logo
UK probes 34 porn sites under new age-check rules

UK probes 34 porn sites under new age-check rules

CNA31-07-2025
LONDON :Britain's media regulator on Thursday launched investigations into the compliance of four companies, which collectively run 34 pornography sites, following the country's new age-check requirement rules coming into force.
Ofcom said it was formally probing whether the companies - 8579 LLC, AVS Group Ltd, Kick Online Entertainment S.A. and Trendio Ltd - had "highly effective" age verification checks in place to protect children from encountering pornography across the websites.
These companies have been prioritised based on the risk of harm posed by the services they operate and their user numbers, the watchdog added.
Britain's Online Safety Act, passed in 2023 by the previous Conservative government, sets tougher standards for platforms to tackle criminal activity, with an emphasis on child protection and illegal content.
The legislation requires pornography sites and other platforms hosting harmful content to implement robust age verification systems to prevent children from accessing them.
Ofcom has the power to fine a firm up to 18 million pounds ($23.84 million) or 10 per cent of its qualifying worldwide revenue, or block non-compliant sites.
The Labour government has said the law is a vital tool to protect children online, saying it strikes the right balance between safety and freedom of expression.
Populist Reform UK party, led by Nigel Farage, has vowed to repeal the act, calling it a "massive overreach" that threatens free speech.
In response, technology secretary Peter Kyle accused Farage of siding with "people like Jimmy Savile" - one of the UK's most prolific sexual predators - by opposing measures designed to protect children.
($1 = 0.7551 pounds)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations
Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations

CNA

time15 hours ago

  • CNA

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations

LONDON :The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of Britain's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms and has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech. The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent category of duties on Wikipedia. The foundation said if it was subject to so-called Category 1 duties – which would require Wikipedia's users and contributors' identities to be verified – it would need to drastically reduce the number of British users who can access the site. Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "(impermissibly) concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service". He added that his decision "does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations". The Wikimedia Foundation said the ruling "does not provide the immediate legal protections for Wikipedia that we hoped for", but welcomed the court's comments emphasising what it said was "the responsibility of Ofcom and the UK government to ensure Wikipedia is protected". Britain's Department for Science, Innovation and Technology did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ofcom said it would "continue to progress our work in relation to categorised services". The Online Safety Act, which became law in 2023 and is being rolled out this year, was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law. Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content.

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act
Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act

CNA

time16 hours ago

  • CNA

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act

LONDON :The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of Britain's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms but has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech. The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent duties on Wikipedia. The foundation said if it was subject to so-called Category 1 duties – which would require Wikipedia's users and contributors' identities to be verified – it would need to drastically reduce the number of users who can access the site. Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "(impermissibly) concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service". The Online Safety Act was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law. Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators".

Palace's Europa League demotion would 'devalue the competition', says keeper Henderson
Palace's Europa League demotion would 'devalue the competition', says keeper Henderson

CNA

time19 hours ago

  • CNA

Palace's Europa League demotion would 'devalue the competition', says keeper Henderson

Crystal Palace goalkeeper Dean Henderson said that the club's drop from the Europa League would "devalue the competition", as they await the Court of Arbitration for Sport's (CAS) decision on their appeal against UEFA's ruling in a multi-club ownership case. Palace were demoted to the Conference League, the third-tier European competition, by UEFA's Club Financial Control Body in July because John Textor, president of the Eagle Football Group, majority owners of Olympique Lyonnais, also has a controlling stake in the London club. Ligue 1 club Lyon, which also qualified for the second-tier continental competition, was allowed to compete. Palace have appealed to CAS against UEFA's decision to remove them from the Europa League, with a closed-door hearing taken place on August 8. A decision is expected on Monday. "We win the FA Cup, we are justified to be in the Europa League," Henderson told BBC Radio 5 Live after leading Palace to a FA Community Shield victory over Premier League champions Liverpool on Sunday. "For football purposes, we deserve to be in the Europa League. I think it would devalue the competition unfortunately if we weren't in the Europa League." Palace said in June that New York Jets co-owner Robert Wood "Woody" Johnson had signed a legally binding agreement to buy Eagle Football Holding's stake in the club. Palace, however, missed the March deadline to comply with the multi-club ownership rules before winning the FA Cup in May to earn their place in European competition. "I know the chairman (Steve Parish) has fought hard against it and fingers crossed we are in the Europa League like we deserve to be...," Henderson, 28, said. "I am sure they will see sense and put us back in the Europa League."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store