
Government Budget 2025: Depreciation On The Rise In Positive Change For Businesses
Budget 2025 has given businesses a welcome boost to tax deductions for investing in assets.
Speculation had been rife in the last week that the Budget would include full expensing of assets, however some had questioned the corresponding fiscal cost of such a move, says Deloitte Partner Robyn Walker.
'With an estimated annual cost of $1.7 billion, Budget 2025 has delivered on depreciation changes, not as generously as some would have liked, but more generously than many would have predicted,' Walker said.
'Overall, this is a really positive change for businesses.'
What the Government has proposed
Effective immediately, businesses will be able to deduct 20% upfront of the cost of any new assets (or improvement to existing assets). The balance of the asset cost will continue to be depreciable (if depreciation deductions apply). While commercial buildings remain non-depreciable, they will be eligible for the 20% investment boost.
Urgent Budget legislation in the form of the Taxation (Budget Measures) Bill (No 2) ('the Tax Bill') will be quickly enacted to give businesses the certainty they need about what is or isn't eligible.
The Government estimates that increased investment in assets will lift GDP by 1% and lift wages by 1.5% over the next 20 years.
'It is understood officials advised the Minister of Finance a 20% expensing regime was the most optimal solution to boost investment,' Walker said.
What is eligible
Investment Boost will apply to most new assets that are depreciable for tax purposes; it will also apply to commercial buildings.
'Critically, the assets must be new, or new to New Zealand; second-hand assets will not qualify,' Walker said.
In the year an asset is acquired, 20% can be claimed upfront and depreciation can be claimed on the balance.
For example, if an asset costing $100,000 with a 10% depreciation rate is acquired on the first day of the tax year, an immediate deduction is available for $20,000, and a depreciation deduction of $8,000 (being 10% of $80,000). This gives total deductions in year one of $28,000, as compared with $10,000 under existing rules.
What isn't eligible
More detail will be included with the Tax Bill commentary, but it's anticipated certain assets will be ineligible:
Assets that have been previously used in New Zealand
Land (but land improvements will be eligible)
Trading stock
Residential buildings (there will be exceptions for hotels, hospitals and rest homes)
Fixed-life intangible assets (such as patents)
Assets that are expensed under other rules (for example, low value assets below $1,000)
Other important details
The new rule will be optional;
There are no limitations on who can use the rules, it applies to businesses of all sizes, and assets of any value;
The rules will apply to assets which were first used or available for use on or after May 22, 2025. This will create some boundary issues for businesses who were in the process of purchasing or constructing assets to understand when something is eligible. This should be made clear in the Tax Bill commentary.
Capital improvements of existing assets (for example, seismic strengthening of buildings) should be eligible.
Depreciation recovery rules will apply to claw back the Investment Boost deduction if an asset is sold for more than its book value.
The rules will also apply to assets which have deductions under separate taxation regimes which are akin to depreciation. This includes improvements to farm and forestry land (such as fencing), planting of listed horticultural plants, improvements to aquacultural businesses, and certain kinds of petroleum development expenditure and mineral mining development expenditure.
The Investment Boost deduction can be included in R&D tax incentive calculations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
We need to fix the human-shaped hole in our economy
Specifically, I mean the flow of humans across our border. We are a very small country, with a total population the size of Sydney. So, whether it's tourists or immigrants, the fluctuations in the number of people leaving and entering the country have an outsized impact. When the numbers fall dramatically, as they have done, we feel it acutely. There is a human-shaped hole in our economic recovery. We had more good news out of the primary sector last week. A Government report forecast primary sector export earnings will hit $59.9 billion in the June 2025 year – $3b higher than was projected in December. That's a big stimulatory boost on top of already strong earnings. But we had more bad news out of the retail sector. Electronic card transaction data for May showed consumers are still feeling cautious. We should have had more money in our pockets thanks to lower petrol prices and lower interest rates. But core spending (which excludes fuel) was down 0.2% in May, with falls for durables and consumer goods. Hospitality and apparel were basically flat, up just 0.1%. There really aren't any obvious signs of recovery there for the beleaguered Auckland CBD. It's a tale of two economies, and there's a big divide opening up. It would be interesting to compare and contrast the vibe at Fieldays this weekend with that on Queen St. Last week, we also saw the release of new immigration and tourism data. These provided a timely reminder of what the missing pieces of this economic recovery are. Our annual net migration gain dipped to just 21,300. That's still population growth and I suppose we should be thankful for it. However, if we put aside the Covid years when the borders were closed, it is the country's lowest rate of population growth since January 2014. Back then, things were building up again after a post-GFC exodus. Since then, our economy has grown used to running with high levels of net migration gain. From 2015, it ran between 50,000 and 70,000, which everyone thought was pretty wild at the time. But after we opened the borders post-Covid, things really took off. New Zealand's net migration gain soared to a record peak of 138,000 in the year to October 2023. It pushed the economy to the limits of its ability to cope. But it also meant unprecedented demand for housing, cars, furnishings and all sorts of other retail goods. Every new immigrant has to live somewhere. Most drive cars. So the big fall in numbers – a combination of fewer arrivals and record departures – puts a huge dent in demand relative to where the economy has become used to operating. Then there is tourism. New Zealand had about 3.6 million overseas visitors in the year to April. That's a big number relative to our population and illustrates just how important tourism is to the economy. But it should be much bigger. Stats NZ points out that the visitors in April 2025 represent just 86% of the total we got in April 2019. Not only have we not yet returned to pre-Covid levels, but the current trend suggests we aren't about to any time soon. The tourist spending deficit looks even worse for our economy if we assume that, without the big Covid break, we might have achieved some degree of growth in the past five years or so. What can we do to address this human-shaped hole in the economy? Clearly, the Government is well aware of the problem. We saw two new policies unveiled last week to try to shift the dial. On the tourism front, it was back to the future with the $5.5 million reboot of the '100% Pure' marketing campaign around the world. That successful slogan was ditched in 2022 for 'If You Seek', which doesn't seem to have made much impact. That change is unlikely to shift the dial massively. The big issue with tourist numbers right now is the drop-off in Chinese visitors. The consumer end of the Chinese economy has been struggling too, and New Zealand is an expensive place to visit. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will be hoping he can drum up some renewed hype about New Zealand when he visits China late this month. Based on our relationship with China though, and the surge in tourist interest after the free trade deal in 2008, the real key to a renewed tourist boom likely lies with India and the publicity a free trade deal there might bring. On the immigration front, the Government has introduced a new Parent Boost policy, which will enable the parents of immigrants to stay for up to 10 years. That should add to the appeal of New Zealand for many migrants. But the reality is most immigration is driven by economic factors. Immigrant numbers are unlikely to pick up until our job market does, which means we can't rely on it to drive growth in the short term. It's probably good for our economy to sweat it out with lower than average net migration for a while. House prices are balancing out, and this provides a chance for infrastructure planning and building to catch up. But we need to turn the trend around soon. We especially need to stop the youngest and brightest Kiwi workers from departing in high numbers. The boom and bust cycles we seem to perpetually swing through are no good for long-term stability. The goal of this Government and the next should be to encourage a steady pace of population growth, perhaps in the range of 30,000-40,000 net gain per year. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.

RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
More claim social development benefits during May
Unemployment is at 5.1 percent through May. Photo: JES2UFOTO Latest numbers show 27,243 more people received a benefit in May, compared to the year before. The Ministry of Social Development's monthly update shows the number of people on a benefit in New Zealand rose by just over seven percent to 403,311 in that time. The unemployment rate is 5.1 percent. Most of the increase is due to people accessing JobSeeker support - there was an 11 percent rise of just over 21,000, to a total 213,831. In May, 9.5 percent more people found work, compared to the same time last year, but eight percent more benefits were cancelled than a year ago - a total of just over 6000 - for other reasons, including sanctions. The Government aims to reduce the number of people on the Jobseeker Support benefit by 50,000 by 2030, introducing a traffic-light system and new non-financial sanctions , and changing the re-application for job seekers to every six months, instead of each year.


Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Do I Have To Pay For My Partner's Care?
RNZ's money correspondent answers your questions. Send your questions to If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out? The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account. If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy. 'People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider,' said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress. 'MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'. 'To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount.' People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account. If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment. If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment. There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too. I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident). This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax. Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident. Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold. You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations. Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you. I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution? Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65.