
Government Budget 2025: Depreciation On The Rise In Positive Change For Businesses
Speculation had been rife in the last week that the Budget would include full expensing of assets, however some had questioned the corresponding fiscal cost of such a move, says Deloitte Partner Robyn Walker.
'With an estimated annual cost of $1.7 billion, Budget 2025 has delivered on depreciation changes, not as generously as some would have liked, but more generously than many would have predicted,' Walker said.
'Overall, this is a really positive change for businesses.'
What the Government has proposed
Effective immediately, businesses will be able to deduct 20% upfront of the cost of any new assets (or improvement to existing assets). The balance of the asset cost will continue to be depreciable (if depreciation deductions apply). While commercial buildings remain non-depreciable, they will be eligible for the 20% investment boost.
Urgent Budget legislation in the form of the Taxation (Budget Measures) Bill (No 2) ('the Tax Bill') will be quickly enacted to give businesses the certainty they need about what is or isn't eligible.
The Government estimates that increased investment in assets will lift GDP by 1% and lift wages by 1.5% over the next 20 years.
'It is understood officials advised the Minister of Finance a 20% expensing regime was the most optimal solution to boost investment,' Walker said.
What is eligible
Investment Boost will apply to most new assets that are depreciable for tax purposes; it will also apply to commercial buildings.
'Critically, the assets must be new, or new to New Zealand; second-hand assets will not qualify,' Walker said.
In the year an asset is acquired, 20% can be claimed upfront and depreciation can be claimed on the balance.
For example, if an asset costing $100,000 with a 10% depreciation rate is acquired on the first day of the tax year, an immediate deduction is available for $20,000, and a depreciation deduction of $8,000 (being 10% of $80,000). This gives total deductions in year one of $28,000, as compared with $10,000 under existing rules.
What isn't eligible
More detail will be included with the Tax Bill commentary, but it's anticipated certain assets will be ineligible:
Assets that have been previously used in New Zealand
Land (but land improvements will be eligible)
Trading stock
Residential buildings (there will be exceptions for hotels, hospitals and rest homes)
Fixed-life intangible assets (such as patents)
Assets that are expensed under other rules (for example, low value assets below $1,000)
Other important details
The new rule will be optional;
There are no limitations on who can use the rules, it applies to businesses of all sizes, and assets of any value;
The rules will apply to assets which were first used or available for use on or after May 22, 2025. This will create some boundary issues for businesses who were in the process of purchasing or constructing assets to understand when something is eligible. This should be made clear in the Tax Bill commentary.
Capital improvements of existing assets (for example, seismic strengthening of buildings) should be eligible.
Depreciation recovery rules will apply to claw back the Investment Boost deduction if an asset is sold for more than its book value.
The rules will also apply to assets which have deductions under separate taxation regimes which are akin to depreciation. This includes improvements to farm and forestry land (such as fencing), planting of listed horticultural plants, improvements to aquacultural businesses, and certain kinds of petroleum development expenditure and mineral mining development expenditure.
The Investment Boost deduction can be included in R&D tax incentive calculations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
27 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Shane Te Pou: We can't spend Government ghost money
There is nothing new here. All the money was already planned for in the Budget. That means no new jobs or economic growth are being delivered that weren't already in the Budget. A Budget after which unemployment rose by 24,000 by June 2025. This isn't a stimulus to the economy because there is no extra investment beyond that already being planned – meaning no extra GDP. It's a Clayton's announcement. Critics urge a genuine, long-term infrastructure strategy, emphasising collaboration and addressing urgent economic and social needs. Photo / Sylvie Whinray Given the fact that 16,000 fewer people are working in construction than this time last year, you would think this would be the ideal time to boost investment. ANZ reported this week that, 'it appears residential builders are giving up on a recovery any time soon'. You would think that now would be an excellent opportunity to build new state housing. Alas, no such announcements were made. As the famous quote goes, ministers are finding that 'winning is easy, governing is hard'. The initial decisions made to cut investment in areas such as ferries, housing and Dunedin Hospital have sapped confidence in the economy. The impact of tax cuts promised at the last election has long since gone. The likelihood of further interest rate cuts is diminishing as inflation creeps towards 3% and above. It's time for a different approach. Our economy, our productivity and our public realm don't benefit when the Government changes long-term infrastructure planning like this. It doesn't help when ministers use infrastructure announcements as a means of political advertising. Chris Bishop claimed he wanted a 'cross-party consensus' on infrastructure, but critics question whether he's truly engaging with a broad range of voices beyond his own. Photo / Sylvie Whinray That's made even harder when the announcements don't mean anything. We need a long-term approach to tackling this problem – one that will work across Parliaments. An approach that doesn't put one form in infrastructure – roads – ahead of everything else. In December last year, Bishop said he genuinely wanted to build a 'cross-party consensus' on how we build infrastructure in New Zealand. That's great in theory, but when your idea of a consensus is everyone agreeing with you, that's not going anywhere. Building a true consensus would involve working with much wider groups. When was the last time Bishop sat down with trade unions to discuss infrastructure? When did he last sit down with child poverty advocates to talk about our housing that puts kids in hospital? New Zealand's economy is struggling. The US President has just slapped 15% tariffs on our exports – and it's our second-biggest export market. We are losing a generation of people who are voting with their feet because they can't see a future here in Aotearoa. Nurses are on strike. Yet our Government is concerned with changing the name on the front of a passport. It's dangerously out of touch with the real needs of New Zealanders. Infrastructure development and renewal can play a key role in restarting the economy. You simply can't re-wrap last year's Christmas presents and present them as new this year. When we invest in New Zealand, we invest in ourselves and we reap the dividends. The Government is pretending to invest right now, dressing up old investments as new. There is a ghost plan for the economy. It's time for a real one.


NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Gisborne advocate criticises Kāinga Ora land sales amid ‘housing crisis'
'We currently plan to sell about 36 hectares of land that is no longer needed for either new social housing projects or for urban development work,' an information sheet on land sales said. Land included a range of larger sites in Auckland and Wellington, as well as 'smaller vacant sites across the country which are not needed for social housing projects'. Kāinga Ora properties on the market and properties sold were also listed online. These included properties in Gisborne, on the Coast and at Te Karaka. A social housing property for sale as at July 31 is 4 Tui St in Gisborne. Vacant land Kāinga Ora has for sale in Kaiti as at July 31 is at 43 Ranfurly St, 5 Lawrence St, 23 Cavendish Cres and 28 Dalton St. Land at Tolaga Bay is also on the market – at 2,4,6,8 and 10 Discovery St and 1 and 9 Adventure Ave. Elgin properties sold as at July 31 were 47, 49, 51 and 53 Centennial Cres, as well as 8 Puriri St. In Te Karaka, the property at 22 Currie St had sold. 'Like any developer, we are continually reviewing the land we own to see if it is still fit for purpose, and as such, it is expected that the divestment of sites will be an ongoing process,' the Kāinga Ora information said. 'It is likely that further sites will be added to our divestment programme in the future.' In a separate statement to the Gisborne Herald, the agency said: 'Market conditions are continually evolving, demand for new housing can change, and more detailed due diligence may mean sites intended for redevelopment no longer work for us.' Lizz Crawford, the manager of Oasis Community Shelter in Kaiti, was concerned with the sales of Kāinga Ora property amid a "housing crisis". Photo / Gisborne Herald Crawford said the selling of properties was part of an ongoing crisis. 'It appears we have not only a housing crisis, but a societal crisis, which has more than likely exacerbated the lack of housing for the most vulnerable of society. 'There are countries that have actively reduced homelessness, and it is sad to see that New Zealand is not one of them. We have done the opposite and not only turned a blind eye, but perhaps our backs, too,' she said. East Coast MP Dana Kirkpatrick outlined the Government's policy on housing as well as helping the homeless. In response to questions about homelessness and housing, East Coast MP Dana Kirkpatrick said the Government had recently released the latest Homelessness Insights Report and announced 'a series of actions to reduce the number of people living without shelter, including sleeping rough in New Zealand'. The report 'confirms what frontline organisations have been saying ... there are too many people in housing need. Accurate numbers are difficult to pin down. People without shelter often move around and may avoid engaging with government services, but it's clear we have a real problem', she said. The Government was making 'a serious response' to housing issues, Kirkpatrick said. 'At present, over $550 million is spent annually across a range of programmes run by multiple agencies, including Transitional Housing, Housing First, Rapid Rehousing and many other support services. 'We've made it clear that officials should engage with frontline providers to do this because they are the organisations working at the frontline of this problem. We will not be returning to the previous Government's large-scale emergency housing model, which cost over $1 million a day at its peak and was a social disaster.' The Government was reviewing housing support services, she said. 'Our aim is to make the system simpler, more effective and reduce duplication. We want to fund what works.' 'We're also looking at ways to improve the social housing system to ensure it delivers the right homes in the right places for the right people. The Government has recently changed Kāinga Ora's funding settings to enable the agency to build more one-bedroom units. About 50% of people on the Housing Register require a one-bedroom unit, but they only make up about 12% of Kāinga Ora's housing stock.' Some new homes were blessed recently on Kowhai St in Te Hapara and were ready for tenants to move in.


Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Boaties Soon Off The Hook: ACT Ends Unfair Petrol Tax
ACT MP and keen boatie Cameron Luxton is celebrating a long-overdue win for fairness with the end of petrol excise taxes for boat users and other off-road fuel users. 'Fuel tax is supposed to fund roads. So why have boat owners been forced to pay it when their vehicles never touch a road,' says Luxton. 'It's always been unfair, which is why ACT has been fighting since 2021 to scrap this boatie tax. Now, it's finally happening. 'Following the 2023 election, ACT secured a coalition commitment to replace petrol excise with road user charges (RUCs) across the board with progress confirmed this week. 'This means you'll no longer be taxed at the pump when filling up your boat, lawnmower, quad bike, or chainsaw. 'For boaties, that's around 70 cents a litre in excise saved, plus another 10 cents in GST that gets put on top. That's $120 off a 150-litre tank. It's a massive win for fairness and common sense. 'The shift to RUCs won't happen overnight – it's part of a broader transition and will involve public consultation – but the Government's direction is clear, and ACT will make sure this promise is kept. 'The day I get to go fishing without paying road tax will be a good one – and it's thanks to Kiwis who've supported ACT.'