Polytech boss launches withering attack on government
In an interview with the Otago Daily Times , the polytechnic's executive director, Megan Potiki, was withering in her criticism of the government.
Topics she covered included Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds' failure to respond requests for meetings and her belief Otago Polytechnic had been singled out for the worst treatment of any institution in the government's shake-up of the sector.
Her interview comes as the polytechnic undergoes two separate but simultaneous restructures — one affecting management; the other general staff — and grapples with the fact it has been placed into a federation with the Open Polytechnic and Universal College of Learning rather than being independent.
"It feels like we have had completely different treatment to everyone else, it's been utterly unfair.
"What was [Ms Simmonds'] understanding to get to this point where she decided that others were going to stand up that were clearly similar to us or worse, in some cases?
"We have had no conversation with her about us going into a federation, it was a complete surprise."
Dr Potiki likened the situation to "building a ship while we're actually sailing" because the minister had not met her to explain how the federation model would actually work.
Otago Polytechnic had one of the highest degree completion rates in the country, and placing it in a federation with Open Polytechnic could drag down its reputation, she said.
"Not to be disrespectful to the Open Polytech, but they've got very low completion of degrees.
"There's a risk of being dragged down to the lowest common denominator. If our stake in the ground is that we have exceptional learning and great learning outcomes for our akonga and our community, why would we want to put that at risk?"
Dr Potiki said Otago Polytechnic's management and staff "bled blue and gold" — and she had been impressed by the community response to its troubles.
"We've re-engaged stakeholders and we had a really successful stakeholder meeting the other night with about nearly 80 people and we've got community people who have reached out who care and we're wanting to engage them as well."
Dr Potiki said among the institutions to have received better treatment was Invercargill-based Southern Institute of Technology, which was allowed to stand alone.
"SIT leadership reached out because, actually, I have a really good relationship with them through Te Pūkenga ... so those are relationships I don't want to burn.
"We want to have continued strong relationships in the South Island with all polytechnics. But the minister has muddied the waters."
Dr Potiki acknowledged staff would be getting mixed messages in recent times about their future.
"We're receiving mixed messages from government.
"We just want more clarity and a path for us.
"What we're asking staff to consider now is, unfortunately, they've been through this before, and nothing happens quickly."
The nature of the funding model of polytechnics meant "reviews" of staff could happen annually.
"It's good practice. I think that's part of something that staff need to understand.
"But actually, we want to look at our vision, our values, our future and get to that point. We haven't had the chance to really do that. So there's a lot of good work to come."
Ms Simmonds said supporting Otago Polytechnic to achieve a surplus was critical.
"With the support of a soon to be appointed Establishment Advisory Group (EAG), I am sure Otago Polytechnic will continue to progress along their financial viability pathway. At that stage, they would not require the support of the Federation if they did not wish to use it."
She had met Dr Potiki on several occasions and "was committed to continuing open and constructive engagement".
"The federation approach avoids the drawbacks of the centralised, one-size-fits-all model of Te Pūkenga and instead supports regional polytechnics to thrive, while offering the option to access system-wide efficiencies through the Federation."
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Government to fund one-off national day of reflection for survivors of abuse in care
author:ellen_o'dwyer] Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The government has confirmed a one-off national day of reflection for survivors of abuse in care will take place on Wednesday, 12 November, 2025. Lead Coordination Minister for the government's response Erica Stanford said a $1 million fund had been set up for survivor-led groups to apply to hold local or regional events to mark the day. But a survivor says the day felt like "symbolic lip service" with many survivors still waiting for justice or fair redress. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon promised a National Remembrance Day in his apology to survivors in Parliament last year. A year on from the apology, Stanford said the day aimed to acknowledge survivors of abuse in care, raise awareness about a part of New Zealand's history, and remind people of government progress in responding to the recommendations of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care. The final report from the Royal Commission found abuse was rife in state and faith-based care settings over decades, and the state failed to respond to signs of systemic abuse and neglect. The Commission made 138 reccommendations to the government to right past wrongs, and prevent abuse from occurring again. Stanford said survivors had indicated they would like to mark the one-off day of reflection in their own way - the day would consist of community-led events and activities, as well as activities organised by government agencies that demonstrated "progress, accountability and transparency". "Survivors have indicated they would like to mark the day in their own way and their preference is for survivor-focused groups and organisations to hold local, regional or national events." Up to $10,000 would be available for local events and up to $25,000 for regional events, and applications were open until 31 August. At the time, Luxon said the day would "provide us with an opportunity to stop and reflect on what you endured and ensure we are doing all we can to prevent future abuse". But survivor Tu Chapman, who is the spokesperson for Tikanga-based survivor movement He Kura Morehu, said many were expecting the national day of remembrance to be an enduring event, rather than a one-off day. "It's a little bit of a joke to be honest, one day doesn't acknowledge the decades of abuse, the decades of violence and harm that continues to plague survivors today, and impact us today." Tu Chapman is the spokesperson for Tikanga-based survivor movement He Kura Morehu. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Chapman said the day felt like lip service when many survivors were still waiting for justice or fair redress. The announcement earlier this year from the government that no public servant would be held accountable for abuse against survivors meant justice had not been delivered, Chapman said. A lack of legislative change designed to prevent abuse in care from happening again was also unjust, Chapman said. Survivor groups applying for the fund for the day of reflection must have legal entity status to apply. Chapman said that would mean some groups would miss out on holding events, because with only four months to apply, there was limited time to set up a legal and governance structure and meet the criteria for funding from a government agency. That would impose barriers on many survivor groups, Chapman said. "We will miss out and other groups will miss out, because the rules aren't realistic for survivor groups." Chapman also questioned whether the $1m was coming out of $774m set aside for abuse in care redress, or another source of funding. The government earlier this year committed $774 million on its redress system, increasing average payments from about $19,000 to $30,000, and opening up an option to top up previously settled claims by up to 50 percent. But it did not follow through on a pledge made on the national day of apology to set up an entirely new redress and compensation scheme, recommended by the Royal Commission of Inquiry and survivors. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Urban planning gives town ‘deferential' treatment
Arrowtown. PHOTO: STEPHEN JAQUIERY An independent commissioner has questioned why Arrowtown should receive special treatment when it comes to the Queenstown Lakes District Council's proposed urban intensification variation. Hearing panel chairman David Allen, commissioner Ian Munro and Wanaka-based district councillor Lyal Cocks began the first week of submissions hearings on the proposal in Arrowtown yesterday. The variation seeks to amend the proposed district plan by increasing heights and densities in residential and business zones close to the commercial centres in Queenstown, Arrowtown, Frankton and Wanaka to enable intensification of development. It stems from a government mandate — policy 5 of the National Policy Statement for Urban Development — that urban centres have to zone for denser, more affordable housing. Almost 40% of submissions received came from Arrowtown residents or ratepayers, many of whom were horrified at the possibility of 12m-high housing — 11m plus a pitched roof — in the historic village, which could apply to 266 medium density-zoned properties. In a report to the panel, council resource management policy principal planner Amy Bowbyes recommended a rule be amended for that zone in Arrowtown, to enable a building height of 9m (8m plus a pitched roof), which was essentially two-storey development. In the lower density suburban residential zone in Arrowtown, she recommended a height of 6.5m, and restricted discretionary building height band of 6.5m to 8m. However, Mr Munro yesterday challenged the council's lawyer, Sarah Scott, of Simpson Grierson, on that. "I've had the, I'd say, pleasure of being invited to be a commissioner for nearly 40 years in this district, and it is just not the case that only Arrowtown has beautiful residential streets, one or two-storey houses, and has charming views of the [outstanding natural landscapes] behind them ... and extremely rich character and very high [amenity] values," he said. "Why does nowhere else in this district's urban zones get the same deferential balancing of this character and amenity if it's a valid resource consent management way to apply policy5? "The question is, if it's good for one part of the district ... why would we not ask for the same approach to be used elsewhere, too?" Ms Scott said there were "bespoke provisions" for other parts of the district, but from a legal perspective, Arrowtown's special recommendation was in the operative district plan (ODP) and proposed district plan (PDP). "Perhaps Arrowtown people have fought harder ... but the facts are, it's in the PDP, it was in the ODP and it's been recognised for some time." She told the panel the district-wide variation amends the proposed plan by increasing heights and densities in some urban zones, and by amending provisions to recognise the benefits of intensification, to ensure adequate amenity values were provided for within intensification areas, and to ensure intensification can be serviced. "It's very hard to draw a line in the sand here, but it essentially requires almost a merits-based assessment of the changes requested — it is actually about ensuring that the greater densities can ... be realised." Mr Munro questioned how that was not contradictory as it pertained to the discussion about Arrowtown. "The purpose of this plan change is ... to investigate what the correct amenity values and intensification areas are [across the district]. "Surely that opens the ability of submitters to say the correct amenity values in [their] intensification area is to have less intensification?" While Ms Scott said the council had treated such submissions as "out of scope", there was a pathway for the panel to respond to them. The hearing continues.
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Fears grow for NorthTec as more cuts loom amid break-up of Te Pūkenga
Te Pūkenga only opened a new NorthTec campus at Ngāwhā, near Kaikohe, in 2023, but it's now scaling back courses as part of a de-merger. Photo: Peter de Graaf Fears are growing for the future of Northland's biggest vocational education provider as it scrambles to break even amid the break-up of mega-institute Te Pūkenga. A 'Save NorthTec Hui' was called at short notice at the main campus in Whangārei on Friday as the institute starts consulting on a new round of cuts. It comes as the government returns 10 polytechnics around the country to standalone, regionally-run institutes, reversing the previous government's 2020 merger. However, polytechnics in four other regions - including Northland - have been given until next year to prove they can be financially viable. Those that can't balance the books face possible closure or a merger with the Open Polytechnic. Tertiary Education Union (TEU) rep Sharlene Nelson told the hui the restructuring proposal could see the axing of courses in forestry, primary industries, apiculture, pest control and creative writing, as well as the closure of the Auckland campus. Adding to staff concern was the uncertainty around whether NorthTec would exist in a few years' time, she said. "Morale is pretty low ... it just creates anxiety, because you don't know if you've still got a job. Do you put that effort in? And where are students going to go if we don't exist?" Nelson said she'd been shocked by revelations in an RNZ report last Thursday that polytechnics around the country expected to cut about 550 courses, up to 900 full-time equivalent staff and 30 delivery sites. "We knew it was happening, but we never saw the magnitude of it. It's quite scary." Another tutor and TEU rep, Jim Hutchinson, said the proposed cuts were devastating for staff. "That's their livelihood, and they love to teach." Hutchinson said the potential closure of NorthTec was especially concerning for students in the Far North, who would have to travel long distances to pursue other training options. Poor connectivity in some parts of Northland made online learning impractical, he added. Nelson said the cuts also threatened Northland's future economic growth. "Without education, how do you grow? If you decide to cut back to next to nothing, then what is the future for Northland?" Former NorthTec student, tutor and director Hūhana Lyndon – now a Green MP – called the Save NorthTec Hui on Friday amid concerns for the institute's future. Photo: RNZ / Peter de Graaf The public hui was called with two days' notice by Hūhana Lyndon, a former NorthTec student, tutor and learner support director, now a Green MP. She said she organised the meeting after news emerged last Wednesday that Northland would not necessarily retain a polytechnic following the dis-establishment of Te Pūkenga. That was followed on Thursday by revelations of the scale of course and job cuts nationwide. Lyndon said uncertainty over the 46-year-old institute's future was "hugely concerning", even if some courses needed "a rev-up". "It really leaves us vulnerable in terms of powering up the economy, and being able to educate our young people and those that are transitioning between jobs." The timing was "awkward" because just last Wednesday, Northland's biggest businesses made a presentation to Parliament about the region's potential to expand from an $11 billion-a-year economy to $60 billion by 2050. The same presentation explained Northland's current under-performance was due to long-term under-investment in infrastructure, a skills shortage and poor educational outcomes. Lyndon said the answer to the skills shortage was "industry-relevant, credible training options". She was pleased with the turnout of more than 100 people at the hui given the short notice. Lyndon planned to raise her concerns with NorthTec's interim leadership, as well as industry, hapū, iwi and councils. Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds said the government was committed to helping NorthTec work towards long-term financial viability. "A committed group of community leaders are working alongside the government in Northland to ensure this happens. NorthTec is a valued polytechnic and will remain within Te Pūkenga over the next few months as it works with specialist advisors on a pathway toward viability, with decisions due in the first half of 2026." Simmonds said the government had set up a $20 million annual fund for the next two years to support "strategically important provision" in smaller, rural regions. Tutors and Tertiary Education Union reps Sharlene Nelson and Jim Hutchinson address a Save NorthTec Hui called at short notice last Friday. Photo: RNZ / Peter de Graaf That would help ensure learners in regions such as Northland were not disadvantaged while the government worked through longer-term funding plans. As part of the new "blended learning" model, regional institutions would have autonomy to choose the right mix of online, work-based and in-person learning to meet local needs. Regarding NorthTec's current cuts, Simmonds said she was not privy to polytechnics' operational decisions. "However, I'd suggest it is important for NorthTec, as it is for all polytechnics, to be taking appropriate actions to ensure their overall viability and maintain their relationships with local industries and communities," she said. Simmonds said the government wanted to build a vocational education system that was "locally led, regionally responsive and financially sustainable, including for Northland". The three other regions where polytechnic survival is uncertain are Taranaki (Western Institute of Technology), Wellington (Whitireia Community Polytechnic and Wellington Institute of Technology) and the West Coast (Tai Poutini Polytechnic). NorthTec was founded as Northland Community College in 1978. Its main campus is in the Whangārei suburb of Raumanga but it has satellites in Kaitāia, Kerikeri, Ngāwhā and Auckland. The brand-new campus at Ngāwhā, just east of Kaikohe, only opened in 2023. The Rāwene campus closed in 2017 but the buildings remain in use as a community-run education hub. NorthTec has been contacted for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
