It is okay to be a 'foreign' Indian
US Vice President
JD Vance is well known for making acerbic comments. But during his recent four-day visit to India, he narrated an anecdote in Jaipur that warmed the cockles of many Indian hearts. After dining on some really delicious food at the most famous address in Delhi, 7 Lok Kalyan Marg, and chatting with its prime occupant, seven-year-old
Ewan Vance
apparently said, "Dad, I think I can live in India." The rider, however, would also sound familiar to Indians.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
India pulled the plug on IWT when Pakistanis are fighting over water
What makes this India-Pakistan standoff more dangerous than past ones
The problem of Pakistan couldn't have come at a worse time for D-St
It seems that after a few hours of sweaty sightseeing around Jaipur, young Ewan eventually decided that moving to England might be a better idea. Those conflicting emotions must go through the minds of the offspring of even the most optimistic Indian (or half-Indian) families when visiting India, especially at any time other than that magical two-month winter window. They arrive full of excitement, expectations and enthusiasm but often leave with mixed feelings.
The fact is, much of the
Indian diaspora
is now like their Irish, Scottish, Polish, Italian and other peripatetic counterparts, with their idea of a homeland no longer coinciding with their ethnicity anymore. Generations of ethnic Indians have been born in and lived out their lives in other countries. They are culturally attuned to different rhythms, so expecting them to warm to Indian beats with any more alacrity than other visitors who have no Indian parentage at all, is naive.
Nevertheless, many desi relatives feel a twinge of sadness that their visiting
NRI
or mixed-race family seem more 'foreign' than Indian. That they respond to what they see, hear, taste or feel on visits "home" in the same way as Norwegian or Nigerian visitors of similar age, background and passports. Yes, many ethnic Indians do not feel any instinctive affinity to India, but many do come to love it, albeit more in the way other foreigners fall for India rather than as 'desis'.
Coinciding with India's rising world profile, the Indian-origin diaspora now seems more willing to acknowledge, learn about and relate to their desi background, no matter how many generations remote. Yet it is too much to expect that they will feel a natural empathy for all things Indian, from customs and weather to food and idiosyncrasies. Despite ethnic ties, desi notions of privacy, relationships, personal space and hospitality can seem odd or mystifying to many of them.
Their detachment or unfamiliarity should not surprise, much less offend, resident Indians. After all, resident Irish or Poles rarely take umbrage if their diasporic tourists do not have the faintest idea about local cultures beyond, say, the stereotypical leprechauns and pierogies. India is now "the land of techies and chess geniuses" so it is alright if foreign-born ethnic Indians come "home" expecting to see those everywhere instead of the proverbial snake charmers and tigers.
The Vances had to tread a fine line between their official position as America's Second Family and their Indian link on this visit "home". The three children wore Indian outfits but the Telugu-origin, US-born-and-bred Second Lady Usha Vance did not wear a saree, or even a kurta set like former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's wife Akshata Murty wore during their G20 visit. Murty grew up in India and remains an Indian national, so it was natural. Usha Vance is American.
Many ethnic-Indian or part-Indian foreigners who no longer have any relatives in India tread a fine line too, as they often do not feel any special pull towards this 'homeland'. They regard India with the same way as any foreigner sees a land of great antiquity, modern relevance, philosophical and spiritual depth, business opportunities, and, yes, touristic value. Like Ewan Vance, they may love some things, change their minds about many other things. That's totally okay.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Operation Sindoor Proves Dharmic Wars Can Be Fought Even In Our Times
Last Updated: India, through Operation Sindoor, has taught the world how to conduct a 'limited military operation' without unjustifiable collateral casualties and extended warfare It is anybody's guess why Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Gen Anil Chauhan chose an overseas venue, Singapore, and two foreign journalists/news agencies, Reuters and Bloomberg, to reiterate his earlier acknowledgement of possible losses of air assets in Operation Sindoor. Of course, he had said almost as much at Savitribai Phule University in Pune earlier. Yet, the question remains why the CDS, or a political administrator, say, Prime Minister Narendra Modi or Defence Minister Rajnath Singh could not have said the same things, that too at a news conference in the national capital. After all, these preferred foreign news sources would have been represented by their Delhi-based correspondents, and others, mainly our own journalists, too would have benefited from an open interaction of the kind. The question however is where from here, how and for what. Yes, India set a kind of precedent on neutralising an adversary militarily without having to violate international borders directly. We also did it within a matter of days, which is not the case even with Israel's bombing out of a small parcel of land in Gaza, continually for months and months now. India showed to the world how to fight a modern war and win. During the Bangladesh War, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi gave Army chief Gen Sam Manekshaw three weeks to conclude the mission before international pressure caused a ceasefire. This time, too, the political leadership seemed to have taken into account the time-lines before a ceasefire became unavoidable. It's thus not about whether US President Donald Trump caused the ceasefire, as he only claimed. Instead, it is as much about the clear-cut political instructions that seem to have gone down the line, on the modalities and methodologies of warfare as it was about how and how fast our armed forces achieved the set goals and objectives. This aspect of Operation Sindoor has not been adequately acknowledged. What more, it is becoming increasingly clear that the operation would not have crossed into the second day after the Indian forces had neutralised terror sites in Pakistan and PoK. It is not unlikely that after the previous Surgical Strikes, a one-dayer of the kind would not have been appreciated as much by the public in this country as they did after the four-day military engagement. What has stood out since is that Operation Sindoor was as much a surgical strike as the previous ones. Only selected targets were bombed. Even Pakistan has not claimed collateral damage, especially in the form of loss of human lives from around the targeted sites. To that extent, too, India has proved that we were waging a 'dharmic war' with minimum war and maximum loss to the adversary's military capabilities—and nothing else. Compare it to the US war on Afghanistan and Iraq, the Ukraine War and Israel's Gaza strikes, and the picture will be complete. All these wars are in the post-Cold War. In the pre-Cold War period, you had the Vietnam War, which was a standing proof of how wars should not be fought—but ended up being fought, when Big Powers engaged in muscle-flexing at the expense of their poor cousins, far away from their borders. In a way, Operation Sindoor might have ended on day one had Pakistan not escalated the military engagement, to target Indian military targets and civilian settlements, too. It was unwanted and unwarranted, if and only if their command and political leadership had assessed the damage and accepted that the Indian shelling had stopped with terror targets. Suffice to point out that to this day, Islamabad or Rawalpindi, respectively the seat of political and military power, has not claimed that any or all of the day one targets of Operation Sindoor were not terror bases but were civilian habitations. By extending and expanding the scope of their adversary's operations, Pakistani military command commenced a war of attrition, which it lost out conclusively. In cross-border military strikes without IAF fighters crossing the International Border (IB) into Pakistan, India taught a lesson that will be remembered in post-Cold War global history of warfare. In doing so, the world may not want to classify Operation Sindoor as a 'classic war'. It would then be only to India's political advantage on the global theatre. What more, such constructs do not alter the ground reality one wee bit: Pakistan involved India in a military engagement, and lost squarely. Now, one needs to look at the truthfulness or otherwise of India's early claims that it was only a limited operation, confined to neutralising Pakistani terror-sites, and nothing more. Imagine a situation if Pakistan had not attacked India militarily from day two on. India would not have had a justifiable political reason to neutralise Pakistan's radar stations and air defences, without actually causing loss of their fighter aircraft. Given the way India chose the targets, both for day one and later on, and the way Indian forces carried out their assigned mission, it is becoming increasingly convincing that if they had taken aim at Pakistani air bases and their fighter aircraft in numbers, they would have also gone up, 'boom'. This would also go to prove the Indian claim of a limited, targeted operation, and not a full-fledged war (unless imposed on it by the other side). Nuclear bogey It is also now clear from the Kargil War on, how India has been able to keep military operations against Pakistan at the conventional level. Western governments and media hype up every India-Pakistan military operation to a nuclear war, making it as if the two South Asian adversarial neighbours are incapable of fighting a 'responsible war'. Operation Sindoor has proved India's proven path of peaceful coexistence and limited adversity in times of pressing needs. After all, this is one country in the world that at one point of time was a big power—and aspires to be one, again, any time soon—and still did not capture or retail territories. If there were limited engagements, there were justifiable reasons. The government also thought on its feet, and sending out political delegations the world over for briefing local governments about the compulsions that caused Operation Sindoor, and the conclusions that justified the same post facto, was also a top scorer like the political messaging and military operations. To have Opposition parliamentarians like Shashi Tharoor and Assadudin Owaisi to lead some of those teams clearly showed how united India was in times of war as much in times of peace. India, through Operation Sindoor, has taught the world how to conduct a 'limited military operation' without unjustifiable collateral casualties and extended warfare that anyway are destructive—as the world has seen in the post-Cold War era. But then wars are big business, and who else wants a short war! The writer is a Chennai-based policy analyst and political commentator. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 09, 2025, 17:55 IST News opinion Opinion | Operation Sindoor Proves Dharmic Wars Can Be Fought Even In Our Times
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
Indian Student Handcuffed, Pinned At US Airport: 'Treated Like A Criminal'
Last Updated: An Indian student was handcuffed and pinned at Newark Airport, as shared by Kunal Jain on X. The student was crying and treated like a criminal by authorities A video has been going viral on social media where an Indian student was handcuffed and pinned at a US airport. Kunal Jain, an Indo-American social entrepreneur, took to X (formerly Twitter) to share a photo of the Indian student who was being deported from Newark Airport last night. He said the student was crying and was treated like a criminal by the authorities, as he was handcuffed and pinned to the ground. I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night— handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal. He came chasing dreams, not causing harm. As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy. @IndianEmbassyUS #immigrationraids — Kunal Jain (@SONOFINDIA) June 8, 2025 'As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy," Jain wrote on X. Jain, President of HealthBots AI, said that the student was speaking in the Haryanvi language. 'I could recognise his accent where he was saying 'I'm not insane, these people are trying to make me look insane'," he wrote. In the post, Jain said, 'These children get their visas and get on a flight in the morning. For some reason, they are unable to explain the reason for their visit to the immigration authorities and are sent back on the evening flight tied up like criminals. Every day 3-4 such cases are happening. There have been more such cases in the last few days." First Published: June 09, 2025, 18:00 IST
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
CEC Kumar to speak on electoral integrity at IDEA Stockholm Conference
Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) of India Gyanesh Kumar has been invited to deliver the inaugural keynote address at the International IDEA Stockholm Conference on electoral integrity on 10 June. Kumar, who is leading a delegation of senior officials, interacted with members of the Indian diaspora in Sweden on Monday ahead of the conference. He is also scheduled to hold one-to-one bilateral meetings with the Chief Election Commissioners of nearly 20 countries, including the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, South Africa, Indonesia, Mexico, Mongolia and Switzerland. 'The massive scale of the Indian elections and the magnitude of the logistics involved in the exercise evinces keen interest amongst the Election Management Bodies (EMBs) across the world. Over 100 participants representing around 50 countries are taking part in the conference,' the Election Commission said in a statement. Kumar's keynote address comes at a time when questions have been raised in India over the neutrality of the Election Commission of India (ECI). On Saturday, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi criticised the ECI's functioning and raised concerns about electoral integrity in a column published in multiple newspapers. Gandhi called the recent Maharashtra election 'a blueprint for rigged elections' and alleged that the next instance of 'match fixing' would occur in the Bihar polls. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis responded in a separate column, accusing Gandhi of 'insulting' India's democratic processes and the people's mandate. 'The people have rejected Rahul Gandhi, and in retaliation, he is rejecting the people and their mandate,' Fadnavis wrote. Despite the public exchange, Gandhi has not formally submitted a letter to the ECI with his claims. According to established procedure, any constitutional body, including the ECI, requires an official written communication to issue a formal reply. India's ranking in the Electoral Democracy Index of the V-Dem Democracy Report 2023 has declined to 108th, from 100th in 2022. Since 2017, the report has categorised India under the 'electoral autocracy' classification. The ongoing international conference on electoral integrity and Kumar's participation are expected to draw attention to both the scale of India's electoral operations and the domestic discourse around democratic institutions.
