logo
John Curran: Illinois Democrats' delivery tax is a short-term cash grab paid by those who can least afford it

John Curran: Illinois Democrats' delivery tax is a short-term cash grab paid by those who can least afford it

Chicago Tribune8 hours ago
Well past midnight, on the final night of the spring session, Illinois Senate Democrats passed one of the most broad-based, regressive taxes on working families our state has seen in decades, which will affect every family and business from deep southern Illinois to towns on the Wisconsin border and everywhere in between.
This delivery tax would force each Illinoisan to pay an additional $1.50 on nearly every order placed in our state, regardless of its cost, size or supplier. Whether you are making a bulk order of expensive items or just need a pack of diapers for a sick child, the tax will charge you $1.50 on every order.
The Senate Democratic majority says groceries and prescriptions are exempt — but the moment your cart includes anything else, from shampoo to school supplies, the tax kicks in.
The majority of the estimated $1 billion collected yearly from Illinois taxpayers in all 102 counties will be sent to bail out the grossly mismanaged CTA and decades of unfunded pensions in the city of Chicago.
Unfortunately for Illinois taxpayers who are expected to shoulder this burden, the proposal lacks the meaningful reforms needed to improve transit funding long term and, as these Chicago bailout proposals always do, carves out an exemption for many deliveries in the very city it was created to help.
Known as the Retail Delivery Climate Impact Fee, the proposal would not collect a tax on any deliveries made by bicycle, which, because of congestion, are far more prevalent in Chicago, ensuring that suburban and downstate residents will be much more likely to be charged the fee. Besides being patently unfair, it doesn't make any sense, as studies show delivery services can actually help lower emissions by reducing trips to the store.
The regressive nature of the tax will have the worst effect on vulnerable populations, including low-income people unable to afford or store bulk orders, seniors, single parents and everyone without their own transportation. This effect on the poor is so concerning that a group of faith leaders sent a letter to Illinois senators opposing the legislation, saying the plan is 'a tax structure that punishes poverty.' Sadly, their pleas were ignored.
Data from Colorado, the only state that has enacted a broad delivery tax — 28 cents per motor vehicle order, a far cry from Illinois' $1.50 — validates their concerns. A survey of Colorado residents highlighted the tax's disproportionate impact on people with disabilities and low-income households. The share of the tax relative to income was over four times higher for households earning less than $25,000 per year compared with those earning $200,000 or more.
The tax increased take-out prices across the board, leading to more than hundreds of thousands of fewer delivery orders, millions in lost revenue for local businesses, and revenue and job losses for restaurant and delivery workers. The increased prices and reduced sales are especially burdensome for small businesses that already operate on razor-thin margins.
Other states are taking note, and in 2024 and 2025, every state that considered such a tax, including neighboring Indiana, dropped or rejected their proposals.
Maurice Scholten: The RTA has more money to work with than it realizes. State lawmakers need to know this.This tax on working families is even more offensive when you consider the fact that Illinois brought in a record $54 billion in tax revenue in fiscal year 2025 — the most money our state has ever taken from taxpayers — and the Democratic majority still passed a budget with nearly $1 billion in additional tax hikes, budget gimmicks and no solution for the CTA.
There is no denying that we must continue to invest in our state's public transit system for the millions of Illinois families, students, tourists and workers who rely on it. But the taxpayers who pay for it deserve a fiscally conservative approach and reforms needed to ensure a world-class, safe and soluble system — not a short-term cash grab that hurts, rather than helps, Illinoisans, $1.50 at a time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Senator Changed Child Rape Law After Relative Accused of Sex With Minor
GOP Senator Changed Child Rape Law After Relative Accused of Sex With Minor

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

GOP Senator Changed Child Rape Law After Relative Accused of Sex With Minor

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An 18-year-old in Utah who was accused of having sex with a 13-year-old avoided jail after the laws governing sexual offenses were changed while his relative was president of the state Senate. Senate President J. Stuart Adams confided to legislators that the law relating to his relative's case should be reviewed in a large bill that was passed in 2024, according to a report from The Salt Lake Tribune. Adams told The Salt Lake Tribune: "Some have suggested this change was made to benefit the case I was made aware of involving the high school senior. That is simply not true. "While the sponsor of [the bill] was aware of the case, I did not request the legislation and did not intervene or give input on the drafting of the bill." Newsweek reached out to Adams via email for further comment. Why It Matters The fact that the 18-year-old was related to someone with significant political power in Utah has raised questions over whether or not the legislation was adopted in order to make the sentencing less strict. While the law did not apply retroactively and the 18-year-old was not charged with the new lower-level crime created by the bill, they nonetheless avoided further jail time and were not required to register as a sex offender after the bill was passed. What To Know SB213, a 49-page bill sponsored by Republican Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, passed into law in March 2024, changing sentencing rules over sex between teenagers. Prior to the bill passing, the 18-year-old could have faced a charge of child rape, a first-degree felony that would have required them to register as a sex offender, along with a prison sentence ranging anywhere from six years to life in jail. However, the bill allowed a clause that lets 17-year-olds receive a less serious third-degree charge of unlawful sexual activity to be extended to 18-year-olds, provided they were still in high school. The new bill did not apply to cases brought before it became law, but the 18-year-old was not given any jail time beyond the initial week they had spent, after they pleaded guilty to reduced charges. Prosecutor and defense attorney for the case, Cara Tangaro, said in court hearings that the legislation had been crucial to the improved plea deal, telling Judge Rita Cornish at sentencing, "You saw the legislative change. We all agree that's not retroactive, but the government did change their offer based on that." The bill's sponsor, Cullimore, told the Tribune that Adams had requested that the charges against the relative be looked into for the legislation. Adams denied using his political power to benefit a relative. The Utah State Capitol in Salt Lake City. The Utah State Capitol in Salt Lake City. Getty Images What People Are Saying The mother of the 13-year-old told The Salt Lake Tribune: "I feel like a law is the law, regardless of who you are, but that wasn't what was going on here. I feel like [the 18-year-old] just got special nobody was going to say anything about it." What Happens Next Utah will continue to use the new law for sex offenses going forward for all cases.

House Republican: Johnson needs to ‘show some leadership,' end redistricting ‘chaos'
House Republican: Johnson needs to ‘show some leadership,' end redistricting ‘chaos'

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House Republican: Johnson needs to ‘show some leadership,' end redistricting ‘chaos'

Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) called out Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) over their responses to redistricting efforts across the country, saying the chaos needs to end. 'Ultimately I think that the Speaker needs to step up and show some leadership here because even our own members in states that might in some theoretical way, mathematical way stand to benefit from new maps, they don't like what's going on either,' Kiley told MSNBC's Chris Jansing on Tuesday. 'They don't like the prospect of having their district broken up or having communities they've represented, been voted in by, taken out of their district.' Kiley, who represents a competitive House district, said on Monday he will introduce legislation on Monday that would block states from redrawing their congressional districts prior to the 2030 census. 'It's not a good thing for either Democrats or Republicans. It's certainly not a good thing for the country,' he continued. 'So I think that the Speaker and Leader Jeffries need to show some leadership here to bring this chaos to an end, and I think that the bill that I have offered gives them the opportunity to do just that.' In the same interview, Kiley also criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) efforts to redraw maps in California as a means of fighting back against Republican redistricting efforts in red states. Newsom has said he wants to abolish the state's Independent Redistricting Commission. 'The old saying is that voters should choose their representatives; representatives shouldn't choose their voters,' Kiley said. 'And I think that what's happening right now across the country, and especially in California, is a very unhealthy thing for democracy.' The redistricting fight jumped into overdrive in Texas this week after state Democratic lawmakers fled the Lone Star State for blue states including Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York.

Schatz locks down votes to replace Durbin as whip
Schatz locks down votes to replace Durbin as whip

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Schatz locks down votes to replace Durbin as whip

Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz (D) has locked down the votes he needs to replace Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) as Senate Democratic whip once Durbin retires from Congress at the end of next year, according to a person familiar with Schatz's support. Schatz, the Democratic chief deputy whip, has also earned the endorsement of Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) to succeed Durbin as whip in 2027. 'I'm grateful for the support from so many of my colleagues. I intend to continue earning their support in the months to come,' the Hawaii Democrat said in a statement. It would be the biggest change to the Senate Democratic leadership team since Schumer ascended to leader after the 2016 election. Durbin has served as Democratic whip since 2005, first under the leadership of Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), from 2005 to 2017, and then under Schumer from 2017 until today. Punchbowl News first reported that Schatz had collected enough votes and Schumer's support. Schatz, 52, formally launched his bid to become Democratic whip in April, telling The Washington Post at the time: 'Not everybody loves the aspects of politics that occurs on the floor. … This is where I think I can be most useful.' He assumed his Senate office in December of 2012, making him Hawaii's senior senator by a few days. He previously served as the Aloha State's lieutenant governor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store