Tariffs, trade and the green pivot: How Indian exporters can navigate a shifting global order
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
The global trade environment is in flux, ever since the new tariffs have been announced, while also changing the market priorities. The United States has imposed a 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods, and that affects key sectors including steel, aluminum, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and electronics.This policy is part of President Trump's trade strategy, which has been brought in to protect U.S. industries. But as it turns out, it might create challenges for Indian exporters by increasing costs and reducing the competitiveness in the U.S. market. For global manufacturers, this means re-routing trade flows to avoid higher costs.In practice, companies are considering alternate suppliers and markets. For example, major electronics firms are moving production from China to Vietnam and India to dodge Chinese tariffs. In metals, exports are being redirected to friendlier markets. The sudden policy shift has effectively reshuffled supply chains, prompting Indian manufacturers to rethink export strategies. Exporters are scrutinizing their footprints and looking beyond the U.S. – and beyond China – for growth.India has so far largely avoided direct U.S. targeting, but it will feel the repercussions. In the short term, Indian firms face added volatility: commodity input costs can spike under global tariffs, and demand in tariff-affected markets may soften. With U.S. markets effectively walled off for some exports, India risks surplus domestic output and dumping pressures. India's Steel Association warns that a sudden collapse in U.S. orders (85% down) could flood India's market with excess capacity. The U.S. tariff surge could even depress world prices, squeezing Indian margins.Longer term, experts emphasize the need for 'future-ready' export strategies. India's competitive position is improving – Indian products currently face lower U.S. tariffs than Chinese goods – which could make Indian exports more attractive if Chinese shipments shrink. However, it is important to understand that gains are not automatic. The IMF stresses that tariff wars curb growth and investment, which may translate into slower global demand (especially from developed markets). The Indian industry is already diversifying. In sum, while India avoids the immediate brunt of recent U.S. tariff moves, second-order effects – supply-chain flux, higher input costs, shifting orders – highlight the urgency of broadening trade links and building resilience.While the US is taking a protectionist stance, the European Union is aggressively aligning trade policy with climate goals. The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) imposes a carbon levy on imports of energy-intensive goods. CBAM, which expects foreign producers to match EU carbon prices on embedded emissions, creates a level playing field for EU industry but raises costs for higher-emitting imports.At the same time, new EU regulations tighten social and environmental rules in value chains. The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) requires large companies to identify and mitigate human-rights and environmental harms across their global supply chains. Importers and traders of major commodities (rubber, soy, wood, cocoa…etc.) across the EU are asked to ensure their supplies are deforestation-free under EU Deforestation Directive (EUDR). Non-EU firms that supply EU companies will thus face direct scrutiny: sourcing from an Indian supplier now implies liability for that supplier's practices under EU law. Similarly, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) (with European Sustainability Reporting Standards, ESRS) mandates that EU-listed companies disclose detailed sustainability metrics. These transparency rules will trickle down, as manufacturers must now provide data to their EU customers.Sectors most affected are those with heavy carbon footprints or extended value chains. EU buyers will demand precise 'embodied emissions' data for every tonne imported under CBAM. In short, the EU has essentially made sustainability compliance a prerequisite for market access. Exporters to Europe must navigate a web of new rules – carbon pricing, supply-chain due diligence and rigorous sustainability reporting – in order to compete.For Indian exporters who embrace transparency, this new reality can be an opportunity rather than an obstacle. The EU's carbon taxes and procurement policies mean that low-carbon, traceable supply chains now enjoy a competitive edge. Case in point is CBAM which explicitly aims to 'incentivize foreign producers to adopt greener practices'. Indeed, producers who can furnish accurate emissions data will avoid hefty CBAM charges and may even be eligible for rebates if they've already priced carbon costs. With India's Carbon Credits Trading Scheme (CCTS) gaining momentum, manufacturers can align with global sustainability standards and enhance their access to international markets.Beyond raw materials, exporters with certified sustainable practices earn market trust. Consumer and corporate buyers increasingly reward 'green' suppliers. A recent survey indicates that globally, compliance to external supply chain regulations is cited (by 59% of surveyed companies) as one of the key drivers of sustainable procurement practices. Many EU companies require their suppliers to meet net-zero targets. Thus, Indian firms that invest in traceability (logging of Scope 1,2,3 emissions) and transparent reporting can position themselves as preferred partners. Sustainability is no longer just a 'nice-to-have'; it's quickly becoming a gatekeeper for market access. Early movers – those who adopt renewable energy, optimize material use, and embed sustainability into their processes – can brand themselves as premium, compliant exporters and capture new demand in eco-conscious markets worldwide.The challenge is that most Indian SMEs are still far behind. Large Indian corporations (mandated to disclose) have made progress – recent data show about 94% of top listed companies now report Scope 1 and 2 emissions and energy usage. But at the micro, small and medium levels, sustainability tracking is scant. A global survey of small businesses found only ~4% could even provide data on their total emissions, and only 5% measured their renewable energy use. Most lack formal GHG accounting, have limited digital infrastructure, and do not issue sustainability reports.There are signs of change: a recent SIDBI MSME survey reported that 39% of firms increased investment in environmental measures during 2024, and 44% plan further investments next year. But these remain minority actions. Without urgent upgrades, thousands of small exporters risk being disqualified from lucrative contracts. With EU buyers demanding digital data on emissions and supply-chain practices, any gap in reporting or traceability could effectively shut small manufacturers out. Only a tiny fraction of India's MSMEs are equipped to measure or disclose this footprint. If unaddressed, this gap endangers India's competitive access to high-value markets.Here, technology can help close the gap cost-effectively. Smart digital platforms and AI tools are increasingly available to simplify compliance. The UN-backed SME Climate Hub, for example, offers Indian MSMEs free online tools – a Business Carbon Calculator to identify emissions sources and a web-based reporting portal to log annual emissions – making it easier to start the climate disclosure process. In the private sector, a new generation of startups and software solutions are applying AI to sustainability. By detecting inefficiencies in real time, such systems guide business leaders to reduce emissions, waste and power draw without manual data entry.In the face of recent U.S. tariffs, Indian exporters cannot afford complacency. These policies bring near-term headaches, but they also reinforce a vital lesson: diversification is essential. For Indian industry, the EU market – Europe's $18 trillion economy – now presents a clear opportunity for growth. Success in Europe will require a dual focus on digitalization and decarbonization. Exporters who can digitize their operations, embed carbon tracking into routine practice, and transparently disclose their environmental footprint will not only meet new EU trade rules but also unlock new value.The disruptions from trade barriers should galvanize Indian firms to accelerate their sustainability journey. Those who act decisively today stand to transform uncertainty into a long-term advantage, cementing India's place as a reliable, green supplier on the global stage.The writer is CEO and Co-founder, Sprih
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
BRICS Summit: Focus on India-Brazil strategic partnership for a multipolar world
With the arrival of Prime Minister Modi in Rio de Janeiro to take part in the 2025 BRICS Summit & Brasilia for a bilateral State visit, a first by an Indian PM in nearly six decades, the gaze is now on the India-Brazil Strategic Partnership. Far too long viewed essentially as South-South solidarity or symbolic multilateralism, this axis of rising power has in recent years achieved bolder geopolitical recognition. While India enhances its international footprint and Brazil restores its regional leadership, the convergences between the two democracies are no longer rhetorical; they increasingly become strategic driven by the shared vision of an equitable multipolar world order. In the midst of an expanded BRICS and rising challenges to the international system, Brazil has proved an invaluable interlocutor of India in the BRICS and the UN and in voicing the hopes and ambitions of the Global South. Brazil today matters to India not only as the largest economy of Latin America but also as a like-minded democratic country with whom India wishes to 'co-write' the rules of international governance. This convergence has been reflected also in the growing frequency and intensity of high-level interaction between the two countries. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Prime Minister Modi have also been spotted several times since Lula's 2023 re-election as the two leaders have committed to upgrading the Strategic Partnership to the next level. But the current era of geopolitics gives special meaning to their convergence. The Rio BRICS Summit, its first since the grouping expanded in 2024, occurs against the backdrop of a fracturing international order where the return of multilateralism is increasingly questioned. Western institutions increasingly appear self-absorbed and the global South is speaking out more vocally than before. In this fluid world, India and Brazil offer the world a development-focused and democratic alternative. Their collaboration in BRICS seeks to turn the grouping into more than the symbol of rising power solidarity that it is today. India and Brazil aim to make it the forum for offering tangible deliverables for the Global South in the form of alternate sources of finance like the New Development Bank or new models of trade, digital connectivity, and climate finance. Indeed, the current Brazilian presidency of BRICS this year and the upcoming Indian chairmanship in 2026 is a rare diplomatic relay. Under Lula's administration, Brazil has emphasized a more politically integrated BRICS, one advocating for democratic values and challenging the imbalances of the current world order. Modi has echoed this priority, arguing that BRICS must induce international institutional change. The two leaders ratify the idea that the Global South should no longer only be the target of international decision, but the co-author of international rules. This convergence is not limited to BRICS. The two countries are equally committed to restructuring the UN Security Council and are the most vocal members of the G4 grouping (India, Brazil, Germany, Japan) pushing for permanent representation for emergent powers. Both find the present configuration of the UNSC as archaic and unrepresentative. In their latest bilateral, Modi and Lula renewed their backing for each other's candidacies and called for time-bound negotiations in the UN. Brazil has used its presidency of the G20 in 2024 to showcase global governance reform and India has been forthright in its support of this agenda. Together, they have been able to give new impulse to what has thus been an extremely stalled process of reform. Another area of great geopolitical convergence is in their approach towards the Global South. India and Brazil have been voices of Southern solidarity, with one difference: they offer pragmatic implementable solutions. India's 2023 and Brazil's 2024 G20 presidencies were built around development agendas, of inclusive finance and food security to digital public goods and climate justice. Lula openly acknowledged the reality of the fact several of Brazil's G20 agendas borrowed from India's G20 Presidency. Modi himself has praised Brazil for continuing the momentum and ensuring continuity in the upholding of voices of the developed world. As the baton comes up to South Africa to preside over the G20 presidency next year, the IBSA trio (India-Brazil-South Africa) would have achieved the rare distinction of back-to-back leadership of the world's most powerful economic forum and offer a unique moment of Southern convergence. The bilateral is also expanding with new content. Commerce between India and Brazil has exceeded $12 billion, and complementarities in energy, agro-products, and pharma are driving the push. Indian companies like UPL, Wipro, and Tata Motors have increasingly expanded operations in Brazil, and Brazilian enterprises in mining and airlines are considering Indian marketplaces. Modi's visit is expected to deliver new deals in green energy, food processing, and defence cooperation. These steps are the bigger picture: India no longer regards Latin America as the faraway theatre of power politics and Brazil increasingly regards India as the gateway to the Indo-Pacific and the hub of the economic rise of Asia. In the coming years, India and Brazil could really transcend being co-passengers of the multilateral system and turn out to be co-designers of a new equilibrium of power internationally. As bridge-builders between the Global South and the North, between the world of the democracies and the world of the developing nations, between development and growth, their bilateral ties are now a global good. For India, Brazil is as big of a partner of BRICS as it is a center-piece of a larger diplomatic offensive aimed at democratizing international institutions and transferring normative power. When PM Modi and President Lula get together side by side at the Rio Summit, the conversation must be bold: the India-Brazil relationship is no longer peripheral but at the very core of the way the two countries see the future of world order. The strength of the relationship will be less in terms of common desire and more in terms of collaborative action, from G4 to BRICS, from the UN to the G20. In a world as desperately in need of new coalitions for reform as for peace and inclusive growth, the coming together of Delhi and Brasilia gives the world a strong, democratic, and developmental vision of the multipolar world to come. (Manish Dabhade is an Associate Professor of Diplomacy in the School of International Studies, JNU& founded The Indian Futures, an independent think tank in New Delhi; X: @imanishdabhade)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mines, magnets and Mao: How China built its global rare earth dominance
Rare earth metals were an afterthought for most world leaders until China temporarily suspended most exports of them a couple of months ago. But for almost half a century, they have received attention from the very top of the Chinese government. During his 27-year rule in China, Mao Zedong focused often on increasing how much iron and steel China produced, but seldom on its quality. The result was high production of weak iron and steel that could not meet the needs of the industry. In the late 1940s, metallurgists in Britain and the United States had developed a fairly low-tech way to improve the quality of ductile iron, which is widely used for pipelines, car parts and other applications. The secret? Add a dash of the rare earth cerium to the metal while it is still molten. It was one of the early industrial uses of rare earths. And unlike most kinds of rare earths, cerium was fairly easy to chemically separate from ore. When Deng Xiaoping emerged as China's paramount leader in 1978, he moved quickly to fix the country's iron and steel industry. Deng named a top technocrat, Fang Yi, as a vice premier and also as the director of the powerful State Science and Technology Commission. Fang immediately took top geologists and scientists to Baotou, a city in China's Inner Mongolia that had vast steel mills and the country's largest iron ore mine nearby. Baotou had already made much of the iron and steel for China's tanks and artillery under Mao, but Fang's team made an important decision to extract more than iron from the mine. The city's iron ore deposit was laced with large quantities of so-called light rare earths. These included not just cerium, for ductile iron and for glass manufacturing, but also lanthanum, used in refining oil. The iron ore deposit also held medium rare earths, like samarium. The United States had started using samarium in the 1970s to make the heat-resistant magnets needed for electric motors inside supersonic fighter jets and missiles. 'Rare earths have important application value in steel, ductile iron, glass and ceramics, military industry, electronics and new materials,' Fang declared during his visit to Baotou in 1978, according to an exhibit at the city's museum. At the time, Sino-American relations were improving. Soon after his Baotou visit, Fang took top Chinese engineers to visit America's most advanced factories, including Lockheed Martin and McDonnell Douglas assembly plants near Los Angeles. Rare earth metals are tightly bound together in nature. Prying them apart, particularly the heavier rare earths, requires many rounds of chemical processes and huge quantities of acid. During the 1950s and 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had each developed similar ways to separate rare earths. But their techniques were costly, requiring stainless steel vats and piping as well as expensive nitric acid. China ordered government research institutes to devise a cheaper approach, said Constantine Karayannopoulos, a chemical engineer and former chief executive of several of the largest North American rare earth companies. The Chinese engineers figured out how to separate rare earths using inexpensive plastic and hydrochloric acid instead. The cost advantage, together with weak enforcement of environmental standards, allowed China's rare earth refineries to undercut competitors in the West. Facing increasingly stiff environmental regulations, almost all of the West's refineries closed. Separately, China's geologists discovered that their country held nearly half the world's deposits of rare earths, including rich deposits of heavy rare earths in south-central China, valuable for magnets in cars as well as for medical imaging and other applications. In the 1990s and 2000s, Chinese refinery engineers mastered the task of prying apart heavy rare earths. That gave China an almost total monopoly on heavy rare earth production. 'The Middle East has oil,' Deng said in 1992. 'China has rare earths.' By then, he and Fang had already trained the next leader to guide the country's rare earth industry: a geologist named Wen Jiabao. He had earned a master's degree in rare earth sciences in the late 1960s at the Beijing Institute of Geology, when most of the rest of China was paralyzed during the upheaval of the Cultural Revolution. Wen went on to become a vice premier in 1998 and then China's premier from 2003 to 2013. During a visit to Europe in 2010, he declared that little happened on rare earth policy in China without his personal involvement.
The Print
43 minutes ago
- The Print
Nirav Modi's brother Nehal held in US on CBI, ED extradition requests; Justice Dept to oppose bail
Nehal, a Belgian national, has been named as an accused in charge sheets filed by both CBI and ED in the bank loan fraud, amounting to an excess of Rs 13,000 crore, which was borrowed fraudulently from the Punjab National Bank. His elder brother Nirav Modi and uncle Mehul Choksi have been named as the prime accused in the case. The Indian agencies have been informed by their American counterparts about the arrest, as well as given assurances from the US Justice Department that his bail plea will be opposed during the next date of hearing in the extradition proceedings. The next hearing is scheduled for 7 July, sources privy to the developments told ThePrint. New Delhi: Authorities in the United States Friday arrested Nehal Modi, brother and alleged co-conspirator of fugitive diamond businessman Nirav Modi, on the request for extradition submitted by India's agencies, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which have been probing the 2018 PNB loan fraud case. Notably, Nirav Modi has been in custody in the United Kingdom since March 2019, on account of pending extradition proceedings, while Mehul Choksi was detained by authorities in Belgium, where his extradition is also pending. Indian agencies managed to obtain a Red Corner Notice against Nehal in July 2019, based on which Interpol requested all its 192 member states to arrest or detain him upon spotting him in their countries, after which extradition or deportation proceedings could begin. In its charge sheet, the CBI has alleged that Nehal Modi attended a meeting with senior managers of the Punjab National Bank on 26 January, 2018, days before the CBI booked Nirav Modi, his family, Choksi, and retired deputy manager of the bank Gokulnath Shetty. Additionally, the agency found in the probe, through statements from individuals associated with Modis' firms, that after the registration of the CBI's case, Nehal Modi took overall control of the various companies' affairs. In the probe, agencies also allegedly found that Nehal Modi directed and facilitated the movement of funds and dummy directors of the firms of Nirav Modi from Dubai to Cairo, in an attempt to avoid arrest or criminal proceedings. He also allegedly instructed those directors to make false statements in the event of arrest by agencies, including claiming that they did not work for Nirav Modi. The ED also highlighted that Nehal allegedly took around 50 kg of gold and AED 3.5 million from a Dubai-based firm, Firestar Diamond FZE, as well as 150 boxes of pearls worth USD 6 million from Hong Kong, following investigations in India. Additionally, the agency alleged he was personally overseeing attempts to erase accounts and records that established the money trail of firms established by his brother, Nirav Modi, and his associates. 'He intimidated witnesses and sent them to Cairo, where their passports were taken over, and they were forced to sign some false papers. He offered a witness Rs 20 lakh for tendering false testimony before the judicial authorities of Europe,' the agency has alleged. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Rs 22,280 cr black & laundered money recovered, including from Mallya & Nirav Modi, says Sitharaman
