Doom: The Dark Ages release date and how to start slaying up to two days before the official launch
Doom: The Dark Ages is coming to Xbox, PC and PS5 day one, with Game Pass subscribers getting it included as part of their membership.
It's been almost a decade since the Doom series reboot in 2016, and since then we've only had one follow-up with Doom Eternal in 2020. But after five years, we're getting a brand new series entry with Doom: The Dark Ages which is coming to PlayStation, Xbox and PC in May.
While the first two titles in the rebooted series were multi-platform, after Microsoft bought Bethesda-parent company, Zenimax, in 2021, it was thought that the franchise would be skipping the PS5 going forward, but thankfully that's not the case.
Xbox boss, Phil Spencer, offered IGN his reasoning for the decision in an interview last year, saying, 'Doom is definitely one of those franchises that has a history of so many platforms. It's a franchise that I think everyone deserves to play.
'When I was in a meeting with [id Software Studio Director Marty Stratton] a couple years ago, I asked Marty what he wanted to do, and he said he wanted to sell it on all platforms. Simple as that.'
Obviously Xbox Series X |S owners get the added benefit of having the title be a day on Xbox Game Pass title, but we won't begrudge its absence from PS Plus given we're luck to see it on PS5 at all.
Here's exactly when Doom: The Dark Ages releases and how you can play up to two days ahead of anyone else with early access.
Doom: The Dark Ages release date
Doom: The Dark Ages is set to release on Thursday, May 15 at 12am UTC according to the PlayStation Store listings in the UK, US, and AU. This reddit thread has also spotted the same time over on the Xbox store page, but it looks like it'll be a simultaneous global launch rather than midnight local time.
This may be a placeholder as we often see games go live at midnight local time (or 12am EDT in the US dictating the time for all territories in the region), but we'll be keeping an eye on social media for official confirmation closer to the time. In the meantime, based on the game launching worldwide at 12am UTC, here's what that is for your region:
Wednesday, May 14
5pm PDT
6pm CDT
7pm MDT
8pm EDT
Thursday, May 15
12am UTC
1am BST
2am CEST
10am AEST
If you're keen to play early, then you'll have to fork out for the Premium Edition, Collector's Bundle, or Premium Upgrade – all of which will give you up to two days early access for Doom: The Dark Ages, on the following dates:
Monday, May 12
5pm PDT
6pm CDT
7pm MDT
8pm EDT
Tuesday, May 13
12am UTC
1am BST
2am CEST
10am AEST
As for the editions themselves, as well as early access, here's a brief summary of the price and what it gets you:
Doom: The Dark Ages standard edition
DOOM: The Dark Ages
Void DOOM Slayer Skin
Price: £69.99 / $69.99 / AU$119.95
Doom: The Dark Ages Premium Edition
DOOM: The Dark Ages
Up to 2-Day Early Access
Campaign Add On
Digital Artbook & Soundtrack
Divinity Skin Pack
Void DOOM Slayer Skin
Price: £99.99 / $99.99 / AU$169.95
Doom: The Dark Ages Premium Upgrade (Xbox and PC only)
Up to 2-Day Early Access
Campaign DLC
Digital Artbook and Soundtrack
Divinity Skin Pack
Base game required (sold separately)
Price: £34.99 / $34.99 / AU$59.95
Bear in mind that if you're an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate member, you can grab the Doom: The Dark Ages Premium Upgrade for just £3.50 / $3.50 / AU$6; although give it's a day one release, that rules out the possibility of you playing early but the looks of things. But you'll still get all the other extras.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
AI isn't to blame for the graduate jobs crisis
You should think about being a powerboat driver. Or perhaps a railway builder. Or, although it might not be great for your online dating profile, a sewage worker. On absolutely no account should you consider anything that requires a degree. Microsoft last week released a study of the careers that are most likely to survive the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI). It joins a whole series of reports pinning the blame for the graduate jobs crisis on super smart chatbots. But while there is a desperate shortage of vacancies out there, it is the Government that is to blame and AI is just a convenient excuse. If you graduated from university this summer, being a sewage worker was probably not vying with law, consulting or finance as your top career choice. According to Microsoft, however, perhaps you should be thinking about it after all. After examining 200,000 conversations with chatbots to determine which roles were most at risk from the rise of AI, it concluded that historians, translators and sales reps were the most likely to be replaced by machine, along with anything that traditionally required a degree. By contrast, blue-collar jobs were a lot safer, with pile drivers and dredge operators up there with the sewage guys at the very top of the 'safe for life' list. It turns out the chatbots don't want to get their hands dirty any more than the rest of us. It joins a host of reports pinpointing AI as the explanation for the terrifying collapse in graduate recruitment. The online jobs board Adzuna said only last month that the number of entry-level jobs on offer in May was down 32pc from three years ago, before ChatGPT and all its rivals were released. Meanwhile, we have now learnt that 'Mickey Mouse' degrees are paying less than ever. Figures released this week showed that 630,000 graduates are now collecting benefits, which hardly suggests their careers are accelerating into the fast lane. All those student loans are unlikely to be paid back. There is no question that the job market for new graduates is grim right now. It has always been tough to get your foot on the career ladder, but right now it is harder than ever. But should we really blame AI for that? In fact, there is a far simpler explanation. It is the Government that has no idea how the economy works that is the real problem. Over the year since it took office, the Labour Government has made employing someone, and especially a new graduate, about as unattractive as it possibly could be. In her first Budget, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, imposed a steep rise in the rate of National Insurance that employers have to pay, while reducing the threshold at which it starts to kick in. If you put a big new tax on jobs it should not come as any surprise if, not long afterwards, there are fewer of them. That is what happens. Next, the reform of employment legislation by Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has made it harder to sack anyone if they don't work out. In the graduate jobs market in particular, companies want to try people out and figure out if they have the skills and attitude for the working world before offering them a full-time position. But that is no longer possible. If you hire a 22-year-old now, you are stuck with them for 40 years, no matter how completely hopeless they are, or else you have to pay a huge bill for getting rid of them. The flexibility has gone, and the safest thing to do is not to hire anyone in the first place. Finally, the economy has been crushed by taxes and regulations. Output shrank again last month, and with yet more tax rises likely to be imposed in the autumn, we may soon be in a full blown recession. The Institute of Directors reported on Friday that business confidence had fallen to its lowest level on record, below even the levels reported during the Covid pandemic. With the outlook so bleak, the easiest thing for any company to do is simply to slash graduate recruitment. If you are not planning to expand, you don't need the extra people anyway, and at least it will save some money. Over time, AI will almost certainly change the labour market, and potentially radically so. It will automate a lot of routine white collar work, and that may eliminate some jobs. We should however, keep two points in mind before falling for too much of the hype. To start with, we have a couple of hundred years of industrial history to tell us that new technologies don't ever lead to a reduction in the overall amount of work available. We just find new stuff to do that we had not thought of before. And, just as significantly, it is surely far too early to see the impact on employment. Most companies are experimenting with AI and trying to figure out where it can help them. But very few of them have yet got to the stage of replacing their workers in droves. They don't trust it enough yet, and probably rightly so. The blunt truth is this. The Government has taken a wrecking ball to the jobs market. It has punished employers with tax rises, crushed the market with regulations, and killed growth stone dead. Against that backdrop, it is easy to blame AI for the shortage of graduate jobs. But it is really just a convenient excuse. It is destructive government policies that are really to blame. And we should focus on fixing that before telling all the English, philosophy and history graduates this summer to send their CVs straight to the sewage works.
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Warning to anyone using AI for money advice and why it could be costing you more
MoneyMagpie Editor and financial expert Vicky Parry warns about the ways AI can cost you money – and how to avoid it Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be everywhere these days. But did you know that it could be costing you more money each month than you need to spend? Follow these tips to avoid the AI and keep on top of your finances. When AI can be useful We're not here to bash AI: it does have useful applications. For example, apps like Emma help you analyse your spending across different bank accounts and can help you identify expenses you've forgotten about, like unused subscriptions. AI can also be handy for those dipping their toe into their investing journey. Robo advisors and AI investment programmes can help you learn more about investing and 'set and forget' investing small amounts to try out the stock market. However, there are also lots of ways AI is actually costing you more cash each month – here's what to look out for and how to avoid these sneaky expenses. Cancel your software upgrade Many subscription-based softwares now include AI tools – and they're making you pay for the privilege. For example, Microsoft rolled out CoPilot and then raised the price of Microsoft 365 to account for the 'added benefit' of AI. Where possible, keep control of your spending by rejecting the AI tools. Many software companies will offer a rollback or a 'basic' option without the 'premium' AI tools – you may have to contact their helpdesk to get it, though. Or, with Microsoft Office, consider either buying a single Home Office licence which is offline, single-payment, and not subscription (and without AI), or switching to free options like Google Docs or Libre Office. Don't sign away your ownership Check the terms and conditions of software, too. Companies are sneaking in terms that allow them to use your work to train their AI models, or use your privately saved or transferred content via the software to 'use in perpetuity' how they wish. This could mean using your photos for advertising, marketing, or even demographic training to target adverts more precisely. WeTransfer recently had to walk back such a change. The file transfer service is often used by creatives to send large-sized files to each other, and the change in terms suggested this content could be used by WeTransfer with impunity. This caused outrage in users, as it held huge potential to devalue their creative work. Since the outcry, WeTransfer has altered the wording and confirmed user content will not be used to train their AI. While most companies insist that this kind of wording is designed to improve the in-house customer experience, the terms can be vague. This means you might be granting access to your content – including stuff that would normally be considered under your copyright, like images and writing – for companies to use as they wish. If that turned into using it for advertising, or putting your personal images on marketing content for the world to see, you could lose revenue from your business or even suffer reputational damage. Always read the fine print – no matter how boring it might be! It could save you from financial loss. Built-in device AI Laptops, tablets, and smartphones all already use AI in some forms. However, new devices are now using it as a selling point, with advanced features connecting a wide range of features to make things easier for you. For example, you could more easily edit your photos at the click of a button – or a calendar invite can be set to give you an audible reminder on your Amazon Echo. However, you're paying for this software and might not even use it. More than that, the design of the newest AI connecting everything, everywhere makes a lot of people uncomfortable and can cause extra anxiety. Look for second-hand older models without the built-in AI, or some 'dumb' tech which operates 'old school' ways, like the Chatsie phone with its text interface. Some budget smartphones will also not have the super-duper AI tools included, too. Turn off personalised advert options A more insidious form of AI that makes you spend money is the way many platforms allow tracking cookies for personalised adverts. This is not new, it's been around for a long time – but AI has made it even easier than before for marketers to finesse their target audience and make sure you're served adverts for things you're more likely to be interested in. Have you ever noticed that you paused a little too long on an advert for something while you're scrolling, and then suddenly your feed is filled with similar products? It's how retailers get you! Turning off personalised adverts means you'll be served all kinds, rather than only the things you want or are interested in buying. This will reduce the impulsivity of online shopping, especially when you're scrolling social media. Go old school for research ChatGPT not only uses ten times more energy to reply to a query than a Google search, but it also hallucinates. That's the term for when it makes up answers – basically, it makes assumptions based on patterns rather than uses critical thinking like humans can. Why can this cost you money? It could cost you your job! If you're regularly using ChatGPT for research, you might think it's saving you time – but with a high error rate, not fact-checking the information provided to you could mean huge, and costly, mistakes. The popular AI tool even states below the query bar that it isn't accurate and should be checked. So, why waste time asking ChatGPT in the first place? 'Old-fashioned' Google searches will help you find the best resources, double-check details, and save you time on fact-checking the AI results in the first place. Remember that the AI summary that comes up on a Google search can also hallucinate (a classic example is it not recognising that 2015 was ten years ago), so keep scrolling to reach the web pages instead. You can avoid any AI summaries by using -ai at the end of your search query. Some of the brands and websites we mention may be, or may have been, a partner of However, we only ever mention brands we believe in and trust, so it never influences who we prioritise and link to.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Big tech has spent $155bn on AI this year. It's about to spend hundreds of billions more
The US's largest companies have spent 2025 locked in a competition to spend more money than one another, lavishing $155bn on the development of artificial intelligence, more than the US government has spent on education, training, employment and social services in the 2025 fiscal year so far. Based on the most recent financial disclosures of Silicon Valley's biggest players, the race is about to accelerate to hundreds of billions in a single year. Over the past two weeks, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, Google's parent, have shared their quarterly public financial reports. Each disclosed that their year-to-date capital expenditure, a figure that refers to the money companies spend to acquire or upgrade tangible assets, already totals tens of billions. Capex, as the term is abbreviated, is a proxy for technology companies' spending on AI because the technology requires gargantuan investments in physical infrastructure, namely data centers, which require large amounts of power, water and expensive semiconductor chips. Google said during its most recent earnings call that its capital expenditure 'primarily reflects investments in servers and data centers to support AI'. Meta's year-to-date capital expenditure amounted to $30.7bn, doubling the $15.2bn figure from the same time last year, per its earnings report. For the most recent quarter alone, the company spent $17bn on capital expenditures, also double the same period in 2024, $8.5bn. Alphabet reported nearly $40bn in capex to date for the first two quarters of the current fiscal year, and Amazon reported $55.7bn. Microsoft said it would spend more than $30bn in the current quarter to build out the data centers powering its AI services. Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said the current quarter's capex would be at least 50% more than the outlay during the same period a year earlier and greater than the company's record capital expenditures of $24.2bn in the quarter to June. 'We will continue to invest against the expansive opportunity ahead,' Hood said. For the coming fiscal year, big tech's total capital expenditure is slated to balloon enormously, surpassing the already eye-popping sums of the previous year. Microsoft plans to unload about $100bn on AI in the next fiscal year, CEO Satya Nadella said Wednesday. Meta plans to spend between $66bn and $72bn. Alphabet plans to spend $85bn, significantly higher than its previous estimation of $75bn. Amazon estimated that its 2025 expenditure would come to $100bn as it plows money into Amazon Web Services, which analysts now expect to amount to $118bn. In total, the four tech companies will spend more than $400bn on capex in the coming year, according to the Wall Street Journal. The multibillion-dollar figures represent mammoth investments, which the Journal points out is larger than the European Union's quarterly spending on defense. However, the tech giants can't seem to spend enough for their investors. Microsoft, Google and Meta informed Wall Street analysts last quarter that their total capex would be higher than previously estimated. In the case of all three companies, investors were thrilled, and shares in each company soared after their respective earnings calls. Microsoft's market capitalization hit $4tn the day after its report. Even Apple, the cagiest of the tech giants, signaled that it would boost its spending on AI in the coming year by a major amount, either via internal investments or acquisitions. The company's quarterly capex rose to $3.46bn, up from $2.15bn during the same period last year. The iPhone maker reported blockbuster earnings Thursday, with rebounding iPhone sales and better-than-expected business in China, but it is still seen as lagging farthest behind on development and deployment of AI products among the tech giants. Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, said Thursday that the company was reallocating a 'fair number' of employees to focus on artificial intelligence and that the 'heart of our AI strategy' is to increase investments and 'embed' AI across all of its devices and platforms. Cook refrained from disclosing exactly how much Apple is spending, however. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'We are significantly growing our investment, I'm not putting specific numbers behind that,' he said. Smaller players are trying to keep up with the incumbents' massive spending and capitalize on the gold rush. OpenAI announced at the end of the week of earnings that it had raised $8.3bn in investment, part of a planned $40bn round of funding, valuing the startup, whose ChatGPT chatbot kicked in 2022, at $300bn.
