UN was doing all it could to send aid, adding that since last week 800 truckloads were approved by Israel but fewer than 500 made it into Gaza. As the war entered its 600th day Wednesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the offensive had "changed the face of the Middle East". He said it had killed tens of thousands of militants including Mohammed Sinwar, Hamas's presumed Gaza leader and the brother of Yahya Sinwar - mastermind of the October 2023 attacks that sparked the Gaza war. Israeli media said Mr Sinwar was targeted by strikes in southern Gaza earlier this month. His brother was killed in October 2024. In Washington, US envoy Steve Witkoff expressed optimism about a possible ceasefire, saying he expected to propose a plan soon. "I have some very good feelings about getting to a ... temporary ceasefire, and a long term resolution, a peaceful resolution of that conflict," he said. But Gazans remained pessimistic. "600 days have passed and nothing has changed. Death continues, and Israeli bombing does not stop," said Bassam Daloul, 40. "Even hoping for a ceasefire feels like a dream and a nightmare." Israel stepped up its military offensive earlier this month, while mediators push for a still elusive ceasefire. In Tel Aviv, hundreds of people called for a ceasefire, lining roads at 6:29am - the exact time the 7 October attack began. Relatives of hostages held since that attack also gathered in Tel Aviv. "I want you to know that when Israel blows up deals, it does so on the heads of the hostages," said Arbel Yehud, who was freed from Gaza captivity in January. "Their conditions immediately worsen, food diminishes, pressure increases, and bombings and military actions do not save them, they endanger their lives," she said. Out of 251 hostages abducted during the 7 October attack, 57 remain in Gaza including 34 the Israeli military says are dead. Some 1,218 people were killed in Hamas's 7 October 2023, attack, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Leo Varadkar: The EU needs to ‘grow a bit of backbone' and stand up to Israel
Summits of the EU 's 27 national leaders take place every few months and usually kick off on a Thursday. When Leo Varadkar was attending as taoiseach he was always happier when they started earlier in the week. 'It was great on the rare occasion that you had to be away on a Tuesday or Wednesday, because then you got to avoid Leaders' Questions [in the Dáil],' the former Fine Gael leader tells me. Very few heads of government take questions from the Opposition 'twice a week for several hours', he says. 'It's mostly just theatre, I didn't particularly like it.' More than a year on from his political exit, Varadkar sat down to chat about European politics. We spoke last week, the day after the European Union agreed to a review of its trade agreement with Israel , following growing concern over the war in Gaza . READ MORE This review was something that Varadkar and Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez first called for in February 2024. At the time they were ignored. 'I feel more angry than vindicated, because Pedro and I went out on a limb on that and we had very few supporters at the time,' Varadkar says. It was depressing that so many Palestinians had to be killed before other European governments came around to Ireland's position, he says. 'The time has come for the European Union to grow a bit of backbone. I hope this is the start of it.' The EU-Israel association agreement, which includes a free trade deal, is seen as a key piece of leverage with which to exert pressure on Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu 's government. The EU should suspend the accord even if a fresh ceasefire is negotiated between Israel and Hamas militants, according to Varadkar. Israel portrays itself as a western liberal democracy, but is 'none of those things', the former Fine Gael leader says. Varadkar feels European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen gets too hard a time in Ireland over the misstep she made in the days after the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023. Comments by the German politician were seen as offering unqualified support for how Israel saw fit to respond. [ Leo Varadkar has more to offer than reality TV shows or doling out PR advice to mega-rich clients Opens in new window ] 'I spoke to her about it and I told her: 'This isn't going to go down well in large parts of Europe',' Varadkar recalls. 'I think since then she's been much more circumspect and careful ... She's a friend of Ireland, and Ireland has done well by the position she's taken on Brexit ,' he says. Brexit comes up several times. The negotiations to sort out the UK's exit from the EU were a big part of Varadkar's first term as taoiseach. It influenced a lot of his thinking during summits of EU leaders, including how he handled Hungary's far-right prime minister Viktor Orban and Poland's then-hard-right government. 'There was an attempt by the British to seek support from Poland and Hungary ... I was kind of limited in my scope for righteousness, given that I needed Hungary and Poland not to be a problem on Brexit, and they weren't,' he says. What's it like inside the room during those summits? 'It's just you in there, there's no officials,' Varadkar says. Leaders still message their entourage of advisers and officials waiting outside the room, though sometimes mobile phones have to stay outside as well. The legwork to tee up a policy shift is done by diplomats in the weeks leading up to a summit. 'The good thing is that it's often just the big decisions and the final calls that are left to the leaders,' he says. [ Varadkar: marriage-equality vote result and hospice opening made my best day in politics Opens in new window ] The need to unanimously agree on foreign policy decisions means one rogue leader – such as Orban – can hold everything up. The Hungarian leader has repeatedly used this veto power to block financial and military support for Kyiv in the Ukraine war. Varadkar does not believe the solution is to just take more decisions by majority vote. 'Maybe make it so that one country can't block something, or two countries can't block something,' he says. We're talking in the cafe of the Sofitel, a five-star Brussels hotel down the road from the EU institutions. National leaders in the European People's Party (EPP) , the centre-right grouping that includes Fine Gael, all breakfast here on the morning of a summit. Varadkar, who stepped down as taoiseach in April last year, says these European political groupings are much more influential than many people realise, even politicians in his own party. 'Any time people talked about Fine Gael becoming too liberal or too left-leaning for the EPP, I took a very contrary view. This is the most influential group, the biggest bloc, it's good for Fine Gael and good for Ireland to be in it,' he says. It's hard to tell whether Varadkar secretly misses being in the thick of it all. He definitely doesn't miss Leaders' Questions.
