logo
B.C. Mountie loses bid to stay charges in obstruction of justice case

B.C. Mountie loses bid to stay charges in obstruction of justice case

Yahoo4 hours ago

A Prince George RCMP officer has lost a bid to stay an obstruction of justice charge and will now be sentenced, in a case connected to the death of an Indigenous man in custody.
In July 2024, Const. Arthur Dalman was found guilty of obstructing justice for ordering a bystander to delete cellphone video showing the aftermath of the police takedown and arrest of Dale Culver on July 18, 2017.
The 35-year-old Gitxsan and Wet'suwet'en man died in police custody 29 minutes after he was arrested, following a struggle with multiple police officers. Dalman is one of two officers who went on trial in the obstruction of justice case.
The constable filed an application to stay his 2024 conviction, arguing that lengthy pre-trial delays meant he was denied his Charter rights to a trial within a reasonable timeframe.However, in a ruling on May 29, Judge Adrian Brooks dismissed Dalman's application. His next court appearance is on June 19 to schedule a date for his sentencing.
The other officer accused of obstruction of justice, Staff Sgt. Bayani (Jon) Eusebio Cruz was found not guilty in 2024.
Culver's arrest and death happened nearly eight years ago, on July 18, 2017. That was followed by an investigation by B.C.'s Independent Investigations Office (IIO), an oversight agency that investigates anytime a police-involved incident results in serious harm or death.
It filed its initial report to Crown counsel in July 2019, followed by an updated report in May 2020.
Close to three years later, in February 2023, Crown prosecutors announced charges of manslaughter against two Mounties and charges of obstruction against three others, the first time the accused were publicly named.
Charges against the two officers accused of manslaughter were stayed in April 2024.
Charges against one of the officers accused of obstruction were stayed a month later, while the trial for the other two officers accused of obstruction was completed on July 25, 2024, resulting in Dalman's guilty verdict.
'Rare occurrence,' civil rights group says
Culver's death and its aftermath have been viewed by civil rights advocates and First Nations leadership groups in B.C. as a key test of the justice system's ability to hold police accountable.
The B.C. Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) hailed the recent dismissal of Dalman's application, with a staff lawyer saying it's uncommon for officers to be charged with criminal offences and even less common for them to be found guilty.
"We recognize that this is such a rare occurrence — that not only was Const. Arthur Dalman found guilty of obstruction of justice, but that despite his application to challenge that verdict, the judge upheld his guilty verdict," said Latoya Farrell.
"And now we're going to be moving to sentencing, which is monumental in steps towards the police accountability."
In a statement shared by the BCCLA, Culver's daughter asked how many people would have to die before the public realized the justice system was broken.
"We have been waiting eight long years for this, and I have somehow managed to remain positive about my feelings that eventually someone would be held accountable," Lily Speed-Namox said.
However, the National Police Federation's Pacific-North director, Chris Voller, was critical of Dalman's application being dismissed.
"I think that this was an error," he told CBC News. "I think it was very clearly demonstrated, throughout the testimony of all involved, that Const. Dalman's Charter rights were clearly denied."
Voller said the IIO, which forwarded a report to Crown prosecutors in Dalman's case recommending that charges be laid, made evidentiary errors in the case.
"The public of British Columbia want and deserve to have the ability to say the oversight of their police officers is competent, timely and reasonable," he said.
"We would request a review of the competency, timeliness and reasonableness associated to both the IIO investigations and charge assessment by the Crown counsel."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sexual assault survivors calling on Ontario to lift policy that limits access to community justice programs
Sexual assault survivors calling on Ontario to lift policy that limits access to community justice programs

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sexual assault survivors calling on Ontario to lift policy that limits access to community justice programs

Marlee Liss still remembers how dehumanizing it felt to sit through the preliminary trial of the man accused of sexually assaulting her, disturbed by how she was treated while testifying, as she answered a series of invasive questions. It took three years for the Toronto woman's case to make it to trial. The whole time, she said, she didn't necessarily want her alleged assailant to go to jail — she just wanted him to take accountability. Thanks to a referral from her Crown attorney, the case was put on pause in 2019 so that Liss could pursue a community justice program, also known as restorative justice. There, she got to hear her alleged assailant take accountability in a private room, apologizing to her directly. He also underwent months of therapy. Liss said the prosecutor agreeing to resolve the case outside the daunting courtroom was the most healing moment in the entire process. "It was the first time someone was finally saying … 'Your voice matters, what you need matters, your boundaries matter, your healing matters. Let's act according to what you need,'" said Liss, who is the founder of the global advocacy group, Survivors 4 Justice Reform. Because the case was diverted from the court system, Liss's alleged assailant did not receive a criminal conviction, but by the time the community justice program was complete, Liss said she was confident he wouldn't re-offend. Liss's experience is rare. In Ontario, sexual offences are among a list of serious offences deemed ineligible for referral to community justice programs by Crown prosecutors. According to a 2023 report from the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), the Crown attorney for Liss's case was later formally disciplined for her actions. Survivors 4 Justice Reform is calling on the province to scrap that policy. The group has written an open letter to the Ministry of the Attorney General, co-signed by 50 individuals and organizations that work with and advocate for sexual assault survivors. "Denying survivors this option perpetuates a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to meet the complex realities of sexual violence," says the letter, shared publicly on Monday. A spokesperson for the minister of the Attorney General declined to comment, having not yet seen the letter. Charlotte Carron then declined to answer questions from CBC about the policy of not referring sexual assault cases to community justice programs and whether that might be changed in the future. "It would not be appropriate to comment on this topic without seeing the letter," she said via email. Restorative justice can take different forms, including therapy, healing circles rooted in Indigenous practices, rehab programs or volunteer work. People accused of crimes have to assume responsibility for their actions and be willing to make "meaningful amends" to participate, according to the province's Crown Prosecution Manual. "The idea that restorative justice could be a thing that lets perpetrators off the hook — I think we have to start by recognizing perpetrators are not on the hook right now with the criminal legal system," said Liss. Right now, community justice programs are available in Ontario to sexual assault survivors who haven't reported their case to police. But many don't know that's an option, Liss said. She says people's first instinct is to call the police, and once a case is in the legal system it's too late. "We really want it to be possible for people who are already going through the criminal legal system to be able to change their mind … that's what consent is," Liss said. Emily Quint says she wishes she'd known about restorative justice as the sexual assault case against her alleged assailant was going through the legal system. The charges were eventually stayed because of an unreasonable delay in 2023. Hers was one of 59 sexual assault cases that year in Ontario which were stayed due to delays, according to data from from the Ministry of the Attorney General. "I was re-traumatized, re-victimized, just treated like I was absolutely nothing," she said. WATCH | Emily Quint's case tossed over court delays: While she understands why many survivors want to see their assailants punished, Quint says it was never about that for her. "I wanted to stand up and say, 'this is what happened to me and it wasn't OK,'" she said. " I wanted healing for myself, healing for him, counselling for myself, counselling for him." Lack of access is another barrier Lawyer Deepa Mattoo said she's seen many survivors prefer seeking justice outside the court in her time as director of the Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic, which supports survivors of gender-based violence. She says they would go to the Human Rights Tribunal or the now-defunct Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. Mattoo agrees survivors should have greater choice, but says the clinic tends not to refer them to restorative justice programs because of low availability for those services throughout the province. "Those options need to be designed and available in [the] community for people to be referred out to," Mattoo said. The policy barring prosecutors from referring sexual assault survivors to these programs is a big reason that programs are under-resourced, according to Rosel Kim, a senior staff lawyer at LEAF, one of the organizations that co-signed the open letter. Not only should the province relax its policy, Kim says, but it should also increase the funding for the programs as well. "If you just sort of lift the moratorium, but they don't provide options, that's not meaningful either," Kim said.

To Protect Amazon from Drug Traffickers, Title Indigenous Lands, Report Says
To Protect Amazon from Drug Traffickers, Title Indigenous Lands, Report Says

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

To Protect Amazon from Drug Traffickers, Title Indigenous Lands, Report Says

Drug traffickers are violently seizing Indigenous lands in the Peruvian Amazon to clear rainforest and grow coca. To combat the drug trade, a new report calls for titling Indigenous territories along major trafficking routes. Since 2020, 27 Indigenous leaders in Peru have been assassinated, it is believed, for defending their land, including more than a dozen who were murdered in connection to drug trafficking, according to a new report published by Amazon Watch. 'We, the Indigenous defenders, face threats from drug traffickers when we speak out,' said Marcelo Odicio, an Indigenous Kakataibo leader. 'We are calling for real change in how this crisis is addressed.' Drug traffickers are able to seize land through organized invasions and cement their holdings with fraudulent contracts. More than 270 Indigenous communities in the Peruvian Amazon are at risk of being attacked and uprooted by drug traffickers, the report said. To protect native lands and stem the loss of forest, it called for titling Indigenous territories. Until recently, the U.S. Agency for International Development had been supporting Indigenous groups in Peru in combating deforestation related to the production of cocaine. But the recent dismantling of the agency, under President Donald Trump, has threatened to reinvigorate the drug trade, the Associated Press reports. U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard

B.C. Mountie loses bid to stay charges in obstruction of justice case
B.C. Mountie loses bid to stay charges in obstruction of justice case

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

B.C. Mountie loses bid to stay charges in obstruction of justice case

A Prince George RCMP officer has lost a bid to stay an obstruction of justice charge and will now be sentenced, in a case connected to the death of an Indigenous man in custody. In July 2024, Const. Arthur Dalman was found guilty of obstructing justice for ordering a bystander to delete cellphone video showing the aftermath of the police takedown and arrest of Dale Culver on July 18, 2017. The 35-year-old Gitxsan and Wet'suwet'en man died in police custody 29 minutes after he was arrested, following a struggle with multiple police officers. Dalman is one of two officers who went on trial in the obstruction of justice case. The constable filed an application to stay his 2024 conviction, arguing that lengthy pre-trial delays meant he was denied his Charter rights to a trial within a reasonable in a ruling on May 29, Judge Adrian Brooks dismissed Dalman's application. His next court appearance is on June 19 to schedule a date for his sentencing. The other officer accused of obstruction of justice, Staff Sgt. Bayani (Jon) Eusebio Cruz was found not guilty in 2024. Culver's arrest and death happened nearly eight years ago, on July 18, 2017. That was followed by an investigation by B.C.'s Independent Investigations Office (IIO), an oversight agency that investigates anytime a police-involved incident results in serious harm or death. It filed its initial report to Crown counsel in July 2019, followed by an updated report in May 2020. Close to three years later, in February 2023, Crown prosecutors announced charges of manslaughter against two Mounties and charges of obstruction against three others, the first time the accused were publicly named. Charges against the two officers accused of manslaughter were stayed in April 2024. Charges against one of the officers accused of obstruction were stayed a month later, while the trial for the other two officers accused of obstruction was completed on July 25, 2024, resulting in Dalman's guilty verdict. 'Rare occurrence,' civil rights group says Culver's death and its aftermath have been viewed by civil rights advocates and First Nations leadership groups in B.C. as a key test of the justice system's ability to hold police accountable. The B.C. Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) hailed the recent dismissal of Dalman's application, with a staff lawyer saying it's uncommon for officers to be charged with criminal offences and even less common for them to be found guilty. "We recognize that this is such a rare occurrence — that not only was Const. Arthur Dalman found guilty of obstruction of justice, but that despite his application to challenge that verdict, the judge upheld his guilty verdict," said Latoya Farrell. "And now we're going to be moving to sentencing, which is monumental in steps towards the police accountability." In a statement shared by the BCCLA, Culver's daughter asked how many people would have to die before the public realized the justice system was broken. "We have been waiting eight long years for this, and I have somehow managed to remain positive about my feelings that eventually someone would be held accountable," Lily Speed-Namox said. However, the National Police Federation's Pacific-North director, Chris Voller, was critical of Dalman's application being dismissed. "I think that this was an error," he told CBC News. "I think it was very clearly demonstrated, throughout the testimony of all involved, that Const. Dalman's Charter rights were clearly denied." Voller said the IIO, which forwarded a report to Crown prosecutors in Dalman's case recommending that charges be laid, made evidentiary errors in the case. "The public of British Columbia want and deserve to have the ability to say the oversight of their police officers is competent, timely and reasonable," he said. "We would request a review of the competency, timeliness and reasonableness associated to both the IIO investigations and charge assessment by the Crown counsel."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store