logo
Reading to Kids Is Becoming Obsolete

Reading to Kids Is Becoming Obsolete

Yahoo23-05-2025

Who among Gen X remembers RIF — the major Reading Is Fundamental campaign? It clearly worked because the importance of reading is deeply ingrained in me. I also knew the importance of reading to my kids. But Gen Z didn't have RIF and they also had tangible books replaced by books online. I'm creating this generational divide to explain that this might be why Gen Z parents aren't reading to their kids as much as the generations before. We can't blame them ... exactly.
HarperCollins Publishers conducted a study, detailed in Parents, which revealed that Gen Z parents don't enjoy reading to their kids and instead they see it as something kids should learn in school.
Related:
Only 41 percent of 0–4-year-olds are read to, compared to 64 percent in 2012.
Breaking the numbers down more, only 29 percent of 0–2-year-old boys are read to, compared to 44 percent of girls that age.
Jocelyn M Wood, SLP, PLLC, a child development expert declared this "the downfall of literacy in young children."
'[We will] begin to see children who lack language skills, critical thinking skills, and early literacy skills that come from book reading — not to mention the loss of bonding time with caregivers,' Wood added.
We really need RIF. And Dolly Parton's Imagination Library.
Why is this happening?
Related:
The research showed that many parents simply don't enjoy reading — Gen Z likes it less than Gen X.
Child psychology expert Matthew Danbrook, MA, feels we shouldn't put a lot of pressure on parents. The "why" some parents don't read their kids could have a lot behind it — fatigue, being overworked, the list goes on. We get it.
But I can't help but come back to our use of devices. So many of us read our news online instead of the newspaper. We read e-books instead of actual books. Bookstores are downsizing and going out of business. It's no wonder this is happening.
What we do know is not reading to kids is doing them a disservice with literacy and language. So we have to find the love. Perhaps by incorporating just one book a day could show how reading to our kids can be a relaxing practice. The rewards are too great to not try.
Up Next:Reading to Kids Is Becoming Obsolete first appeared on WeHaveKids on May 23, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Employee slammed for not seeing anything wrong with her ‘inappropriate' work outfit: ‘Confused how this outfit left the house in the first place'
Employee slammed for not seeing anything wrong with her ‘inappropriate' work outfit: ‘Confused how this outfit left the house in the first place'

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Employee slammed for not seeing anything wrong with her ‘inappropriate' work outfit: ‘Confused how this outfit left the house in the first place'

One woman's co-worker complained about her office attire, so she turned to TikTok to ask if she was in the wrong. With many companies shelling out return-to-office mandates — many Gen Z and millennial employees — are confused about what is considered appropriate workplace attire these days. Working at an affordable housing non-profit in California, on a regular workday, Alejandra Carreño opted for a black long-sleeved top, heeled shoes and jean shorts. These weren't Daisy Duke shorts by any means. But supposedly, people were still up in arms over them. In a TikTok video — viewed by over 11 million people — Carreño showed off the infamous outfit and wrote,''Are my shorts inappropriate for work? Asking because someone complained about them.' In an interview with People, the employee gave more context, explaining that some of her co-workers commented on her outfit the day she wore it — but it didn't seem like anything she should be concerned about until her denim cutoffs were brought up in a meeting that same day. 'Oh, before I forget, I do have to tell you that someone mentioned a complaint about your shorts. Short shorts aren't allowed,' Carreño recalled her manager saying to her in the interview. 'To me, they seemed fine. I didn't see anything wrong with them. I think you look nice, but unfortunately, I do need to let you know we can't wear short shorts or short skirts,' her manager continued. Talk about confusing rules. Although the woman didn't see this rule anywhere in the company's handbook — according to the many comments on Carreño's video, there still seems to be an unspoken rule that shorts of any kind should not be worn in the workplace. 'As an HR Manager.. if you're in corporate America i cannot think of an instance where shorts are appropriate,' one comment read. 'Shorts should never be in an office,' someone else chimed in. 'Unfortunately, it has nothing to do with being revealing. as an HR professional, denim shorts are never going to be appropriate in an office/corporate environment,' agreed another commenter. 'Just because something isn't revealing doesn't necessarily make it appropriate for work,' another great point made by someone else. 'I'm confused how this outfit left the house in the first place,' quipped another commenter.

15 Things Younger Generations Do That Boomers Find Appalling And Disrespectful
15 Things Younger Generations Do That Boomers Find Appalling And Disrespectful

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

15 Things Younger Generations Do That Boomers Find Appalling And Disrespectful

The generational gap has never been more obvious, and nowhere does it show up faster than in daily behavior. What younger generations consider normal, casual, or even progressive can leave boomers absolutely floored—and often, deeply offended. It's not always about malice—sometimes it's just about different values, expectations, or definitions of respect. But let's be real: some of these habits feel like a total rebellion against the world boomers grew up in. The things that make younger generations feel empowered or authentic can strike boomers as chaotic, rude, or downright absurd. Here are 15 things younger generations do that leave boomers shaking their heads—and why the generational tension runs so deep. Younger generations often drop the formalities when talking to bosses, teachers, or even elders, using first names and casual language like it's no big deal. Boomers, grew up in a world where authority was respected and feared according to Science Direct, so they find this shocking. It can feel like a blatant disregard for hierarchy and tradition. What Gen Z sees as confidence or authenticity, boomers often interpret as disrespectful or arrogant. The disconnect runs deep because respect was once tied to how you spoke, not just what you said. And that clash makes every conversation feel loaded. Younger generations love to challenge systems—whether it's questioning work hours, gender roles, or even the concept of marriage. Boomers, who were often taught to follow rules without question, see this constant pushback as rebellious and ungrateful. It's like they're tearing down the very structures that kept society functioning. But for Gen Z and millennials, the willingness to question is about creating something better, not disrespecting the past. They're not afraid to ask, 'Why?'—and that alone can feel like a slap in the face to boomers. It's a fundamental difference in how each generation views tradition. For younger generations, glancing at a phone mid-conversation is practically second nature. But for boomers, it feels like a direct insult—like saying, 'You're not important enough to have my full attention.' It comes off as careless, rude, and dismissive. As The Atlantic points out, the constant presence of phones has radically changed social dynamics, often creating an invisible barrier between people. What Gen Z sees as multitasking, boomers see as emotional neglect. It's a subtle habit that can quietly erode connection. Posting everything from relationship drama to mental health struggles on social media is second nature for younger generations. But boomers, raised with a 'keep it private' mindset, find this level of transparency shocking and even embarrassing. They see it as a lack of boundaries—and a total disregard for personal dignity. For younger people, though, sharing online is a form of self-expression and community. It's about normalizing struggles, not hiding them. But for boomers, it feels like airing your dirty laundry for the world to see. Boomers often believe in family loyalty at all costs, even when relatives say or do hurtful things. But younger generations are more willing to call out racism, sexism, or toxic behavior—even within their own families. That level of confrontation feels shocking and disrespectful to boomers. As Forbes highlights, younger people see accountability as love, not betrayal. They believe in addressing harm, even if it means uncomfortable conversations. Boomers, however, often see it as a lack of respect for elders and family traditions. For boomers, a steady 9-to-5 job was the ultimate badge of responsibility. But younger generations are ditching the cubicle for gig work, side hustles, and freelancing—leaving boomers baffled. It feels risky, unstable, and ungrateful for the stability boomers fought so hard for. Younger generations, however, see this as reclaiming freedom and flexibility. They want work to fit into their lives, not the other way around. It's a fundamental shift in values that leaves boomers worried about the future. Taking mental health days, setting boundaries at work, and openly talking about burnout is standard for younger generations. But boomers, raised on the idea that hard work is the ultimate virtue, see this as weakness or an excuse to avoid responsibility. It feels like a slap in the face to the 'pull yourself up by your bootstraps' mentality. As highlighted by Harvard Business Review, mental health is increasingly viewed as essential to productivity, not a distraction from it. Younger people aren't willing to sacrifice well-being for career success. Boomers, however, often see this shift as entitled and soft. For boomers, calling is the default mode of communication. But younger generations hate unexpected phone calls, preferring texts, voice notes, or DMs instead. Ignoring calls feels like a clear message of disinterest or disrespect to boomers. To Gen Z and millennials, though, it's about managing energy and time. They see calls as invasive unless scheduled. Boomers see it as a breakdown of basic social etiquette. Boomers grew up in a world where gender roles were rigid and binary. So when younger generations reject labels, use they/them pronouns, or talk openly about fluid identities, it can feel confusing—and even threatening. It challenges everything boomers were taught to believe. For younger people, it's about authenticity, inclusivity, and freedom. But for boomers, it often feels like a radical shift that's happening too fast. And that cultural whiplash fuels misunderstanding. Boomers see home ownership, car ownership, and even having 'nice things' as signs of success. But younger generations are opting for rentals, rideshares, and minimalism, valuing experiences over possessions. To boomers, this looks like irresponsibility and a lack of ambition. Younger generations, however, see it as freedom from debt and the rat race. They don't want to be tied down by stuff. And that mindset can feel like a rejection of everything boomers worked for. Boomers were raised on the idea that you don't question authority figures—you respect them, period. But younger generations believe in open dialogue, even if it means challenging teachers or calling out a boss's bad behavior. That pushback feels like a lack of respect to boomers. For Gen Z and millennials, it's about equity and fairness. They don't believe respect is automatic—it has to be earned. That shift in mindset often leads to generational clashes. Boomers grew up in a culture where your job defined you—and loyalty to your employer was a moral obligation. Younger generations, though, see work as a means to an end, not their identity. They prioritize balance, and they'll leave a job that doesn't meet their needs. To boomers, this looks like flakiness or a lack of gratitude. But for younger generations, it's about valuing life outside of work. And that difference in priorities is hard to bridge. Younger generations are much more comfortable saying 'no' to social invitations without long explanations or guilt. Boomers, who were taught to accept every invite as a sign of respect, find this shocking and hurtful. It feels dismissive—like the relationship doesn't matter. For Gen Z and millennials, it's about boundaries and protecting their time. They don't feel obligated to say yes just to avoid awkwardness. But for boomers, it feels like a breakdown of social graces. For younger generations, read receipts are a game—leaving them on can signal interest, while leaving them off feels like self-protection. Boomers don't understand the nuance; they see it as a basic courtesy to respond quickly. To them, slow replies feel cold, detached, or downright rude. For younger people, though, digital boundaries are essential. They don't owe instant access, even in a world of constant connectivity. And that boundary often feels like rejection to boomers. Younger generations talk openly about going to therapy, taking antidepressants, or managing mental health diagnoses. Boomers, who were raised to keep personal struggles private, find this public honesty unsettling—sometimes even attention-seeking. It can feel like oversharing or a lack of resilience. For Gen Z and millennials, though, it's about normalizing mental health care and breaking stigma. They see vulnerability as strength, not weakness. Boomers, however, often see it as 'too much information.'

To Humanize The Hiring Process, Start With These 3 Elements
To Humanize The Hiring Process, Start With These 3 Elements

Forbes

time20 hours ago

  • Forbes

To Humanize The Hiring Process, Start With These 3 Elements

Sherry Martin is a holistic human resources leader with expertise in delivering strategic solutions that solve organizational challenges. The job market has dramatically shifted in the digital age, especially since Covid-19. Online applications, automated screening tools and virtual interviews have, without question, brought efficiency to the hiring process. In this drive for optimization, have we inadvertently lost something crucial: the human element? How often do talented individuals feel their carefully crafted résumés vanish into a digital void, their aspirations reduced to keywords, ultimately eroding their dignity and respect? The feeling of being a cog in the machine is widespread, especially when being ghosted after an interview is becoming a common experience. While navigating my own career transition, I saw just how impersonal the process can be and attended job seeker workshops where others expressed similar frustrations. When people invest substantial time and emotional energy into job applications, the absence of personalized feedback or even simple acknowledgment can be deeply disheartening. According to Greenhouse's 2024 State of Job Hunting report, 79% of U.S. job seekers, particularly Gen-Z, feel anxious about the market. This harms both the candidate's experience and employers' reputations. It's time for organizations to consciously bring back humanity into the hiring process and recognize the unique person and story behind every application. By making this shift, you can showcase your company culture from the beginning and shape how your brand is remembered by all candidates. Recruitment shouldn't feel transactional. To establish a human-centered approach, build your hiring practices around three key pillars: transparency, respect and genuine engagement. Transparency should be foundational to the entire hiring process. It shows respect for candidates' time and empowers them to make informed decisions. Being clear and open also builds trust, promotes fairness, reduces anxiety and ensures expectations are aligned from the start. Job descriptions are the initial—and crucial—point of contact and information for prospective candidates. So, they must be upfront. For example, instead of vague terms like "competitive salary" or overly broad salary ranges (e.g., $50,000 to $200,000), providing more-specific compensation figures (e.g., $70,000 to $85,000 annually) avoids disappointment and wasted effort on both sides. You should also highlight specific offerings in your benefits package because that's essential information for candidates' ability to make informed decisions. Transparency also means sharing the details of the hiring process, such as how you conduct screenings, who will be involved in each interview and the expected timeline for each stage. Setting these expectations significantly reduces candidate uncertainty. So, during initial contact, briefly review these hiring steps. You can also reiterate the salary range and offer to discuss benefits, which reinforces your company's commitment to open communication and respect. The interview process is a crucial touchpoint, so create an experience that's both informative for the hiring team and worthwhile for the candidate. For example, providing a few key interview questions in advance allows them to prepare thoughtfully and showcase their abilities effectively. This demonstrates respect for their time and sets up the chance for a more meaningful conversation. Humanizing the hiring process also means looking beyond traditional career trajectories and recognizing the value of diverse experiences and transferable skills. Thoughtful in-the-moment questions can help gauge adaptability, problem-solving skills and cultural add. For example, I was recently asked in an interview, "If hired, what would you need from your manager to be successful?" This question moved the conversation beyond past accomplishments, focusing instead on future success, support requirements and the potential for a collaborative working relationship. Post-interview communication is as crucial as the interview itself for showing respect and care. Impersonal automated rejection emails can dehumanize candidates, particularly because they often provide no explanation. Consider offering the option for a brief, follow-up phone call. This empowers candidates by giving them the choice to receive feedback and continue engaging with you. It also reinforces that you prioritize a respectful candidate experience that acknowledges their effort, communication preferences and desire for closure. Constructive post-interview feedback, even if it's concise, can be invaluable for a candidate's professional growth, and it demonstrates that you took time to understand their candidate profile. To put this into practice, focus on one or two job-related points that can aid the candidate's future development. Beyond feedback, a personalized thank-you note reiterating your interest or respectfully closing the loop leaves a positive final impression. This way, you create a positive candidate experience that can turn even those not selected into future customers, advocates or even future employees. The impact of a human-centered hiring approach extends far beyond filling open positions. It shapes perceptions, influences talent pools and contributes to a more positive, equitable professional landscape. By treating candidates with respect, embracing transparency and developing genuine communication, we can move beyond a purely transactional model and build meaningful connections. Ultimately, reclaiming the human element in the job market is an investment in a more ethical, effective and sustainable future for all. Forbes Human Resources Council is an invitation-only organization for HR executives across all industries. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store