
Inside FBI boss Kash Patel's new secret spy base in New Zealand to counter chilling moves by China
For the first time ever the bureau is establishing a law enforcement attaché office in New Zealand, the Daily Mail can exclusively reveal.
FBI Director Kash Patel traveled this week to open the office in Wellington and met on Wednesday with key New Zealand officials to emphasize the importance of expanding cooperation in the region.
While the FBI has personnel stationed in New Zealand already, opening an office marks a significant step in addressing the threat the Chinese Communist Party poses to the U.S. and its allies.
New leadership at the FBI said it was surprised to find out an office was not already established in the region considering the increased tensions between Washington, D.C. and Beijing in recent years.
'The FBI has had a strong relationship and collaborated closely with our counterparts in New Zealand for years,' Patel said in a statement to the Daily Mail regarding the opening of the new office.
'Expanding the Wellington office demonstrates the strength and evolution of our partnership as we continue to work together to address our shared security objectives in the region.'
The trip comes as the FBI and Justice Department continue to face fallout from the botched review of the Jeffrey Epstein files. But Director Patel is chugging forward with his mission to restore Americans' faith in the bureau.
The roles of attaché agents are to build and maintain relationships with foreign law enforcement and security services – specifically to facilitate information sharing among the intelligence communities.
These FBI offices are spread throughout the world through agreements with the host countries to coordinate operations and collaborate on operations.
The move this week marks an acknowledgement that the FBI is taking seriously the continued increase in threatening activity from Beijing and other foreign adversaries in region.
'Opening our first new law enforcement attaché in the Wellington Office marks a historic step for the FBI as we strengthen our working relationship with New Zealand and confront the growing threats of our time emanating from the Indo-Pacific — particularly from hostile nation-state actors like the Chinese Communist Party,' FBI spokesperson Ben Williamson told the Daily Mail.
He said that the office will help 'better position' the U.S. to protect itself and its citizens, as well as partners in the so-called Five Eye coalition.
The Five Eyes (FVEY) coalition was established shortly after the end of World War II and facilitates intelligence sharing between the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
While the FBI's goal is protecting the homeland from terrorism, cybercrime and other civil rights threats, it's also tasked with investigating and preventing transnational criminal activity involving the U.S.
Law enforcement attaché offices, known as legats, are a way for the FBI to collaborate with international partners worldwide under mutual agreement with the host country.
Director Patel recognizes that having a legat office in New Zealand will combine resources and allow for a more significant impact in combating cyber threats, drug trafficking and terrorism.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Kash Patel's girlfriend slaps down conspiracies that she's a secret Israeli 'honeypot' agent
FBI Director Kash Patel's girlfriend is firing back after earning the ire of MAGA circles furious over the agency's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Alexis Wilkins, 26, is pushing back on conspiracy theorists who accuse her of being a 'honeypot' agent for Israeli intelligence meant to influence her FBI Director boyfriend's actions. 'It's accusing me of manipulating the person that I'm with, that I love. That's a horrible accusation,' Wilkins told Megyn Kelly on her Wednesday podcast episode. 'It would have been a really long-game play,' she joked, noting she has been dating Patel, 45, 'long before he was the head of the FBI' for over two years. A conservative country music singer who hosts a show on the digital nonprofit platform PragerU was opened up to wider public influence when she attended the confirmation hearings and swearing-in for Patel earlier this year. The Daily Mail reported at the time on their not-yet-reported relationship that quickly went public. Wilkins, however, was surprised to find she somehow became the center of fury within factions of the MAGA movement who were most furious over the FBI and DOJ findings in the Epstein files review. Conspiracies swirled online that she was an agent with Mossad, Israel's national intelligence agency. 'I knew that Prager – this is something the deep sides of the internet like to pick at when they can't find out what else is wrong. So, some of it didn't surprise me when it first started coming up,' Wilkins told Megyn Kelly. PragerU CEO Marissa Streit was an intelligence officer in the Israeli Defense Forces, which has fueled anti-Semitic attacks on the conservative nonprofit. The latest attacks came after the Justice Department and FBI released a memo earlier this month concluding their review of the Epstein files and revealing nearly no new information. The document confirmed that Epstein killed himself in prison on August 10, 2019 and claimed there was no so-called 'client list' of the sex traffickers' accomplices. Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi said they would not be targeting anyone else for prosecution. They did release an 11-hour video of the area outside Epstein's cell the night he was killed. But this only caused more uproar after a 'missing minute' of footage that was initially described as an autonomic tech reset every night turned out to be footage that the FBI and DOJ had in their possessions but never released. It's still unknown what's in that 'missing minute,' why it wasn't included in the original release and whether it will ever be made public. While that drama has unfolded over the last month, Wilkins has been facing her own issues with critics harassing her online and doxxing her family over claims she's a foreign intelligence agent. One account on X even misidentified Wilkins, who is Christian, as a 'Jewish' country singer. Wilkins has been in the public eye as a country music artist and conservative activists, but was was cast even further into the limelight this year when it became public that she was dating Patel. Pictured: Wilkins attends Patel's swearing-in as FBI Director at the White House on February 21, 2025 Wilkins acknowledges where some of the spy claims are coming from, noting that people want answers and are trying to 'piece' things together. 'They want to connect things, they want to justify, you know, some of the pain that they've been through watching the last four years, and there's pieces of this that, you know, I can, I understand,' she told Kelly. 'But I think that they've taken just these pieces of evidence that you laid out and tie them together in all of the wrong ways.' Wilkins and Patel's 19-year age gap doesn't help with claims she is 'honeypotting' the FBI Director. But the singer and conservative activist says the gap never felt relevant. 'I have always liked, when I met him, I just liked that he was so, so honest,' Wilkins disclosed. 'He's exactly who he is all the time.' 'And, you know, we both are very patriotic,' she added. 'So obviously there are things there that we definitely agree on, but he's just the most honest, you know, most integrity I've really experienced in a person.'


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Trump's tariffs: both a political and an economic threat
Donald Trump's 1 August tariffs deadline did what it was always intended to do. It kept the markets and the nations guessing amid last-minute uncertainty. It attempted to reassert the global heft of the United States economy to take on and master all comers. And it placed President Trump at the centre of the media story, where he always insists on being. In the event, there were some last-minute agreements struck this week, few of them fair or rational in trade terms, most of them motivated by the desire to generate some commercial order. Some conflicts are still in the balance. There were 11th-hour court challenges too, disputing the president's very right to play the trade war game in this way. Even now, no one, probably including Mr Trump himself, knows whether this is his administration's last word on US tariffs. Almost certainly not. That's because Mr Trump's love of tariffs is always more about the assertion of political clout rather than economic power. Mr Trump's antipathy towards the European Union drives one example. The pact agreed by Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend underlines that the EU's aspirations as a global economic superpower exceed its actual clout. The EU could not prevent Mr Trump making European goods 15% more expensive if they sell on US markets. Nor could it stop Mr Trump getting EU tariffs on US goods withdrawn. Equally eloquent about the global balance of economic power is that Mr Trump has not been able to force China to bend the knee in the manner of the EU. China has responded aggressively to Trump's tariff threats, retaliating with tariffs of its own and blocking the sale of commodities, including rare-earth minerals, that the US most covets. Unsurprisingly, this standoff has not produced one of Mr Trump's so-called deals. Friday's deadline has been reset for later in the month. It would be no surprise if it was eventually pushed back further. Mr Trump is not imposing tariffs on the rest of the world in order to promote global trade or even to boost the US economy. He is doing it, in part, because Congress has delegated this power to him, allowing the president to impose or waive tariffs at will. He uses this power for many purposes. These include raising government income without congressional oversight and also, because tariffs are regressive, shifting the tax burden away from the very rich, like Mr Trump himself, on to the middle and working class. But economics also comes way down the field in the list of reasons why Mr Trump is wielding the tariff weapon internationally. US talks with Brazil – with which the US runs a trade surplus, not a deficit – have been hijacked by Mr Trump's grievance over the prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro for trying to overturn his 2022 election defeat. Talks with India are deadlocked because Mr Trump wants to penalise Delhi for buying energy and weapons from Russia. Those with Canada have been hit by Mr Trump's objections to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestine. The ultimate test of the policy, however, will indeed be economic. For now, financial markets appear to have decided that Mr Trump's tariffs are manageable. If tariffs now raise the cost of goods on US high streets, slowing growth and feeding inflation, as they may, the wider market response could change quickly. In that event, the mood among American voters might even shift too.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
China summons Nvidia over 'backdoor safety risks' in H20 chips
China 's cyberspace regulators on Thursday summoned Nvidia over security concerns that its H20 chips can be tracked and turned off remotely, the Cyberspace Administration of China said on its website. In the meeting, Chinese regulators demanded that the U.S. chip company provide explanations on 'backdoor safety risks' of its H20 chips to be sold in China and submit relevant materials, the office said. ' Cybersecurity is critically important to us. NVIDIA does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement to AP. It came just about two weeks after the Trump administration lifted the block on the computing chips and allowed Nvidia to resume sales of H20 chips to the Chinese market. Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, made the announcement with fanfare when he was in Beijing earlier this month. The latest episode appears to be another turbulence in the tech rivalry between the United States and China, which have left businesses in both countries tussling with governments over market access and national security concerns. Any safety concern by Beijing could jeopardize the sale of H20 chips in China. Citing unnamed U.S. AI experts, the Chinese regulators said Nvidia has developed mature technology to track, locate and remotely disable its computing chips. The regulators summoned Nvidia to 'safeguard the cybersecurity and data security of Chinese users,' in accordance with Chinese laws, the statement said. The statement also referred to a call by U.S. lawmakers to require tracking and locating capabilities on U.S. advanced chips sold overseas. In May, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R.-Michigan, and Rep. Bill Foster, D.-Illinois, introduced the Chip Security Act that would require high-end chips to be equipped with 'security mechanisms' to detect 'smuggling or exploitation.' The bill has not moved through Congress since its introduction. Foster, a trained physicist, then said, 'I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands.' The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. After the ban was lifted, Nvidia expected to sell hundreds of thousands more H20 chips in the Chinese market. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns". While chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100, 'they give (China) capabilities that its domestically-developed chipsets cannot,' the senators wrote. Shortly after the ban was lifted, Rep. John Moolenaar, R.-Michigan, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, objected. 'The Commerce Department made the right call in banning the H20. Now it must hold the line,' Moolenaar wrote in a letter to Lutnick. 'We can't let the CCP use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation," Moolenaar wrote, referring to the Chinese Communist Party by its acronym.