If a Chief Secretary does not obey court orders, who else will, asks Madras High Court judge
He posed the question during the hearing of suo motu contempt of court proceedings initiated against Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary N. Muruganandam and his predecessor Shiv Das Meena, now serving as chairperson of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA).
After both officers appeared before the court following the issuance of statutory notices, the judge observed that Mr. Muruganandam would not have needed to stand before the court if Mr. Meena had promptly complied with an order passed as early as September 19, 2023.
Pointing out that Mr. Muruganandam had taken charge as Chief Secretary only on August 19, 2024, the judge said, he might not have come to know about the 2023 order until the present suo motu contempt proceedings were initiated against both officers in June 2025.
The judge also expressed satisfication with the steps taken by Mr. Muruganandam to implement the court order pursuant to the contempt proceedings, but questioned as to why Mr. Meena had not taken steps to implement the order between September 2023 and August 2024.
Justice Devanand recalled to have recorded his appreciation for Mr. Meena two years ago, in another case, for having issued a circular instructing all government officials to comply with court orders in true letter and spirit and also within the time stipulated by the court for their implementation.
'Now, the same officer is standing before the court for not implementing his own circular,' the judge remarked. Nevertheless, he closed the suo motu contempt proceedings after accepting the unconditional apology and being satisfied with steps taken by Mr. Muruganandam to implement the 2023 order.
What is the contempt case about?
Then, Justice Devanand had directed the Chief Secretary to constitute an expert committee for recommending necessary amendments to the Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 2023, since the existing provisions suffered from various infirmities.
The judge had also ordered that the committee should consider fixing a time frame for providing compassionate employment to the dependants of government employees who died in service and consider the possibility of maintaining a district-wise list of dependants eligible for compassionate appointment.
He had also called for an action-taken report from the Chief Secretary within three months. However, in June 2025, the judge learnt that his 2023 direction had not been complied with and therefore, he initiated suo motu contempt against all those who held the post of Chief Secretary since then.
After Mr. Muruganandam reported that he had now constituted the committee and also submitted the minutes of its meetings, the judge recorded his submissions and closed the contempt proceedings with a direction to submit the amended statutory rules before the court after two weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Primary school teachers on padayatra today in protest against govt. failure to keep promise
Government school teachers under the banner of the district unit of Karnataka State Primary School Teachers Association are set to take mass casual leave on Tuesday and participate in a padayatra seeking fulfilment of their long-pending demands placed before the State government. Association district president Mallayya Guttedar, addressing a press conference here on Monday, said that Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in September last year promised to provide primary school teachers designation as Graduate Primary Teacher and revise the Cadre and Recruitment (C&R) Rules implemented in 2017. But the State government has failed to deliver its promise even after 11 months, he said. Mr. Guttedar said that their demands include designating qualified government primary school teachers appointed to teach classes 1 to 7 before 2016 as Graduate Primary Teacher and promotion of senior teachers as headmasters in schools considering their seniority. He said that nearly 400 posts of headmasters are lying vacant in government schools in Kalaburagi district. He also demanded that teachers should not be assigned non-academic work. The association members have set a deadline of 15 days for the State government to fulfill their demands, They said that if the State government fails to address them by August 25, then, they will be forced to intensify their agitation. Replying to a question, Mr. Guttedar clarified that on Tuesday they will not be protesting but the teachers will take out the padayatra from Jagat Circle to the Deputy Commissioner's office and also to the Deputy Director for Public Instructions office and submit a memorandum. He said that the padayatra will not affect the functioning of schools as 50% of teachers will stay back in schools.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"Streets Must Be Safe": P Chidambaram Backs Top Court's Stray Dogs Order
New Delhi: Veteran Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP P Chidambaram has welcomed the Supreme Court's tough order to check the stray dog menace in Delhi-NCR and said the directions need to be implemented in every city across the country. "The Supreme Court's directions on stray dogs must be implemented in every city and town. It is not difficult to round up stray dogs and put them in proper dog shelters. All that a town needs is government or municipal land on the outskirts of a town; levelling the land and fencing it; and putting the dogs in the enclosed space," the former Home Minister said in a post on X shortly after the top court asked authorities to immediately take steps to move dogs from residential localities in Delhi-NCR to animal shelters to check rising cases of dog bites. Mr Chidambaram said these shelters must have adequate provisions to provide dogs with food and water. "There are cost-effective ways to find the food and water for the dogs," he said. The Supreme Court's directions on stray dogs must be implemented in every city and town It is not difficult to round up stray dogs and put them in proper dog shelters All that a town needs is government or municipal land on the outskirts of a town; levelling the land and… — P. Chidambaram (@PChidambaram_IN) August 11, 2025 "ABC methods must and can be thought of in due course, but the first task is to round up the stray dogs and put them in a protected place. Streets must be free and safe for all people, especially children and elderly people," the Congress leader added. ABC methods or Animal Birth Control Rules focus on sterilising and vaccinating stray dogs to control their population and prevent the spread of rabies. They also aim to address the welfare of the animals and prevent human-dog conflicts. The Supreme Court today directed civic authorities in the Delhi-NCR region to take immediate steps to remove stray dogs from residential neighbourhoods. The bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan is hearing the matter after taking note of a news report on the rising incidents of stray dog attacks in Delhi, leading to rabies deaths. "We are not doing this for us, it is for the public interest. So, no sentiments of any nature should be involved. Action should be taken at the earliest," Justice Pardiwala said. "Pick up dogs from all localities and shift them to shelters." When Justice Pardiwala sought Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's opinion on the matter, he was told that a site in Delhi had been identified for relocating stray dogs, but the plan was stalled after animal rights activists obtained a stay order. "All these animal activists, will they be able to bring back those who have fallen prey to rabies? We need to make streets absolutely free of stray dogs," the bench said, adding that it won't allow any adoption of stray dogs either.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Recruitment of assistant professors: Punjab moves Supreme Court, seeks modification of July 14 orders
Bathinda: Nearly a month after a double bench of the Supreme Court quashed the recruitment of 1,158 assistant professors and librarians in Punjab, the state govt has moved the top court seeking modification of its July 14 orders. The state govt prayed that 1,158 assistant professors and librarians should be allowed to continue for the time being in the interest of students in govt colleges. The Punjab govt is also exploring other possible legal remedies, higher education minister Harjot Singh Bains stated in a social media post on Monday. The assistant professors and librarians were mounting pressure on the state govt to file a review petition in the apex court against its order setting aside the high court order, which upheld their recruitment. The Supreme Court (SC) bench comprising Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice K Vinod Chandran, while setting aside the order issued by the division bench of the Punjab and Haryana high court, observed that the advertisement inviting applications for the posts was issued on Oct 19, 2021, and on the same day, the department of higher education wrote to the Punjab Public Service Commission to return its requisition sent to the commission for these posts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 10 Best Mattresses by Consumer Reports (Here's What You May Not Want to Miss) QuestionHero Learn More Undo The SC bench in its 56-page order delivered on July 14 further mentioned that the commission on Nov 16, 2021, wrote to the department disagreeing with the idea of taking the posts out of its purview since the action required at the end of the govt was not followed. However, without any further action, the examinations were conducted between Nov 20 and 22, 2021. It was after the selection and appointments were made that retrospectively, on March 26, 2022, an amendment was made taking out these posts from the purview of the commission. The single bench of the Punjab and Haryana high court had rightly observed that the retrospective amendment to the 1955 Regulations, which was made much after the conclusion of the recruitment process, was nothing but a response to the writ petitions filed by the appellants, mentioned the SC. Article 320(3)(a) of the Constitution, inter alia, states that the State Public Service Commission shall be consulted on all matters relating to methods of recruitment to civil services and for civil posts, the SC observed and set aside the order dated Sept 23, 2024, passed by the division bench of the Punjab and Haryana high court. The SC quashed the entire recruitment process and directed the state to initiate the recruitment process as per the 2018 UGC Regulations. Earlier, a double bench of the Punjab and Haryana high court on Sept 23, 2024, reversed the order by the single bench and allowed the recruitment to continue following which the professors received the appointment letters. MSID:: 123236167 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
