Driver seriously hurt as vehicle crashes into house
Photo:
RNZ / Jimmy Ellingham
The driver of a car that crashed into a house in Palmerston North has been taken to hospital with serious injuries.
The vehicle crashed on the corner of Russell and Titoki streets, in the central city, about 7.10pm on Thursday.
A police spokesperson said only one car was involved, and there were no road closures.
No arrests have been made and police inquiries into what happened were continuing.
On Friday morning wooden boards had been nailed up to cover the damage to the house, while a piece of the property's fence was missing.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
7 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Vehicles stolen after NZTA database breach
Photo: RNZ A privacy breach exposed the details of nearly 1000 people in an NZ Transport Agency database over the course of 12 months. The agency said the breach was suspected to have resulted in at least 13 vehicles being targeted for theft. It admitted the problem to RNZ after one of the people affected contacted RNZ. The agency said the problem involved the agency's Motochek system, which allowed registered users to electronically access information held on the Motor Vehicle Register. "NZTA became aware of the breach in May 2025, via a customer complaint and through police as a part of an ongoing investigation. We determined that the unauthorised access resulted from the Motocheck account of an ex-employee of Auckland Auto Collections Ltd being used to access people's names and addresses from the MVR," it said in a statement. "To date we have determined that names and addresses of 951 people were accessed improperly over the 12 months to May 2025, and that at least 13 of these vehicles are suspected to have been targeted for theft." The agency said it was contacting potentially affected people to advise them of the breach, update them on actions being taken to address the situation, and to provide support and advice to address their concerns. "We have sincerely apologised to those affected for the inconvenience and distress caused by the breach," it said. NZTA said it was also assisting police with their investigations of the breach and vehicles which might have been targeted for theft. It had also notified the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. NZTA said it had systems and processes to protect people's privacy, including the terms and conditions which authorised users were expected to meet if they accessed the register. "Work is underway to improve the protection of personal information within our registers, with a priority to address risks of harm. This work will involve improvements across policy, contractual, operational and digital aspects of register access," it said. A person affected by the breach was told in a message from NZTA that their full name and address were accessed last year. "We have been unable to confirm the reason why your name and address was accessed. If you feel that your personal safety is at risk, we encourage you to contact NZ Police directly," the message said.
RNZ News
7 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Murder defence team claim shots fired at Hori Gage were intended to intimidate, not kill him
By Jeremy Wilkinson, Open Justice reporter of Robert Richards (left) and Royden Haenga are jointly charged with the murder of Hori Gage. Photo: NZ Herald / Jeremy Wilkinson The lawyer for a Black Power member accused of shooting a man in front of his family says the accused man only wanted to scare and intimidate Hori Gage, not to kill him. Royden Haenga and Robert Richards are facing trial for the murder of Gage, whom the two Black Power members allegedly killed in retaliation for an attack on one of their local presidents several days earlier. However, Gage, who was a member of the Mongrel Mob, was part of a different chapter and hadn't been involved in the earlier incident at all. It's the Crown's case that Richards and Haenga were driving around Palmerston North on Sunday, 6 August, 2023, armed with guns and searching for revenge. Richards denies being there at all, while Haenga admits he was in the car and admits shooting at Gage, but claims he didn't mean to kill him. Defence lawyer Scott Jefferson partly quoted his client's words in his closing address in the High Court at Palmerston North this morning when he said: "Ladies and gentlemen, it was a f***ing sh*tshow that shouldn't have happened, but it wasn't Royden Haenga's sh*tshow." During a police interview, Haenga had described the situation on 6 August in those words. Later in that same interview, Haenga claimed he was "... just trying to intimidate him, not kill the c*nt". "Who plans or who wants a sh*tshow? No one does," Jefferson put to the jury this morning. "This is the whole point of Mr Haenga's case." Jefferson said Haenga didn't plan the murder, and the person in the back seat of the car acted alone and unscripted. The Crown alleges Richards was the man in the back seat and that he got out, advanced on Gage and shot him five times while he sat in his car with his family. A third man in the car, who was driving, Neihana Cunningham, has already pleaded guilty to manslaughter, and Jefferson said that whoever the back seat passenger was, he was primarily to blame. "There is a huge distinction between what Neihana Cunningham and Royden Haenga did and what the guy in the back seat did," Jefferson said, noting that Haenga had been shooting low, not trying to hit Gage. "What the person in the back seat did to Mr Gage was an execution, but it was an entirely unscripted and unassisted act from Mr Haenga's point of view." Following a violent depatching and stabbing of a local Black Power president on 4 August, the Crown says a national call to arms went out to other chapters of the gang. The Crown says Richards travelled from Hawke's Bay with other Black Power associates in response to that call to arms and got into a car with Haenga, looking for someone from the Mongrel Mob as a target. Richards' lawyer, William Hawkins, centred his closing address on the credibility of what he described as "self-interested" Crown witnesses. "Only one person formally identifies him as the shooter," Hawkins said, referring to a sole witness who was granted name suppression at the trial. Hawkins centred on this witness' first interview with police, in which he lies about his involvement in terms of driving Haenga out to a Black Power address known as "The Farm", and then leaving with him and another man whom he later identified from a police montage as being Richards. Hawkins accused the witness of wanting to "have his cake and eat it too" by claiming he wasn't in the car, but was also able to identify Richards. Hawkins also suggested that the witness was in the car when Gage was shot. Also under fire in Hawkins' closing address was Cunningham, whom he said was perilously close to sitting in the dock next to Richards and Haenga as an accessory to murder. "But he had a change of heart," Hawkins said, referring to Cunningham's decision to plead guilty to manslaughter for his role as the getaway driver of the car after Gage was shot. Hawkins said Cunningham was doing everything he could to reduce his sentence, including giving evidence against Richards and Haenga at the "11th hour" before the trial. Finally, Hawkins said that while there was CCTV that placed Richards around Palmerston North leading up to the murder, there was none that placed him at The Farm, nor any cellphone polling data. Crown prosecutor Guy Carter summarised several weeks of Crown evidence for the jury on Tuesday, including police surveillance, phone polling data, and testimony from multiple witnesses. A key Crown witness, who has name suppression, admitted driving Haenga to a known Black Power address in Palmerston North roughly 40 minutes before the murder. That witness, who is not a Black Power member, then drove away with Haenga and another person he later identified to police as Richards, before stopping at another address where he got out and Cunningham got in to drive. It was Cunningham's evidence that, as he was driving along Croydon Ave, it was Haenga who told him to turn around as they drove past Gage and his family sitting in their car in the driveway. Carter said CCTV footage places Haenga's white Nissan Teana driving towards The Farm shortly before the murder, and more footage shows it speeding away from the scene of the crime on Croydon Ave on 6 August, 2023. In that footage, gunshots can be heard and Gage's partner, Amethyst Tukaki, and her three children can be heard screaming in the aftermath. Carter referenced forensic evidence heard in the trial showing that, in total, nine bullets were fired from two guns. Six of them struck Gage. Five of them, the Crown says, were fired by Richards, while the sixth, which struck Gage in the arm, was allegedly from Haenga. "You've heard the shooting and the audio," Carter said, "He was shot six times in front of his family, while he sat defenceless and unprotected in his vehicle." Carter said it was clear that Richards was the third person in the car, and that there was an overwhelming amount of evidence to support that. However, Carter said that Haenga facilitated the murder to the point it couldn't have happened without him by supplying the car, the local knowledge and the driver. The prosecutor also said Haenga deliberately shot at Gage, and had brought a gun he knew was loaded, which he aimed at the other man and squeezed the trigger. Carter said that while, yes, Gage was a member of the Mongrel Mob, he was also a family man and a father to four children, and he'd had nothing to do with the gang violence from days earlier. "But he was the one who paid the perverse price that was demanded for it. "A man they didn't even know personally, but they chose to kill him because he was associated with the wrong gang on the wrong weekend." Carter said the several-week-long trial had been about holding the two shooters accountable. "What they did does amount to an execution," he said. "It was targeted, it was a callous, it was cold-blooded." Justice Helen McQueen will sum up the case for the jury on Thursday morning, before they are sent out to deliberate. - This story was first published by NZ Herald.
Otago Daily Times
37 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Thousands of shoplifting complaints not investigated across NZ
By Sam Sherwood of RNZ More than 5000 complaints of shoplifting below $500 were not forwarded for investigation while a controversial police directive was in place, documents released to RNZ reveal. RNZ earlier revealed a directive was sent to staff relating to police's File Management Centre (FMC) titled 'Assignment Changes - Theft and Fraud'. The directive said FMC was applying "nationally standardised value thresholds" when assessing theft and fraud files. The value thresholds were: General theft $200, petrol drive off $150, shoplifting $500, fraud (PayWave, online, scam etc) $1000, and all other fraud $500. "When assessing files with these offences, you will apply the relevant value threshold and file any file under that threshold regardless of any lines of enquiry or IFA score," it said. Following the revelations Police Commissioner Richard Chambers canned the directive, which he called "confusing and unhelpful" following significant backlash. On Wednesday, RNZ was released a series of documents from police under the Official Information Act. Among the documents was a tally of shoplifting complaints under $500 during the period the directive was in place. It revealed there were 5454 complaints of shoplifting that were not assigned for investigation. In Auckland, only 73 of 927 complaints were assigned, in Canterbury 192 of 742, Wellington 131 of 694. Chambers earlier said he was unaware of the directive until RNZ revealed it. A staffer from the police minister's office emailed Chambers on the evening of 26 May about an RNZ article on the memo. "It would be helpful if we could get some clarity as to what the policy actually is and clear up the messaging around this," the email said. Chambers replied that he had liaise with Rachael Bambery, the executive director of service, victims and resolutions and asked for a briefing to him and the Minister's office to "sort the messaging out". "For the record the messaging about not following up shoplifting complaints under a certain threshold is not correct and unhelpful. A range of information is taken into account when assessing complaints and this will inform what Police does. "We have seen very effective approaches to retail crime in locations such as Tauranga and Gisborne which set the standard in terms of what is achievable, irrespective of threshold." Shortly after another email from a parliamentary email asked to be looped into any communications being sent about the limits on investigating shoplifting. "We can see there's a bit of traction tonight." Chambers replied: "I don't agree with the content, and we need to provide some reassurance and better messaging to retail sector". The following morning Chambers released a statement and said the memo did not meet his expectations on retail crime. The directive Also in the OIA is a document titled 'Service Group Continuous Improvement Project' dated January 2025. The document said to provide a more "efficient and consistent service and to meet increasing demand", the FMC was moving from a regional model to a national model. "This will allow the FMC workload to be triaged, prioritised and actioned by FMC staff across the country, rather than the FMC staff physically based within Districts." The process for assigning volume crime files was "inefficient, with avoidable time delays and double handling". Volume crime cases made up 62 per cent of daily reports, of which 70 per cent were theft, fraud and burglary. It was proposed that the FMC and 105-non emergency teams would assign volume crime cases based on the solvability only, with "streamlined assignment rules" across the Districts. "By standardising processes like assignment rules, FMC can move towards utilising its workforce more efficiently, freeing up capacity to do higher value and higher priority services." The document included the proposed value thresholds. The value thresholds were: General theft $200, petrol drive off $150, shoplifting $500, fraud (PayWave, online, scam etc) $1000, and all other fraud $500. On March 17, Superintendent Blair MacDonald sent the email earlier revealed by RNZ that from 26 March the thresholds would be in place. The documents include an email from 7 April revealing the number of files being assigned for investigation since the rules were put in place 12 days earlier. In the email, the police adviser, said Wellington had the biggest change from an average of 60 per day to an average of 30. The numbers were being compared to baseline data over a 47-day period before the threshold was put into place. During the same period Auckland City had a 26 per cent decrease, Counties Manukau 21 per cent, Eastern 38 per cent, Central 42 per cent and Canterbury 13 per cent. Waikato had a 2.7 per cent increase, which the staffer said was due to filed being reassigned and appearing twice. 'Unable to investigate further' The OIA also includes a template that had been created to send to victims whose crimes did not meet the threshold. The email thanked the victims for reporting their crime but said they "regret to advise, at this time, Police is unable to investigate further". "While we would like to resolve all matters to our victims' complete satisfaction, there are occasions where we cannot. "Investigations are prioritised using a range of factors including legal timeframes and the likelihood of a successful conviction." The email said police appreciated this may be "frustrating and upsetting" to hear, "particularly if you reported the incident recently or provided lines of enquiry". "We will however review your case if our ability to resolve this matter changes." Police Minister Mark Mitchell told RNZ he was "pleased that the Police Commissioner moved quickly to clarify Police's position, initiate a review of relevant cases, and reassure the retail sector and the public that Police will continue to enforce the law with their usual discretion". Review under way Police earlier launched a review to establish how many cases of retail crime were filed while the controversial directive was in place. A police spokesperson earlier confirmed to RNZ the national value threshold applied to the prioritisation of lower-level theft and fraud offences was being removed. "A review is being completed on any cases that may have been impacted by those thresholds to assess whether they should be assigned to districts for follow-up," the spokesperson said. The review will be done by police's data quality team. "Police want to reassure that cases will continue to be managed locally balancing demand, resources and priorities to ensure the best possible service to victims in those communities." Rachael Bambery, Executive Director Service, Victims, Resolutions said it was not correct to assume that all the closures were due to the monetary thresholds for early case closure. Some may have had no information or evidence to follow up on. She confirmed police were completing a review on files that were closed previously due to the monetary threshold. That review was focused on identifying and pursuing any outstanding lines of enquiry.
