The Déjà Vu of Trump 2.0's First Foreign Trip
It's been nearly a decade, but the image from Riyadh still prompts fascination, mystery, and a general feeling of Just what was that anyway? The glowing orb radiated from the center of a darkened room lined with computer screens. A trio of world leaders—President Donald Trump, King Salman of Saudi Arabia, and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt—silently and slowly approached. All three then placed their hands on the bright white sphere and held them there for nearly two minutes. Their faces were illuminated from below, as if they were standing above the world's most expensive campfire. No one said a word.
The first lady, Melania Trump, also momentarily touched the orb, which, upon closer inspection, was actually a globe. Photos and videos of the scene immediately went viral and, depending on your political viewpoint, evoked either the bridge of a sleek Star Trek spaceship or a summit of James Bond supervillains. None of the leaders seemed to know quite what to do. At one point, Trump sort of smirked. I was standing about four feet away from the odd assemblage. And it wasn't even the strangest thing I saw that day.
The first foreign trip of Trump's second term, scheduled for next week, will come almost eight years to the day after the first international trip of his previous term, and it will begin in the same place—the Saudi Arabian capital. Many of the same themes that defined the president's 2017 visit remain pertinent now: Trump's support for Israel, his fondness for authoritarians, his push to contain Iran, and his prioritization of deals over humanitarian concerns. Now, as then, European allies are watching nervously.
For all the spectacle of that first trip, its true revelation was Trump's refusal to say the things that American presidents normally say. He made no attempt to publicly promote democracy and human rights in Saudi Arabia. In Israel and the West Bank, he pointedly declined to affirm America's long-standing support for a two-state solution. And on the last leg of the trip, in Europe, Trump would not explicitly endorse the mutual-defense doctrine that has been the cornerstone of transatlantic security for decades. But what was shocking then is expected now. In many ways, Trump on that trip first suggested the role he intended to play as a global figure that has now been fully realized in his second term in office.
In 2017, world leaders were still adjusting to the new American president, knowing they needed to flatter him but deeply uncertain about what he truly believed and how he would wield his power on the international stage. Now there are fewer mysteries with Trump, who, since his return to power, has shown no hesitation in straining alliances, igniting a global trade war, and favoring autocratic regimes over democracies. But he is heading back to the Middle East at a fraught moment, amid a humanitarian crisis and renewed conflict in Gaza, as well as precarious talks over Iran's nuclear future. His transactional view of foreign policy has only hardened, and it will be on full display as he returns to the region.
As soon as Air Force One touched down in Riyadh's triple-digit heat in May 2017, it was clear that the Saudis had figured out how to get in Trump's good graces. When Trump stepped onto foreign soil for the first time as president, he did so onto a literal red carpet and was greeted by the king—an honor not given to his predecessor, Barack Obama. Cannons boomed, and Saudi military jets roared overhead. I was in the press pool—the rotating group of journalists that travels with the president—and as our motorcade raced through the city's emptied streets, we saw giant images of Trump and King Salman hanging on nearly every highway overpass and many buildings. A lavish cardamon-coffee ceremony and medal presentation at the Royal Court followed, honors usually bestowed only on royalty. Trump's image was also projected onto the side of the Ritz-Carlton resort where he stayed, towering over the sprawling desert metropolis. (That same hotel would later be used as a luxurious detention center, where Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the king's son and heir apparent, imprisoned his political foes.)
[Read: Saudi Arabia first]
The strange orb was part of a hastily built anti-extremist center. And yet it was somehow topped on the surrealness scale by a traditional sword dance that followed a few hours later at the nation's official cultural center, which included Steve Bannon, noted isolationist, cutting a few moves alongside saber-toting Saudi royals. Everything about the Saudi stop was larger than life, meant to impress and woo the president, and Trump seemed flattered by the overtures. The template established by those days in Riyadh was emulated in some fashion in the months ahead in global capitals as disparate as London and Beijing.
'One thing that has remained constant is his seeming kindred affection for strong leaders,' Mark Hannah, the head of the Institute for Global Affairs, a foreign-policy think tank, told me. Hannah added that Trump's choice not to lecture about American values on the world stage might now put him in a better position to broker deals. 'He's shrewd about the value of geopolitical neutrality,' Hannah said, 'and creates a sense to others that they can do business with him.'
Next week's trip will be more modest in scope than the 2017 tour, with just three Gulf-state stops—Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates—over a few days. A major focus for Trump will be business, including investments in technology, as well as weapons sales and joint AI projects. A Saudi-U.S. investment forum will take place during Trump's visit. Similar efforts are being planned for the UAE. A diplomat who works for one of the nations Trump will visit, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss upcoming negotiations, told me that the trip is expected to focus more on concrete financial achievements than on achieving diplomatic breakthroughs. 'We're no longer in 'solving the world's problems' mode,' this person said.
'A secure and stable Middle East means greater prosperity for our partner nations and the United States,' a White House spokesperson told me.
But the world's problems will be impossible to avoid. Israel has announced that it plans a military assault and full-on occupation of Gaza unless Hamas agrees to concessions, including releasing the remaining hostages it is holding; the deadline the Israelis gave the terrorist group falls the day after Trump's visit to the region concludes. Israeli officials had hoped that Trump would include a stop in their country. But two administration officials told me that Trump did not want to visit unless he had secured a Gaza cease-fire that he could tout. At the same time, Trump has given Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wide leeway to run his war in Gaza, and proposed that all 2 million Palestinian residents be removed so the Gaza Strip could be turned into a resort. Gulf-state leaders, mindful of the sympathy their people have for the Palestinians, are expected to lobby Trump to rein in Israel.
'When President Trump came into office, there was real positive movement in Gaza. There was a cease-fire in place. There were dozens of hostages released, and there was robust humanitarian aid getting in to address the suffering of Gazans. That's changed,' Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat who sits on the Foreign Relations Committee, told me. 'Trump has an enormous opening here, an opportunity to show real leadership on the world stage by pressing Netanyahu to abandon the idea of occupying Gaza fully, to abandon the idea of displacing Palestinians, and to restart humanitarian aid into Gaza.'
Negotiations between the United States and Iran about its nuclear future will also be a central agenda item for the trip. Tehran is close to developing a nuclear weapon, which Israel and other Middle Eastern neighbors, including Saudi Arabia, strongly oppose. There has been internal debate within the Trump administration as to what path Tehran should be permitted to take; the Iran hawks support Netanyahu's view that the nuclear program should be completely destroyed, while others, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have voiced support for allowing Iran to maintain a nuclear-energy program. Trump has argued against using military force and recently said on Meet the Press that he wants 'total dismantlement' of Iran's nuclear program, something Tehran has previously refused. Still, some in the administration believe that a deal could be possible before long, according to the two U.S. officials.
'We have to remember what led to the Iran negotiations to begin with: The administration's motivation to pursue talks is rooted in an assessment that Iran could be close to having a nuclear weapon,' Hagar Chemali, a former Treasury Department official under President George W. Bush and National Security Council adviser under Obama, told me. 'That would fundamentally change things across the Middle East.'
Trump has established close ties with the Saudi crown prince, known as MBS, whom he defended after the Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered in 2018, allegedly at Riyadh's order. And the president's fondness for Saudi Arabia has further isolated its rival Iran. Aides told me that one goal for his second term is to secure an extension of the Abraham Accords, the deal his first administration brokered to normalize relations between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, and others. Now the administration wants to do the same for Israel and Saudi Arabia. A deal between those two countries was gathering momentum in the Biden administration before Hamas's attack against Israel on October 7, 2023. Most observers believe that a breakthrough in Gaza is needed before much additional progress can be made.
[From the April 2022 issue: Inside the palace with Mohammed Bin Salman]
Trump earlier this year teased one other blockbuster possibility for his time in Saudi Arabia: a surprise meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in an effort to end the war in Ukraine. But Trump has since downplayed those chances, and both the White House and the Kremlin have said no summit is scheduled.
As for the orb? The anti-extremist center in Riyadh is still open, but the orb is no longer there, according to a book by the New York Times reporter Ben Hubbard. When workers at the center noticed that many American visitors took photos with it, the Saudi government gave the sphere to the U.S. embassy as a gift. It has since been placed in storage.
Article originally published at The Atlantic

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What a weaker dollar means for inflation
The US dollar ( has fallen this year, and that can have big implications for inflation. RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas talks about that connection and when the impact of tariffs may start to show in the US economy. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. turning out to the dollar index, it's seen many swings we know amid economic uncertainty. Joe, you highlight what the moves in the currency mean for inflation? Walk us through that. All right. When you get a sustained 10% decline in the value of the dollar, typically, you should expect to see a 1/2 of 1% increase in inflation over the next 6 to 12 months. We clearly are at that point, even though we had a nice rebound. I think it was 3.3% for the month of July, strongest month for the greenback this year, but nevertheless, the policy mix out of the administration, all points towards a weaker dollar, and I think that's what we're going to get. Moreover, when you take a look at import prices, especially import prices ex petroleum, it tells the tale. We're going to see more inflation and a weaker dollar going forward. Does Trump want a strong dollar? I would think he does, and I think, well, I think like all politicians, he wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He doesn't want de-dollarization, clearly, but he wants a weaker dollar because A, it really tends to juice the tech sector, and B, it will provide relief to the beleaguered manufacturing sector that's been in an effective recession for the past couple of years. Is it too soon to say the kind of impact the softer dollars had during this earnings season, particularly what it's meant for the multinationals? It's way too early to jump on that bandwagon. I think we're really going to be talking in the fourth quarter earnings, and then next year. Moreover, a lot of those firms that he wants to help are actually having real problems with the tariff issue because, you know, 45% of everything we import goes into domestic manufacturing. So policies at a cross purposes, a good portion of the time this year, which is why that economy slowed to 1.2% growth in the first half of the year, and we think it's not going to do much better. Our forecast for this year is 1.1%. Can I ask you when we talk about these tariff policies? We've been talking about them all show. There's the near to intermediate impact, but how long do we have to wait to see what the long-term impact is? Meaning, do I have to wait till does it have to be August 2026, and Joe and Josh are back on set for me to really know, okay, it's really boosted manufacturing job. It's really opened up all these new markets for American business. It's really raised this much revenue. It's a little worse, actually. So as of midnight last night, on once we get to October 5th, we're going to have an effective 18.3% tariff. The real problem is we won't really understand what any of this means, not till October 5th, 2026, but more like October 5th, 2027. Why? Why do you say that, Joe? Because it takes so long to pass through the tariff costs. You know, there are four points along the chain. You've got your retail, you've got your consumers, you've got your importers, and you've got your exporters. At each point of the supply chain, you're going to see a bit of it absorbed, a bit of it eaten. When we went through this in 2018, for example, we didn't see the full price of the increase in the price of washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers caused by tariffs show up on consumers' balance sheets until about two years later. Turned out 90% of that cost was eaten entirely by consumers. So when we talk about whether where the cost falls falls on the value chain, and there was this big debate, maybe it's really the key debate inside the Fed. Tell me if I'm wrong, but this debate about whether the the the tariff induced inflation is one time or transitory persistent. Even if it's one time, it could go on for some time. Is that part of the point? Well, that's right, and that's why they've been counseling patients because you just don't know. Right now, for all of the noise, right? The tariff rate that's showing up, which is causing revenues to rise, right? And from the Trump administration's point of view, that's an absolutely good thing. It's about 8.85%. It's not 30, it's not 50, it's not 15. But as we get into mid-October, it'll be closer to 20 is my sense because we're still not done with Mexico, and we're still not done with China, and then USMCA has to be renegotiated next year. So this is going to be a variable target. It's going to be a moving target, but nevertheless, if you cause the average price of goods imported in the United States to rise by 18.3%, that's going to be eaten. And here's why we say that. There's a lot of talk that, well, foreign exporters are just eating the price. You know, they're going to engage in invoice pricing. If that was the case, import prices would be falling significantly. They're not. They're actually rising. So that's just not happening. So that means it's not the exporter, it's going to be the importer, the retail, or the consumer. Those points on the chain where those are going to be eaten. Joe, I can honestly say that given the news flow today, you were the perfect guy to be sitting in that chair. That's very kind of you to say. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much, Joe.


CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's tariffs are as unpopular as ever, but the GOP's tolerance is growing
Donald Trump TariffsFacebookTweetLink Follow There has been something of a shift in the conventional wisdom about President Donald Trump's tariffs of late. On the one hand, economists and political analysts have warmed to the idea that Trump is more or less getting what he bargained for out of his threats of a global trade war. This has come as a number of foreign nations come to the table and, in a few cases, cut apparent deals. On the other, that's different from saying Trump's tactics will ultimately work. And the picture there certainly got more complicated this week, including with yet more judges suggesting they could rein in Trump's tariff authorities and the increasingly troubling economic numbers highlighted by another bad jobs report Friday. Many have been wondering when (and if) the economic pain many economists predicted would actually arrive, and signs are increasing that it might be upon us. In other words, we seem to be at an inflection point, particularly with Trump signaling Thursday that he'll finally press forward with global tariffs (probably!) next week. But how is all of this playing? Are people reevaluating their previous positions? It's too soon to gauge public opinion on Trump's latest moves this week. But the short answer is that we haven't seen many shifts of late in the already pretty dismal views of Trump's trade war at the macro level; if anything, views appear to have gotten slightly worse. But there have been some key shifts that suggest his base is more on-board than it used to be, which could allow Trump to press forward. Overall, foreign trade and tariffs remain some of the president's worst issues, and it continues to look like the policy that very few people (besides Trump) are asking for right now. Gallup polling shows Trump's approval on 'foreign trade' dropping from 42% in February to 36% in mid-July. Fox News polling around the same time showed Americans disapproved of Trump on tariffs by a 26-point margin, virtually the same as in April (25 points). And CBS News-YouGov polling shows people increasingly dislike that this is a priority for Trump. Its most recent data, from mid-July, show 61% say Trump is too focused on tariffs, similar to April but up from March. It also showed a new high in the percentage of people who say Trump isn't focused enough on lowering prices (70%). (This also ties into the tariffs, because tariffs are often inflationary.) The CBS data also show a slight drop in the percentage of Americans who think Trump's policies are making them better off financially (23% in March versus 18% today), and an increase in perceptions that his policies are making food prices increase (52% in March versus 62% today). Overall, Americans went from opposing the tariffs by 12 points in March to opposing them by 20 points today. So if there is a vibe shift on Trump's tariffs, it hasn't really shown up in the polls – at least yet. But as with most things Trump, overall views probably don't matter as much as how his base feels. The president has proven over and over again that he's happy to plow ahead as long as his supporters are on board. And those supporters might be growing in their tolerance for this gambit. The percentage of Republicans who say Trump is focused too much on tariffs in the CBS poll actually fell from 34% in April to 28% today. And polling from Quinnipiac University suggests Republicans are also less pessimistic about economic pain from the tariffs. Republicans were already much more patient with Trump's gambit. More than 8 in 10 said in that polling in both April and today that the tariffs were likely to help the economy over the long term. That's been consistent. But there has been a shift in Trump's favor in views of their short-term impact. While Republicans back in April were about evenly split on whether the tariffs would help or hurt in the short term, they now say by about a 2-to-1 margin that they'll help over the short term. While Republicans in April said 46-44% that the tariffs would help in the short term, they now say that 62-30%. Republicans also overwhelmingly express confidence in Trump's strategy on tariffs, saying it's working, 84-9%, in Quinnipiac's July polling. All of which suggests Trump's leash on this has lengthened with his base, which matters a great deal. It means GOP lawmakers who might feel compelled to try and check Trump on this gambit will probably be less likely to do so. But all of this is subject to change, particularly if the economic numbers look suspect like many economists predicted they will. How Republicans respond to that is when the rubber will really meet the road and the White House could face some really hard choices.


New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary
From the right: Dems' Grim Outlook for '26 'November 2026 may not go the way conventional wisdom suggests,' and Dems may lose, warns the Washington Examiner's Michael Barone. During midterm elections, 'the president's party almost always loses the House and, slightly less often, Senate seats.' But this time around, 'it looks like the Democrats' baggage, especially from the Biden years, is heavier than the loads Trump Republicans must juggle.' Black marks like 'the Russia collusion hoax, COVID-19 school closings, 'transitory' inflation, the Hunter Biden laptop, and open borders immigration' have too deeply damaged' Dems' credibility. Trump and Republicans are also becoming widely popular, with 'Republican gains' being 'widespread while Democratic gains are scarcely visible.' 'Nothing's inevitable in politics, but so far, the Democrats have not gotten up off the floor.' Mideast beat: 'Palestine' Is a Made-Up Cause Advertisement Westerners should 'understand that the George Soros-funded agents of Jew Hate and chaos' in the streets 'have zero to do with the overwhelming majority of Muslims around the world,' argues Christopher Messina at Messy Times. As Dalia Ziada, an Egyptian political analyst notes, protesters claim ' 'Palestine' is the cause of all Muslims,' but there's 'no trace of anything called 'Palestine' or anything similar to it in the Quran or the Prophetic Hadiths!' Indeed, the 'Palestinian Cause' was 'invented by the Pan-Arabist communists,' who 'attached it to Islam' to 'fool ordinary Muslims' and gain 'legitimacy' to commit crimes against nations 'in the East and the West.' 'I am a Muslim,' but Palestine 'will never be my cause,' because it hinders 'peace' — 'a divine obligation of all Muslims.' Former U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala in Chicago on July 31, 2025. REUTERS Capitol watch: Rep's War on DC Dementia Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) wants a 'way for Congress to evaluate whether some politicians are no longer fit to serve,' reports The Free Press' Gabe Kaminsky. Most Dems 'would rather talk about anything other than the Biden cover-up — and the wider problem of the gerontocracy that runs the party and Washington.' But, Gluesenkamp Perez is pushing'an amendment that would direct the Office of Congressional Conduct to develop a standard to determine House members' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' ' Some Democratic colleagues took her move 'personally,' and it 'failed in her first attempt to tuck it into a federal spending bill, with Democrats and Republicans all voting against its inclusion.' But her office is 'still exploring avenues to build a coalition.' Advertisement Liberal: Democrats' Best Way Back 'The Democratic Party faces a conundrum,' observes the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. Despite President Trump's struggles with voters on 'his overall job approval rating' and among specific issues, 'Democrats are doing even worse with Americans.' They've tumbled 'from roughly a 3-point net unfavorable rating just before [Joe] Biden was elected in 2020 to a 30-point net unfavorable rating today.' With polls showing more than half of voters believe 'Congress isn't doing enough to keep Trump in line,' a 2026 message 'arguing for divided government to stop Republican overreach' may help 'Democrats to retake the House.' Ahead of 2028, Democrats should offer 'new voices without cultural baggage' and a message of 'economic uplift for America's working- and middle-class families.' Advertisement Foreign desk: Chinese Dam's Regional Threat China has 'officially acknowledged' that it's building 'the biggest dam ever conceived,' gasps Brahma Chellaney at The Hill. The structure will 'generate nearly three times as much hydropower' as the massive Three Gorges Dam but 'portends a looming geopolitical and environmental crisis.' The new dam 'is on a geologic fault line — a recipe for catastrophe.' Moreover, 'capturing silt-laden waters before they reach India and Bangladesh, the dam will starve' farmers of crucial riparian nutrients. While China's dam-building 'has long alarmed downstream nations, from Vietnam and Thailand to Nepal,' this project 'raises profound questions about regional stability.' By seizing control over regional water, 'China is methodically locking in future geopolitical leverage.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board