Kent woman invents panic alarm using domestic appliances
'Call for help from hairdryer'
"It's a tool in your tool kit as a victim of domestic abuse that keeps you safer," she said.Ms Longhurst, an IT engineer, said she wanted the software, called Ask Joan, to be accessible. She said she has tried to control the cost of the app, which is nearly £10 a month, as she is aware of how economic abuse can impact victims."My ex-partner would lock me in my bedroom, so I wanted to be able to call for help from my hairdryer, or if I was in the kitchen I could use my kettle, my air fryer, something that was an everyday household appliance," she said.She added that a smart meter or similar device is used to help detect any unusual surges in energy when an appliance is switched on and off in a certain pattern."We will send a push notification directly to your next-of-kin or your point of contact, in line with your safety plan."Ms Longhurst, who now has a non-molestation order in place, said her attacker sometimes hid in her cellar and put listening devices around her home.
"I had 169 crime reports. He broke my ribs, he cracked my cheekbone, he broke my nose," she said.She said her abuser tracked her down after she was moved to Northern Ireland."My family didn't really believe me because he was Jekyll and Hyde. To the outside world he was the most perfect businessman."
Ms Longhurst said the Ask Joan technology was first introduced under a pilot scheme with a support group of other domestic abuse survivors in Kent. She said local authorities and charities could refer victims who might benefit from a secret SOS system.The Ask Joan system is also being made available as a smartphone app, said Ms Longhurst.Breckland Council in Norfolk is trialling the app. Staff have distributed 19 units and they are now offered as part of every new referral, said a council spokesperson.It comes as the Kent-based Oasis Domestic Abuse Service charity is warning of a surge in incidents of domestic abuse during the school holidays, when victims may struggle to pick up the phone for help and advice."It's not so easy to do when there are children around and there's a perpetrator at home," said Ms Alexander."If you're isolated from friends and family you may not have anyone that can help you during that period of time."If you are affected by any of the issues raised, help and support is available via the BBC Action Line.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Fact check: Google Lens's AI overviews shared misleading information
This roundup of claims has been compiled by Full Fact, the UK's largest fact checking charity working to find, expose and counter the harms of bad information. The AI overviews of searches with Google Lens have been giving users false and misleading information about certain images being shared widely on social media, a Full Fact investigation has revealed. This has happened for videos supposedly relating to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, the India- Pakistan conflict, the June 2025 Air India plane crash and small boat arrivals in the UK. Full Fact ran a number of searches for screenshots of key moments of misleading videos which we've fact checked in recent months using Google Lens, and found the AI overviews for at least 10 of these clips failed to recognise inauthentic content or otherwise shared false claims about what the images showed. In four examples, the AI overviews repeated the false claims we saw shared with these clips on social media – claims which Full Fact has debunked. We also found AI overviews changed with each search, even when searching the same thing, so we often weren't able to generate identical or consistent responses. Google Lens is a visual search tool that analyses images – including stills from videos – and can surface similar pictures found online, as well as text or objects that relate to the image. According to Google, the AI overviews which sometimes appear at the top of Google Lens search results bring together 'the most relevant information from across the web' about the image, including supporting links to related pages. These AI overviews do have a note at the bottom saying: 'AI responses may include mistakes'. This note links to a page that says: 'While exciting, this technology is rapidly evolving and improving, and may provide inaccurate or offensive information. AI Overviews can and will make mistakes.' When we asked Google about the errors we identified, a spokesperson said they were able to reproduce some of them, and that they were caused by problems with the visual search result, rather than the AI overviews themselves. They said the search results surface web sources and social media posts that combine the visual match with false information, which then informs the AI overview. A Google spokesperson told us: 'We aim to surface relevant, high quality information in all our Search features and we continue to raise the bar for quality with ongoing updates and improvements. When issues arise – like if our features misinterpret web content or miss some context – we use those examples to improve and take appropriate action under our policies.' They added that the AI overviews are backed by search results, and claimed they rarely 'hallucinate'. Hallucination in this context refers to when a model generates false or conflicting information, often presented confidently, although there is some disagreement over the exact definition. Even if AI overviews are not the source of the problem, as Google argues, they are still spreading false and misleading information on important and sensitive subjects. Miscaptioned footage We found several instances of AI overviews repeating claims debunked by Full Fact about real footage miscaptioned on social media. For example, a viral video claimed to show asylum seekers arriving in Dover in the UK, but this isn't true – it actually appears to show crowds of people on a beach in Goa, India. Despite this, the AI overview generated when we searched a still from this footage repeated the false claim, saying: 'The image depicts a group of people gathered on Dover Beach, a pebble beach on the coast of England.' Another clip circulated on social media with claims it showed the Air India plane that crashed in Ahmedabad, India, on June 12. The AI overview for a key frame similarly said: 'The image shows an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft that crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, 2025, while en route to London Gatwick.' But this is false – the footage shows a plane taking off from Heathrow in May 2024. Footage almost certainly generated with AI In June, we wrote about a video shared on social media with claims it shows 'destroyed Russian warplanes' following Ukraine's drone attacks on Russian aircraft. But the clip is not real, and was almost certainly generated with artificial intelligence. When searching multiple key frames from the footage with Google Lens, we were given several different AI overviews – none of which mentioned that the footage is not real and is likely to be AI-generated. The overview given for one screenshot said: 'The image shows two damaged warplanes, possibly Russian, on a paved surface. Recent reports indicate that multiple warplanes have exploded, including Russian aircraft that attacked a military base in Siberia.' This overview supports the false claim circulating on social media that the video shows damaged Russian warplanes, and while it's true that aircraft at Russia's Belaya military base in Siberia were damaged in that Ukrainian attack, it doesn't make sense to suggest that Russian aircraft attacked a military base in Siberia, which is mostly Russian. AI overviews given for other screenshots of the clip wrongly claimed 'the image shows the remains of several North American F-82 Twin Mustang aircraft'. F-82s were used by the US Air Force but were retired in 1953. They also had a distinct design, with parallel twin cockpits and single tail sections, which doesn't match any of the planes depicted in the likely AI-generated video. Footage from a video game Gameplay footage from the military simulation game Arma 3 often circulates on social media with claims it shows genuine scenes from conflict. We found several instances when Google Lens's AI overviews failed to distinguish key frames of these clips from real footage, and instead appeared to hallucinate specific scenarios loosely relating to global events. For example, one Arma 3 clip was shared online with false claims it showed Israeli helicopters being shot down over Gaza. When we searched a key frame with Google Lens, amid Israel-Iran air strikes following Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure in June, the AI overview said it showed 'an Israeli Air Force (IAF) fighter jet deploying flares, likely during the recent strikes on Iran'. But the overview did not say that the footage is not real. Another Arma 3 clip was shared amid conflict between India and Pakistan in May with false claims it showed Pakistan shooting down an Indian Air Force Rafale fighter jet near Bahawalpur in Pakistan. The AI overview said the image showed 'a Shenyang J-35A fighter jet, recently acquired by the Pakistan Air Force from China'. While there have been recent reports of Pakistan Air Force acquiring some of these Chinese fighter jets, this is not what the footage shows and the AI overview did not say it was from a video game. Use with caution Google Lens is an important tool and often the first thing fact checkers use when trying to verify footage, and we've encouraged the public to use it too. This makes the inaccuracy of Google Lens's AI overviews concerning, especially given that the information features prominently at the top of people's search results, meaning false or misleading claims could be the first thing people see.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
VW introduces monthly subscription to increase car power
German car making giant Volkswagen (VW) has introduced a subscription for UK customers wanting to increase the power of some of its electric who own an eligible car in its ID.3 range can choose to pay extra if they want to unlock the full power of the engine inside the says the "optional power upgrade" will cost £16.50 per month or £165 annually - or people can choose to pay £649 for a lifetime subscription. The firm said it was "offering customers choice" with the feature. Auto Express, who first reported the story, said a lifetime subscription would be for the car rather than the individual - meaning the upgrade would remain on the car if it was sold on.A VW spokesperson told the BBC they believed giving people the option to purchase more power for their car is "nothing new"."Historically many petrol and diesel vehicles have been offered with engines of the same size, but with the possibility of choosing one with more potency," they added that the power upgrades would allow customers to opt for a "sportier" driving experience at any time, "rather than committing from the outset with a higher initial purchase price".Such offers have proved controversial for some customers in the past, who are displeased they may have to pay to access features which - in some cases - are already present inside the car they own. 'Nothing new' Other vehicle manufacturers such as BMW have introduced similar subscription-based add-ons in the past, such as for heated seats and steering Mercedes introduced an online subscription service in the US in 2022 which allowed customers to pay to make its electric cars speed up to a survey from S&P Global, some customers may be put off by the cost of in-car subscriptions for features such as connectivity, or by basic functions being split into paid said the number of respondents who said they would pay for connected services had fallen from 86% in 2024 to 68% in is despite a wider embrace of subscriptions in general, with market research firm Juniper Research estimating in 2024 the global subscription economy would reach nearly $1tn (£740bn) in value by 2028. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Return of the flip phone: does Apple's new foldable iPhone signal a new era in design?
Back in 2005, nothing felt more high-powered and sophisticated than ending a call by snapping shut a clamshell flip phone. Now, two decades since they hit peak popularity, they're back – with Apple rumoured to be working on its first ever flip phone. Little is known about how the new device will look. It could more closely resemble Samsung's Flip design – closer to a 2000s-style clamshell phone – or its Fold, more like a foldable iPad. The rectangular tablet has been a mainstay of phone design for the last 15 years, but could Apple betting on the flip phone be a sign that's about to change? Tech experts told the Guardian that the new product launch probably reflected the fact that people now mostly use their phones to access the internet, rather than laptops or tablets, and are looking for a device that optimises that experience. 'Apple and all other smartphone makers are somewhat stymied by the fact the smartphone has become somewhat of a boring category – it's absolutely essential in people's daily lives, but it no longer has the excitement of the next big thing,' said Ben Wood, an analyst at the tech consultancy CCS Insight. This is why Apple has been reaching for new designs that can get people talking – for example, the ultra-thin iPhone, expected to be launched in September. He thinks Apple is entering the foldable market because other companies have experimented first. Samsung's initial Galaxy Fold designs were bedevilled by screen problems, but the Galaxy Fold 7 is expected to represent the 'next generation' of foldable phones. 'Apple is rarely first to anything – it's not typically a company that dives in with both feet – it likes to take its time, see how it can refine and optimise it, and deliver the best, most reliable experience, then it jumps,' Wood said. He noted that Samsung's flip phone has proven more popular than the fold model 'because it's cheaper and has captured imagination of the population who like the idea of having something different from everyone else'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion But he thinks that Apple producing a foldable mini-tablet has the most potential to 'move the needle', by giving people the opportunity to unfold a larger screen where they can easily watch videos, show off photos and browse documents when working remotely. Margarita Panayiotou, a tech researcher at the University of Manchester, said academic research had identified that people prefer bigger screens for browsing and gaming. This, combined with the fact that young people, especially, tend to use smartphones to go online, suggests that the foldable design could offer an ideal compromise. Prof Ben Carter, who researches how smartphones impact our lives at King's College London, agreed that video watching is 'one of the wins' for foldable phones, especially since videos constitute a growing proportion of the content that people consume. Foldable phones can have larger screens, and can also be propped up for easier viewing. He thought there could be mental health benefits to a design resembling a 'mini-laptop that you can close down', because his research shows that disabling notifications is highly effective in reducing screen time and tackling smartphone addiction. If the screen is not visible, it removes the 'variable reward scheme' – the same process by which gambling addiction works, whereby not knowing when you will receive a reward makes something more compelling. 'If you can switch it off, more like a laptop, that distraction has gone,' he said, though he noted there is not yet evidence that people are using foldable phones in this way. This might be especially beneficial for children, who receive on average over 200 notifications a day – though the high price point of foldable phones makes it unlikely that many will have access to them until their parents pass on secondhand models several years after launch. Prof David Ellis, the chair of behavioural science at the University of Bath, added that other draws include the fact that screens are better protected and fit into a smaller pocket, as well as the 'sense of nostalgia that comes with a flip phone'. But he added that it might not be the gamechanger people are expecting: Apple doesn't have a '100% success rate – the Vision Pro [headset] has been a spectacular failure'.
