Navajo, San Juan County leaders extend accord bolstering voting access
The agreement, stemming from a 2016 lawsuit filed by the Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission against the county, extends a prior accord that expired after the November 2024 general elections. Notably, the accord calls for creation of three language-assistance locations and polling places within Navajo Nation land in San Juan County, pre-election advertising in the Navajo language, Diné Bizaad, and employment of Navajo interpreters to aid in the election outreach.
'This settlement affirms a fundamental truth — the voices of Navajo voters in San Juan County matter. We are dedicated to making sure the ballot box remains open and accessible to Navajo language speakers today, tomorrow and every day after that,' said Abby Cook, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, which helped represent the Navajo Nation.
The Navajo Nation is spread across southeastern Utah, northeastern Arizona and northwestern New Mexico, but the settlement agreement applies to the Utah portion of the reservation. According to 2024 U.S. Census Bureau estimates, 46.5% of the county's 14,601 residents are American Indians or Alaska Natives.
The original 2016 lawsuit stemmed from the move in Utah in 2014 to mail-in balloting and concerns the change disenfranchised Navajo voters, in part due to unreliable postal service in Navajo Nation territory. The first settlement agreement resolving the dispute was executed in 2018, the second was finalized in 2021, and the new one, extending the varied provisions through the 2028 general election cycle, was inked last week. The San Juan County Clerk's Office is the main county party in the matter.
The new accord, filed in U.S. District Court in Utah, says the goal of those involved is 'to continue to achieve, if possible, a larger turnout by Navajo voters in future elections.' The language assistance, it reads, has 'produced some noteworthy results,' including turnout by voters on the Navajo reservation of 89.07%, which compared to overall Utah voter turnout that year of 90.09%.
Per the agreement, voting information centers will be created in the run up to elections in Montezuma Creek, Navajo Mountain and Monument Valley. 'Each center will be staffed with a trained Navajo language interpreter, offering services including voter registration, ballot replacement, and language assistance,' reads an ACLU press release.
Additionally, election information will be provided in Diné Bizaad, on local radio stations and newspapers.
'All eligible voters have a right to full and equal voting access without barriers, including the right to read and understand their ballot and voting resources,' said Aaron Welcher, spokesman for the ACLU of Utah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 days ago
Appeals court tosses judge's contempt finding against Trump administration in prison deportations
WASHINGTON -- A split appeals court panel tossed out a judge's contempt finding against President Donald Trump's administration on Friday in a case over deportations to an El Salvador prison. The decision comes after planes carrying Venezuelan migrants landed at the prison even after U.S District Judge James E. Boasberg said in court they must return to the United States. Boasberg found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt of court. The ruling marked a dramatic battle between the judicial and executive branches of government. But the divided three-judge panel in the nation's capital found that Boasberg had exceeded his authority and intruded on the executive branch's foreign affairs powers. Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao, both of whom were nominated by Trump in his first term in the White House, agreed with the unsigned majority opinion. 'The district court's order attempts to control the Executive Branch's conduct of foreign affairs, an area in which a court's power is at its lowest ebb,' Rao wrote. Judge Cornelia Pillard, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, dissented. 'The majority does an exemplary judge a grave disservice by overstepping its bounds to upend his effort to vindicate the judicial authority that is our shared trust,' she wrote. The 250 migrants have since been released back to their home country in a prisoner swap with the U.S. after months at the mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. Boasberg had accused Trump administration officials of rushing deportees out of the U.S. under the Alien Enemies Act before they could challenge their removal in court and then willfully disregarding his order that planes already in the air should return. The Trump administration has denied any violation, saying the judge's directive to return the planes was made verbally in court but not included in his written order. Last month, the Justice Department filed an unusual judicial misconduct complaint against Boasberg over comments he allegedly made at a closed-door meeting of judges as well as his actions in the deportations case. The complaint calls for the case to be taken away from Boasberg while an investigation proceeds. Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated the appeals court ruling, calling it a 'MAJOR victory defending President Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act' in a social media post and vowing to 'continue fighting and WINNING in court.' Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney who represented the migrants, said there was 'zero ambiguity' in Boasberg's order about the planes. 'We strongly disagree with today's decision regarding contempt and are considering all options going forward," he said.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Organizations call on Morrisey not to release WV SNAP recipients personal data
SNAP and EBT Accepted here sign. SNAP and Food Stamps provide nutrition benefits to supplement the budgets of disadvantaged families. (Getty Images) A group of West Virginia advocacy and food assistance organizations is calling on Gov. Patrick Morrisey not to comply with a request from the federal government for personal information belonging to recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, better known as food stamps. The 22 organizations — which include the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy, the ACLU of West Virginia, Facing Hunger Foodbank and the West Virginia Food and Farm Coalition — called the request an 'outrageous act of federal overreach' without clear parameters for how the federal government intends to use the personal data. 'West Virginia SNAP recipients share their personal information with the state SNAP agency because they trust it will be used only to help them access food assistance,' the letter says. 'That trust is grounded in longstanding state and federal laws and standards that strictly limit how this data can be used. Now, the USDA is attempting to bypass those protections — pressuring states to hand over sensitive data for unrelated and undisclosed purposes.' Earlier this year, the federal Department of Agriculture asked states to turn over SNAP recipients' sensitive information to comply with an executive from President Donald Trump called 'Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos.' The request included recipients' names, dates of birth, personal addresses and Social Security numbers along with records to calculate the amount of SNAP benefits they got over time. 'President Trump is rightfully requiring the federal government to have access to all programs it funds, and SNAP is no exception,' USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a statement at the time. 'For years, this program has been on autopilot, with no USDA insight into real-time data. The Department is focused on appropriate and lawful participation in SNAP, and today's request is one of many steps to ensure SNAP is preserved for only those eligible.' The federal agency later broadened the request to other data points including recipients' immigration status and household members. The USDA's Food and Nutrition Service said it would use the data to 'ensure program integrity,' including verifying recipients' eligibility and would follow up with states as necessary regarding next steps. Late last month, a coalition of 21 states and Washington D.C. led by Democrat attorneys general in California and New York sued the federal government over privacy concerns with the data request. They asked a judge to stop the government from making the demand or stop it from withholding funding from states that don't comply. In their letter, the West Virginia organizations write that complying with the request would compromise SNAP recipients' personal data and cause fewer people to feel comfortable participating, undermining Morrisey's efforts to improve health in the state through his 'Four Pillars of a Healthy West Virginia' plan. In West Virginia last year, SNAP provided food assistance to 277,400, or one in six people, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. It fed more than 41 million Americans that year. A spokesman for Morrisey did not respond by deadline to a request for comment. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
CBS News
3 days ago
- CBS News
13 cities join federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's immigration enforcement tactics
Thirteen additional cities have joined the federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's illegal immigration enforcement tactics. Los Angeles City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto made the announcement Friday morning at a news conference. She said her office is amending the complaint and adding 13 cities representing four counties. The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Public Counsel and other immigration and civil rights attorneys, claiming that federal agents were violating the Constitution by arresting people solely based on their skin color, performing raids without warrants and denying legal counsel to detainees. Los Angeles city and county, along with seven other cities, including Culver City, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Pico Rivera, Santa Monica and West Hollywood, joined the initial lawsuit. The new cities joining the lawsuit are: Long Beach, Pomona, South Gate, Lynwood, Huntington Park, Paramount, Bell Gardens, Beverly Hills, Anaheim, Santa Ana, City of Santa Barbara, Carpinteria, and Oxnard. "We will always stand up to protect our communities and to uphold the rule of law," Feldstein Soto said. "Thank you to our growing coalition representing multiple jurisdictions across southern California." CBS Los Angeles reached out to the White House for a comment on the matter and is waiting for a response. Several mayors from the cities joining the lawsuit said they are proud to be joining the coalition of other local leaders. "Our decision to intervene in this lawsuit is about standing up for civil rights. No one in our community should be subjected to unlawful treatment or targeted based on race or ethnicity. We believe in due process, fairness, and the responsibility to hold all levels of government accountable when those principles are lost," said Mayor Peggy Lemons, City of Paramount. On July 11, a lower court judge ordered to temporarily halt immigrations raids saying, federal agents couldn't "rely solely" on certain factors when considering whether to make a "detentive stop," including the "apparent race or ethnicity" of the person in question, whether they are "speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent," and their "presence at a particular location (e.g. bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc.)." On Aug. 1, a panel of judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely denied the Trump administration's request to suspend the lower court's ruling. In a statement to CBS News regarding the decision from the Court of Appeals, Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in part: "What makes someone a target of ICE is if they are illegally in the U.S.—NOT their skin color, race, or ethnicity," she said. "America's brave men and women are removing murderers, MS-13 gang members, pedophiles, rapists—truly the worst of the worst from Golden State communities. 70% of ICE arrests are of criminal illegal aliens who have been convicted or have pending charges. President Trump and Secretary (Kristi) Noem are putting the American people first by removing illegal aliens who pose a threat to our communities. Law and order will prevail."
