
German government to approve 2026 budget with record investment and borrowing surge, sources say
Germany is throwing off decades of fiscal conservatism in the hope of reviving economic growth, modernising its crumbling infrastructure and scaling up military spending, as Europe's biggest economy has gone from economic powerhouse to the euro zone's laggard.
It is the only G7 economy that failed to grow for the last two years and the government forecast in the spring that it would stagnate again this year. The sources said that with the budget plans, the economic environment should improve noticeably over 2025 and 2026 compared with those forecasts.
The 2026 draft budget comes together with a medium-term financial framework until 2029, with the whole package expected to be approved by the cabinet.
The budget discussions will then start in parliament at the end of September before expected approval in both houses of parliament at the end of the year.
The 2026 draft budget, with total spending of 520.5 billion euros ($606.80 billion), includes 126.7 billion euros ($147.71 billion) in investments earmarked for the modernisation of the country.
That is an increase from 74.5 billion euros in 2024 and 115.7 billion euros in 2025.
The investment surge in 2026 and subsequent three years will be possible thanks to a special 500 billion euro ($583 billion) infrastructure fund and an exemption from debt rules for defence spending approved in March.
The special fund for infrastructure, which is also excluded from Germany's "debt brake" that limits borrowing to 0.35% of GDP, will add borrowing of 58.9 billion euros in 2026.
For defence, the 100-billion-euro special fund created by former Chancellor Olaf Scholz following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which will be exhausted in 2027, will add 25.5 billion euros in borrowing in 2026.
In the core budget, borrowing will go up from 33.3 billion euros in 2024 to 89.9 billion euros in 2026, the sources said.
Adding those three components, total borrowing in 2026 will be 174.3 billion euros ($203.20 billion). It compares with total borrowing of 50.5 billion euros in 2024, under the previous government.
Interest expenses will rise more sharply than previously forecast, the sources said, forecasting an increase to 66.5 billion euros in 2029, which compares with the 61.9 billion previously expected.
Germany will raise defence spending to 3.5% of economic output by 2029, sources said on Monday.
After low spending following the end of the Cold War, Germany complied with the NATO defence alliance's target of 2% of GDP for the first time in three decades in 2024 due to Scholz's special fund.
NATO countries committed in June to spend 2.8% of GDP on defence in 2026 and then increase it to 5% - a new target to be achieved over the next 10 years, representing a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal.
Germany's total defence spending will go up from 95.1 billion euros ($110.90 billion) in the draft budget for 2025 to 161.8 billion euros ($188.67 billion) in 2029, the sources said.
Germany would be able to borrow a total 380 billion euros for defence between 2025 and 2029 thanks to debt brake reform from March, they said.
($1 = 0.8519 euros)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sheffield Wednesday players refuse to play friendly as wages are late again
Sheffield Wednesday 's players have refused to feature in a friendly this weekend after the club failed to pay their wages on time for the fourth time in five months. The Championship club were due to face Premier League side Burnley in a behind-closed-doors game but it is understood the Wednesday players are refusing to play. The Owls appointed Henrik Pedersen as their new head coach on Thursday following the departure of Danny Rohl and, just hours later, Saturday's friendly was cancelled as players and coaching staff decided to boycott the match after not receiving July's monthly salary on time. Rohl left Hillsborough on Tuesday during a chaotic summer which has seen Wednesday placed under a number of embargoes because of financial issues. Players were paid late in May and June, while this is the fourth time in the last five months that salaries have been delayed. The club are currently under an English Football League embargo for unpaid transfer fees and owner Dejphon Chansiri is trying to sell the cash-strapped Sky Bet Championship club. It is understood there is increasing concern within the EFL over the growing crisis at the club and that extends to whether Wednesday will be able to fulfil their opening Sky Bet Championship fixture at Leicester on August 10. Thai businessman Chansiri completed his takeover from previous owner Milan Mandaric January 2015 for a reported £30million and the club twice went close to promotion to the Premier League when losing out in the 2016 and 2017 play-offs. Since then Wednesday have lurched from one financial crisis to another. They were first placed under an EFL embargo in 2017 over profitability and sustainability rules and were docked 12 points – reduced to six on appeal – at the start of the 2020-21 season for further financial breaches. The Owls were placed under embargo for late salary payments to players and staff in 2024, while a player registration embargo is also in place for unpaid transfer fees. New boss Pedersen admitted the club were in 'rough waters' following his appointment, with registration restrictions and the departure of several key players leaving him with a threadbare squad. Djeidi Gassama and Anthony Musaba have been sold this summer to Rangers and Samsunspor respectively, while Josh Windass and Michael Smith had their contracts terminated by mutual consent to allow them to join Wrexham and Preston. The latest missed payments to players and staff heaps further pressure on Chansiri, who insists he is willing to sell the club for the right price. He recently revealed he had rejected one consortium's £40million bid, while talks with various other interested parties have stalled.


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of Gary Neville's money
As a footballer Gary Neville was not known for his versatility. He was a one-club man who trundled up and down the right flank like a plough-horse. So it is heartening to see him switching things up politically. This week he became the latest Labour supporter to turn on them over tax. 'I honestly don't believe […] companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people,' said Neville, who owns several businesses alongside his punditry gigs. 'So, I think the National Insurance rise was one that I feel probably could have been held back.' Leaving to one side the fact that Sky viewers might not mind living without his rabid commentary, there is a delicious schadenfreude in watching Neville, a noisy Labour fan, change tack. Last June, he even proved his commitment by taking Keir Starmer up the Langdale Pikes for a campaign interview, in what must have been the most tedious man-marking job of his life. Until recently Rachel Reeves has been blessed in her enemies. When she and Starmer broke a manifesto promise to whack farmers with inheritance tax, they couldn't have hoped for a better opponent than Jeremy Clarkson. Here was not some sympathetic turnip-tender on the breadline but a celeb who was on the record as saying dodging IHT was a reason he bought a farm. Number 10 must have rejoiced again in March when Alexander Armstrong, arguably the pre-eminent primetime posho, complained about VAT on private school fees. His quip that he was feeling 'extremely poor' did not land well with those who were actually feeling extremely poor. Now, even Labour's fans are rethinking. Neville was not the first. In February, the Iceland boss Richard Walker, who had supported Reeves' Budget, warned that, while it was right to look at 'levelling the playing field on tax', the Government had 'parked its tractor in the wrong place going after hard-working British farmers'. The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. Even Gary Neville's. Lower the voting age? Here's a better solution Full credit to Jeremy Corbyn for waiting until Labour had said they would lower the voting age before announcing his new party. The Government thought letting 16 and 17-year-olds have a go at the ballot box might give them the edge in a few marginals. Instead, they might hand a sizeable bloc to Corbo and his band of plucky dreamers, not to mention the Greens and even Reform. Luckily for Keir Starmer I have a solution. Rather than lowering the voting age, he should introduce a cut-off. Many problems in the UK are, we're told, down to our limitless brigades of pensioners. As they don't have day jobs or Xboxes to occupy them, voting provides a welcome distraction. With gilded pensions and houses they bought for a shilling and sixpence, they vote to preserve their interests. But you have to reapply for your driving licence at 70, so why not your voting licence? A short quiz could determine eligibility: should we keep the triple lock? Should the winter fuel allowance be extended to summer? Is the PM too young? Are the policemen too young? Is the Pope too young? I can foresee objections, so how about a compromise: you have 50 eligible voting years in your life and you can choose when to use them. If you wanted to torch them on idealism at 16, you would be free to, but you wouldn't be able to defend your pension later. Either way, surely this would be the kind of bold move Starmer had in mind when he promised 'action, not words'. At least, that's what he told Gary Neville, on a hillside in Cumbria.


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Revealed: Iran's plan to kidnap and kill UK and US citizens
Iran is conducting a covert operation to 'kill and kidnap' people in the UK and US, the State Department has warned. The United States and more than a dozen of its allies, including the United Kingdom, accused Tehran of conducting a campaign to murder and abduct dissidents, journalists and officials around the world. 'We are united in our opposition to the attempts of Iranian intelligence services to kill, kidnap, and harass people in Europe and North America in clear violation of our sovereignty,' a joint statement read. 'These services are increasingly collaborating with international criminal organisations to target journalists, dissidents, Jewish citizens, and current and former officials in Europe and North America. This is unacceptable.' Earlier this month, Britain's spy agencies warned that Iran had targeted 'prominent Jewish individuals' in at least 15 attempts to kill or kidnap people in the UK. In May, a suspected Iranian terror attack in Birmingham hours away from being launched was foiled by counter-terror police. Police were deployed to Rochdale, Swindon, west London, Stockport and Manchester in response. Five men, including four Iranian nationals, were arrested at locations across England on Saturday in what the Home Secretary described as one of the biggest counter-terror operations in recent years. In the United States, two purported mobsters were convicted of a plot to assassinate Masih Alinejad, the Iranian American journalist, at her home in New York City in a murder-for-hire scheme financed by Tehran. Prosecutors said Iranian intelligence officials first plotted in 2020 and 2021 to kidnap her in the US and move her to Iran to silence her criticism. When that failed, Iran offered $500,000 for a July 2022 killing of Alinejad after efforts to harass, smear and intimidate her failed. In 2011, the US authorities foiled an Iranian bid to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington. The attacks amount to 'violations of our sovereignty,' the countries said. 'We are committed to working together to prevent these actions from happening and we call on the Iranian authorities to immediately put an end to such illegal activities in our respective territories.'