UK bank profits in focus as lenders await critical motor finance court ruling
Lloyds Banking Group will kick off the sector's half-year earnings with its results on Thursday, followed by NatWest Group on Friday.
It comes at a significant juncture for motor finance lenders, with the Supreme Court set to deliver a final judgment on alleged mis-selling by the end of the month.
If the UK's Financial Conduct Authority concludes that customers have lost out from widespread failings by firms, it could set up an industry-wide redress scheme.
Lloyds has said it is setting aside £1.2 billion to cover potential costs and compensation in relation to the issue, with the banking giant exposed to the market through its Black Horse business.
Santander said it had put aside £295 million as a provision to cover potential payouts as well as legal costs.
Gary Greenwood, an equity analyst for Shore Capital, said he was anticipating a 'common sense outcome' from the Supreme Court ruling.
If firms are found to have mis-sold car loans, the ruling may allow for a proportionate redress scheme that 'punishes the worst offenders' but allows others to 'get off with a lighter touch, or maybe don't have a charge or redress at all,' Mr Greenwood said.
He added: 'It'll be painful for Lloyds, but they generate about £4 billion of surplus capital every year, so it's something that they could handle.
'It's the difference between something that's annoying and a bit more annoying, rather than something that will create a systemic issue or raise severe problems for Lloyds.'
Lloyds is expected to report a pre-tax profit of £3.2 billion for the first six months of the year – which would be lower than the £3.3 billion made over the same period last year.
While NatWest, which is not exposed to the motor finance market, is expected to report a pre-tax operating profit of £3.5 billion, which would be up on the £3 billion reported this time last year.
Investors are expecting a slowdown in mortgage lending over recent months, after a rush in activity ahead of a deadline for stamp duty relief at the start of April.
And banks are set to give an update on customer savings activity amid uncertainty in the wider economic climate.
Mr Greenwood said consumers are likely to have been keeping cash in accounts they can easily access rather than moving it into those with higher returns, which would mean deposits were stable over the latest period.
He added that the UK 'enjoyed a strong cash ISA season, with customers looking to put money aside ahead of the Chancellor potentially introducing greater restrictions on the use of cash ISAs, which has not yet happened and now seems less likely'.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves used her annual Mansion House speech this week to say retail investing had been painted in a 'negative light' and that she wanted to encourage more savers to take the leap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Sun
World's ‘most expensive bungalow' is being DEMOLISHED in UK seaside beauty spot after two-year battle
AN ENTREPRENEUR who spent £13.5 million on the "worlds most expensive" bungalow has been given the greenlight to demolish it. Tom Glanfield, 46, bought the property on Dorset's exclusive Sandbanks Resort, described as a millionaire's row, in March 2023. 7 7 He had planned to knock down the cottage and replace it with a modern family home. Planners had other ideas however and recommended his application be refused. They claimed that it would "result in the total loss of the non-designated heritage asset." Planners also believed that it would cause "significant harm" to the Sandbanks Conservation Area. Mr Glanfield, who lives in Poole, Dorset, said that the current house was no longer "fit for purpose." He claims he designed a family home that was "sympathetic to the beautiful surroundings of the conservation area." During a meeting with planners today, July 18, Mr Glanfield had a breakthrough after insisting he was "not a property developer" and was not " flipping the bungalow for profit." He said: "I'm not a property developer looking to put in a big block of flats here. I'm not flipping this for profit. "I am very much a family man who is trying to make a family home. I will probably die in that home. "I care deeply about the environment. I have a renewable energy recruitment firm that I built from scratch. "This property is currently energy rated F. It would become energy rated A. "The house's current state also isn't good. I don't allow my kids down to the harbour wall because it is dangerous. "Instead, I am creating a living sea wall at great expense. I won't even see that from the property - it's all for public benefit. "So the proposal would improve the environment. 7 7 7 "Currently, the property looks out of place. On either side of it you have flat-roof modern houses. "And in my opinion the property isn't of any heritage significance - it was the servant quarters to the main house which has since been demolished. "It's been altered significantly over the years with permitted developments and extensions. "It's time for it to be developed. You actually all have an opportunity with me, without sounding arrogant, in that I've got the time, energy, and money to make this something you can all be proud of. "So I really hope you grant it." Planners took his words on board and granted him the permission he had sought for two long years. Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (BCPC) officers granted Mr Glanfields proposal by seven to one. Many said they did not consider the current property as a "heritage asset" - adding that, if it was, it was of "very limited value." Others said the loss of the heritage asset would be justified as the "benefits outweigh." One councillor listed the benefits of Mr Glanfield's proposal as: "Energy efficiency, ecological benefits provided by the living sea wall, bringing the property back into local use, and a design that is more sympathetic to the environment than what is currently there." Mr Glanfield now hopes to transform the bungalow, dubbed the "world's most expensive" into a sustainable two-storey family home. He said that the property currently suffered with a leaking roof, mould and mildew. The new-build, the entrepreneur says, will be complete with renewable power and a desalination facility - and will see the sea wall, which is currently "unsafe", "unsightly", and crumbling, enhanced and restructured. 7 7 He previously said: "My dream is to build a family home that will not only retain the modest beauty of the plot but will also stand the test of time." Mr Glanfield received significant backing for his proposal from the local community - with 38 letters of support submitted to the council. Among those was one from neighbour Ros Smart, who labelled the plans as an "outstandingly innovative design for an iconic site." She continued: "The modern sleek appearance is entirely in keeping with houses in the surrounding area and is totally suitable for the conservation area." Others agreed that the design was "sympathetic" to the location - describing the "modern sleek appearance" as "entirely in keeping with houses in the surrounding area". Planners however argued that the proposal should be refused on "conservation grounds" and said alternative options "involving the retention of the cottage" could have been explored. Planning officer Babatunde Aregbesola told the meeting that the existing building was considered very important to the Sandbanks Conservation Area (CA) given its age, which he described as "very early Edwardian, one of the oldest in the area." He said: "The proposal by reason of the demolition of the existing cottage would result in the total loss of the non-designated heritage asset causing significant harm and failing to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sandbanks Conservation Area." He also argued that the benefits proposed by Mr Glanfield do not outweigh the harm. He said: "The applicant, via legal representation, identifies the following public benefits: visual and environmental enhancements from a proposed sea wall and landscaping; design choices including use of local materials and a sedum roof; and improved energy efficiency (F to A rated). "But while the scheme would deliver a more energy efficient home and some economic activity, it would replace an existing, habitable dwelling and would not increase housing supply. "The reduced flood risk benefits are private in nature. These benefits are modest and do not outweigh the identified heritage harm "The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and its significance. "The proposal would also cause harm to non-designated heritage assets which adds further substantial weight against the development. "In conclusion, the development conflicts with the relevant policies and lacks sufficient public benefit to justify the harm. "The application should therefore be refused." Following Mr Glanfield's speech however, one councillor told the meeting: "The house itself as it stands is not particularly special, charming or dynamic. It's just an ordinary house. "But what is being proposed is a special, ecologically designed property that is going to enhance the area and make a huge difference to what the Conservation Area looks like. "I can't support the officer's recommendation [to refuse the application]." Another said: "I'm struggling to see how this is a heritage asset. Let these people build the home they want and have a positive impact on the surrounding area." He will now be able to push ahead with his new family home. The Sun has contacted BCPC and planners for comment. Do I need planning permission to convert my shed? CONVERTING an existing shed or outbuilding into a self-contained living space will usually require you apply for planning permission. However, there is a "loophole" Brits can use to convert outbuildings into a tiny home without permission. Planning expert Martin Gaine from Just Planning warned the conversion process is far easier than you may think. Speaking to The Sun, the Chartered Town Planner of 14 years' experience explained: " An outbuilding can be built using 'permitted development rights ', meaning it does not need planning permission. "As long as you comply with the various restrictions and conditions." One of these is that the outbuilding can only be used for something 'ancillary' to your main living accommodation - examples include storage, a gym or a pool room. If the outbuilding is existing, converting it then into primary living accommodation IS allowed. Martin explained: "This is because internal changes to an existing building are not considered to be development at all under the Town and Country Planning Act. But like anything, there is one catch. The new living accommodation must still have some connection with your use of the main house. For instance, if your gran is living out there, she must still come into the house to eat.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Water regulator to be scrapped as sewage spills soar
While it is understood that ministers have not yet received the final report, which will be published on Monday, Sir Jon's interim report last month criticised 'deep-rooted, systemic' problems across the water industry, laying the blame at the door of both companies and regulators. Ofwat has been criticised for its part in failing to prevent sewage spills and then allowing water companies to put up bills by almost £10 a month on average to fund improvements in environmental standards. The regulator has also been criticised for failing to hold Thames Water to account before it slipped into crisis. Thames Water nationalisation Britain's largest water company – Thames Water, which is saddled with debt – faces the prospect of government control, with its boss warning this week that it will take at least a decade to turn the company around. Environment Agency figures showed a sharp jump in pollution incidents in England, with Thames Water, Southern Water and Yorkshire Water the worst offenders. Ofwat declined to comment, while a government spokesman said: 'We are not going to comment on speculation'. Mark Lloyd, chief executive of the Rivers Trust, which represents trusts across the country, welcomed the proposed overhaul. He said: 'The problem for Government is clear: economic and environmental regulation of the water industry has been very muddled since privatisation and is the root cause of many of the issues with the sector. 'Greater clarity, consistency, certainty and accountability of regulation are urgently needed for water companies to improve their performance and to attract investment. They therefore face a choice between reforming the current regulatory framework to make it work better or creating a new, single regulator.' Thames bondholders also welcomed proposals to scrap Ofwat, pointing to the regulator's failure to rein in Thames Water's debt binge.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Brentford attempt to open contract talks with Wissa
Brentford have attempted to open contract talks with Yoane Wissa but he is understood to prefer a move away from the club this Bryan Mbeumo expected to join Manchester United, the Bees' attentions are turning to resolving the future of 20-goal forward Tottenham and Nottingham Forest are among those with a firm interest in the DR Congo have tried to pre-empt the developing issue by starting contract talks with the 28-year-old, who moved to west London in 2021 from French club sources have indicated that, as things stand, Wissa has no inclination to discuss improved terms and privately has made his intentions to explore options elsewhere three interested clubs can offer him European football next season and it is understood agreeing personal terms, particularly with either Tottenham or Newcastle, will not be an issue. With that in mind, Brentford's valuation of Wissa is emerging as a factor in his have no intention of losing both Mbeumo and Wissa this summer but, in reality, with Wissa turning 29 in September, the scenario of a depreciating asset – who this summer could command in the region of £40m, if not more - will likely be a he has just 12 months left on his current deal, though there is an option to activate by a further year, is another factor to mull all parties, there appears merit to finding a resolution – whether that's a sale or contract renewal – sooner rather been a summer of upheaval at the G-Tech Community Stadium - manager Thomas Frank joined Spurs, goalkeeper Mark Flekken was sold to Bayer Leverkusen, captain Christian Norgaard has left for Arsenal and now star forward Mbeumo is set for a move to Old have already started the process of replenishing their forward options with an unsuccessful £35m offer made to Ipswich for attacker Omari also extensively watched Bournemouth forward Dango Ouattara last matter how Wissa's future develops, it will be a challenging start for new boss Keith Andrews who is preparing for his first season as a manager at any level of professional football.
