Historic Hill Air Force Base chapel reopens following years of extensive renovations
The chapel, which was originally built in 1942, closed to the public in 2023 in order to accommodate upgrades and several preservation efforts.
Renovations included a roof and window replacements, pew repairs, new carpet, freshly painted walls, refinished wood, updated restrooms, a new sound system, as well as heating, ventilation and air conditioning. Officials said these renovations were necessary after decades of heavy use.
'We are thrilled about this renovation project,' said Aaron Clark, museum director. 'Renovating and preserving World War II-era Army Air Forces chapel ensures the vital stories of local and national history are not forgotten over time.'
Hill Air Force Base officials described the chapel as a vital part of the base and its communities for decades after it originally opened in the 1940s. It was first renovated in 1945 following a major fire and then remodeled just three years later. In 1964, it was replaced by a new base chapel but continued to serve as an education building and office space. That was until 1984, when the base declared the chapel was 'excess' and scheduled it for demolition.
PBS program Antiques Roadshow films at Red Butte Garden in Salt Lake City
However, instead of demolishing the building, the Cultural Resource Program coordinated with the Aerospace Heritage Foundation of Utah to fund the relocation of the chapel to museum grounds and restore it. It has since become a permanent part of the museum's Memorial Park.
'Renovating the chapel provides a meaningful community gathering space that blends history with ongoing civic and cultural engagement,' said Clark. 'This unique historic structure serves as a tangible connection to Utah's World War II involvement, offering educational opportunities for future generations to ensure the sacrifices of Airmen from decades ago are not forgotten.'
A bat in Morgan County has tested positive for rabies, health officials warn
Historic Hill Air Force Base chapel reopens following years of extensive renovations
Utah House Republicans elects new leadership members
Elon Musk blasts spending bill
Surge of moisture brings storms to southern Utah, raising flash flood potential
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Why young Americans dread turning 26: health insurance chaos
But for years, Republicans have whittled away at the infrastructure of the original law. Long gone is the requirement to buy insurance. Plans sold in the online insurance marketplaces have no stringent quality standards. Costs keep rising, and eligibility requirements and subsidies are a moving target. Advertisement The erosion of the law has now created an 'insurance cliff' for Americans who are turning 26 and don't have a job that provides medical coverage. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Some, scared off by the complexity of picking a policy and by the price tags, tumble over the edge and go without insurance, in a health system where the rate for an emergency room visit can be thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars. Today, an estimated 15% of 26-year-olds go uninsured, which, according to an analysis by health research group KFF, is the highest rate among Americans of any age. If they qualify, young adults can sign up for Medicaid, the federal and state program for low-income Americans, in most but not all states. Advertisement But many buy cheap subpar insurance that leaves them with insurmountable debt following a medical crisis. Others choose plans with extremely limited networks, losing access to their longtime doctors and medicines. Often they find those policies online, in what has become a dizzyingly complicated system of government-regulated insurance marketplaces. They vary in quality from state to state; some are far better than others. But they generally offer few easily identifiable, affordable and workable choices. 'The good news is that the ACA gave young people more options,' said Karen Pollitz, who directed consumer information and insurance oversight at the Department of Health and Human Services during the Obama administration. 'The bad news is the good stuff is hidden in a minefield of really bad options that'll leave you broke if you get sick.' Publicly funded counselors called 'navigators' or 'assisters' can help insurance seekers choose a plan. But those programs vary by state, and often customers don't realize that the help is available. The Trump administration has cut funding to publicize and operate those navigator programs. In addition, changes to Medicaid eligibility in the policy bill passed by Congress in July could mean that millions more enrollees lose their insurance, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Those changes threaten the very viability of the online marketplaces, which currently provide insurance to 24 million Americans. In dozens of interviews, young adults described the unsettling and devastating consequences of having inadequate insurance, or no insurance at all. Damien Phillips, 26, a reporter at a West Virginia newspaper, considered joining the Navy to get insurance as his 26th birthday approached. Instead, he felt he 'didn't make enough to justify having health insurance' and has reluctantly gone without it. Advertisement When Ethan Evans, a 27-year-old aspiring actor in Chicago who works in retail, fell off his parents' plan and temporarily signed up for Medicaid, diminished mental health coverage meant cutting back on visits to his longtime therapist. Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., the first Generation Z member of Congress, was able to quit his job and run for office at 25 only because he could stay on his mother's plan until he turned 26, he said. Now 28, he is insured through his federal job. 'The ACA was groundbreaking legislation, including the idea that every American needs health care,' he said. 'But there are pitfalls, and one of them is that when young adults turn 26, they fall into this abyss.' Back in 2010, the decision to make 26 the cutoff age for staying on a parent's insurance was 'kind of arbitrary,' recalled Nancy-Ann DeParle, deputy chief of staff for policy in the Obama White House. 'My kids were young, and I was trying to imagine when my child would be an adult,' she said. Before that time, children were often kicked off family plans at much younger ages, typically 18. The Obama administration's idea was that by 26, young adults were most likely settling into careers and jobs with insurance. But if they still didn't have access to job-based insurance, Medicaid and the online marketplaces would offer alternatives, the thinking went. But over the years, the courts, Congress and the first Trump administration eviscerated provisions of the ACA. By 2022, a shopper on the marketplace run by the federal government had more than 100 choices, many of which included expensive trade-offs, presented in a way that made comparisons difficult without spreadsheets. Advertisement Young Invincibles, an advocacy group representing young adults, runs its own 'navigator' program to help young people choose health insurance plans. 'We hear the frustration,' said Martha Sanchez, who was until recently the group's director of health policy and advocacy. 'Twenty-six-year-olds have had negative experiences in a process that's become really complex. Many throw up their hands.' The ACA was supposed to help consumers find affordable, high-quality plans online. The legislation also tried to expand Medicaid programs, which are administered by states, as a way to provide health insurance to low-income Americans. But the Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that states could not be forced to expand Medicaid. Ten states, led mostly by Republicans, have not done so, leaving up to 1.5 million Americans, who could have qualified for coverage, without insurance. Even where Medicaid is available to 26-year-olds, the transition has often proved precarious. Madeline Nelkin of New Jersey, who was studying social work, applied for Medicaid coverage before her 26th birthday in April 2024 because her university's insurance premiums were more than $5,000 annually. But it was September before her Medicaid coverage kicked in, leaving her uninsured while she fought a chest infection over the summer. 'People tell you to think ahead, but I didn't think that meant six months,' she said. When Megan Hughes, 27, of Hartland, Maine, hit the cliff, she went without. An aide for children with developmental delays, she has a thyroid condition and polycystic ovary syndrome. She looked for a health care plan but found it hard to understand the marketplace. (She didn't know there were navigators who could help.) Now she can't afford her medicine or see her endocrinologist. Advertisement 'I'm tired all the time,' Hughes said. 'My cycles are not regular anymore at all. When I do get one, it's debilitating.' She is hoping a new job will provide insurance later this year. Traditionally, most Americans with private health insurance got it through their jobs. But the job market has changed dramatically since 2010, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, with the rise of the gig economy. Over 30% of people ages 18 to 29 said in recent surveys that they were working or have worked in short-term, part-time or irregular jobs. The ACA requires organizations with 50 or more employees to offer insurance to people working 30 hours per week. This has led to a growing number of contract employees who work up to, but not past, the hourly limit. In Oklahoma, Daisy Creager, 29, has had three employers over the last three years. Insurance was important to her, not least because her former husband had Type 1 diabetes. As she left the first of those jobs, her husband's endocrinologist helped the couple stockpile less expensive insulin from Canada, since they would be uninsured. After a few months, they bought a marketplace plan, but it was expensive and 'didn't cover a lot,' she said. When she found a new job, she dropped that plan, only to discover that her new insurance coverage didn't start until the end of her first month of employment. The couple would be uninsured for a few weeks. A few days later, she came home to find her husband unconscious on the floor, in a diabetic coma. After hovering near death in an intensive care unit for four days, he woke up and began to recover. Advertisement 'I think I've done everything right,' Creager said. 'So why am I in a position where the health insurance available to me doesn't cover what I need, or I can barely afford my premiums, or worse, at times I don't even have it?' Experts agree that the marketplaces need stronger regulation. In 2023, the federal government defined clearer standards for what plans in each tier of insurance should offer, such as better prescription drug benefits, defined co-pays for X-rays, or coverage for emergency room visits. Certain types of basic care, such as primary care, should require just a small co-pay for at least a small number of initial visits. Each insurer must offer at least one plan that complies with these new standards at every tier of coverage -- an 'Easy Pricing' option or 'standard plan.' Most plans on the marketplaces don't meet these criteria. Federal and state regulators had long planned to cull such 'noncompliant' plans, but gradually, fearing that doing so too quickly would scare insurers away from participating. But with the priorities of the new Trump administration now in focus, and a Republican majority in Congress, it's far from clear what course President Donald Trump, who sought to repeal the ACA outright in his first term, will take. There are hints: Subsidies to help Americans buy insurance, adopted during the Biden administration, are set to expire at the end of 2025 if the Republican-led Congress doesn't extend them. If subsidies expire, premiums are likely to rise sharply for plans sold on the marketplaces, leaving insurance out of reach for many more young adults. This article originally appeared in
Business Insider
18 hours ago
- Business Insider
I visited the only B-2 stealth bomber on display in the world. Take a closer look.
The advanced warplanes, which cost around $2 billion each, can evade radar detection and drop tens of thousands of pounds of nuclear or conventional weapons. They were most recently deployed in Operation Midnight Hammer in June, dropping 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. All 19 of the US Air Force's operational B-2 planes are housed at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, where access is strictly limited. However, there is one place in the world where a B-2 is on permanent public display: the National Museum of the US Air Force in Dayton, Ohio. I visited the museum in August to see the one-of-a-kind exhibit. Take a look. The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit entered development during the Cold War, and the first plane became operational in 1993. B-2s were used in Operation Allied Force in Serbia in 1999, as well as in Afghanistan and Iraq during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom in the early advanced stealth technologies that make it extremely difficult to detect by radar, a capacity to deploy nuclear and conventional weapons, and an ability to refuel midair for flight times that can exceed 30 hours, the B-2 is one of the most powerful warplanes in the world, and it has a very long reach. No other country operates anything comparable to the combat power and capability of the B-2 bomber. Technicians conducted over 1,000 hours of temperature testing at McKinley Climatic Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida and found that the B-2 could withstand temperatures ranging from -65 degrees to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. To commemorate their work, the technicians painted a decorative "Fire & Ice" decal on the nose landing gear panel and signed their art was popular during World War II, when pilots and crew members would often personalize their planes with cartoons, pinups, or tallies of their missions. It's not as common on bombers in active service today. Air Combat Command prepares and equips Air Force teams to provide fighter power, intelligence, cyber operations, and support for combat missions around the shield-shaped emblem shows a downward-facing sword with wings spread on either side. The "509th" and "Follow us" reference the origins of the modern 509th Bomb Wing, which operates B-2 World War II, the historic 509th Composite Group was responsible for deploying nuclear weapons. The B-29 Superfortress bombers that dropped the first atomic bombs on Japan were part of this motto was "Follow Us, Follow Us, as we usher in the Nuclear Age," according to the US Air Force's official 509th was instrumental in the formation of Strategic Air Command and continues to support US nuclear deterrence. I found the B-2 to be one of the most memorable exhibits at the museum. The National Museum of the US Air Force features around 350 planes and missiles over 19 acres of exhibit space — among which were an Air Force One used by eight US presidents, Titan and Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missiles, and the B-29 that dropped the atomic bomb on Nagasaki — but seeing one of the world's most advanced warplanes up close was a memorable experience.
The Hill
21 hours ago
- The Hill
Abortion shield laws face mounting pressure
Republicans are waging a multipronged campaign against abortion shield laws in blue states, hoping to force the federal government to ultimately intervene. Legal experts say the effort will be difficult — as some states have already learned. State abortion shield laws are meant to protect providers and patients from civil and criminal actions. Eighteen states plus the District of Columbia have an abortion shield law, according to Rachel Rebouché dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law. Shield laws in eight of those states protect abortion providers regardless of patient location, which has helped cover health care providers who send abortion medication to telehealth patients living in states where the procedure is restricted. Republicans are fighting the laws in court, while also pushing for a federal law that supersedes the protection. More than a dozen GOP attorneys general recently urged congressional leadership in a letter to preempt the state laws by passing legislation that bans shield laws. Signees include Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill (R), both of whom have taken legal action against a New York doctor for allegedly prescribing and mailing abortion pills to women in their respective states. Some legal experts don't think congressional leadership will introduce legislation to preempt state abortion shield laws because it would struggle to pass. 'It's just not realistic,' said James Bopp Jr., general counsel for the National Right to Life Committee, adding that there is not a single anti-abortion Democratic senator and at most two anti-abortion Democrats in the House. 'There is absolutely zero prospect of it passing the Senate, and it makes no sense to waste your time on things that are completely hopeless and pointless.' Bopp said he believes that the state lawsuits challenging abortion shield laws have an objective legal merit, arguing that since each state is sovereign, no other state can regulate conduct within them. He argues that in attempting to do this, abortion shield laws deny 'full faith and credit' to the state laws where these abortions occur. Paxton has led the charge in combating these laws in court, most notably with his lawsuit against New York physician Margaret Carpenter. His office sued Carpenter in December, accusing her of sending abortion pills to a Texas woman last year. Soon after, a Texas judge ordered Carpenter to pay more than $100,000 in penalties, but she did not respond to the lawsuit nor appear for the subsequent court hearing. Paxton has tried twice to force a New York county clerk to file the ruling against Carpenter, but the clerk has refused, citing the state's abortion shield laws. He is now seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk, Taylor Bruck, to enforce the summary judgment and court summons. In January, a grand jury in Louisiana indicted Carpenter for also allegedly prescribing abortion medication to a woman in the state, resulting in state authorities requesting she be extradited. Paxton and Murrill have said that they will continue to try and press charges against Carpenter. 'That case is far from over, and we are continuing to evaluate our options to ensure that Dr. Carpenter faces justice in Louisiana,' Murrill said in a statement to The Hill. But New York leadership does seem likely to recognize Texas or Louisiana's judgments anytime soon. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) has vowed to protect Carpenter. This puts Texas and New York at loggerheads, legal experts said, which could lead to a lengthy back and forth of appeals and clashing state court rulings that could lead to nowhere or eventually force a federal court to get involved. Legal experts told The Hill that Paxton's actions regarding the case against Carpenter suggest he is trying to get an abortion shield law case to be seen before the Supreme Court. 'This is the road toward getting courts to weigh in on whether or not shield laws, in doing what they do, will be upheld by the Supreme Court under various challenges,' said Rebouché. A spokesperson for Paxton did not respond to multiple requests for comment from The Hill. States filing lawsuits that challenge shield laws are going to face obstacles, and cases will be difficult to win, legal experts said. This is because a lot of the arguments that a state like Texas would make to suggest that an abortion shield law should be struck down by a federal court are untested in this context, according to Rebouché. Once at the Supreme Court, Texas would likely argue that New York's shield law is violating the Constitution's full faith and credit clause, which mandates that all states must respect the judicial proceedings of another state, she said. And winning a legal case arguing that an abortion shield law violates the full faith and credit clause could be difficult, since a state like New York could argue that the clause is not absolute, Rebouché said. There is a long-held exception to the clause that states are not required to enforce a penal law from another state. Mary Ziegler, a professor of law at the University of California, Davis, said the letter to congressional leadership could mean that anti-abortion lawmakers might not be confident they wouldwin a case at any federal level. 'It's not much of a vote of confidence in terms of how they think they're going to, you know, do in federal court when these clashes arrive there,' she said. While state courts battle, a Texas civil lawsuit could end up being how an abortion shield law case appears before the Supreme Court. A Texas man is suing a California doctor for allegedly providing his girlfriend with abortion medication. Unlike the other state challenges, the wrongful death suit was filed in federal court. It could potentially lead to the downfall of shield laws faster than any action taken by an attorney general.
