Why you don't see this in Hawaiʻi: It's a history and a mission
Since 1912, The Outdoor Circle has helped pass laws, plant trees and lead local efforts to preserve the beauty of these islands. Today, that mission is as urgent as ever.
KHON2.com was able to sit down with Winston Welch, the executive director for The Outdoor Circle. In operation since 1912, this organization has remained true to its mission.
'Our mission here is to keep Hawaiʻi clean, green and beautiful,' explained Welch. 'Most of the large trees that you see in Honolulu were advocated for, perhaps planted by, The Outdoor Circle.'
The Outdoor Circle began with a group of women in Honolulu who had seen public parks and tree-lined boulevards in other cities. They came home inspired.
They were not impressed by the large ads for cigarettes, whiskey and diapers that covered buildings and blocked the views their own town.
'These ladies got together and said, we're going to start a boycott of the stores that carry the products that were advertised on the billboards,' Welch said.
The campaign worked. The media joined in, the laws followed; and the last billboard company was eventually bought and shut down.
'It's a testimony to time and to talent and endurance,' Welch said. 'If you see that Hawaiʻi's different and you think about it, we don't have ads here. We don't have billboards. We have a beautiful environment. I think in large part, you have The Outdoor Circle to thank for that and the work and the advocacy that's been done over the century.'
Hawaiʻi bans all off-site advertising: That means no billboards, no ads for products or services on public property, and no corporate logos on places like stadiums or state buildings.
It's been this way for more than 100 years: The Outdoor Circle helped pass the first laws in the early 1900s. These laws have been repeatedly tested and upheld in court.
Most residents support it: 'There's overwhelming support for keeping these protections in place,' Welch said. 'We value our view. We value our heritage. We don't need or want corporate logos or advertising taking over what we value here.'
Naming rights are the new threat: Under recent proposals like Senate Bill 583, the state could sell naming rights to public facilities. 'It could be Marlboro Lights Stadium or Pepto-Bismol Stadium,' Welch said. 'Is this something that we need?'
This is about more than names: 'This belongs to the people of Hawaiʻi,' Welch said. 'When we allow this, it degrades and cheapens what Hawaiʻi is.'
Senate Bill583 is a bill that would allow corporate naming rights for public buildings and assets. Welch said that's just another form of offsite advertising and one that threatens to undo generations of work.
'This bill offers no rules, no time limits, no oversight and no public say in the process,' Welch said. 'Once naming rights are sold, they may never be undone.'
Welch wrote in his testimony on the bill that 'Unlike traditional philanthropy, where donations support public facilities without altering their identity, this bill hands over 'naming rights' in exchange for corporate imprint, a.k.a. offsite advertisements, potentially forever, on public assets.'
Once 'sold' it would be difficult or impossible to 'buy back' naming rights.
Welch asked lawmakers to think carefully about what kind of future they want to leave behind.
'If naming rights are sold, they may never be undone, forcing future generations to live under branding decisions made today,' he said.
Hawaiian place names are not just words. They are tied to the land, the culture, and the stories of this place. Welch said replacing these names with corporate brands would be a major loss.
'Hawaiʻi's place names hold meaning. They tell stories of the lands, the aliʻi, the moʻolelo and Hawaiʻi itself,' Welch said. 'What happens when corporations dictate the names of our most treasured public sites?'
This is not just about signs or logos. It's about identity. Welch said protecting Hawaiʻi's unique visual character is about respecting the culture, the ʻāina, and the people.
'Not everything should be up for sale,' Welch said in his testimony. 'Allowing advertising to assault us all everywhere should not stand.'
Welch said the Outdoor Circle is not against public-private partnerships. But he draws a clear line at selling the identity of public places.
'If corporate donors genuinely care about Hawaiʻi, they can support public assets without demanding ownership over their identity,' he explained in his testimony.
The work of The Outdoor Circle goes far beyond signs and advertisements. Across the islands, its branches take care of parks, gardens, bike paths, and trees.
'As stated earlier, I think it's fair to say that most of the large trees that you'd see in Honolulu were advocated for, perhaps planted by The Outdoor Circle,' Welch said.
In Waimea, there's a nature park. In Kailua, women at the Hawaiʻi Correctional Facility grow hydroponic lettuce to sell at Foodland. On the North Shore, volunteers help maintain bike paths. Every branch is different. Each one has its own focus.
'This organization is about community,' Welch said. 'It's about making the difference where you live in your local area.'
The Outdoor Circle sees itself as one tree with many branches. Welch said each branch makes its own decisions based on what its community needs.
'It's one organization that has very different manifestations of what it does,' Welch said. 'And that is locally decided by each branch with its own board and how they want to focus on the beauty that they want to create.'
Welch invites anyone interested to get involved.
'We encourage anybody who's interested in starting their own branch to reach out to us at outdoorcircle.org,' he said. 'Say, hey, I want to start something in my own community.'
SB583 is still being debated. Welch and The Outdoor Circle are asking lawmakers to reject it outright.
'There is no amendment that can 'fix' this bill,' he said in his testimony. 'It must be rejected outright.'
Welch is not interested in half-measures or compromises when it comes to protecting Hawaiʻi's beauty.
You can click to read the bill. You can click to learn more about The Outdoor Circle. Welch said the organization is keen to continue expanding. They work in many different areas around Hawaii from creating community gardens to educational programs and political advocacy to protect Hawaiʻi.
So, if you're interested in creating an affiliated organization, then you can click that link and get started on an amazing journey that is entrenched in Hawaiʻi's modern history.
Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8
'This is not just a policy debate. This is about who we are as a state and a people,' he said. 'Hawaiʻi is not for sale.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
25 minutes ago
- CBS News
Controlling the back-to-school chaos: How parents can get own the morning as school approaches
The clock is ticking down to back-to-school time. While we know that parents are the biggest helpers, cheerleaders, supporters, and everything else in between, being prepared for the chaos that comes with returning to school is key. That struggle is real for parents when the school doors open, and for one mom who owns the morning, she's got the advice that parents will need. Ashley Rusnic knows what it's like with two school-aged children at home. Come the fall, he son and daughter will go into 6th and 4th grades, respectively. "There is no tired like back-to-school tired," she said. Not only does she have two school-aged children, but she also teaches middle school health and physical education, which means she knows that every minute in the morning counts. "I wish that minutes on the treadmill went as fast as minutes in the morning," Rusnic joked. She has mastered the morning routine, and it all begins the Sunday evening before. They meal prep the lunches going into the week, smoothies make for a fast, nutritious meal the kids will like, and then it's time to get dressed. Marked bins hold the clothes the kids chose to wear for the week, making the process go a little smoother. "I have told a couple of parents, just set all of those clocks like 15 minutes earlier," she said. The Notes app on her phone helps her create a to-do list that she can burn through. "In 10 minutes, you can get a lot done," Rusnic said. "I can go through those checklists and just order things online." Staying with technology, the family shares a calendar through the Cozi app. "It's been a lifesaver for us," she said. "I have the app on my phone, my husband has it, the kids have it on their iPads, and it actually syncs with a digital calendar we have." All that said, don't be deceived. She said there are mornings when hair is, figuratively, on fire, and things are forgotten. For Rusnic, it takes a village, and she reminds parents that they are not alone. "Don't be afraid to ask people for help, and to offer it," she said. One more note on getting prepared for school: Cleveland Clinic sleep specialists suggest getting kids adjusted to their back-to-school sleep schedule 2-4 weeks before school starts. That will allow kids to gradually transition their bodies for earlier bedtimes and wake-up times.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family Drama Unfolds as Bride and Groom Invite Nephew but Exclude Twin Nieces from Wedding
The bride and groom argue that because their twin nieces are only about a year old, they'll "summon a considerable amount of attention"NEED TO KNOW Family tension has risen four months before a couple's wedding because they invited their nephew to their ceremony but want to exclude their nieces The bride-to-be explained that her sister-in-law's 1-year-old twin daughters would "summon a considerable amount of attention," taking away guests' focus, but that the 6-year-old son would be a great "flower boy" Now, the bride and groom have been given an "ultimatum": "either all her kids come or none will"A soon-to-be bride and groom are refusing to invite their nieces to their wedding, sparking family tension before their big day. In a post on Reddit's "Wedding Drama" forum, the bride-to-be, 32, shared that she and her fiancé, 34, are dealing with family drama just four months before their wedding because her sister-in-law is insistent that all of her children be invited despite the couple previously telling her that only one of her three kids was welcome. The bride's sister-in-law has a 6-year-old son and almost 1-year-old twin daughters. While the bride and groom would "love" to have the boy as their "flower boy," the groom does not want the baby girls there because they "summon a considerable amount of attention" and guests would be "focused" on them. Before the twins were born, the bride's sister-in-law told her that she "didn't want her kids" at the wedding because she was "looking forward to knowing at the 12-month mark there would be a child-free evening where she could let loose." So, she "agreed" to her son being a part of the ceremony, then being driven the "short distance" home afterward to join his sisters and baby sitter during the reception. The mother-of-three seems to have "forgotten" her conversation with the bride because she's been "shopping for dresses for the twins for the wedding day." "I've been gentle but I have said that it was only the 6-year-old that was planned to be there and I wasn't too keen on the younger kids being there," the bride wrote. Now, both the bride's sister-in-law and mother-in-law are "upset" with the couple over their baby-free wedding ceremony decision. The mother-in-law is pushing for the "whole family" to be invited so that everyone can be included in the "nice" group family wedding photos. Similarly, the sister-in-law believes her twin daughters "deserve" to be at the wedding. "[Sister-in-law] has also said she doesn't want the six-year-old to be attending events without the twins because he has had trouble adjusting to them and is always asking to leave them behind," the bride said. "SIL (sister-in-law) doesn't want to encourage that behavior by having him attend anything without them." The bride's sister-in-law has given her an "ultimatum": "either all her kids come or none will." The Redditor feels like she was "dismissed" by her in-laws, and says the "tense" conversation was left "unresolved." Although she and her fiancé have offered compromises, such as taking group photos the night before or morning after the wedding to include the twins, their suggestions have been "completely dismissed." "They've tried to change plans without letting me know and then tried to guilt trip me when I called it out," the bride said. "Now it kind of feels like an ultimatum is being set and the whole attitude around it has me wanting to put my foot down and push back." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The majority of Reddit users in the comments section said that the bride was not overreacting by excluding the twins from her wedding, and argued that the best solution would be to keep the wedding entirely child-free. A few people also said it was important for the bride to set boundaries with her in-laws before getting married. "I almost feel like a 6yo little boy would be just as much of a loud distraction as two 1yos and your entire wedding is child-free anyways so it would be odd that one single small child is the exception to that," the top comment reads. "Just avoid the whole thing and leave all the kids out of it." Another individual wrote, "Just know if you give in this time, SIL (sister-in-law) and MIL (mother-in-law) will not stop here. Every single decision you make will have to go thru them. Have a kid-free wedding period. When they try to back peddle, tell them this was THEIR DECISION." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Small plane crashes into water during emergency landing off North Carolina
This is the moment a small plane was forced to make an emergency landing in the Atlantic Ocean off of Oak Island, North Carolina on Saturday after the aircraft's engine suddenly shut off. The male pilot and sole occupant said he wanted to land on the beach, but there were too many people.