logo
Starmer has turned Labour into the most hated party in Britain

Starmer has turned Labour into the most hated party in Britain

Yahoo02-05-2025
Not in my lifetime has a political party been so deserving of a beating. By just six votes Labour has suffered a humiliating defeat in Runcorn. Keir Starmer didn't visit the constituency once during the campaign; now it's not hard to see why.
The usual caveats apply. There have been many such by-election successes for Liberals, Social Democrats and other smaller parties in the past. By-election results can rarely be extrapolated across the country. With no record to defend, Farage's party had the advantage.
But this was a seat won by Labour with a 14,696 majority last year and was the party's 49th-safest seat of the 411 secured in 2024. Keir Starmer's personal approval rating has plummeted; Labour has slipped behind Reform in polls. This time it could be different.
The Government's agenda for 'change' and its promises for 'growth' now lie in tatters. They've talked centrist but governed Left: hiking taxes and handing those revenues to public sector workers and Mauritius. They've raised the energy bills they pledged to lower, made enemies of farmers and small businesses, prompted an increase in unemployment and triggered bond market turmoil.
Perhaps worst of all, they've done nothing to bring down legal migration, whilst small boat crossings have reached record levels. Serco is now incentivising landlords to host those migrants, offering five-year guaranteed rent agreements with the taxpayer footing the bill. Few believe Yvette Cooper wants to bring down the numbers: we've just learned that benefits claims by refugee households have surged past £1 billion. Reform, by contrast, are unapologetically promising to leave the ECHR and settle zero illegal migrants here.
Millionaires are doing the rational thing and leaving. Private schools are closing, businesses are dishing out P45s. People are increasingly asking themselves what the point is of studying, striving, risk-taking if their hard work won't lead to a better life. Young people, one expert recently told a House of Lords Committee, don't want to get out of bed for less than £40,000. This isn't just idleness: our welfare and tax system is so dysfunctional that it barely pays to get entry-level jobs any more.
As if on autopilot, a Labour spokesman has responded to the by-election defeat by insisting the Government needs to 'move faster'. Like the snake oil salesman whose solution is to double the dose when the patient deteriorates, Starmer will stick doggedly to his high-tax, high-spend agenda. When the Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a £5 billion cut to disability benefits (which will still increase by more than £20 billion by 2030), it prompted a backlash from Labour MPs. They'd prefer Rachel Reeves brought in a wealth tax.
So long as Labour continue to believe that public spending drives growth, that Net Zero is the economic opportunity of the century, that all boat people are genuine asylum seekers, that GDP cannot expand without mass migration, that private enterprise is a predatory target to be shot not a horse pulling the wagon, Britain will continue to decline. However much the Government may utter platitudes about 'fixing foundations' and whinge about '14 years of Tory chaos', voters know who's really responsible. Four more long years.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact Check: Unpacking claim new Trump law automatically marries unwed couples after 5 years
Fact Check: Unpacking claim new Trump law automatically marries unwed couples after 5 years

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Unpacking claim new Trump law automatically marries unwed couples after 5 years

Claim: U.S. President Donald Trump signed a law effective Aug. 1, 2025, making couples who have been in a relationship for five years automatically legally married. Rating: In July 2025, a rumor circulated online that U.S. President Donald Trump signed a law effective Aug. 1, 2025, making couples who have been in a relationship for five years automatically legally married. "Trump just signed a bill effective Aug. 1 if u have been in a relationship for 5 years you legally married #cc," one Facebook post (archived) read. One TikTok video (archived) with the claim reached over 2.4 million views and 314,300 reactions, with a caption "Trump announced You are legally married if you are in a relationship for 5+ years." The rumor spread on multiple social media platforms such as Threads, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit. But there was no such law, nor was there any credible indication that Trump was proposing such a law in July 2025. No reputable news outlets, government websites, or official Trump statements supported this claim. What's more, marriage laws are primarily determined by individual states, not the federal government. Any such major federal legislation would have been widely reported by the press. Therefore, we have rated this claim as false. We contacted the White House for a comment, but a spokesperson declined to provide an on-the-record statement. No evidence of new Trump law on marriage A search on the White House website showed no mention of "marriage" between mid-June and mid-July 2025. Additionally, a Google search for "New Trump law all couples together 5 or more years are legally married" and similar search terms yielded only social media posts, with no credible news reports, government announcements or legal sources confirming such a law. If this claim were true, it would almost certainly have been widely covered by major news outlets, legal analysts, and official government channels, given the significant legal implications of automatically recognizing couples as legally married after five years. The rumor seemed to stem from a misunderstanding of common law marriage, a legal concept that exists in some U.S. states. Common law marriage recognizes couples as married without a formal ceremony or marriage license, but only if certain conditions are met, typically that the couple live together and present themselves as a married couple. Importantly, however, common law marriage does not "force" people to be married, but rather grants couples the legal recognition and protections of marriage if they meet specific criteria. As of this writing, there was no evidence that Trump's administration enacted or proposed any federal changes to common law marriage laws. Videos, both real and AI-generated, helped advance rumor The rumor likely originated from a July 5 TikTok video (archived) posted by the user @goldmiind18, who has shared multiple similar videos framed as breaking news about Trump announcing controversial legislation (see screenshot below). (TikTok user @goldmiind18) We contacted the user to ask about the origin of the story and to request the source of the information but as of this writing have not received a reply. In the video, the user claimed, "it's all over the news, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, world news, top news, national news, CNN, TMZ," and also stated that couples would be receiving marriage licenses in the mail. In reality, this was false and no news outlets reported such a development, as we have already explained. The rumor was later picked up by accounts sharing clearly AI-generated videos on the topic. While it remains unconfirmed who first originated the specific claim about a new Trump marriage law, similar ideas have circulated online for some time. For instance, in mid-June 2025 one X user wrote, "We would free so many people if common law marriage kicked in by default at the 5-year mark," reaching over 1.2 million views. (X user @webdevMason) Another post shared a similar sentiment: "This is why common-law marriage is a very good idea for women and children. I can't think of a case against it. Cohabiting for five years? Married. Men can't get all the benefits without the legal responsibilities." While these posts suggested support for the idea of automatic marriage after a certain period of cohabitation, they didn't provide evidence of any such policy proposal from Trump or any federal law. In 2016, NPR published an article titled, "No, You're Not In A Common-Law Marriage After 7 Years Together," addressing widespread misunderstandings about common law marriage. We have fact-checked similar claims regarding marriage law in the past. For instance, in 2022 we looked at claims that Tennessee Republicans supported a piece of legislation that would legalize child marriage. "Common Law Marriage." LII / Legal Information Institute, Accessed 18 Jul. 2025. Glenn, Heidi. "No, You're Not In A Common-Law Marriage After 7 Years Together." NPR, 4 Sep. 2016. NPR, MacGuill, Dan. "Would a Proposed Tennessee Law 'Legalize Child Marriage'?" Snopes, 5 Apr. 2022, "Which States Recognize Common Law Marriage?" Accessed 18 Jul. 2025.

Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders
Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders

Sir Keir Starmer will co-chair a meeting with pro-Ukraine allies on Wednesday after a call with US President Donald Trump and European leaders about ending the war. Sir Keir will join a virtual call at midday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. They will then be joined by Mr Trump and US vice president JD Vance. Later, the Prime Minister will co-chair a Coalition of the Willing meeting to update wider partners on the day's discussions. The Coalition of the Willing is an international effort to support Ukraine towards a lasting peace, led by the UK, France and Ukraine. It is made up of 31 countries that have pledged strengthened support for Kyiv, including 27 European countries, as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan. Ahead of Wednesday's call, a Downing Street spokesperson said: 'The Prime Minister remains absolutely focused on a solution to this conflict grounded in Ukraine's national interests. 'He is determined to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, backed by robust and credible security guarantees that will deter Russia from threatening Ukraine in future.' This comes ahead of the expected meeting between Mr Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. The two leaders are set to meet to discuss the future of the Kremlin's invasion, without the presence of Mr Zelensky. The Ukrainian President said at a news briefing on Tuesday that Mr Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that Kyiv controls as part of a ceasefire deal. This was conveyed to him by US officials, Mr Zelensky explained. However, he reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls because it is unconstitutional and would only serve as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. Mr Trump has also signalled he thinks Ukraine might need to cede territory in order to end the conflict, stating there is likely to be 'some land-swapping going on'. Speaking during a lengthy press conference on Monday, Mr Trump pledged to 'try to get back' some of Ukraine's 'oceanfront property' from Russia. He said: 'We're going to change the lines, the battle lines. Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine. 'They have taken largely – in real estate we call it oceanfront property. That's always the most valuable property.' A statement released by the European Union on Tuesday read: 'A just and lasting peace that brings stability and security must respect international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and that international borders must not be changed by force. 'The people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. 'Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities.' In response, Mr Zelensky said on X (formerly Twitter): 'I am grateful to the leaders of Europe for their clear support for our independence, territorial integrity, and precisely such an active approach to diplomacy that can help end this war with a dignified peace. 'Indeed, We all support President Trump's determination, and together we must shape positions that will not allow Russia to deceive the world once again. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations. 'In such circumstances, it is important that the unity of the world is not threatened. 'As long as they continue the war and the occupation, all of us together must maintain our pressure – the pressure of strength, the pressure of sanctions, the pressure of diplomacy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store