
Agonizing final moments of Nevada mother who melted to death in the desert heat
A mother battling an alcohol addiction died in 107 degree Las Vegas heat after being discharged from a treatment center, her family has claimed.
Melissa Gallia, 50, died of environmental heat stress in July last year, according to a wrongful death lawsuit filed in Clark County District Court on Tuesday.
The mother-of-two checked herself into Desert Hope Treatment Center seeking help with alcoholism, but was transferred to nearby Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center after suffering from hallucinations.
But doctors at the hospital claimed she was exhibiting 'drug-seeking behavior' and discharged her to her home, according to a complaint obtained by Daily Mail.
Gallia was found dead in a parking lot near Sunrise Hospital lot just hours after her release, with her husband Bart alleging he was not made privy of the emergency room visit until after she had died.
Her family alleges Gallia 'died alone' in the parking lot because of the 'outrageous, willful, wanton, reckless and malicious' actions of staff at both facilities.
The family's attorney, in a statement to Daily Mail, claimed, 'Melissa would not have died in the heat of Las Vegas' had it not been for the alleged, 'failure of medical professionals' and 'administrative failures' by both Desert Hope and Sunrise Hospital.
Sunrise Hospital, which declined to comment on the case citing 'pending litigation', told Daily Mail it is, 'always sensitive to situations involving patients and remain sympathetic to the details that have been made public'.
The mother-of-two checked herself into Desert Hope Treatment Center on June 30 seeking help with alcoholism, but was transferred to nearby Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center after suffering from hallucinations. Her husband Bart (pictured with Gallia) had not been made privy to her whereabouts despite her authorizing the facilities to contact him, the complaint alleges
Gallia developed a problem with alcohol after the death of her mother and went to Dessert Hope seeking help just before 10pm on June 29, the complaint states.
The facility collected her personal effects, including her ID, and she allegedly signed paperwork authorizing the facility to discuss her medical information with her husband, father and Sunrise Hospital.
She was administered several medications shortly after her admission and again the next morning, with her case manager contacting Bart just after 8am to offer an update on her condition, the lawsuit states.
But her symptoms seemingly worsened and staff continued to administer more drugs throughout the day, according to the complaint.
By 11pm on June 30, Gallia reported that she was 'seeing things moving' and her doctor ordered another dose of medication.
Her condition did not improve, with Gallia reporting high levels of anxiety around 3am, and 'worsening visual hallucinations' and feeling 'restless' about two hours later.
Staff called 911 and Gallia was transported to the emergency room. She arrived at Sunrise Hospital on July 1 at 5:54am, but was not admitted until 11:06am, the complaint alleges.
She was discharged less than 30 minutes after being seen with the attending physician noting, Gallia stated, 'she has urinary infection' and that she was seen at an 'outside facility but not prescribed antibiotics'.
The notes also stated that she had 'drug seeking behavior' and was 'discharged to home', according to the complaint.
Surveillance camera footage from a nearby business captured Gallia 'alone' and 'stumbling' through a parking lot around 2:21pm.
She sat in a landscaped area and then, just before 3pm, was seen lying in a parking spot, the complaint states.
An employee found her 'lying on the ground' and 'unresponsive' about an hour later and called emergency services. She was pronounced dead at 6:25pm.
The Clark County Coroner conducted an autopsy and determined that Gallia died of environmental heat stress.
According to the lawsuit, Bart was not informed that his wife had been transferred to the hospital or discharged until he received a call from a Desert Hope nurse on July 2 at 3:28am asking him where Gallia was.
He rushed to Sunrise Hospital seeking information, but was 'provided conflicting answers from staff', the filing states.
Bart says he only received confirmation of his wife's whereabouts later that day after getting a call from an investigator at the coroner's office, who advised him that she had died.
The lawsuit also included sworn expert testimony from two medical professionals who identified multiple 'breaches in the standard of care', which they allege 'represented an utter disregard for the life and safety of Melissa'.
Citing failures in properly documenting Gallia's case, as well as the lack of notifying her family of changes in her care, the experts alleged 'neglect' on behalf of the facilities, with one saying: 'In all my years of practice I have never seen so many missed opportunities to provide proper care.'
The wrongful death lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.
Gallia's family attorney Robert Murdock told Daily Mail in a statement: 'The matter involves the failure of medical professionals as well as administrative failures by the entities involved, which we believe allowed and caused the death of Melissa.
'At the end of the day, had Desert Hope simply picked up the phone and called Melissa's husband Bart, or, had Sunrise Hospital simply picked up the phone and called Melissa's husband Bart, Melissa would not have died in the heat of Las Vegas.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes
Oregon track star Alexa Anderson has revealed she was ordered away from the high jump podium by angry officials after she protested the inclusion of a trans athlete. Anderson and fellow competitor Reese Eckard were filmed refusing to step onto the podium during the medal ceremony, in an apparent protest of a fifth-place finisher who is reportedly transgender. Rather than taking their spots on the podium, footage obtained by Fox News showed the girls turning their backs to the crowd before being ushered away from the ceremony by an official. Now, Anderson has revealed that the official was apparently deeply unimpressed by the gesture. She told Fox: 'We stepped off the podium in protest and, as you can see, the official kind of told us "hey, go over there, if you're not going to participate, get out of the photos". 'They asked us to move away from the medal stand, so when they took the photos, we weren't even in it at all.' Anderson had finished third in the competition while fellow protestor Eckard had just clinched fourth place. Anderson continued: 'It's unfair because biological males and biological females compete at such different levels that letting a biological male into our competition is taking up space and opportunities from all these hardworking women. 'The girl in ninth who should have came in eighth and had that podium spot taken away from her, as well as many others.' She added: 'This was my first time competing against a transgender individual and the first public stand I have taken in this issue. 'But I have privately supported all the other girls who have done the same.' Anderson insisted at the time, in a separate interview with Fox, that she was not trying to stir hatred towards the trans community. 'We didn't refuse to stand on the podium out of hate,' she said. 'We did it because someone has to say this isn't right. 'In order to protect the integrity and fairness of girls sports we must stand up for what is right.' Daily Mail has reached out to the Oregon School Activities Association for comment on the controversy. Oregon is one of several states challenging President Donald Trump's 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports' executive order, which threatens to deny federal funding to rogue governments. The American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association have both stated that gender is a spectrum and not a binary structure, as the White House argued in its January 20 executive order 'defending women from gender ideology.'


Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Wind opponents sue Trump administration to block New York wind project
June 3 (Reuters) - Fishing companies and offshore wind opponents filed a lawsuit on Tuesday challenging the Trump administration's decision to reverse course and allow construction to resume on Empire Wind, a $5 billion wind farm project off New York's coast. Protect Our Coast New Jersey, Clean Ocean Action, ACK for Whales and 12 fishing industry participants in a lawsuit, opens new tab filed in federal court in Trenton, New Jersey, sought to reinstate a stop work order Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued in April halting construction of Equinor's ( opens new tab wind project. Burgum issued that order after Republican President Donald Trump on his first day back in office on January 20 directed his administration to halt offshore wind lease sales and stop the issuance of permits, leases and loans for both onshore and offshore wind projects. He did so while also moving to ramp up the federal government's support for the fossil fuel industry and maximize output in the United States. Trump as a candidate last year promised to end the offshore wind industry. But weeks after Burgum signed the stop-work order, the administration in a turnabout on May 19 allowed work to resume on Empire Wind, which is being developed by Norway's Equinor and is expected to provide power for half a million homes from 2027 onward. The administration did so in a compromise with New York that could also see canceled plans for a gas pipeline revived. Burgum said he was encouraged that New York Governor Kathy Hochul will now allow new gas pipeline capacity to move forward. Tuesday's lawsuit argued that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management did not adhere to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to provide a basis for restoring the work permits. Bruce Afran, the plaintiffs' lawyer, said the administration had properly recognized the lack of investigation about serious environmental harm from Equinor's project. "The administration correctly pulled the Empire Wind work permit because of these concerns and had no basis to reinstate the work orders a month later," he said in a statement. "This lawsuit seeks to restore the stop work order." Equinor declined to comment on the lawsuit itself but in a statement said the project "has undergone years of rigorous permitting and studies, and secured all necessary federal, state and local approvals to begin construction in 2024." The agency did not respond to a request for comment.


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK appears to have been spared immediate hit of Trump's 50% steel tariffs
The UK appears to have been spared from the immediate hit of Donald Trump's 50% steel and aluminium tariffs. The US President has decided to 'provide different treatment' to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London last month. Levies will remain at 25% for imports from the UK, however Britain could still be subject to the higher 50% rate from July, according to a version of the order confirming the tariff increase posted by a White House X account on Tuesday. According to the text of the order, Mr Trump has 'further determined that it is necessary and appropriate to allow for the implementation of the U.S.-UK Economic Prosperity Deal of May 8, 2025 (EPD), and to accordingly provide different treatment, as described below, for imports of steel and aluminum articles, and their derivatives, from the United Kingdom'. The order later says that rates will for now stay at 25% and adds: 'On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminum consistent with the terms of the EPD, or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD'. The 50% tariff rate more widely is due to come into force from 12.01am Washington DC time on Wednesday, which is shortly after 5am in the UK. A Government spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our plan for change. 'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. 'We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the US, struck last month, included relief on the steel and aluminium tariffs, but the implementation has not yet been finalised. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met White House trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. According to the Department for Business and Trade, Mr Reynolds and Mr Greer discussed a desire to implement the deal struck between London and Washington as soon as possible, and committed to working closely to make it happen. The general terms for the agreement between the UK and US were published in May when the deal was announced, and outline the intended plans. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked if there was a text of the full deal ready to be released, and told reporters on Tuesday: 'There 's most definitely text with this deal, there is language that this side has seen. 'You'll have to ask the UK Parliament why they haven't seen it from their own Government, I obviously can't answer that question.'