Democratic Maine oyster farmer to challenge Susan Collins
Graham Platner's story could be compelling to Maine voters aching for a political outsider: His only experience on Capitol Hill was as a bartender, a job he held while attending George Washington University on the GI Bill. But being a 'regular working guy' is one of his strengths, Platner told MSNBC.
'Right now it feels like there's an anti-establishment fervor amongst the working people of this state,' said Platner, who announced his candidacy on Tuesday. 'Going with someone of the establishment is not going to work.'
He's running on a platform centered around economic issues, such as housing affordability and universal health care, so it's no surprise he cites Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., as a major political influence. Yet he declines to identify with a progressive label.
'I think it's silly that thinking people deserve health care, that makes you some kind of lefty. But I do think those working-class policies are necessary. That's what we need to do to make this country work for working people.'
An Army and Marine veteran, Platner is calling for an end to U.S. involvement in foreign wars, and the 'trillions and trillions' of taxpayer dollars spent on them. He served four combat tours in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Platner has his work cut out for him, as he is joining an already crowded primary race for Collins' seat, which she has held since 1997. The field also includes Jordan Wood, who served as chief of staff to then-Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif., along with David Costello, who challenged Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, last year.
Maine Gov. Janet Mills, a Democrat, has said she's considering entering the race as well. Mills memorably stood up to President Donald Trump earlier this year when he threatened to withhold federal funding if her state did not comply with banning transgender athletes from competing in women's sports.
'See you in court,' she said to Trump in a room full of governors.
Mills would be nearly 80 years old if she were to win. Platner said it's time for a fresh face with the energy for the job.
'I just think if we keep running the same kind of playbook, we're going to get the same results,' he said.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
18 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Joke Of No Elections In 2028 — People React
On Monday, Donald Trump met with several European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and made some remarks that left the internet saying, "WTF." When asked if he was open to holding an election once peace is achieved, Zelenskyy replied, "Yes, of course." He explained there aren't elections during wartime as they're focused on security, but the goal is "truth everywhere, in the battlefield, in the sky, in the sea," so people can resume democratic, legal elections. Trump interrupted the Ukrainian leader to confirm the bit about no elections during wartime. "Three and a half years from now, if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections," he said. "Oh, that's good," he concluded. Good for who??? I really don't like this little smile at the end. Notably, this happened on the same day Trump made headlines for showing off his "Trump 2028" and "4 more years" merch. Obviously, people had a lot to say about this: "A sitting US President 'jokes' about manufacturing a war to stop democracy and stay in power. Crazy how this shit is not a MUCH bigger deal and will instead be forgotten or dismissed," one X (formerly Twitter) user wrote. Another person said, "You can practically see the dim little lightbulb flicker on above his head. 'Wait a second... if my country is in a war... I don't have to leave the White House... EVER?! THAT'S GOOD!' It's the giddy, amoral excitement of a child who has just discovered a brand new and fantastic way to cheat at the game. Except the game is the Constitution of the United States." "It's not funny.... Cause you know DAMN well it has already crossed his mind, that to me is scary!!! YOU'RE NOT FUNNY TRUMP!!!!" "Democrats need to step up and meet this loser and loser gop party where they are at! Ethics are no longer a part of the Republican party and everyone needs to realize that." And finally, "Don't get your hopes up, fuck-face. We've had elections during every war we've ever fought. And we've fought a lot of wars." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below!
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
House committee launches investigation into California's high-speed rail project
A bipartisan congressional committee is investigating whether California's High-Speed Rail Authority knowingly misrepresented ridership projections and financial outlooks, as alleged by the Trump administration, to secure federal funding. In a letter sent to Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy on Tuesday, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chair James Comer (R-KY) requested a staff briefing and all communications and records about federal funding for the high-speed rail project and any analysis over the train's viability. 'The Authority's apparent repeated use of misleading ridership projections, despite longstanding warnings from experts, raises serious questions about whether funds were allocated under false pretenses,' Comer wrote. Comer's letter copied Congressman Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee who has also voiced skepticism about the project. Garcia, whose districts represent communities in Southern California, was not immediately available for comment. An authority spokesperson called the House committee's investigation 'another baseless attempt to manufacture controversy around America's largest and most complex infrastructure project,' and added that the project's chief executive Ian Choudri previously addressed the claims and called them 'cherrypicked and out-of-date, and therefore misleading.' Last month, the Trump administration pulled $4 billion in federal funding from the project meant for construction in the Central Valley. After a months-long review, prompted by calls from Republican lawmakers, the administration found 'no viable path' forward for the fast train, which is billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule. The administration also questioned whether the authority's projected ridership counts were intentionally misrepresented. California leaders called the move 'illegal' and sued the Trump administration for declaratory and injunctive relief. Gov. Gavin Newsom said it was 'a political stunt' and a 'heartless attack on the Central Valley.' The bullet train was proposed decades ago as a way to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco in less than three hours by 2020. While the entire line has cleared environmental reviews, no stretch of the route has been completed. Construction has been limited to the Central Valley, where authority leaders have said a segment between Merced and Bakersfield will open by 2033. The project is also about $100 billion over its original budget of $33 billion. Even before the White House pulled federal funding, authority leaders and advisers repeatedly raised concerns over the project's long-term financial sustainability. Roughly $13 billion has been spent so far — the bulk of which was supplied by the state, which has proposed $1 billion per year towards the project. But Choudri, who started at the authority last year, has said the project needs to find new sources of funding and has turned focus toward establishing public-private partnerships to supplement costs.
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump just offered NY kids cash for schools — will Gov. Hochul turn it down to please unions?
New federal law offers scholarship grants for kids to use at private schools — if their state's governor opts to allow it. We can't recall Gov. Kathy Hochul or any of her predecessors ever turning down free, no-strings-attached cash — but giving the thumbs-up here would risk the ire of New York's powerful teachers unions. Will she dare? Advertisement The program has two steps. First, it lets taxpayers give up to $1,700 to a scholarship-granting nonprofit, trimming their federal tax liability dollar-for-dollar. Advertisement Then, it lets the charities offer grants to help kids pay for private-school tuition, books or other educational expenses — as long as the state's governor 'or other entities/individuals designated by state law' opts in. The aid can surely help New York kids to better futures — by letting them escape low-performing public schools. A whopping 40% of New York City kids in grades 3-8 failed this spring's state tests in math and English (though city schools spend $37,000 a year per student, while the average private-school tuition in the state is about $22,000). That's why 74% of New York school parents back vouchers. And why tens of thousands of kids are on waitlists for seats at public charter schools, which are privately run. Advertisement Alas, teachers unions, which control public schools, fear losing students to schools they don't control: It means fewer union members, reduced dues collection — and ever-shrinking teacher-union power. So the unions hate the scholarship program, even pushing transparent lies that is somehow steals money away from public schools. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters In truth, not one dime would come from New York public schools or any state tax revenue at all. Advertisement If Hochul turns down the cash, as schools expert Corey DeAngelis notes, she'll be shooting New York in the foot: letting New York taxpayers' donations go to help other states' kids, while local children get bupkis. On every other front, Hochul is devoted to maximizing federal grants to New York; along with practically every elected Democrat in the state, she's been furiously denouncing Medicaid 'cuts' that mainly amount to imposing work requirements on able-bodied beneficiaries. If the gov blocks Empire State children from getting these scholarships, it'll be undeniable proof that unions matter to her more than New York's kids.
