logo
PBS, NPR face ‘tremendous changes' as funding cut looms

PBS, NPR face ‘tremendous changes' as funding cut looms

New York Post19 hours ago
PBS and NPR face an uncertain future after the Senate voted to slash funding to the public broadcasters — leading the heads of both companies to make dire warnings about looming changes.
NPR CEO Katherine Maher gathered rattled staffers Thursday for a closed-door meeting at their Washington DC, office, shortly after the early-morning vote by the GOP-controlled Senate clawed back roughly $9 billion in spending for foreign aid, NPR and PBS.
The House has until Friday to seal their fate and send it to President Trump's desk, who is expected to sign the legislation.
Advertisement
Roughly $1.1 billion of the targeted cut would defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the nonprofit that funds NPR — home to flagship shows 'Morning Edition' and 'All Things Considered' — and PBS, the decades-long carrier of 'Sesame Street' and Ken Burns documentaries.
4 NPR CEO Katherine Maher led a 30-minute meeting Thursday, addressing network staffers ahead of Friday's critical House vote.
Getty Images
About 70% of that goes directly to the 330 local PBS outlets and 246 NPR stations.
Advertisement
On average, PBS says 15% of its stations' budgets come from public funding. But there are wide variations. Stations in larger markets usually get more money through philanthropy and fund drives, while smaller stations depend much more on the government.
NPR receives about 1% of its funds from federal sources annually, and about 3% indirectly from stations, the company has reported. The bulk of NPR's funding comes from member station fees, corporate sponsorships and individual donations.
4 The funding cuts will hit PBS, home of 'Sesame Street' and 'PBS NewsHour.'
REUTERS
Maher predicted 'a tremendous amount of change' if federal funding goes away, according to NPR media reporter David Folkenflik, who posted her comments from the meeting on X.
Advertisement
PBS CEO Paula Kerger expressed the same gloomy sentiment in an interview with CNN, saying that public TV stations will be 'forced to make hard decisions in the weeks and months ahead.'
Neither exec adressed whether federal spending cuts would result in layoffs or force them to slash programming.
4 PBS' 'Sesame Street' should be safe after the popular childrens' show inked a deal with Netflix in May.
AP
PBS and NPR did not return requests for comment.
Advertisement
One PBS show that should be safe is 'Sesame Street.' The home of Elmo and Big Bird signed a deal with Netflix in May to stream the upcoming 56th season and 90 hours of previous episodes of the popular kids show.
Terms of the Netflix deal weren't released. The streaming giant swooped in after Warner Bros. Discovery decided against renewing a deal that reportedly paid Sesame Workshop between $30 million and $35 million a year.
4 NPR execs did not address whether federal spending cuts would result in layoffs or a scaleback in programming.
Getty Images
Trump and other conservative critics have accused NPR and PBS of being politically biased towards Democrats.
Earlier this week, Maher denied claims of bias, saying they 'serve all Americans.'
'The intent [of the legislation] is to make CPB no longer function,' NPR's chief government affairs executive Marta McLellan Ross told staffers, Folkenflik wrote.
In an effort to rally the troops, Maher said public media is fighting and are 'taking this one all the way to the end,' according to Folkenflik.
Both PBS and NPR sued President Trump and other administration officials in May to block his executive order stripping federal funding.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OpenAI gets Wall Street attention, crypto craze rages on: Opening Bid top takeaways
OpenAI gets Wall Street attention, crypto craze rages on: Opening Bid top takeaways

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

OpenAI gets Wall Street attention, crypto craze rages on: Opening Bid top takeaways

The week has seen the market meander as it searches for its next catalyst. One possible catalyst — an interest rate cut from the Federal Reserve later this month — has been removed from the equation following sticky inflation reads. Meanwhile, strong earnings reports this week from Netflix (NFLX) and United Airlines (UAL) haven't done enough to excite investors to push valuations to even richer levels. On the month, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) is up 1.1% while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) has notched a 1.8% gain. The Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) has led the way with a 2.8% advance thanks to enthusiasm on AI chip demand from the likes of Nvidia (NVDA) and Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM). Here is everything we touched on during Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid on Friday. Tune in live daily to Opening Bid at 9:30 a.m. ET. The fight for Fed independence Fed Chair Jerome Powell defended the $2.5 billion renovation to the institution's headquarters in a letter to White House budget director Russell Vought. The remodeling job has angered President Trump and given him a new piece of arsenal in his attacks against Powell and the Fed. Trump's public rebuke of the Fed is triggering growing concerns on Wall Street about the near-term outlook for bond markets. "We would not be surprised by a knee-jerk 50bp sell-off in the long end were this to take place. Subsequent price action would depend on court rulings," a Barclays researcher said. One top economist told me this week that, should Powell get fired, it would lead to a jump in inflation expectations — and subsequently reduce the chance of the rate cut Trump has demanded. Netflix streams a strong quarter and outlook The streaming giant did everything in its power on Thursday to justify its stock's sizzling 43% run this year. Here's what I saw in the numbers: No consumer resistance to higher prices. Revenue and operating margin guidance lifted for 2025. Sequential acceleration in revenue and operating margin growth. Commitment on the earnings call to more live events. Upcoming events include an NFL double-header on Christmas Day. The Street is bullish on Netflix's trajectory into year-end due to a slew of new content, headlined by "Happy Gilmore 2." "Given Netflix's track record of creating new hits, we are comfortable that viewership growth can continue and support future price increases and ad monetization," KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson said. Patterson reiterated an Outperform rating on Netflix shares. The year of the crypto craze rages on The House voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to pass the GENIUS Act, the first-ever major legislative overhaul of crypto regulations. The bill now heads to Trump's desk. The act establishes guidelines for banks and other entities that issue stablecoins and safeguards for stablecoin holders. Shares of crypto plays Webull (BULL), Coinbase (COIN), Circle (CRCL), and Robinhood (HOOD) all jumped on Friday. "GENIUS is the stamp of approval from federal lawmakers that will make our industry unstoppable. We have no doubt that this will catalyze even more interest in stablecoins and activity across the broader crypto landscape," said Nass Eddequiouaq, CEO of stablecoin issuer Bastion. Amex charges forward In yet another sign the US consumer is taking Trump tariffs in stride, American Express (AXP) smashed second quarter earnings estimates by $0.21 this morning. Sales and adjusted EPS rose a healthy 9% and 17%, respectively. The company said it saw record cardmember spending in the quarter. Amex made no change to its full-year sales and profit outlooks. "I think people just want to live their lives, and that's what they're doing. I mean, you're seeing a little less air travel, obviously, but people are still spending and they are still traveling," American Express CEO Stephen Squeri told me by phone on Friday. Amex shares have been up 226% since Squeri took over as CEO from Ken Chenault on Feb. 1, 2018. OpenAI lands Wall Street research coverage It's not common practice for a company to land Wall Street research coverage when it's still private. But when you are talking about OpenAI, conventional wisdom needs to be tossed in the trash. JPMorgan's Brenda Duverce is initiating coverage on the AI startup today. Duverce said OpenAI stands to shake up the search market further in the years ahead, with an unrivaled brand and a $700 billion total addressable market potential. OpenAI is the second-highest-valued private company in the world, according to Yahoo Finance private markets data. The company has an estimated valuation of $325 billion, second only to Elon Musk's SpaceX at $443 billion. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Netflix Stock is Slipping Despite Its Q2 Earnings Beat: How Should You Play NFLX Here?
Netflix Stock is Slipping Despite Its Q2 Earnings Beat: How Should You Play NFLX Here?

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Netflix Stock is Slipping Despite Its Q2 Earnings Beat: How Should You Play NFLX Here?

Netflix (NFLX) reported its Q2 earnings yesterday, July 17, after the close of markets. While the earnings were better than expected, NFLX is trading lower today. In this article, we'll look at the key takeaways from Netflix's Q2 report and analyze how to play the stock after its YTD outperformance. Netflix reported revenues of $11.08 billion in the second quarter, up 15.9% year-over-year and slightly ahead of Street estimates. As a reminder, Netflix has stopped reporting quarterly subscriber numbers even as it attributed the rise in revenues to 'more members,' along with higher subscription prices and ad sales. The company's earnings per share (EPS) came in at $7.19, which easily beat its guidance of $7.03 and the consensus estimate of $7.07. More News from Barchart Insider Trading Alert: Here's Who Bought Nvidia and AMD Stock Before the U.S. Chip Deal with China Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 23 Robinhood Keeps Hitting New Highs. How Should You Play HOOD Stock Here? Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! Netflix Raised Its Annual Guidance Netflix has raised its annual guidance, now expecting full-year revenues to be between $44.8 billion and $45.2 billion, up from the previous guidance of $43.5 billion to $44.5 billion. The company attributed the raised guidance primarily to favourable currency movements. Notably, the U.S. dollar ($DXY) has weakened against most major currencies this year, which is a tailwind for U.S. tech giants that get substantial revenues from global markets. Netflix also raised the guidance for its currency-neutral operating margin by 50 basis points to 29.5%. Moreover, it now expects free cash flows to come in between $8 billion and $8.5 billion, up from the previous forecast of around $8 billion. Key Takeaways from Netflix's Q2 Earnings Report Here are some of the other key takeaways from the report. Operating Margins to Fall in the Back Half of the Year: Netflix expects its operating margins in the second half to be lower than the first half, which it attributed to the "higher content amortization and sales and marketing costs associated with our larger second half slate.' Ad Revenues on Track to Double in 2025: While Netflix does not provide a dollar number for its ad business, it reiterated that its ad revenues are on track to double in 2025. In the next couple of years, ad revenues will become a significant driver of Netflix's top line as the company adds more subscribers to the ad-supported tier and its ad sales start taking off. Deal with TF1 in France: Netflix has partnered with TF1 in France, which will let it show TF1's content, including free-to-air channels and on-demand content, directly on the Netflix platform in the country. This is the first of its kind partnership for Netflix, and the company did not rule out more such deals. Streaming Tiers: In response to an analyst's question on whether Netflix can have more tiers in the future as it broadens its slate to include live sports and other offerings like TF1 in France, co-CEO Gregory Peters responded diplomatically by saying, 'I've learned to never say never. So I would say we remain open to evolving our consumer-facing model.' Notably, the comments should be seen in the context of Netflix previously battling against ads on streaming but later pivoting to ads in a departure from its original strategy. Meanwhile, we can be reasonably sure of Netflix making some content exclusive for premium tiers in the future, which will be another revenue opportunity for the streaming giant. Overall, I would say that Netflix's Q2 earnings were pretty solid and justify the kind of rally we have seen this year. However, my concern with Netflix remains the same as it was prior to the confessional. At nearly 50x its forward earnings, Netflix is priced for perfection, and the risk-reward does not look attractive, at least for the short term. I will continue to stay on the sidelines and wait for a better entry point to buy NFLX stock, even as I have no intention of selling my existing shares after an encouraging Q2 performance. On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi had a position in: NFLX. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos

Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell
Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell

A firing of Jerome Powell by President Trump would likely open up a legal war never before seen in the US, without any guarantee of a courtroom victory for the White House. That may be why Trump hasn't done so. Yet. Powell has made his intentions clear. He said earlier this year that he wouldn't leave if Trump tried to fire him and that his removal is 'not permitted by law.' Fed officials privately have been preparing for a legal battle as far back as Trump's first term, when the president also toyed with removing the chair, according to the Wall Street Journal. The strength of Powell's case is based on some protections of Fed autonomy already embedded in US statute. The Federal Reserve Act, which created the central bank in 1913 and was amended in 1935, states that each member of the Fed board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President." The intention of the "for cause" condition was to enhance the Fed's independence by making it more difficult for a president to fire its board members, who are appointed by the president. There are also signs that the Supreme Court would step in if Trump were to act, although the high court's views on the topic are unclear. In an ambiguous ruling earlier this year, Supreme Court justices allowed Trump to temporarily proceed with the firings of board members at two other independent agencies. In granting the administration's request, the court said that in its judgment, the government "is likely to show" that the fired board members exercised "considerable executive power," a view that suggests the president possesses broader power to remove the officials at will. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Legal challenges from those board members are still playing out at an appeals court. But Powell got a good sign Thursday when a Washington, D.C., district court judge ruled that another Trump firing of FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal and that she should be reappointed. The judge cited a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent that limits the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance. That precedent offers Powell a layer of protection. It was set in a 1935 case titled Humphrey's Executor v. US that challenged President Franklin Roosevelt's termination of the US Federal Trade Commissioner. The court held that the president's authority to terminate agency officials at will was limited to purely executive officers, and not those leading independent agencies that engage in regulation and adjudication. Congress, the court said, had power to limit the president's removal power over those officials "for cause" — then described that term to mean inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. Trump is challenging whether that precedent applies across various independent agencies, but the Supreme Court has not yet made a definitive ruling on whether it should stand. If the precedent falls and leaves no explicit protection for the central bank, a Powell firing could certainly be a lot easier to pull off. 'For cause' Powell does have one major vulnerability, however. That 'for cause' language embedded in the Federal Reserve Act hasn't really been defined or tested in court. The statute also doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors. And the White House has been using a new line of attack against Powell that could offer a path to a 'for cause' dismissal, as the president and his allies raise concerns about a $2.5 billion renovation of the central bank's headquarters. "I mean it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5 billion renovation," Trump told reporters on Wednesday, after saying earlier that the project "sort of is" a fireable offense. He said he wasn't planning to fire Powell but also left the door open, saying, "I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely, unless he has to leave for fraud.' National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett — one of Powell's potential successors — said last Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does." But he also acknowledged it was a 'highly uncertain legal matter.' Politico reported that outside lawyers told the White House counsel's office it would likely lose a legal fight with Powell if Trump removed Powell solely over accusations that he mishandled renovations and that White House officials were also unsure whether it would work. Politico quoted one official who said, 'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know. But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.' The White House is certainly showing no signs of letting up on its pressure. They are seeking a site visit to see the Fed's renovations in person. Powell has asked the Fed's inspector general to review the costs involved. He also sent White House budget director Russ Vought a letter Thursday offering a point-by-point rebuttal of questions raised about the project and denying reports of a VIP elevator and VIP dining rooms. "We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources," he said, and "we have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen.' Case Western Reserve University business law professor Eric Chaffee said he thinks Powell would win any legal battle with the White House on the 'for cause' clause, but he doesn't think such a confrontation will come to pass given that Powell only has 10 months left as chair. "We're just so close to the end of the term that I think the Trump administration is very likely just to wait things out,' he said. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store