Section 122 (5A) ITO: Power granted to IR commissioners is not without boundaries: ATIR
The ATIR emphasised that the scope of investigation and inquiry under this provision is not open-ended, and must operate within clearly defined restrictions and limitations.
In a strongly worded observation, the ATIR remarked that 'justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics and rationality,' asserting that unchecked investigative authority undermines both the legal process and individual freedoms.
ATIR further stated that the investigative proceedings under the cited provision 'suffer not only from the vice of excessive delegation of legislative authority but also amount to a patent violation of fundamental rights and constitutional guarantees.' The ruling criticised the absence of adequate safeguards and procedural clarity, arguing that this lack opens the door to arbitrary use of power.
Tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt says this judgment could set a precedent for future challenges to administrative overreach and highlight the growing need for a balance between state authority and individual constitutional protections. The decision is being welcomed as a reaffirmation of the principles of due process and rule of law.
ATIR order stated: 'under Section 122(5A) the scope of investigation and inquiry is not open ended without any restrictions and limitations. Matter of enquiries and fishing and roving inquiries is to be seen in the context of two mandatory prescribed conditions referred in the provision of law.
Enquiries cannot be conducted without the presence of twin criteria of 'erroneous & prejudicial to interest of revenue' otherwise there would be no difference between (Regular Audit) Section 177 & (Amendment of assessment) Section 122(5A). Verification of any factual controversy is obviously out of purview of section 122(5A) and requires conduct of audit (if any) under section 177.
Creation of tax demand under the umbrella of Section 122(5A) is a blunt violation. There is no concept of 'unfettered discretion' in the fiscal laws and arbitrary exercise of discretionary powers has to be struck down. Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics and rationality, impugned order merits, cancellation, ATIR order added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
FBR procurement plan: IHC-ordered automated IT refund system missing
ISLAMABAD: Despite assurance from Member (Policy) Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), Islamabad High Court's landmark judgment for effective enforcement of an automated income tax refund system under Section 170A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 has not been implemented and no provision has been provided in the annual procurement plan released by the FBR. The court's directive aimed to facilitate taxpayers and minimise interaction with tax functionaries when there is an issue of returning taxpayer money in the shape of refund, but the FBR has failed to take concrete steps in this regard. It is reliably learnt that a landmark order issued by IHC remained unimplemented by the FBR despite lapse of considerable time. Automated income tax refund system: FBR has failed to enforce IHC's directive When contacted tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt who has argued the case before IHC told Business Recorder that a report titled 'Findings and Recommendations of Committee for Effective Enforcement of Section 170A' was submitted to the IHC, outlining comprehensive recommendations for implementation. However, despite assurances from Member (Policy) FBR that these recommendations would be implemented, no progress has been made till date. Waheed Butt further added that FBR's inaction is particularly surprising given the government's efforts to digitize tax processes. The failure to implement the automated refund system as directed by the IHC raises concerns about the FBR's commitment to transparency and efficiency. The FBR's lack of progress on this front is a missed opportunity to streamline tax processes and improve the overall taxpayer experience. This will not only enhance transparency and efficiency but also demonstrate the FBR's commitment to upholding the rule of law and respecting the directives of the judiciary, Waheed added. IHC order states: 'The FBR has submitted a report. The report and recommendations appear fairly comprehensive, and the Member (Policy) FBR appearing today has stated that these recommendations will be implemented in accordance with the USD 25 million loan from an international donor agency.' The objective of this petition seems to have been achieved. The petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the Court again if the recommendations are not implemented, the IHC ordered. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
Rental commercial property: Question arises on legality of taxation by Punjab govt
ISLAMABAD: A question has been raised on the legality of taxation of rental commercial property by the provincial government of Punjab in cases where the same income is already taxed at the federal level, reflecting double taxation. A review of Punjab Sales Tax on Commercial Property by Muhammad Asif Asgher Attorney-at-Law, former Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue/ former Member, Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) revealed that Punjab's move to tax commercial rentals reflects the broader post-Eighteenth Amendment trend of provincial revenue expansion. However, the constitutional boundaries of such powers- especially where the same income stream is already federally taxed- remains unsettled. The eventual judicial outcome will determine whether this revenue measure becomes a permanent fixture or another short-lived experiment. Muhammad Asif Asgher stated that the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 brought sweeping changes, the most significant being the omission of the Concurrent Legislative List from the Fourth Schedule. Prior to the amendment, the Federal Legislative List (FLL) contained subjects under exclusive federal competence (Article 142), while the Concurrent List allowed both the Federation and Provinces to legislate. With the deletion of the Concurrent List, legislative power over its subjects was devolved to the provinces. In addition, certain subjects were removed from the FLL itself. Notably, Clause 49 was amended to read: 'Taxes on the sale and purchase of goods imported, exported, produced, manufactured and consumed (except sales tax on services).' This seemingly small bracketed phrase empowered provinces to levy sales tax on services, creating a significant new revenue stream. Tax expert said that following the Eighteenth Amendment, provinces quickly established their own frameworks for taxing services. Punjab enacted the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012, and Sindh passed the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011. A key drafting challenge was defining 'services' broadly enough to capture emerging transactions. Section 2(38) of the Punjab Act states: 'Service' or 'services' means anything which is not goods or the providing of which is not a supply of goods, and shall include but not be limited to the services listed in the First [or Second] Schedule. This open-ended definition- whether borrowed from India's GST or developed locally — ensured that almost any activity outside the definition of 'goods' could be taxed. Traditionally, a 'service' involves the application of human effort or skill for another's benefit. However, Sindh was first to extend this to letting out of immovable property, reasoning that it did not involve the supply of goods. Amendments were made to include this within the definition of 'service,' and the Sindh Revenue Board began issuing tax notices to landlords. The Sindh High Court, in 2019 PTD 389, faced constitutional and interpretive challenges to taxing immovable property rentals. Rather than directly ruling whether such letting constituted a 'service,' the Court focused on Section 4 (1) (b) of the Sindh Act, which referred only to 'movable property' in defining 'economic activity.' The Court inferred that immovable property was excluded. The Supreme Court, in 2023 PTCL 96, dismissed the Sindh Government's appeal with a single-line observation: 'The mere renting out of property by a landlord to a tenant is not taxable as it is not a taxable service.' Notably, the Court gave no reasoning, leaving the constitutional question open and arguably outside the binding scope of Article 189. Former Member Appellate Tribunal stated both Sindh and Punjab amended their laws to explicitly include immovable property in 'economic activity.' Punjab's change came via the Finance Act, 2018 (effective 1 November 2018). However, Punjab delayed taxing such rentals until Finance Act, 2025, which revised the First Schedule: (i); Exempt: dwellings rented for non-commercial use. (ii); Taxable: dwellings and other immovable property rented for commercial use. The Punjab Revenue Authority has since begun issuing notices to landlords for registration and tax payment. Landlords argued they are already paying income tax on rental income and that this dual taxation is impermissible. One possible ground, relying on 2017 PTD 1 (Pakistan International Freight Forwarders), is that post-Eighteenth Amendment there is no concurrent taxing power: a single taxable event cannot be subject to both federal and provincial levies. Another round of constitutional litigation appears inevitable, Muhammad Asif Asgher added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
05-08-2025
- Business Recorder
Arrest in ST fraud cases: FBR IR officers empowered to exercise civil court powers
ISLAMABAD: The Inland Revenue officers of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) have been empowered to exercise the powers of civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to arrest persons involved in sales tax fraud. According to sales tax circular number 02 of 2025-26 issued by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), a new sub-section (4) in Section 37 has been inserted in the Sales Tax Act to empower the officer of Inland Revenue to exercise the powers of civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Power to inquire and investigate sales tax frauds and procedure for arrest: Through Finance Act, 2025, powers and procedure of inquiry and investigation in cases of sales tax fraud and other offences warranting prosecution under sales tax act have been streamlined. Under the new framework, the Officer of Inland Revenue can initiate inquiry only after obtaining approval of Commissioner on the basis of material evidence pointing to commission of tax fraud or other offence warranting prosecution. After completion of inquiry and after providing an opportunity of being heard to the accused, Officer shall present inquiry report to the Commissioner who shall then decide to either close the inquiry or allow further investigation. In the case of approval of investigation, officer shall be required to complete investigation within three months and submit report before Special Judge for prosecution. The subsections (8) and (9) of Section 37A regarding arrest shall only be applied when investigation under subsection (6) of this section has been initiated & warrant of arrest under subsection (8) of Section 37A may be issued only after approval by a committee comprising of three members of the FBR as may be notified by the Chairman and that too only in the cases where fraud involves amount exceeding Rs. 50 million and nature of the fraud falls within the ambit of any of the first six sub-clauses of the clause (37) of Section 2, which are reproduced as under: (a) Using or preparing false, forged, and fictitious documents, including returns, statements, annexure, and invoices. (b) False claim of input tax credit based on fictitious transactions. (c) Issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods. (d) Tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained under this Act or the rules made there-under. (e) Generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexure. (f) Making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier; and when the fraud amount exceeds Rs. 50 Million. Additional pre-conditions which can compel the officer to seek approval for arrest are: (i) The accused may tamper with documents. (ii) The accused may abscond. (iii) The accused does not help investigations despite three served notices. Further, the power to compound an offence warranting prosecution has been provided where Commissioner can compound the offence if the person pays the amount of tax evaded along with default surcharge and penalty. The warrant of arrest from judge under subsection (9) of Section 37A may be obtained primarily in the sales tax frauds which are heinous or material including fake and flying invoices. Under this subsection, the following pre-conditions shall also apply as is the case of arrest under subsection (8) of section 37A. (i) The accused may tamper with documents. (ii) The accused may abscond. (iii) The accused does not help investigations despite three served notices. In addition to that, the board will separately notify the detailed procedure, preconditions and restrictions through an STGO for the smooth operation of subsections (8) and (9) of Section 37A. Through the substitution of Section 37A, sufficient safeguards have been introduced and multiple approvals are required at inquiry stage, as well as, investigations stage to prevent the misuse of the provisions of prosecution. The provisions of this section also state that the intent of the prosecution proceedings is not to recover the revenue but to create deterrence against the sales tax frauds. Section 378 has been substituted by further elaborating the procedure to be followed on arrest of a person and producing the accused person before the court of law for further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Act as well as the code of criminal procedure. Finance Act, 2025 - Explanation regarding important Amendments made in Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act 2005. Prior to Finance Act, 2025 provisions of the STA did not include or define the role of an 'abettor' in a tax fraud, who facilitates or connives with the tax fraudsters to evade the sales tax. The term 'abettor' and his/ her role have now been defined to expand the scope of tax fraud, and punishment for the abetment of tax fraud has also been introduced, FBR added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
