Venezuela warns citizens not to travel to US
In a travel alert issued via a Telegram video on Sunday, the Venezuelan foreign ministry urged its compatriots to "protect their lives and those of their families and return to their homeland".
It described the US as a "dangerous country where human rights do not exist for immigrants".
"There is no American dream there, only nightmares. Our duty is to denounce this reality and demand respect for our compatriots," the ministry said.
Foreign Minister Yván Gil claimed that it was dangerous to be a Latino, Afro-descendant or Venezuelan migrant in the US. "The police shoot first and ask questions later," he said.
As evidence of the US' persecution of migrants, Caracas cited the case of hundreds of migrants who were deported to a maximum security prison in El Salvador earlier this year.
Venezuela says the deportees are living "under inhumane conditions" and are being "subjected to psychological torture".
Caracas' travel warning comes after the US government issued its own alert last Tuesday, urging its citizens not to travel to Venezuela for any reason and to leave the country immediately because of the high risk of arbitrary detention.
In a statement, the US State Department said there were "serious risks" of unjust detentions, violent crime and civil unrest in the Latin American country.
According to the official note, Venezuela is the country with the highest number of unjustly detained US citizens.
The US does not have an embassy or consulate in Venezuela, so it cannot offer consular assistance to its citizens there.
Last year, Venezuela's authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro cracked down on mass protests following a disputed election victory, with international experts accusing his administration of widespread human rights abuses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
36 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Ukraine: Avoiding the trap of the Russia-US summit in Alaska
For the first time since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three and a half years ago, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, are set to meet, in Alaska on Friday, August 15. The stakes of this summit are considerable. What could be the outcome? Kyiv and its European allies are skeptical, and rightfully so. Putin has several reasons to be pleased with the prospect of this bilateral summit, the first since 2018. He has emerged from the diplomatic isolation imposed on him by the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. He is being treated as the leader of a great power, one on equal footing with the US. He has also – at least for now – managed to sideline Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whom he only met once, in Paris in 2019, and of whom he has a very negative impression. The ultimatum President Trump gave to Russia, and the threat of new sanctions that came with it, have been lifted by this summit. Putin knows Trump is eager to showcase a ceasefire in Ukraine. And the Russian leader believes that, if he makes the right maneuvers, this may be an opportunity to achieve, through diplomatic means, what he has so far failed to achieve militarily: the domination, at least in part, of Ukraine. Whether under the Biden or Trump administrations, the Europeans have always been treated as insignificant in this matter, even though the security of their continent is at stake. Yet they are now the primary suppliers of financial and military aid to Ukraine. US Vice President JD Vance even stated, while speaking on Fox News on Sunday, August 10, that American taxpayers would no longer fund Ukraine's defense. Zelensky asked European leaders for help as soon as the Alaska summit was announced. Leading figures among them demanded that the Ukrainian president participate in any attempt to resolve the conflict and reiterated several basic principles, which establish a kind of red line: the inviolable nature of borders and, if a negotiated compromise with Ukraine were to be reached, solid security guarantees for Kyiv that would deter Moscow from resuming its offensive. In reality, even if they have not been invited to the summit, the Europeans are not excluded from the process. Trump has consulted some of their leaders, JD Vance has held meetings with their representatives, and Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy, has responded to their requests for clarification about his fifth meeting with Putin on August 6, which remains a source of major confusion. Things are moving, and they will continue to shift before Friday. Putin has sensed Washington's irritation, has noted the pressure brought to bear on India over its purchases of Russian oil and does not want to break with Trump. He therefore refrained from repeating his maximalist demands for Ukraine's "denazification" and demilitarization to Witkoff, limiting himself to territorial issues. While the Americans may have been duped, the Europeans – at least the decisive voices among them – are not misled. They have three days left to persuade Washington that only a policy of firmness and increased pressure can push Putin to conduct a genuine negotiation. This is a crucial moment, if the Alaska trap is to be turned into an opportunity.
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Ukrainians view upcoming Trump-Putin summit with some skepticism
Kyiv residents have been sleeping better at night ever since diplomatic contact between Washington and Moscow was restored. Not because they have begun to dream of peace, imagining that it might be miraculously brokered on Friday, August 15, at a meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska. It's just that their nights are no longer punctuated by the sounds of sirens and explosions from Russian projectiles. In an attempt to placate the American president, who has been troubled by Russia's relentless strikes on civilians, Putin has paused the massive campaign of aerial offensives on the Ukrainian capital, which he had been conducting since early August. Instead, he has now begun focusing his army's bombardments on regions near the front lines, where between 50 to 160 strikes have been reported every night. The announcement of the upcoming Trump-Putin summit has dominated the headlines of Ukrainian media outlets, though it has not sparked much hope in the country, which has been at war for the past three and a half years. The United States administration's policy reversals, ever since the billionaire Republican returned to the White House in January, as well as several diplomatic initiatives that have yielded no tangible results, have fueled growing skepticism.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Chipmakers Nvidia and AMD to pay 15% of China revenue to US government
Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay 15% of their revenues from sales of artificial-intelligence chips in China to the US government. The unprecedented deal, first reported by the Financial Times on Sunday, is part of a bargain to secure export licenses for the Chinese market. Nvidia will share revenue from sales of its H20 chip, while the pledge applies to AMD's MI308 chips. According to FT sources, the Trump administration has not yet decided how to use the money. 'The unusual arrangement is another example of a mega tech company acquiescing to the US administration's demands, to gain an upper hand as trade relations are redrawn,' said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown. 'Nvidia's Q1 revenue took a $2.5 billion (€2.1bn) hit due to restrictions on H20 sales to China, but it clearly believes the 15% contribution is well worth it, to keep access to the vast and fast developing market,' she added. The US government last week began to grant licenses for Nvidia to sell its H20 chip in China. The move represented a U-turn for the White House, which in April banned sales of the chip to China, linked to concerns that the technology could be used for military purposes. The H20 chip was specifically designed for the Chinese market, in line with restrictions introduced by former president Joe Biden in 2023. Huang had harshly criticised April's export ban, arguing that restrictions were causing more harm to American businesses than to China. Critics argued that as well as denting the profits of US firms, restricting access to the Chinese market provided an added incentive for China's domestic industry to innovate. The new pledges from AMD and Nvidia are unusual, as no US company has ever agreed to pay a portion of their revenues to obtain export licences. Even so, this brand of dealmaking is becoming increasingly characteristic of firms dealing with the Trump administration. The president is notably encouraging companies to invest in the US to obtain more favourable tariff rates. Last week, Apple said it would invest another $100bn (€85.8bn) in the country, adding to a previous pledge to spend $500bn (€429bn) in the US over the next four years. The announcement came as President Trump said he would impose a 100% tariff on computer chips, only sparing companies that commit to 'building' on US soil. The easing of chip export restrictions has also arrived as relations between Washington and Beijing have thawed in recent weeks. Earlier this year, the Trump administration threatened a 145% duty on Chinese goods sent to the US, and Beijing responded with a 125% retaliatory tariff. The two sides decided to lower these taxes in May, and then agreed on a trade framework in June. Both China and the US are seeking to find a permanent solution to replace the temporary trade truce before a 12 August deadline. Nvidia and AMD did not immediately respond to Euronews' request for comment.
