Thousands of civil servants to be moved out of London as Government cuts costs
Thousands of civil servants are set to be relocated outside of London as the government looks to reduce costs and "radically reform the state".
The move will see 12,000 civil service jobs shifted from the capital to new regional hubs, with 11 London office buildings slated for closure, including one of the government's largest Westminster sites. The projected savings are estimated at £94 million annually by 2032.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Pat McFadden, stated the government is committed to decentralising decision-making, moving it "closer to communities all across the UK."
Government departments are now tasked with submitting relocation plans for their staff, including senior officials, as part of the upcoming spending review. The deadline for these submissions is 11 June.
This initiative will lead to the establishment of two major new 'campuses': one in Manchester focusing on digital innovation and artificial intelligence, and another in Aberdeen specialising in energy.
Both cities already have a significant government presence. Manchester houses substantial offices for the science and culture departments, while Aberdeen is the location of the newly established Great British Energy headquarters.
Other roles will be created in Birmingham, Leeds, Cardiff, Glasgow, Darlington, Newcastle and Tyneside, Sheffield, Bristol, Edinburgh, Belfast and York, with the changes expected to bring £729 million to the local economy by 2030.
Among the offices being closed in London is 102 Petty France, one of the largest Government offices in the capital and home to around 7,000 civil servants in the Ministry of Justice, HM Courts and Tribunal Service, Crown Prosecution Service and the Government Legal Department.
The Government will also close 39 Victoria Street, which has been home to the Department of Health and Social Care since the end of 2017.
Mr McFadden said: 'By relocating thousands of Civil Service roles, we will not only save taxpayers money, we will make this Government one that better reflects the country it serves.
'We will also be making sure that Government jobs support economic growth throughout the country.
'As we radically reform the state, we are going to make it much easier for talented people everywhere to join the Civil Service and help us rebuild Britain.'
Around 80% of civil servants – more than 400,000 people – already work outside London, but the most senior mandarins tend to be based in the capital.
Under Wednesday's proposals, half of senior civil service roles would be based outside London by 2030.
Prospect union general secretary Mike Clancy welcomed the plans to 'increase and empower' civil servants based outside London, but called for more clarity on the role of arm's-length bodies outside the capital.
He added: 'We have been here before with similar announcements, if this one is to be different, Government needs to work closely with unions both on specific relocation plans and on the wider Civil Service reform agenda.'
The Government has previously pledged to cut the total number of civil servants in an effort to make the British state 'leaner' and 'more productive'.
Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA union, also welcomed the proposals to move more staff out of London and allow them to 'build careers for the longer term across the UK'.
But he added: 'There will also be uncertainty for the thousands of civil servants affected by the office closures announced today.
'We need to hear quickly from the departments affected how this will be managed, not least how they will be affected by the office closures, relocation of roles out of London and reduction in headcount all happening at the same time.'
The Tories said the announcement showed the Government was 'fundamentally unserious' about reducing the size of the state and working more efficiently.
Shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Alex Burghart MP said: 'Labour themselves admit that they have set up at least 29 new quangos since entering office whilst Angela Rayner and her ministers also appear to have never used their offices outside of London – and are instead shutting them down.
'It's clear Keir Starmer is taking the public for fools – shuffling things around and making empty promises. Only the Conservatives are serious about reducing the size of the state and making it work more efficiently for British taxpayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
How Palace are fighting to keep European dream alive
Crystal Palace are anxiously waiting to hear whether their European dream is over before it even begins. Winning the FA Cup - the Eagles' first major trophy triumph - resulted in the south London club qualifying for the Europa League, the club's only qualification into continental football in their 164-year whether Palace can start planning for European football is in the hands of governing body Uefa, who must decide whether the Eagles have breached its rules on teams under one multi-club ownership structure competing in the same European final ruling will centre on American businessman John Textor, owner of Eagle Football - which holds a 43% stake in Football also owns a 77% stake in French side Lyon, who - like Palace - have qualified for next season's Europa BBC Sport outlines the details of Palace's defence as they fight for their European lives. Palace deny operating multi-club model Uefa's regulations are in place to prevent collusion between clubs. At the heart of Palace's argument is that their historic FA Cup win and consequential European qualification was an achievement accomplished entirely on their own are insisting they are an entity that operates entirely independently, and not within the structures of a multi-club with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that Textor's personal share in the Selhurst Park side does not meet the 30% threshold - which is key in Uefa determining decisive influence - and that he has just 25% of the voting rules state that "no individual or legal entity" can hold a majority of shareholder voting rights at two clubs in the same European it is understood Palace have made clear they had no assistance in winning the FA Cup, in that they have not collaborated with Lyon since Textor's original investment into the club in August 2021 and will have no connection with the French side during next year's Europa Premier League side are believed to have pointed out that there have been no transfers between the clubs since Jake O'Brien, now at Everton, left Palace for Lyon in August also say there has been no employee, backroom staff or coach sharing, no dialogue, no collaborative strategy, no combined partnerships, sponsorships or commercial deals and no collective scouting, analysis or software is accepted, and been widely reported, that chairman Steve Parish and his leadership team make all final decisions in relation to the management and operations at working structure has existed for a decade and is supported by fellow shareholders Josh Harris and David Textor, who only has one vote, has publicly spoken about his lack of influence at Selhurst Park."As proud as we are to have been a part of the resurgence of Crystal Palace, it remains true that Crystal Palace is an independent club, run by a man with a steady hand, who has achieved a level of sustainability that is incredibly uncommon in today's Premier League," said Textor in May 2024."An integrated sporting model, such as ours at Eagle, is simply not a perfect fit for Crystal Palace."It has been pointed out to Uefa that Textor is an individual and minority shareholder and, when he first invested into Crystal Palace in 2021, he owned no other clubs and his investment into other teams followed takeover over Lyon was confirmed in 2022, 16 months after he secured a stake in Palace. Textor could resign as Palace director Under Article 5 of Uefa's rulebook, which relates to the integrity of the "competition/multi-club ownership", a club is required from March 1 2025 to have complied with the requirements necessary to prove they are not "simultaneously involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration, and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a Uefa club competition".In the past clubs have sought to divest the stakes of key shareholders with a view to complying with Uefa's example, the City Group, Ineos, Red Bull group and most recently Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis have adapted their shareholdings in clubs accordingly to ensure their teams can compete in the same European year Ineos, which owns Manchester United, put its shares in French club Nice into a blind trust to ensure both clubs could compete in the Europa League last made a similar move earlier this season by placing its ownership of Swiss club Lausanne-Sport into a blind trust, before a potential conflict in the 2025-26 rules regarding the March 1 deadline are clear - and clubs have sought to comply with the regulations and cut-offs. A template for Palace to follow is in Palace are understood to have made clear that Textor's position means he cannot be enforced by the club to place his shares into a blind trust, owing to a lack of legal authority, unlike previous precedents where a single entity owns multiple as has been well documented, effectively holds the deciding vote at Palace with the backing of Harris and Blitzer, so existing shareholder agreements would need to be altered to enforce a blind trust scenario - which is not within the club's power and infringes on Textor's property is also a sense that the chain of events that have left Palace's position in European football in jeopardy were unforeseen and is a factor towards why they failed to meet the deadline for ownership faced Millwall in the FA Cup fifth round on March 1. Since then they beat Champions League clubs Aston Villa and Manchester City en route to winning the side Strasbourg conceded a 90th-minute goal on the final day of the season to hand Lyon the final Europa Conference League spot, before Paris St-Germain later won the French Cup to elevate Lyon into the Europa Uefa rules that Lyon and Palace cannot both compete in the Europa League, regulations state that the French side will play in the competition because of their higher league that scenario Palace could play in the Europa Conference League, but even then there is the added complication that Danish club Brondby, who have qualified for the Conference League, are owned by Harris and missed the deadline, Palace have expressed to Uefa that they are prepared to take immediate steps to comply with their with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that one of those measures includes the resignation of Textor as a director of Palace, which would mean he will have no influence in any capacity. 'Europa League ban is disproportionate' It is understood Palace are arguing that banning them from the Europa League would result in a disproportionate sanction and unfairly punish the club, players, staff, fans and local thoughts are that preventing the club from competing in the Europa League next season would result in an injustice, particularly given their breach is technical and that no competitive harm has is believed Palace also feel that refusing them a place would contradict the promotion of football's development that ensure that "sporting values always prevail", as per Article 2 of Uefa's sources are indicating that Palace believe a fine or temporary oversight measures - for example the monitoring of transfers - would appropriately punish a breach, without harming stakeholders who have no involvement in the ownership is expected to confirm its decision in the coming weeks.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves's public finance plan ‘like that of Steve Jobs at Apple'
Rachel Reeves will turn around the British economy like Steve Jobs turned around Apple, the technology secretary has argued. Peter Kyle likened the chancellor to the Apple co-founder who took the tech company from the brink of bankruptcy to become the most valuable in the world. He argued that an £86 billion injection in science and technology due at the spending review would lead to iPhone-style innovation in Britain and turbocharge growth. Reeves is still battling senior cabinet colleagues over cuts to key budgets needed to fund an increase in defence spending and a £30 billion boost to the NHS. She is also expected to increase the budget for schools by £4.5 billion. Kyle said that the police and other services resisting cuts needed to 'do their bit' to help turn around the country. Looser fiscal rules would give Reeves £113 billion a year more borrowing to invest, which she was expected to direct towards infrastructure and research designed to stimulate the economy. After £40 billion of tax rises in the autumn budget, Kyle said the spending review would allow Reeves to invest 'record amounts of money into the innovations of the future.' 'Just bear in mind how Apple turned itself around. When Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office,' he said. 'Now Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod.' He told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips on Sky News: 'Now we're starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future. Some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector. All these really high, highly innovative sectors.' Jobs returned to Apple in the mid-1990s and released a series of products over the next 15 years that revolutionised communications and set the company he co-founded on a path to becoming the most valuable in the world. Apple is worth more than £2 trillion, compared with Britain's GDP of £3.8 trillion. Kyle told Times Radio: 'We are investing into those key innovations of the future. We know that we cannot break this vicious cycle of high tax and low growth by doing the same as we always have done. We have to innovate our way out of this and we are doing so by investing in those high-growth sectors.' • What we'd do in Reeves's shoes — by Hunt, Zahawi and Mel Stride However, an increase in investment comes alongside a squeeze on day-to-day spending, with Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, still holding out over cuts to the police and Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, over council budgets. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Kyle told Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg on BBC1. 'You will see the priorities of this government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
China's super-embassy in London ‘must be blocked' after US warning
Plans for a new Chinese 'super-embassy' in London must be blocked after a warning from the White House, the Tories have said. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said the proposals for a huge new complex near the city's financial hub pose a 'security risk' and should be thrown out. The proposed 'mega embassy' at the former Royal Mint site near the Tower of London has been locked in a planning battle for years, with the decision called in for review last year. The proposal has proved extremely controversial, with fears the building could effectively become a nest of spies in the heart of London. It has now been reported that the White House has warned the UK to reject the proposals on security grounds, given the site's proximity to a hub of sensitive data near key financial centres. It comes after cyber experts for the UK Government privately sounded the alarm about the plans in an exchange sent to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. A senior US official told The Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' On Sunday, Mr Philp said it was 'likely' the embassy would be used as a base for Chinese espionage and urged the Government to block it. Asked for his view on the reports in The Sunday Times, he told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: 'Well, I agree with the United States. We think it is a security risk. 'In government the Conservatives were very clear, we should not be allowing the Chinese to build this super-embassy. 'It is likely to become a base for their pan-European espionage activities and it sits very close to, of course, the UK's financial centre. 'It's very close to three critical data centres … data cables connecting, for example, Canary Wharf to the City, run very close or indeed even underneath the site, and it is very likely the Chinese would use it to organise espionage activities. 'We've seen the Chinese government cracking down on dissidents, running secret police stations in the UK, even putting bounties on the heads of dissidents, some of whom I've met. We should not be giving permission to this.' The row presents an awkward dilemma for Sir Keir Starmer, who has pursued a strategy of engagement with Beijing while attempting to maintain a positive relationship with Donald Trump, a prominent China sceptic. The White House official quoted by The Sunday Times said: 'The United States expects that all decisions will be taken with our (both US and UK) national security interests in mind and after thorough mitigation as recommended and approved by counter-intelligence professionals.' Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, said the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any security concerns raised. He told Phillips: 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process. 'But just to reassure people, we deal with embassies and these sorts of infrastructure issues all the time. 'We are very experienced of it, and we are very aware of these sorts of issues constantly, not just when new buildings are being done, but all the time.' Asked about the US warning, he said: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… We are one of the few countries in the world that share intelligence.' He added: 'If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. But look, the key thing is, these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country. 'This is not new. It's going through planning. These are issues that will be dealt with in that process.'
