See it: Massive megalodon tooth found by diver off Florida coast
VENICE, Fla. – A recent diving trip off the coast of Florida resulted in an ancient discovery.
Kristina Scott found a 6-inch megalodon shark tooth while fossil diving in Venice.
She said she's been fossil diving for three years and has found things ranging from mammoth and sperm whale teeth to megalodon teeth.
Rare Nevada Fish 'Staring Down The Barrel Of Extinction' Could Earn Endangered Species Protections
Scott said she probably has about 100 megalodon teeth in her collection, but that's after "many, many dives."
Scott said the biggest megalodon tooth she had ever found before this one, was 4 inches long.
Watch: Terrifying Moment Sharks Attack Diver's Camera In Australia Sea Caught On Video
Video showed Scott finding the enormous tooth on the sandy ocean floor.
"After I pulled this one up, I knew I had something every other fossil diver dreams about," Scott said.
According to the Florida Museum of Natural History, megalodon teeth can exceed 7 inches in length.
"I looked up how rare it is to find this size," she said. "1% of all Megalodon shark teeth found are 6 inches."
Megalodon is a massive shark species that lived between 23 and 3.6 million years ago, according to the Smithsonian.
This ancient shark species is about three times the size of the modern great white shark, and is known as the largest shark to ever live.Original article source: See it: Massive megalodon tooth found by diver off Florida coast
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Rick Scott urges Trump to relocate NASA headquarters to Florida
On Tuesday, Senator Rick Scott made a pitch to relocate NASA Headquarters from D.C. to Florida's Space Coast. He sent this letter, signed by the entire Florida Delegation, to the Trump Administration asking the President to consider the move. But this afternoon, NASA Watch Founder Keith Cowing told me it's unlikely. He told us, 'I've read the letter, and everybody signed it. Who's a Republican from Florida. They want to move with the Florida because a lot of space people work there. That are isolated from the political environment in DC. Okay, well, you have a big political environment down there. So, I own the lobbyists. Well, they'll just set up new offices. It'll take years.' In his letter, said the lease on Headquarters is expiring, and there's a 500-million plan for a new facility in the National Capitol Region. Scott says Space Florida has build to suit options. He called the state the undisputed leader in space operations and talked about leveraging a world-class workforce. Dr. Don Platt, an Associate Professor of Space Systems at Florida Tech said, 'We do have to remember that the people that work in NASA headquarters are people that interface with Capitol Hill. They interface with budgets, national space policy. They do not build rocket engines. They do not program software. Not engineers, they're more likely to be someone with a business background or a master's in management or finance or any of those areas.' Platt also said that if the Trump administration really was contemplating an HQ move for NASA, several states would be vying for that prize. Scott's letter follows the introduction of the CAPE Canaveral Act earlier this year. Scott co-sponsored the bill, which calls for the relocation of NASA headquarters from D.C. to Brevard County. Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the Old Masters painted animals: dragonfly wings and butterfly dust
The National Gallery of Art and the Smithsonian's Natural History Museum have been next-door neighbors in Washington, DC for nearly 90 years—but until now, they've never shared so much as a cup of coffee across the fence. That all changes this summer, as the two institutions collaborate to create a cross-pollinated art and natural science exhibition featuring selections from the art gallery's centuries-old paintings of birds, bugs, and exotic critters … along with actual examples of those creatures drawn from the Smithsonian's enormous collection of animal artifacts. The exhibit, called 'Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World,' focuses on a period beginning in the 1500s when artists in Northern Europe—inspired largely by strange specimens that had found their way to Antwerp, Belgium, aboard merchant sailing ships—were creating exquisitely detailed, and unprecedentedly accurate, images of creatures from the smallest insects to the largest mammals. One display case features the Smithsonian's own specimen of a Central American elephant beetle, the size of a baby's fist but armored and horned in a most terrifying (if harmless) manner. Next to it is mounted Flemish painter Jacob Hoefnagel's 1592 painting of the same species, meticulously rendered with brushes that at times consisted of a single hair bristle. Nearby is 17th-century Czech artist Wencenslaus Hollar's etching of a Tasmanian vasum ceramicum shell, impossibly spindly and surreally suspended in midair, joined by a spectacular real-life specimen from the Smithsonian's vast shell collection. And there is Hoefnagel's life-sized painting of a Southern Hawker dragonfly, highlighted with gold paint, seemingly ready to fly off its parchment page—accompanied by a real dragonfly, temporarily freed from its drawer in the Smithsonian's climate-controlled archives. (Recent studies have revealed that Hoefnagel, obsessed with accuracy, sometimes fastened actual dragonfly wings to his paintings.) These and the rest of the exhibition's works embrace a historic moment when artists—many wielding magnifying glasses—became obsessed with capturing nature in all its detail. Throughout three exhibition halls, the juxtaposition of art and artifacts reveals the astonishing amount of research and detail represented in each work. (A rare look inside the Smithsonian's secret storerooms) While it holds a prestigious spot on the National Mall, the National Gallery is not part of the Smithsonian—and the collaboration is novel for both institutions. 'We came up with the idea for this during the pandemic,' says Alexandra Libby, a curator of Northern Paintings for the museum. 'We started trading e-mails, hoping to get the Smithsonian people excited about it, explaining that these are not just pretty pictures of butterflies, but evidence that there was a real scientific level of engagement during this period. 'They were engaged from the start. They said, 'This is amazing!'' Moving from gallery to gallery, a visitor to this joint venture exhibition walks through a period when artists took the lead in creating the concept of natural history, says Brooks Rich, a curator of Old Master art at the National Gallery. 'The flourishing of interest in nature in its most minute detail that we see here really provided the foundation for the entire discipline,' he says. That breakthrough is crystalized in a display case positioned at the center of the exhibition's first room: Four diary-sized books, bound in leather, illustrated by the artist Hoefnagel. Entitled Aier, Aqua, Ignis and Terra (Air, Water, Fire, and Earth), the books contain, on fine parchment paper, 270 hand-painted images of creatures ranging from house flies to elephants with a level of detail that rivals anything a 4K TV screen will reproduce today. 'Prior to Hoefnagel, most people dismissed insects as vermin,' says Stacy Sell, the museum's curator of Northern Book Painting. 'But he undertook a sustained study of them, looking at every minute detail, and saw how beautiful they were. 'Finally, he said, 'You know, watercolor just isn't going to cut it.' So, he developed all kinds of innovative techniques to create a level of detail no one had attempted before. 'I mean, he actually painted with butterfly dust. That's pretty amazing.' (How to plan a walking tour of the best museums in D.C.) So delicate are the images in the four books, the museum almost never has them on display. In the course of the exhibition—May through November 2—the pages will be turned just three times. Perhaps the most glorious art work in the exhibition is the epic 'Noah's Family Assembling the Animals Before the Ark,' painted around 1660 by the Flemish artist Jan van Kessell the Elder. The Noahs—dressed in their Flemish finest—herd a zoofull of animals across a distinctively Northern European landscape toward a distant, barely-visible boat. Camels, turtles, monkeys, ostriches—even North American turkeys—ramble across the frame. But it's the sky that commands our attention: A riot of birds, two-by-two, winging their way to safety. 'It was such a joy to work with the Natural History Museum managers as they identified all the birds in this painting,' says Libby. 'They studied it to see what the artist got right, and why they might have gotten some things wrong.' For example, at the painting's extreme upper right, a pair of Paradisaea apoda—Greater Birds of Paradise, from New Guinea—streak into the image like plumed missiles. Besides their glorious color, their most distinctive feature is the fact that they have no legs. 'These birds were prized for their feathers, for women's hats,' says Libby. 'By the time those dead birds arrived in Europe, their legs were gone.' For a painter obsessed with getting everything just right, only one solution could satisfy both art and science: Rather than get the legs wrong, van Kessell simply left them out. (How do you find a 'lost' masterpiece?)
Forbes
18 hours ago
- Forbes
What Did Megalodon Really Eat? Probably Everything.
Lead study author Jeremy McCormack of Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, holds up a fossilized ... More megalodon tooth. For decades, the giant prehistoric shark known ominously as 'The Meg" has been portrayed as a massive apex predator that hunted the only formidable opponent in the oceans at the time: whales. But new research suggests the reality was more nuanced — and a lot more interesting. In a study published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, scientists used advanced geochemical techniques to analyze fossilized tooth enamel and found evidence that indicate this now-extinct behemoth likely had a more varied and opportunistic diet, feeding on whatever was available in its environment to satisfy its immense appetite The key to figuring out this mystery lay in the isotopes of zinc preserved in its teeth, which serve as chemical fingerprints of what an animal ate during its life. Researchers led by Dr. Jeremy McCormack at Goethe University in Germany analyzed 209 fossil teeth from 21 different species (both marine and terrestrial) dating back to the early Miocene period, roughly 20 to 16 million years ago. The fossils were collected from sites in what is now southern Germany, specifically a shallow seaway that once connected the ancient seas known as the Upper Marine Molasse. By focusing on a specific time and place, the team were able to compare Megalodon's diet with that of other sharks, dolphins and marine animals living at the same time. What makes this research stand out is its use of zinc isotope ratios (specifically δ⁶⁶Zn) as a tool for estimating an animal's trophic position, or its level in the food web. While nitrogen isotopes (δ¹⁵N) have traditionally been used to track trophic levels, they can degrade over time, especially in fossils millions of years old. Zinc isotopes, on the other hand, are much more stable and are now emerging as a reliable alternative. The higher an animal is in the food chain, the lower its δ⁶⁶Zn values tend to be, because heavier zinc isotopes are preferentially retained in tissues lower down the food chain, while top predators, which eat those animals, end up with lighter zinc signatures. In this study, Megalodon teeth consistently showed some of the lowest δ⁶⁶Zn values across the entire fossil dataset, placing them at the very top of the marine food web. The researchers also looked at the extinct Carcharodon hastalis, which is a possible ancestor of the modern great white shark, and found its δ⁶⁶Zn values were slightly higher. This suggests it fed at a slightly lower trophic level or had a different diet, supporting what many paleontologists have long suspected — that Megalodon was a top predator, likely preying on large marine mammals such as whales and dolphins. Finally, the scientists analyzed modern marine species, including sharks and dolphins, to create a baseline for comparison. They found that even today, top predators like killer whales have similarly low δ⁶⁶Zn values, further supporting the idea that zinc isotopes accurately reflect trophic level. McCormack works at the mass spectrometer, which is used to determine the zinc isotope ratio. This ... More ratio provides information about the diet of Otodus megalodon. Paleontologists have long suspected that Megalodon was a top predator based on its massive size, tooth morphology, and fossil evidence showing bite marks on whale bones. What this study does is go a step further by providing chemical evidence that directly links Megalodon to a high trophic level, rather than relying only on anatomical or circumstantial evidence. See, scientists face major challenges when trying to reconstruct what a creature like Megalodon actually ate. Sharks have skeletons made mostly of cartilage, which doesn't fossilize well, so researchers often rely on teeth. While bite marks on fossilized whale bones have been strong evidence of marine mammal being part of the Meg's meals, bites on other sharks leave less obvious traces, making dietary conclusions based only on physical bite evidence tricky and potentially misleading. This new chemical analysis helps fill in those gaps. By creating a kind of prehistoric food web, the researchers placed animals like sea bream (which eat mussels and crustaceans) at the bottom, followed by smaller sharks and extinct toothed whales the size of modern dolphins. Megalodon still sat near the top, as expected, but its zinc isotope levels weren't wildly different from those just below it in the chain, suggesting that those species may have ended up on the menu too. While the conclusion itself (big shark ate big animals) isn't groundbreaking on its own, the method is what's novel and important. This is the first time zinc isotopes have been used in this way for extinct marine predators, and the fact that the values line up with what we see in modern apex predators opens the door to re-examining other ancient species' diets and food web roles with greater precision. Still, it seems that ancient ecosystems are not so different from today's. Apex predators existed, food webs were complex, and adaptability was key to survival. Megalodon may have ruled the oceans, but not alone… and not without competition.
