Thousands gather in Dhaka as Bangladesh marks a year after Hasina's ouster
Hasina was removed from power on Aug. 5, 2024, when demonstrators defied a nationwide curfew and stormed her official residence, forcing her to flee to neighboring India, where she remained in exile.
Her removal came following weeks of protests that began in early July 2024. What started as peaceful demonstrations over a controversial quota system for government jobs developed into a wider anti-government movement that was met with a violent crackdown against protesters by security forces that killed more than 1,000 people, mostly students.
The end of her 15 years in uninterrupted power brought the formation of an interim government led by Nobel Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, who promised to restore stability and hold new elections after necessary reforms.
'Together, we will build a Bangladesh where tyranny will never rise again,' Yunus said in a message to the nation on Tuesday, as crowds in the capital, Dhaka, waved flags and used colored smoke to celebrate.
A year on, Hasina, in her absence, now faces trial for crimes against humanity, while the prospect for a better and reformed Bangladesh remains a challenge.
'There is already high hope among the citizens of this country that the interim government could do much. But we have to consider the time frame. At the same time, we have to consider the reality on the ground,' Dr. A.S.M. Amanullah, political analyst and vice-chancellor of the National University, told Arab News.
Although progress on institutional reforms promised by the interim government has been slow and fragmented, the country has recorded signs of economic recovery after the burden left by the previous Awami League party-led government, which accumulated more than $44 billion in foreign debt and oversaw widespread corruption that plagued the banking, infrastructure, energy and power sectors.
'People's hopes are valid … (but) the way the government handled the issue with 180 million people in the country is remarkable,' Amanullah said.
The interim government 'should move to hold a free and fair election early next year, as early as possible,' he added.
Despite calls for early polls, the Yunus administration has delayed elections, which may now take place between February and April 2026.
While uncertainty about the future of democracy still looms large in Bangladesh, the country has witnessed in this past year a greater freedom of expression among the public, which was largely absent under Hasina's rule of extensive suppression of dissent, electoral manipulation and restricted press freedom.
'The people of Bangladesh can speak freely, can run freely, they can move freely without fear. There is no fear of extrajudicial killing. There is no fear of abduction,' Amanullah said.
In a report published on July 30, New York-based Human Rights Watch said 'some of the fear and repression' and 'abuses such as widespread enforced disappearances' that marked Hasina's rule 'appear to have ended.'
For Mahmudur Rahman, editor of Bengali-language daily Amar Desh, this was Bangladesh's 'biggest' achievement.
'We can speak freely, the people can vent their anger. They can criticize the government without any fear of government persecution. And the media is free; media also can criticize the government,' he told Arab News.
But priority must be placed on holding elections that 'will be accepted by the people of Bangladesh' and the international community, Rahman said.
'We should return to the democratic system … without any further delay,' he added. 'It's better to let a political government take over and we'll see where the country goes from there.'
Despite numerous unresolved issues, Bangladeshis believe that unity will be central to the future of their country.
'Most important for the people of the country is to unite against fascism,' Rahman said. 'They should uphold the spirit of the July Revolution and they should unite in a way that never again another fascist regime should come to power in any form.'
Amanullah from Bangladesh's National University echoed the sentiment.
'At this moment, the most important thing for Bangladesh is to be united,' he said. 'This should be the most priority concern for the country. If they remain united, Bangladesh will see a light at the end of the tunnel.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
18 hours ago
- Arab News
UK to prosecute 60 people for supporting banned pro-Palestine group
LONDON: At least 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support' for the recently proscribed Palestine Action group, in addition to three already charged, London's Metropolitan Police said. 'We have put arrangements in place that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary,' the Met said in a statement. More than 700 people have been arrested since it was banned as a terrorist group in early July, including 522 people arrested at a protest last weekend for displaying placards backing the group — thought to be the highest ever recorded number of detentions at a single protest in the UK capital. 'The decisions that we have announced today are the first significant numbers to come out of the recent protests, and many more can be expected in the next few weeks,' said Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson. 'People should be clear about the real-life consequences for anyone choosing to support Palestine Action,' said Parkinson. The first three people were charged earlier this month with offenses under the Terrorism Act for backing Palestine Action, after they were arrested at a July demonstration. According to police, those charged for such offenses could face up to six months imprisonment, as well as other consequences. 'I am proud of how our police and CPS (prosecution) teams have worked so speedily together to overcome misguided attempts to overwhelm the justice system,' Met Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said. In a statement following the latest mass arrests, Interior Minister Yvette Cooper defended the Labour government's decision, insisting: 'UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority.' 'The assessments are very clear — this is not a nonviolent organization,' she added. The government outlawed Palestine Action on July 7, days after it took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated £7.0 million ($9.3 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to Britain's indirect military support for Israel amid the war in Gaza. Britain's Interior Ministry has insisted that Palestine Action was also suspected of other 'serious attacks' that involved 'violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.' Critics, including the UN, Amnesty International, and Greenpeace, have criticized the proscription as an overreach of the law and warned that the ensuing arrests threaten free speech. The UK's Liberal Democrat party said that it was 'deeply concerned about the use of terrorism powers against peaceful protesters.'
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
UK rights watchdog warns police to avoid ‘heavy-handed' policing of Gaza protests
LONDON: Britain's human rights watchdog has urged ministers and police chiefs to avoid 'heavy-handed' tactics when policing demonstrations over the war in Gaza, saying that such actions risk creating a 'chilling effect' on the right to protest, it was reported on Friday. In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, the Equality and Human Rights Commission chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy' and any interference 'must be lawful and assessed case by case.' Her intervention follows reports of individuals facing police action at recent demonstrations despite not expressing support for any banned organizations. The EHRC cited the case of Laura Murton, who in July was threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act by Kent Police in July for holding a Palestinian flag and signs reading 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide' during a demonstration in Canterbury. Murton told officers she did not support any proscribed groups but was reportedly warned that her actions were linked to Palestine Action — which in July was banned by the government. Membership of or support for the group is a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act, carrying a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences,' Falkner said. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections,' she added. She called on the UK government and police to ensure 'all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' so that 'the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights.' In a separate statement, she said that the right to peaceful protest was fundamental to British democracy and must be protected even when dealing with complex and sensitive issues. 'We recognize the genuine challenges the police face in maintaining public safety, but we are concerned that some recent responses may not strike the right balance between security and fundamental rights,' she said. 'Our role as the national human rights institution is to uphold the laws that safeguard everyone's right to fairness, dignity and respect. When we see reports of people being questioned or prevented from peaceful protests that don't support proscribed organisations, we have a duty to speak out,' she added. Last weekend, more than 500 people were arrested in London, most on suspicion of displaying items deemed supportive of Palestine Action. Police figures indicate that half of those detained were aged 60 or older. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury, extensive criminal damage,' citing evidence and security assessments presented in closed court. The group has rejected the claims as 'false and defamatory,' saying they were contradicted by the government's own intelligence. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have urged Attorney General Richard Hermer to delay prosecution decisions for those arrested until after a High Court challenge to Palestine Action's proscription, set for November. They argued that moving ahead before the court's ruling 'raises significant legal and moral questions' and that delaying action 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process.' Murton's lawyers have also issued a letter of claim to Kent Police over her case, which they said was intended to remind forces across the country of their obligations to protect peaceful protest.
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
India says international court lacks authority to rule on Pakistan water treaty
NEW DELHI: The international Court of Arbitration lacks any legal authority to make pronouncements on the Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan as New Delhi has never recognized the legitimacy of the court, India's foreign ministry said on Thursday. A ruling from the Court of Arbitration last week backed Pakistan by saying that India must adhere to the Indus Waters Treaty in the design of new hydro-electric power stations on rivers that flow west into Pakistan. Under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, three rivers that flow westwards were awarded to Pakistan, with India getting three eastern flowing rivers. Pakistan fears its neighbor India could choke its main water supply, with 80 percent of the country's agriculture and hydro-power dependent on those three river flows. In 2023, Pakistan brought a case to the Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration over the design of Indian hydro-power projects on rivers that were awarded to Pakistan under the treaty. The court, in a ruling on Friday that was posted on its website on Monday, said it had jurisdiction over the dispute and ruled the treaty 'does not permit India to generate hydro-electric power on the Western Rivers based on what might be the ideal or best practices approach for engineering' of these projects. Instead, the design of these projects must adhere 'strictly' to the specifications laid down in the treaty, the court said. Pakistan's Attorney General, Mansoor Usman, said in an interview on Tuesday that, by and large, the court had accepted Pakistan's position, especially on the design issue of the new hydropower projects. 'I am sure it is clear now that India cannot construct any of these projects in violation of the court's decision,' he told Reuters. Pakistan's foreign ministry said late Monday that the court ruling said that India had to 'let flow' the waters of the three rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. The court said its findings are final and binding on both countries, according to the foreign office statement. An Indian official pointed to a June statement by India's foreign ministry, which said that India has never recognized the existence in law of the Court of Arbitration. Tensions between the two countries over the Indus Waters Treaty soared when India unilaterally said in April that it would hold the treaty in abeyance in response to the killing of 26 civilians in Indian-controlled Kashmir, an attack it blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denied involvement. Conflict then erupted in May, the most serious fighting between the two countries in decades, before it ended with a ceasefire announcement by US President Donald Trump.
