
Fossil found in cliff 50 years ago in Scotland is 166-million-year-old creature. See it
On one of these trips, Robert Savage, a professor from the University of Bristol, noticed what looked like fossils sticking out from the base of the cliff. He wrote notes about the bones in his notebook.
'Bones of ?dinosaur on big block, v large prob land reptile,' Savage wrote and made no other mention of the bones in his work, according to a study published March 6 in the peer-reviewed journal Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh.
Now, 50 years after the fossils were first discovered, researchers with the National Museums Scotland conducted a 'challenging extraction' to pull the bones from the cliff — and revealed a 166-million-year-old species.
'The fossil was first discovered in 1973, making it Scotland's earliest recorded dinosaur find,' according to a March 6 news release from the National Museums Scotland. 'It was not fully identified at the time and remained uncollected until a team led by Dr Elsa Panciroli returned in 2018 to the location near Elgol, in the south of the island, to undertake its extremely challenging extraction from the rock.'
By the time researchers came to extract the fossils in 2018, they were part of a boulder in a tidal zone, making it very hard to see and approach, Panciroli said in a video shared by National Museums Scotland. Only a small portion of the full fossil assemblage was visible from the surface, but as they split the boulder, they found more bones jumbled together.
Panciroli said 'we'd previously felt (it) was too difficult to collect the fossil, but I thought it was really important to study it. I was able to persuade the team to give it a try,' according to the release.
All of the bones in the assemblage were broken, according to the study, making it impossible to tell exactly how many bones were present.
Researchers believe, however, that they have found parts of the pelvis and leg of a single animal, enough to identify the species.
'We've known there were dinosaurs there for a while, most obviously from the famous footprints at An Corran, Brother's Point and Duntulm and from individual bones, but it's exciting to see a more complete, if still partial, skeleton,' study author Stig Walsh said in the release.
The bones belong to a species of ornithopod dinosaur, similar to well-known groups like iguanodons, parasaurolophus and edmontosaurus, according to the release.
'The Elgol dinosaur dates to around 166 million years ago, in the middle Jurassic, making it one of the earliest known ornithopod body fossils, as that group of dinosaurs became far more prominent in the later Cretaceous period,' researchers said. 'Analysis of the bone structure indicates that the animal, which would have been roughly the size of a pony, was at least 8 years old.'
Susie Maidment, study author and researcher at the Natural History Museum and the University of Birmingham, said while the extraction was difficult, identifying the species may have actually been harder.
'Some aspects of the bones indicate that the specimen may be an ornithopod, a group of plant-eating dinosaurs that are best known from the Cretaceous,' Maidment said in the release. 'This specimen, however, would already have been a fossil by the time that the better-known ornithopods like iguanodon and hypsilophodon were walking the Earth.'
Two other major prehistoric discoveries have been made on the Isle of Skye: young and adult Krusatodons showing how dinosaurs grew over time, and Dearc sgiathanach, the world's largest Jurassic pterosaur fossil, according to National Museums Scotland.
The Isle of Skye is on the western coast of Scotland.
The research team includes Panciroli, Walsh, Maidment, Gregory F. Funston, Richard J. Butler, Roger B. J. Benson, Brett L. Crawford, Matt Fair and Nicholas C. Fraser.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Dogs Able to Sniff Out Parkinson's Before Symptoms Appear
Dogs can be trained to identify individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) by sniffing out a disease-specific odor in skin swabs with up to 98% specificity and 80% sensitivity, a recent study suggested. The findings may help inform key biomarkers for PD before symptoms appear. There is currently no single diagnostic test for PD, and reported estimates show roughly a quarter of patients are misdiagnosed. 'Sensitivity levels of 70% and 80% are well above chance, and I believe that dogs could help us to develop a quick noninvasive, and cost-effective method to identify patients with Parkinson's disease,' lead investigator Nicola Rooney, associate professor at Bristol Veterinary School at the University of Bristol, Bristol, England, said in a news release. The study was published online on July 14 in the Journal of Parkinson's Disease . The Nose Knows Previous studies have shown that dogs can detect disease-specific odors in human breath or urine in patients with cancer, diabetes, and even posttraumatic stress disorder. This study adds to the growing evidence they can also identify PD. Seborrheic dermatitis and increased sebum production are premotor signs of PD. Previous research published last year by a nonprofit Parkinson's organization based in Washington showed that various breeds of dogs can be trained to recognize sebum unique to PD patients. This led the UK-based researchers to suspect sebum could be used as an indicator of PD. For this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, investigators collected dry skin swabs from 130 patients with PD and 175 individuals without the condition. Of these, 205 swabs were used for training dogs from the organization Medical Detection Dogs. For double-blind testing, 40 samples were from patients who didn't use drugs for PD (42.5% women; mean age, 69.6 years), and 60 samples were from individuals without PD. After 38-53 weeks of training, a Golden Retriever named Bumper and a Black Labrador named Peanut were shown samples on four stands in a line. In each line, there was either one positive sample or all controls. Both the trainer and experimenter were blind to the location of positive or negative samples. Computer software confirmed whether the dog's response was correct. If the dog was unsure, samples were retested in new lines until a clear decision was made. Dogs were rewarded for correctly identifying a positive or negative sample. The dogs showed high specificity by correctly ignoring 90% and 98.3% of swabs from the control group and high sensitivity by correctly identifying 70% and 80% of the swabs from patients with PD ( P < .0001). Of note, the Labrador had 15 weeks more training than the Golden Retriever and achieved the higher of the two results. 'While we do not envisage dogs being diagnostic, they could potentially, with refinements, help to validate methods of clinical utility…and aid rapid screening and diagnosis,' the investigators wrote.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers put 3D-printed house to test on 50-ton shaking machine: 'These findings will be essential'
Researchers put 3D-printed house to test on 50-ton shaking machine: 'These findings will be essential' New sustainably constructed houses are being put to the test to see if they can withstand real-world weather conditions. A team of researchers from the University of Bristol has successfully mimicked the effects of an earthquake by placing 3D-printed concrete homes on a 50-ton shaking machine. They were testing their long-term durability, according to a press release, and monitoring any cracking, displacement, and potential failure points. 3D-printing commercial and residential structures has become "a rapidly emerging technology in the construction industry due to its potential to support rapid, resilient, affordable, and sustainable buildings," the press release said. And even though concrete is one of the most durable building materials, the new homes still need to undergo stress testing because they have unique properties and nontraditional geometries due to the 3D-printing process. "Insights from this study will help identify design parameters that optimise seismic performance, such as layer bonding strategies and reinforcement integration," said Dr. Raffaele De Risi, a lead researcher on the project, per the press release. "These findings will be essential for engineers, architects, and policymakers exploring the future of earthquake-resistant constructions." We are just beginning to see the future of construction with 3D printing, as the technology is likely to only improve and gain popularity. There's a need for quick and affordable housing all over the world, and automation like this makes it possible. People are already living in 3D-printed homes, choosing them because they're more cost-effective and eco-friendly than traditional builds and produce less waste. Some styles can even be built in just 24 hours. This efficiency means that they could be a solution for quickly generating housing in the aftermath of natural disasters, as well as emergency shelters and other needed infrastructure. "By testing the seismic resilience of 3D-printed concrete for the first time, we're not just exploring the future of construction — we're helping shape a safer, smarter, and more adaptive built environment," Dr. De Risi said. Would you trust a 3D-printed home in a natural disaster? Yes Depends on the disaster As much as traditional homes Nope Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Biomechanics study shows how T. rex and other dinosaurs fed on prey
By Will Dunham WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Tyrannosaurus subdued prey with raw power, using bone-crushing bite force. But other meat-eating dinosaurs that rivaled T. rex in size used different approaches. Giganotosaurus relied more on slashing and ripping flesh. And the long and narrow snout of Spinosaurus was well-adapted for catching fish. Researchers have documented the feeding biomechanics of meat-eating dinosaurs in a comprehensive analysis of the skull design and bite force of 17 species that prowled the landscape at various times from the dawn to the twilight of the age of dinosaurs. The study found that Tyrannosaurus possessed by far the highest estimated bite force, with a heavily reinforced skull and massive jaw muscles. But it showed that other dinosaur predators evolved successful approaches to bringing down prey even without matching the T. rex chomp. "We found that large predatory dinosaurs didn't all evolve the same kind of skull to deal with the challenges of feeding at massive size," said vertebrate paleontologist Andre Rowe of the University of Bristol in England, lead author of the study published this month in the journal Current Biology. "Some, like T. rex, reinforced the skull to tolerate extremely high bite forces and the associated skull stresses. Others, like Allosaurus or Spinosaurus, went with lighter or possibly flexible builds that spread out stress in different ways. There's no single 'correct' way to be a giant meat-eater, and that's the point," Rowe added. The study focused on species within the group, or clade, called theropods that includes the meat-eating dinosaurs. They ran from Herrerasaurus, which lived in Argentina about 230 million years ago and is one of the earliest-known dinosaurs, all the way to T. rex, which was present in western North America when an asteroid struck Earth 66 million years ago and ended the age of dinosaurs. The researchers used three-dimensional models of the skulls of the 17 species, including two different specimens of Tyrannosaurus, and applied a method for simulating how structures respond to physical stress. They estimated muscle forces using digital muscle reconstructions based on living relatives of the dinosaurs - birds and crocodiles - then applied those forces to the skull models to simulate bites. "Our focus wasn't raw bite force. We were testing how the skulls distributed that force under load, and how these distributions varied by each lineage of carnivores," Rowe said. The early theropods examined in the study such as Herrerasaurus, which lived during the middle of the Triassic Period, and Dilophosaurus, which lived early in the Jurassic Period, exhibited much lower stress resistance than their later counterparts. They were lightly built dinosaurs and not well adapted to high bite forces, Rowe said. The increase in bite force and skull strength unfolded gradually over time, reaching its apex with Tyrannosaurus and its close relatives in a lineage called tyrannosaurs such as Daspletosaurus and Albertosaurus, which like T. rex appeared late in the Cretaceous Period. "In tyrannosaurs, there's a big jump in skull strength and bite mechanics, coinciding with deeper skulls, more robust bone architecture and changes in jaw muscle attachment. So the ramp-up wasn't immediate. It evolved over time and in certain lineages more than others," Rowe said. Tyrannosaurus, Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus were three of the largest theropods, but their skulls were quite different. Perhaps the largest-known Tyrannosaurus is a specimen named Sue at the Field Museum in Chicago, at 40-1/2 feet (12.3 meters) long. Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus rivaled T. rex in size. Giganotosaurus lived in Argentina in the middle of the Cretaceous, while Spinosaurus inhabited North Africa at around the same time, both predating Tyrannosaurus by roughly 30 million years. "Giganotosaurus was large, but its skull wasn't built for the same kind of high-force feeding as T. rex. Spinosaurus had a long, narrow snout, which is consistent with a diet focused on fishing, though we have fossilized evidence that it ate other animals, such as pterosaurs," Rowe said, referring to the flying reptiles that were cousins of the dinosaurs. One of the key takeaway messages, Rowe said, is that giant body size did not funnel all theropods toward the same design. Stronger bite force was one strategy, but not the only one, Rowe added. "Some animals win with raw power, others by striking quickly or repeatedly. What we're seeing here is a spectrum of ecological adaptations. These animals weren't all trying to be T. rex clones. They were solving the same problem in different ways," Rowe added. "That kind of evolutionary flexibility," Rowe added, "probably helped them dominate ecosystems for so long." Solve the daily Crossword