Lava Bold N1 Pro vs Poco C71: Which budget phone offers better value in India
The Lava Bold N1 Pro features a 6.67-inch HD+ punch-hole display with a refresh rate of 120Hz. The device also comes with an IP54 certification to give the device protection against basic dust and water.
Also read: Realme Neo 7 Turbo key features tipped online ahead of May 29 launch: Here's what to expect
In comparison, the Poco C71 comes with a slightly larger 6.88-inch HD+ IPS LCD display, and it also supports a 120Hz refresh rate. It includes a peak brightness of 600 nits and carries an IP52 rating, which offers limited dust and splash resistance. It also provides a side-mounted fingerprint scanner and a 3.5mm headphone jack.
In short, Poco C71 offers a slightly larger screen and higher brightness. Both phones support the same refresh rate.
Also read: Microsoft launches Xbox Copilot beta on Android app to assist gamers with real-time support
The Lava Bold N1 Pro is powered by the UNISOC T606 octa-core processor paired with 4GB LPDDR4X RAM and 4GB virtual RAM. It comes with 128GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 256GB via microSD card.
In contrast, the Poco C71 uses a UNISOC T7250 processor built on a 12nm process and pairs with either 4GB or 6GB LPDDR4X RAM. It includes 64GB or 128GB eMMC 5.1, expandable up to 2TB using a microSD card.
In short, Poco C71 offers a newer chipset, higher RAM variant, and greater expandable storage capacity.
Lava Bold N1 Pro features a 50MP AI-powered triple rear camera setup with LED flash and an 8MP front-facing camera supported by screen flash.
Meanwhile, Poco C71 camera features a 32MP dual AI camera on the rear and an 8MP front camera for selfies and video calling.
Also read: Alcatel V3 Ultra, V3 Pro and V3 Classic launched in India with NXTPAPER display tech - Details
Lava Bold N1 Pro houses a 5,000mAh battery with 18W fast charging support. However, it includes only a 10W charger in the box.
Meanwhile, the Poco C71 packs a slightly larger 5,200mAh battery with 15W wired charging support.
In short, Poco C71 edges out slightly in battery capacity, while Lava offers a faster charging rate, though limited by the bundled charger.
The Bold N1 Pro runs a full version of Android 14 without bloatware.
In contrast, the Poco C71 ships with Android 15 (Go Edition), and the company promises 2 years of OS updates along with 4 years of security patches.
In short, the Poco C71 leads in software support with a longer update promise, though it uses the lightweight Go Edition.
Also read: Uber users can now book Delhi Metro tickets within the app: Here's how to do it
The Lava Bold N1 PRO comes in a single configuration and is priced at Rs. 6,699 for the 4GB of RAM and 128GB storage variant.
Meanwhile, the Poco C71 starts at Rs. 6,499 for the 4GB RAM + 64GB variant, and Rs. 7,499 for the 6GB RAM + 128GB variant.
Both the Lava Blaze N1 Pro and Poco C71 smartphones cater to entry-level needs with minor differences in display, processor, battery, and software. Since they fall in a similar price range, your choice should depend on which features matter most to you. Compare their specifications carefully to decide which suits your needs better.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bill Gates sceptical on electric trucks; Musk says Tesla Semi coming in 2026
Electric heavy-duty trucks have been a topic of debate among industry leaders for years. While Microsoft founder Bill Gates has expressed skepticism about the practicality of fully electric 18-wheelers, Elon Musk , CEO of Tesla Inc., remains confident in their future. 'Tesla Semi is not just feasible, it's the future of trucking,' Musk has said, affirming that his company's all-electric Semi truck will hit volume production next year. His bold claim comes amid growing global interest in electrifying freight transportation to cut emissions and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. As Tesla gears up to ramp production in 2026, industry watchers are eager to see whether the Semi can deliver on its promises and truly compete with traditional diesel trucks. Bill Gates' skepticism on electric 18-wheelers Bill Gates has consistently argued that fully electric 18-wheelers face fundamental limitations, focusing on the technical challenge of batteries for heavy-duty long-haul trucks. He has stated that the high energy density required to move large payloads over long distances with batteries results in trucks carrying more battery weight, which in turn reduces their efficiency and practicality. Gates believes this makes electrification particularly tough for heavy freight, cargo ships, and passenger jets. Even with ongoing progress in battery technology, Gates maintains that batteries alone are unlikely to solve the unique needs of long-haul, heavy trucking, and has suggested that alternatives like hydrogen fuel cells or synthetic electrofuels may be more practical for these larger, energy-intensive applications. He's also noted that these synthetic fuels could be used in existing engines, minimizing the need for wholesale changes in infrastructure. Elon Musk's vision for Tesla Semi Elon Musk, meanwhile, has reaffirmed that Tesla's all-electric Semi truck will begin volume production in 2026. The company has constructed a dedicated production facility near Gigafactory Nevada with an expected annual output of 50,000 units when fully ramped. While actual output in the first year may be lower, Tesla's leadership, including Dan Priestley, head of the Semi program, has publicly shared that the company is preparing for full-scale manufacturing to start in 2026. Tesla's Semi, since its unveiling in 2017, has promised a range of 500 miles per charge, top-tier acceleration and torque, and a gross vehicle weight comparable to that of traditional diesel trucks. Tesla's strategy goes beyond the US: the company has signaled intentions to expand the Semi's market into Europe, where stricter emissions regulations and dense logistics routes present both challenges and opportunities. In addition, Tesla continues to invest in its Megacharger high-speed charging network designed to address heavy-duty fleets specifically. Tesla's expanding electric vehicle lineup Tesla is not only pushing into the heavy-duty sector. The Cybertruck, a full-size electric pickup, officially launched production at Gigafactory Texas in late 2023, with three drivetrain variants now on the US and Canadian markets. Reports also point to Tesla exploring a smaller electric pickup and an autonomous 'Cyber Cab,' specifically aimed at the ride-hailing segment, reinforcing its aim to diversify its electric portfolio further into transportation classes previously dominated by internal combustion. Challenges ahead for electric freight trucks The main challenges for electric heavy-duty trucks include the need for a robust high-capacity charging infrastructure and sufficient grid capacity, as current networks cannot always support the rapid, high-power charging required for long-haul fleets. Heavy batteries add significant weight, reducing payload capacity and fleet profitability, while also limiting range compared to diesel or hydrogen alternatives. High upfront costs, slower charging times, and limited range, often between 100 to 300 miles for most models, affect operational efficiency. Additionally, sourcing affordable, renewable electricity is still a hurdle, and while hydrogen fuel cell trucks offer lighter weight and faster refueling, they face infrastructure gaps and higher production costs. The road ahead for Tesla Semi Truck The positive momentum behind electric heavy-duty trucks is clear, with thousands of units already deployed in regional routes and last-mile logistics in 2024 and 2025, spurred by lower battery costs, new product launches, and increasingly favorable policy and regulatory landscapes. But for truly widespread, long-range electrification, especially in the heavy-duty, long-haul segment, substantial challenges remain. As both startups and legacy manufacturers invest in solutions, options like hydrogen and advanced synthetic fuels will likely complement batteries, especially for the most demanding trucking applications.
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke to Exit as Microsoft Integrates Platform into Core AI Division
GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke has announced he will step down at the end of 2025 to launch a new company, marking the end of a leadership era that oversaw the platform's deep shift toward artificial intelligence. His departure coincides with Microsoft's decision to fully integrate GitHub into its Core AI division, a move aimed at accelerating AI adoption in developer tools. Dohmke, who moved from Germany to the United States over a decade ago after selling his startup to Microsoft, reflected on his journey in a heartfelt farewell post. 'Over a decade ago, my family and I made the leap to move from Germany to the United States after the sale of my startup to Microsoft. In the years since, I've had the privilege of working with many exceptional human beings, including Hubbers, Microsofties, customers, partners, our GitHub Stars, open-source maintainers, and developers around the world who've helped us shape GitHub,' he wrote. The reshuffle will see Julia Liuson, head of Microsoft's developer division, take charge of GitHub's revenue, engineering, and support functions. Meanwhile, GitHub chief product officer Mario Rodriguez will now report to Asha Sharma, Microsoft's head of product for AI platforms. Dohmke played a key role in Microsoft's $7.5 billion all-stock acquisition of GitHub in 2018, working closely with then-CEO Nat Friedman. Under his leadership, the platform expanded its global footprint, achieved US FedRAMP certification for government usage, and doubled the number of AI-related projects hosted. GitHub now serves more than 150 million developers worldwide, offering tools that make it easier to create, manage, and collaborate on software projects. A standout achievement during Dohmke's tenure was the introduction and rapid growth of GitHub Copilot, an AI-powered coding assistant that can generate code snippets, suggest solutions, and boost developer productivity. The tool has become central to Microsoft's vision of integrating AI into every stage of the software development process. Although Microsoft has not yet named a permanent successor, Dohmke will remain in his role through the end of the year to ensure a smooth transition. In his farewell note, he hinted that his next chapter will take him back to his entrepreneurial roots. 'I've decided to leave GitHub to become a founder again,' he shared, keeping details of his new venture under wraps. Reflecting on the broader mission of GitHub and AI's role in shaping the future of coding, he added, 'We only succeed when the world succeeds, too. By launching this new age of developer AI, we've made it possible for anyone — no matter what language they speak at home or how fluent they are in programming — to take their spark of creativity and transform it into something real. I am more convinced than ever that the world will soon see one billion developers enabled by billions of AI agents, each imprinting human ingenuity into a new gold rush of software. When that day comes, we'll know where the path began: with GitHub.'
News18
19 minutes ago
- News18
Microsoft Edge Vs Google Chrome: How The 90s Browser War Is Back With An AI Twist
Last Updated: Google is now backing an industry coalition called the Browser Choice Alliance (BCA), which counts Opera, Vivaldi, and other smaller browser developers among its members Nearly a quarter century after it was accused of using its dominance in the personal computer market to push Internet Explorer onto millions of users, Microsoft once again finds itself at the centre of a browser war. The company had faced a bruising antitrust battle in the late 1990s, a case it ultimately lost, and spent years rebuilding its image. Now, under CEO Satya Nadella's leadership and powered by an aggressive artificial intelligence strategy, Microsoft has returned to the top ranks of the tech industry. But this time, the challenger is Google, and the roles have reversed. Google is now backing an industry coalition called the Browser Choice Alliance (BCA), which counts Opera, Vivaldi, and other smaller browser developers among its members. The group's mission is to pressure Microsoft to stop what it claims are unfair tactics to promote the Edge browser through Windows. While BCA has multiple participants, Google is its largest financial backer, an unsurprising fact given that browser dominance directly affects Google's control over the search market. According to the alliance, Microsoft is once again using its operating system to give Edge an edge, this time by leveraging AI. Microsoft has integrated its AI-powered 'Copilot" assistant directly into Edge, offering features ranging from tab management to task automation. The BCA claims this integration is paired with 'dark patterns", subtle interface choices that make it harder for users to switch browsers. These reportedly include warning messages when downloading competitors' browsers and system resets that restore Edge as the default. The stakes are high because the AI race is increasingly being fought on desktop and laptop computers. While smartphones dominate daily usage, the desktop remains the tool of choice for professional and productivity-heavy work. Microsoft's approach appears aimed at making Edge the go-to 'AI browser" before rivals can catch up. Regulatory pressure is mounting. In Europe, the BCA has filed complaints alleging Microsoft is skirting new competition rules, while in Brazil, Opera has lodged a formal grievance accusing the company of harassing users who try to switch browsers. The irony is not lost on industry observers. Google, which itself has faced criticism for aggressively promoting Chrome, is now championing 'fair competition" in the browser market. BCA members argue that genuine rivalry benefits both consumers and the broader tech sector. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Internet Explorer reigned supreme after being bundled with Windows starting in 1995. By 2002, its market share exceeded 95 percent, but complacency and lack of innovation left it vulnerable. Mozilla Firefox's launch in 2004 dealt the first blow, and Google Chrome's debut in 2008 finished the job. Chrome's speed, minimalist design, and developer-friendly features propelled it past IE by 2012, and today it holds more than 60 percent of the global market. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
