Magpies make Hill concession, Howe concussion call
Hill, the 2023 Norm Smith Medal winner, has made just one senior appearance in the past two months as he deals with personal issues.
The 25-year-old has been absent from training this week and won't play against the Demons at the MCG on Friday night, when the Magpies can lock in a top-four berth.
On Wednesday, McRae said he had dinner with Hill the previous night as he keeps tabs on the small forward's welfare.
Hill asked his coach to leave the door ajar for a possible return to action in September, but appears an unlikely finals participant.
"There's high performance and there's love and care, and I've just sort of left the high performance for now and I'm just making sure the young lad's OK," McRae said.
"Time's running out in the season and maybe the high performance might be a bit far at the moment, but we'll just take that off the table for now.
"Hopefully he can get back in the club and be happy, and then we'll see where we go from there."
McRae specifically asked Hill how he should answer inevitable questions about whether he will play again at AFL level this season.
"He goes, 'Please just leave a little bit of hope there for me'," McRae said.
"But he's well aware that time's running out for getting enough load and then to be available.
"I stepped straight back into love and care and said, 'Nah, let's just get him right day by day'."
Howe has been given the green light to return from concussion, in a significant boost to Collingwood's defensive stocks.
The 35-year-old was knocked out in a sickening collision with Hawthorn's Jai Newcombe in round 22 and is back after missing last week's three-point loss to ladder leaders Adelaide.
"Howey will come back and his experience is important to us. I think he'll play our system really well," McRae said.
Collingwood's forward-line connection wasn't up to scratch against the Crows, when the Magpies dominated the inside-50 tally (71-37) but couldn't make it count.
McRae will consider recalling ruck-forward Mason Cox, with Daniel McStay potentially making way after some quiet performances.
"We're working hard with Dan to get him moving and be part of our best team," McRae said.
"There's a lot of work behind the scenes to work on his craft, jump at the ball well and fit into our patterns."
Jeremy Howe will return for Collingwood's high-stakes clash with Melbourne, but coach Craig McRae concedes time is running out for Bobby Hill to feature in his side's AFL premiership push.
Hill, the 2023 Norm Smith Medal winner, has made just one senior appearance in the past two months as he deals with personal issues.
The 25-year-old has been absent from training this week and won't play against the Demons at the MCG on Friday night, when the Magpies can lock in a top-four berth.
On Wednesday, McRae said he had dinner with Hill the previous night as he keeps tabs on the small forward's welfare.
Hill asked his coach to leave the door ajar for a possible return to action in September, but appears an unlikely finals participant.
"There's high performance and there's love and care, and I've just sort of left the high performance for now and I'm just making sure the young lad's OK," McRae said.
"Time's running out in the season and maybe the high performance might be a bit far at the moment, but we'll just take that off the table for now.
"Hopefully he can get back in the club and be happy, and then we'll see where we go from there."
McRae specifically asked Hill how he should answer inevitable questions about whether he will play again at AFL level this season.
"He goes, 'Please just leave a little bit of hope there for me'," McRae said.
"But he's well aware that time's running out for getting enough load and then to be available.
"I stepped straight back into love and care and said, 'Nah, let's just get him right day by day'."
Howe has been given the green light to return from concussion, in a significant boost to Collingwood's defensive stocks.
The 35-year-old was knocked out in a sickening collision with Hawthorn's Jai Newcombe in round 22 and is back after missing last week's three-point loss to ladder leaders Adelaide.
"Howey will come back and his experience is important to us. I think he'll play our system really well," McRae said.
Collingwood's forward-line connection wasn't up to scratch against the Crows, when the Magpies dominated the inside-50 tally (71-37) but couldn't make it count.
McRae will consider recalling ruck-forward Mason Cox, with Daniel McStay potentially making way after some quiet performances.
"We're working hard with Dan to get him moving and be part of our best team," McRae said.
"There's a lot of work behind the scenes to work on his craft, jump at the ball well and fit into our patterns."
Jeremy Howe will return for Collingwood's high-stakes clash with Melbourne, but coach Craig McRae concedes time is running out for Bobby Hill to feature in his side's AFL premiership push.
Hill, the 2023 Norm Smith Medal winner, has made just one senior appearance in the past two months as he deals with personal issues.
The 25-year-old has been absent from training this week and won't play against the Demons at the MCG on Friday night, when the Magpies can lock in a top-four berth.
On Wednesday, McRae said he had dinner with Hill the previous night as he keeps tabs on the small forward's welfare.
Hill asked his coach to leave the door ajar for a possible return to action in September, but appears an unlikely finals participant.
"There's high performance and there's love and care, and I've just sort of left the high performance for now and I'm just making sure the young lad's OK," McRae said.
"Time's running out in the season and maybe the high performance might be a bit far at the moment, but we'll just take that off the table for now.
"Hopefully he can get back in the club and be happy, and then we'll see where we go from there."
McRae specifically asked Hill how he should answer inevitable questions about whether he will play again at AFL level this season.
"He goes, 'Please just leave a little bit of hope there for me'," McRae said.
"But he's well aware that time's running out for getting enough load and then to be available.
"I stepped straight back into love and care and said, 'Nah, let's just get him right day by day'."
Howe has been given the green light to return from concussion, in a significant boost to Collingwood's defensive stocks.
The 35-year-old was knocked out in a sickening collision with Hawthorn's Jai Newcombe in round 22 and is back after missing last week's three-point loss to ladder leaders Adelaide.
"Howey will come back and his experience is important to us. I think he'll play our system really well," McRae said.
Collingwood's forward-line connection wasn't up to scratch against the Crows, when the Magpies dominated the inside-50 tally (71-37) but couldn't make it count.
McRae will consider recalling ruck-forward Mason Cox, with Daniel McStay potentially making way after some quiet performances.
"We're working hard with Dan to get him moving and be part of our best team," McRae said.
"There's a lot of work behind the scenes to work on his craft, jump at the ball well and fit into our patterns."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
33 minutes ago
- Courier-Mail
AFL 2025: Adelaide Crows not taking responsibility in Izak Rankine investigation
Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News. The Adelaide Crows have come under scrutiny for 'arguing the toss at every turn' with regards to the ongoing investigation into the alleged homophobic slur delivered by Izak Rankine to a Collingwood player. The Crows are bracing for Rankine to be dealt a season-ending suspension from the AFL, but despite expectations a decision would be made on Tuesday — as all parties involved have been spoken to — the league will continue to mull the situation until at least Thursday before determining a sanction. Watch every game until the 2025 AFL Grand Final LIVE with no ad-breaks during play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1. Adelaide was granted 'additional time to respond to the AFL's proposed determinations', per an AFL statement on Wednesday afternoon. The alleged incident occurred on Saturday night, before relevant interviews took place and submissions made on Monday. The league is thought to be hunting a five-match ban for Rankine — which would end his season — with the Crows now in the process of readying their response. Respected commentator and AFL 360 host Gerard Whateley called the drawn-out process 'convoluted' on Wednesday night, with the saga about to enter its fourth day. Izak Rankine's saga is set to enter a fourth day. (Photo by Sarah Reed/AFL Photos via Getty Images) 'That is an intolerably convoluted process, and it risks the AFL looking indecisive — perhaps behind the scenes they haven't been at all, but that's how it looks from the outside,' Whateley began on Fox Footy. 'It does make me wonder why Andrew Dillon and his legal team didn't go to Adelaide on Tuesday, sit in the board room and stay until matters were resolved. 'I think on a public front ... this is going to run all the way until game day of Round 24 — it's a nasty story. It's got an unsavoury edge, and some of the debate around it is it's damaging to the code.' Whateley expressed his belief that the Crows aren't acting 'in a contrite manner' as they continue to try for the most lenient possible suspension. Dawson speaks on potentially losing Rakine for the AFL finals Video Player is loading. Play Video This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. X Learn More Loaded : 31.71% Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. 00:23 SUBSCRIBER ONLY Dawson speaks on potentially losing Rakine for the AFL finals more more spoken about what it could mean to be down one of their guns. Adelaide Crows' Jordan Dawson has...... ... more 'My focus, really, is on Adelaide, who seem desperate to fight every angle of this,' he said. 'It's not a picture of accepting responsibility and acting in a contrite manner. And they are arguing the toss at every turn, formally and informally — (making the argument) finals games should be worth more than home-and-away games, even though there's no precedent in the system for that. 'They have gone with Rankine was provoked, which is a big stretch, I think — he was antagonised, but provoked is a big stretch. 'Informally, they've even raised Snoop Dogg. That's the domain of talkback radio, not a responsible footy club.' Whateley said there were 'three possibilities' that could have eventuated. 'Front up to what happened, pledge to address whatever it is in the environment that allowed this to happen, and accept what's coming,' he said. The Crows forward is facing a lengthy suspension, but the club aren't giving up the fight. (Photo by James Elsby/AFL Photos via Getty Images) Former Demons captain Garry Lyon took a slightly different route to Whateley, suggesting the Crows were within their rights to 'fight and fight hard' to get Rankine off the hook — provided they also fall on their sword and accept the forthcoming penalty when the time comes. 'It's incumbent from a supporter's point of view to do the best job they possibly can to see if they can get Izak back playing,' Lyon said on AFL 360. 'Now, as unsavoury as that may sound, and as you've pointed it out, it smacks of them not wanting to take responsibility, I think they are entitled to argue their case as vociferously and as strongly as they possibly can, given the stakes that are at play — so long as they are accepting of the final verdict and it doesn't go too far. 'As a football club that's sitting on top of the ladder and are premiership favourites, there is a way to deal with it. And as I said, I don't begrudge them the right to fight and fight hard — even if that means getting in the trenches a bit — but there comes a time where you do need to show some humility and be accepting of the penalty, and that'll come.' Originally published as 'Desperate' Crows questioned for 'arguing at every turn' as slur saga stalls
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
AFL's monumental Izak Rankine blunder laid bare as the league fails everyone
COMMENT The AFL has dug itself into a massive hole with its comical handling of the Izak Rankine case. Adelaide forward Rankine is facing a season-ending ban for a homophobic slur aimed at a Collingwood player last Saturday night. The 25-year-old allegedly called his opponent a f****t, with the incident coming just weeks after West Coast's Jack Graham was banned for four matches for calling a GWS player a 'f***ing f****t'. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1. Last month Sydney defender Riak Andrew was also slapped with a five-match suspension after being found guilty of using an anti-gay slur. In the aftermath of the Rankine incident, the AFL launched an investigation into the on-field comment, and as of Thursday morning, they are still deliberating on what ban should be handed down. has contacted the AFL for comment over the incident and the major delay in the suspension being handed down. It marks the game's biggest stress test, seeing if the AFL stay firm in their stance against homophobia, even when the repercussions for Rankine could not be larger - ruling out one of the game's biggest stars for the AFL finals series. A four-game ban would rub Rankine out for the rest of the season if the ladder-leading Crows win both a qualifying and preliminary final to reach the decider, while a five-match ban would definitively end his season. However, the fact that seems to be overlooked by many is that it is a black and white situation, he has either done it or he hasn't. There is a precedent already set by the AFL that if you say a slur, you cop a ban and a hefty one at that, no ifs or buts. Apparently, that is the case until there are potential finals implications. The reality is Rankine is only the latest of a growing number of AFL players and coaches sanctioned for anti-gay language. When an almost certain ban is handed down, he will be the sixth AFL player suspended for a homophobic remark aimed at an opponent in the past 16 months alone, underlining a major problem in the sport. And in the wake of such an incident, the AFL, which needs to portray strength, unity and a zero tolerance for such language, has let the saga dominate the headlines for almost a week and looked increasingly weak. If a five-game ban had been handed down on Monday, to which the Crows could appeal, would have created some uproar but ultimately would have swiftly dealt with the situation and in doing so shown the game's strength and zero tolerance towards such behaviour. Instead, they have twiddled their thumbs, ummed and ahhed, and now it is a full-blown drawn out saga, with more twists and turns than an AFL game itself. Now five days on from when the incident came to light, instead of the news cycle focusing on the final week of the regular season, it is still on Rankine, and now whatever the ban is handed down won't appease anyone and will damage the AFL's reputation. And if he is given a ban of less than five games, well, that will show the league is weak when faced with actually imposing a meaningful sanction. But the underlying truth of the whole ordeal is that the AFL's failings in dealing with the Rankine saga extend far beyond the arbitrary ban. It has far more to do with the hidden message it is sending by letting it drag on. Homophobia is a real problem in our game, and it is something that needs to be rubbed out for good. Long gone are the years of claiming you 'didn't realise' the impact such slurs can have on people, especially in sports that for decades have been accused of marginalising gay players. The weakness of the AFL has been on full display all week, with their decision reeking of uncertainty and an underlying sense that a Grand Final could well outweigh a punishment for homophobia. And now, as the Rankine saga continues on Thursday, the AFL world is totally fed up and rightly so. 'It's mind-boggling the Izak Rankine Adelaid investigation is headed to a 5th day,' sports presenter Stephen Quartermain wrote on X. 'It's now taken longer for the AFL to sanction Rankine than it took The Conclave to elect a new Pope. How is that possible?' broadcaster Matthew Campbell added. While ex-premiership player Will Schofield said: 'Rankine's situation a complete joke. AFL have precedent here - if he's done it, it's a clear-cut penalty (not that I agree with it, but that's how it is.) Adelaide wants their best player to play finals - no s***… but bad luck?!' AFL's previous bans for slurs Jeremy Finlayson (April, 2024) – three game suspension Wil Powell (May, 2024) – five game suspension Lance Collard (July, 2024) – six game suspension Jack Graham (July, 2025) – four game suspension Riak Andrew (July, 2025) – five-game suspension The AFL has made a point of compounding the penalty each time an offence occurs. However, the AFL has since gone back on its word, stating that at the end of last season, they will consider 'specific circumstances in each incident in determining appropriate responses and does not consider that it is bound by the level of sanctions that it has previously imposed for similar incidents.' But in saying that, the most recent ban this year for a slur was five matches, so any less than five for Rankine is simply unacceptable.
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Desperate' Crows questioned for ‘arguing at every turn' as slur saga stalls
The Adelaide Crows have come under scrutiny for 'arguing the toss at every turn' with regards to the ongoing investigation into the alleged homophobic slur delivered by Izak Rankine to a Collingwood player. The Crows are bracing for Rankine to be dealt a season-ending suspension from the AFL, but despite expectations a decision would be made on Tuesday — as all parties involved have been spoken to — the league will continue to mull the situation until at least Thursday before determining a sanction. Watch every game until the 2025 AFL Grand Final LIVE with no ad-breaks during play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1. Adelaide was granted 'additional time to respond to the AFL's proposed determinations', per an AFL statement on Wednesday afternoon. The alleged incident occurred on Saturday night, before relevant interviews took place and submissions made on Monday. The league is thought to be hunting a five-match ban for Rankine — which would end his season — with the Crows now in the process of readying their response. Respected commentator and AFL 360 host Gerard Whateley called the drawn-out process 'convoluted' on Wednesday night, with the saga about to enter its fourth day. 'That is an intolerably convoluted process, and it risks the AFL looking indecisive — perhaps behind the scenes they haven't been at all, but that's how it looks from the outside,' Whateley began on Fox Footy. 'It does make me wonder why Andrew Dillon and his legal team didn't go to Adelaide on Tuesday, sit in the board room and stay until matters were resolved. 'I think on a public front ... this is going to run all the way until game day of Round 24 — it's a nasty story. It's got an unsavoury edge, and some of the debate around it is it's damaging to the code.' Whateley expressed his belief that the Crows aren't acting 'in a contrite manner' as they continue to try for the most lenient possible suspension. 'My focus, really, is on Adelaide, who seem desperate to fight every angle of this,' he said. 'It's not a picture of accepting responsibility and acting in a contrite manner. And they are arguing the toss at every turn, formally and informally — (making the argument) finals games should be worth more than home-and-away games, even though there's no precedent in the system for that. 'They have gone with Rankine was provoked, which is a big stretch, I think — he was antagonised, but provoked is a big stretch. 'Informally, they've even raised Snoop Dogg. That's the domain of talkback radio, not a responsible footy club.' Whateley said there were 'three possibilities' that could have eventuated. 'Front up to what happened, pledge to address whatever it is in the environment that allowed this to happen, and accept what's coming,' he said. Former Demons captain Garry Lyon took a slightly different route to Whateley, suggesting the Crows were within their rights to 'fight and fight hard' to get Rankine off the hook — provided they also fall on their sword and accept the forthcoming penalty when the time comes. 'It's incumbent from a supporter's point of view to do the best job they possibly can to see if they can get Izak back playing,' Lyon said on AFL 360. 'Now, as unsavoury as that may sound, and as you've pointed it out, it smacks of them not wanting to take responsibility, I think they are entitled to argue their case as vociferously and as strongly as they possibly can, given the stakes that are at play — so long as they are accepting of the final verdict and it doesn't go too far. 'As a football club that's sitting on top of the ladder and are premiership favourites, there is a way to deal with it. And as I said, I don't begrudge them the right to fight and fight hard — even if that means getting in the trenches a bit — but there comes a time where you do need to show some humility and be accepting of the penalty, and that'll come.'
