Proposal to allow 2,160 new liquor shops put on hold after Shiv Sena objects
The bid to increase liquor shops in the state, however, was immediately opposed by Shiv Sena ministers, citing the possibility of a backlash from the people and social activists. Ajit then offered to reduce the number to 360 shops but was still opposed by Sena ministers, following which chief minister Devendra Fadnavis put the proposal on hold.
The state government committee, set up in January and headed by Valsa Nair, had proposed one licence per district to each of the 60 distilleries in the state. The liquor-manufacturing companies currently get a licence for one liquor shop, and since new licences have not been issued for over five decades, the excise department opted for the indirect route of issuing new licences to liquor-manufacturing units only.
When the proposal came up for discussion, tourism minister and Shiv Sena leader Shambhuraj Desai, who was excise minister in the previous government, strongly opposed it. Other Sena ministers joined him, pointing out that a similar proposal brought in by Desai during the Eknath Shinde government's tenure, was opposed by Ajit Pawar's party which cited the possibility of a public backlash.
Currently, there are 1,700 liquor licences for Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) and over 3,500 for country liquor in existence in Maharashtra. Owing to opposition from social activists and citizens, the government has not issued new licences since 1972. 'The excise department has been citing the licence auction system practised in other states, including Uttar Pradesh to back up its proposal,' said a senior minister. 'However, the state government, fearing a public backlash, has been deferring it. This time, therefore, the department suggested issuing licences only to liquor-manufacturing units.'
Following the Sena's opposition, Ajit Pawar sought to change the proposal to offering one shop licence for each of the six revenue divisions of the state. This would mean about 360 new liquor shops. Although this was also opposed by Sena ministers, the proposal has not been cancelled but merely put on hold.
The Valsa Nair committee has also recommended a slew of other measures to boost the liquor-manufacturing and consumption sector. It has recommended the adoption of several 'ease of doing business' measures such as doing away with stringent provisions such as the mandatory approval of a superintendent-rank officer for beer dispensers installed in permit rooms. It has recommended the promotion of wine, which right now sells a meagre 10 million litres per year in the total annual liquor sales of over 1,110 million litres.
The committee has also recommended proper coordination between the excise and goods & services tax departments to plug the evasion of value-added tax (VAT). 'The GST department levies 10% VAT on the sale of liquor in permit rooms,' said an excise department official. 'Our department claims that the sales figures of permit rooms are underdeclared, leading to a VAT loss of 50% or ₹600 crore per year. The committee has recommended better coordination and sharing of the data of sales with the excise department to plug the evasion of VAT by permit rooms.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
BJP MLC slams cow vigilantes, says anti-slaughter Act is against farmers
Days after Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar held a meeting with top police officials on the growing menace of gaurakshaks (self-styled cow vigilantes), ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLC and farmer leader Sadabhau Khot on Sunday said that the Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2015, that prevents the slaughter of cow, bulls and bullocks is against farmers. Speaking to The Indian Express, Khot said, 'Let's be very clear. No farmer would part ways with productive cows. Dairy is a supplementary business of lakhs of farmers in the state. The earning from this is now being spent on taking care of unproductive animals as transfer of these animals is not only banned but under threat from these so-called gaurakshaks. The Act (against cow slaughter) is actually turning against farmers…' About cow vigilantism in the state, he said, 'These gaurakshaks resort to extortion from genuine farmers and traders, bringing the transport of animals to a complete standstill.' Khot, a farmer leader from western Maharashtra's Sangli district, said that as a farmer leader he feels that if the present act (to prevent cow slaughter) threatens the livelihood of farmers, then it should be 'torn apart'. 'This (the act) is not even helping desi cows as those are getting replaced by Jersey cows. The transfer of newer breeds from different states has totally stopped due to fear of these cow vigilantes. The so-called gaushalas (cow shelters promoted by the state government) should pay the market price to farmers for unproductive cows and must come forward to rescue the farmers,' he said, adding that he was 'ready to pay any price' for his stand. Last week, The Indian Express had reported that Deputy Chief Minister and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Ajit Pawar held a meeting with top police officials in the state over the demands raised by the Qureishi community, which has been complaining against cow vigilantes who allegedly beat up and extort money from animal traders. Following the meeting, state police issued a circular, clarifying that private individuals have no authority to inspect vehicles that transport animals but only police can act against them. Terming the circular issued by Maharashtra police an eyewash, Maharashtra Congress spokesperson Sachin Sawant said, 'The circular says that only police can take action against illegal animal trade. But it does not say what action will be taken against the private individuals if they are take law in their hands? The majority of these so called cow vigilantes are linked to BJP and RSS and this issue is used for the politics of polarisation.'
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Maharashtra BJP MLA's swipe at Eknath Shinde: ‘Won political lottery'
Maharashtra forest minister and BJP MLA Ganesh Naik has said that Shiv Sena leader Eknath Shinde had won a 'lottery', apparently referring to his appointment as chief minister in 2022. Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis and deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde during the inauguration of the final 76-km-long stretch of the Samruddhi Mahamarg in Nashik district of Maharashtra on June 5.(PTI) "Eknath Shinde (current deputy CM) had won a lottery. Not everyone has to win the lottery, but Shinde won it. However, what matters is how a person achieves a position and retains it, and common people observe this," Naik said at a bhoomi pujan ceremony on Friday, according to PTI. This is not the first time Naik has targeted Shinde. In July, Naik had alleged that outsiders were exploiting Navi Mumbai's resources, without naming Shinde, the guardian minister of Thane district. According to PTI, Shiv Sena had hit back by accusing Naik of trying to deflect attention from his own long-standing hold over the city's affairs. Shinde toppled the Uddhav Thackeray-led Maha Vikas Aghadi government in June 2022 and became the chief minister. Also Read | 'File War': Proposals stuck as Shinde-Fadnavis turf war intensifies However, in 2024, he had to make way for Devendra Fadnavis after the BJP won a maximum number of seats in the assembly elections and settle for the post of deputy chief ministership. Earlier this week, Shinde had skipped a Maharashtra cabinet meeting on Tuesday, fuelling speculation that he continues to be upset with the Devendra Fadnavis-led government. While Shiv Sena leaders downplayed the matter, saying Shinde had extended his stay in Srinagar, where he had gone for a blood donation campaign organised on Sunday by party functionary Chandrahar Patil, opposition parties alleged the deputy chief minister skipped the cabinet meeting due to disagreements within the Mahayuti government. HT reported in February that Shinde had skipped two meetings chaired by chief minister Fadnavis concerning the urban development department, which is headed by the Shiv Sena chief. Back then, Shinde was reportedly upset with Fadnavis for several reasons, including being denied the chief minister's post in Mahayuti 3.0. Since then, the senior BJP leader had seized every opportunity to assert his authority over the Shiv Sena chief.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Indian spirit makers flag discrimination against foreign brands by states' excise policies
Indian spirit makers have raised concerns over alleged discriminations by several states, saying their excise polices are biased in favour of imported alcoholic beverages as compared to domestic brands including those with global recognitions. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency The Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies (CIABC) has approached several state governments pointing that anomalies in their excise policies put the Indian spirit manufacturers at a disadvantage compared to their foreign counterparts. The Indian brands face "exorbitantly high brand registration fees" compared to imported BIO (bottled in origin), hampering product entry in a number of states, said CIABC, which is an apex body of Indian alcoholic beverage makers. The industry body further said that with new free trade agreements coming into effect, the customs duty is going to be reduced further on BIO products , and the prevalent high excise duties by the state government on the Indian premium brands will make the home-grown industry "less competitive". "Ironically, when Indian premium and luxury brands are winning accolades across the globe, they face taxation hurdles and discrimination in duties in the domestic market. Such discrimination in favour of imported products over comparable Indian products belies the Prime Minister Narendra Modi's call for an ' Atmanirbhar Bharat '," said CIABC. Live Events BIO refers to those whiskies/spirits which are bottled in their country of origin and imported into India with their branding and packaging. This discrimination in the excise policy is in around dozen states. It's highest in the large alcoholic beverage-consuming states like Maharashtra, Delhi, Kerala, Haryana, besides states like Odisha, Assam, and Madhya Pradesh, among others. CIABC has been "writing to various state governments flagging various anomalies in their excise policies which put Indian spirits manufacturers at a disadvantage compared to their foreign counterparts, which import various brands", it added. In Maharashtra, the excise duty imposed on IMFL (India made foreign liquor) players is double than that on BIO. Until 2021 the Maharashtra government used to charge 300 per cent excise duty on BIO products, which was reduced to half in 2021, whereas IMFL continues to pay 300 per cent excise duty. "This reduced duty has led to surge in BIO sales (from 5,000 cases per month in 2021 to 42,000 cases per month in 2024). This has given BIO products an unfair edge over domestic brands and has also led to a reduction in state revenue due to a fall in sales of IMFL. High duties on Indian premium brands make them less competitive," said CIABC Director General Anant S Iyer. After a reduction in duty on BIO, growth in premium IMFL sales has dropped to 6 per cent in FY24 from 24 per cent in FY23. Giving an example, the association said in Maharashtra, a case (12 bottles of the standard 750ml) of Amrut Fusion (a premium Indian single malt whisky) has to pay Rs 6,799 as excise duty, while duty in each case of JW Black Label (blended scotch whisky) is Rs 4,785. Similarly in Delhi, imported brands have to pay a lower fee and taxes to sell their products compared to their IMFL competitors. "While an Indian producer has to shell out anywhere between Rs 8 lakh to Rs 25 lakh to register and sell one brand, for BIO products, this fee is just Rs 15 lakh for 5 spirit brands (Rs 3 lakh per brand). Similar is the case for BIO wines versus wines produced in India. Indian wines face higher taxes and registration fee compared to imported brands," CIABC said. For IMFL, the Delhi government charges Rs 25 lakh per brand for all whisky and rum, Rs 15 lakh for beer, Rs 12 lakh for rum, gin, vodka, Rs 8 lakh for brandy, and Rs 2 lakh for wine etc. "New Indian brands, particularly premium, luxury, niche products, face prohibitive costs, thus hampering their entry. There are several premium Indian single malts, which are popular in other states and also overseas, which have stayed away from Delhi due to the exorbitant registration fee," says Iyer. In Kerala, discrimination between IMFL and BIO brands exists in "excise duty, sales tax, retail margin, cash discounts, and STN charges (special transfer note)," the association alleged. IMFL products face a heavy tax burden due to higher excise duty, sales tax, cash discounts (both on GTN & STN) and also the retail margin, it said. "On the other hand, BIO brands enjoy much lower taxation and levies, thus pushing their sales due to the fact that the MRPs of BIO brands are much cheaper than Indian premium brands for the similar supply prices," said CIABC.
