Cruelty claims at children's unit 'must lead to change'
A BBC documentary on alleged cruelty in a children's psychiatric unit "must and will lead to improvements", a government minister has pledged.
Patients who were teenagers when they were admitted to Skye House, a specialist NHS unit in Glasgow, told BBC Disclosure about a culture of cruelty among nursing staff.
Maree Todd, minister for mental wellbeing, told the Scottish Parliament she was treating the issues raised in the documentary "with the utmost seriousness".
Government ministers will meet leaders of all health boards with child and adolescent mental health units on Wednesday.
Programme-makers spoke to 28 former patients, some of whom had been detained under the mental health act, while making BBC Disclosure's Kids on The Psychiatric Ward documentary.
One said the 24-bed psychiatric hospital, which sits in the grounds of Glasgow's Stobhill hospital, was like "hell".
Skye House, which opened in 2009, accepts children aged 12 to 18 who are usually at crisis point.
Most are detained under the Mental Health Act, which means they cannot leave until doctors decide they are fit to be discharged.
The BBC began investigating after one young patient reported her treatment at the unit.
Many other cases soon came to light.
Speaking at Holyrood, Todd said the culture depicted in the documentary was "disturbing" and the conduct of some staff fell far below "basic standards of decency and compassion".
"I treat the issues raised in the documentary with the utmost seriousness," she said.
"It must, and will, result in improvements."
But she said NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde had assured her that issues raised had been dealt with, standards had already improved and internal and external reviews had been commissioned.
She added: "I will carefully scrutinise both of these reviews as soon as they come out and expected Greater Glasgow and Clyde to act immediately on any recommendations for improvement.
"I will also be asking about the governance arrangement in place to make sure that this can never happen again."
Responding to a question from Conservative health spokesman Sandesh Gulhane about who had been held to account for the incidents at Skye House, Todd said improvements had already been made at Skye House.
"What I heard in the programme has shocked me and has put in place a sequence of events that will give myself and others in this chamber assurance that the situation has changed since the time period of the programme," she added.
Tory Meghan Gallacher said individual cases were "critical for shining a light on the lack of action taken by staff, the NHS and the Scottish government.
"The Scottish government didn't find about this through the BBC documentary, they had known for years," she said.
She added that one of her constituents had been contacting the government about the way her daughter was treated since 2023.
"I've no idea how the minister can stand here today and pretend to be shocked because she's known about this for years."
Todd said ministers received a "huge amount of correspondence daily" and letters about medical cases were normally referred to their health board.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde previously said a review of medication was carried out in 2023 and this changed the way medication was administered.
Teenagers mocked by nurses at psychiatric unit
Child psychiatric units to get extra inspections
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
NHS 999 staff quitting and suffering burnout over ‘pressure' of calls
NHS 999 staff are quitting and suffering burnout caused by the 'relentless pressure' of calls, according to new research. Figures obtained by Unison from ambulance services showed high turnover rates among call handlers, which staff say are often over a lack of support and the non-stop, often distressing, calls that force many to take sick leave. A report launched at the union's annual conference in Liverpool today revealed the toll taken on the workforce, with more than a quarter of NHS ambulance control room staff quitting their jobs over the past three years. According to the research, more than half a million days were lost to call handler illness in the three years from April 2021. The figure for 2023/24 alone was 166,940 – the equivalent of more than a month of sick leave for each 999 call handler. The union says high staff turnover and increased sickness absences are having a negative impact on patients. It often means people are having to wait longer for 999 staff to answer calls or for their emergency to be properly assessed and dealt with. Unison general secretary Christina McAnea said: 'These findings paint a bleak picture of the conditions faced by 999 control room staff. 'TV programmes about ambulance services don't show things as they really are. Call handlers are under immense pressure, making split-second decisions that directly affect lives. 'They handle relentless calls, often from people in distress, while dealing with complex emergencies and with limited resources. 'Despite their crucial role, 999 call handlers frequently face emotional strain and operate in an environment where support is sometimes lacking. The job is rewarding, but the challenges behind the scenes are far greater than most people realise. 'It's bad for morale and for patients when so many staff quit or are burnt out. Callers who dial 999 need to know the person picking up the phone is ready to deal with their crisis. 'Ambulance employers must do more to protect the health and wellbeing of staff who provide such high stakes support. 'This would help create a more stable emergency service that can retain the skills and experience of emergency call handlers, and persuade people to stay in the job for longer.' An NHS spokesperson said: '999 call handlers play an essential role as the first point of contact in emergencies and the NHS is taking steps to help staff deal with record levels of pressure including providing a range of health and wellbeing support. 'But we know there is more to do and the health service is committed to tackling burnout by continuing to offer more flexible working options.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'One of the biggest stress factors for 999 call handlers are delays to call outs, which is why we will put almost 500 new ambulances on the roads as part of our wider urgent and emergency care plan to improve the speed and quality of care for those needing urgent or emergency treatment. 'We are also working with the NHS to support staff mental health, through occupation health provision, counselling and employee support programmes.' The data was from 11 ambulance trusts.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump to force NHS to pay for wonder drugs
NHS patients have been given new hope of accessing wonder drugs previously blocked in Britain as Donald Trump pressures the health service to spend more with US suppliers. Ministers are understood to be reviewing the value-for-money rules that govern which drugs the NHS can buy, amid demands from the Trump administration for the UK to be more welcoming to US pharmaceutical companies. Under the trade agreement signed between the two nations earlier this year, the Government agreed to 'endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'. Earlier this week, The Telegraph revealed that this could result in the NHS paying more for US drugs to see off criticism of the differences in medicine prices between the two nations. However, it is understood that discussions include not only paying more for treatments already supplied on the NHS but also making it easier for US drug giants to sell their most cutting-edge treatments to the health service. It follows a wave of high-profile rejections of so-called 'wonder' drugs in recent years. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice), which approves new NHS drugs for purchase, has blocked treatments including one which stopped the progression of Alzheimer's disease and another that doubled the life expectancy for terminal breast cancer patients. Nice has rejected them based on assessments of how long they would extend a patient's lifespan and improve quality of life. To qualify under Nice rules a new treatment must deliver one extra year of perfect health, or longer for less perfect health, for no more than £30,000. This figure has not increased in line with inflation since 1999. If it had, it would be just over £53,000. Nice has maintained that, to get approval for use on the NHS, medicines 'must not only provide benefits to patients but also represent a good use of NHS resources and taxpayers' money'. However, critics say a failure to raise the threshold in-line with inflation meant life-changing drugs were being blocked. Richard Torbett, chief executive of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, said: 'There is growing evidence that it is becoming harder to bring new medicines to NHS patients. Increasingly, some new medicines may not be launched in the UK at all.' Companies including US giant Eli Lilly have said the regulator must rethink how 'value-for-money' is assessed. On Monday, a spokesman for the company said: 'The UK has historically focused on medicines as a cost to the NHS rather than evaluating their social and economic value.' Ministers are understood to be listening to demands from the industry for Nice to shake up its formula, with medicines such as AstraZeneca's breast cancer treatment Enhertu likely to be resubmitted for approval for NHS use if the formula is updated. Nice and AstraZeneca previously failed to reach an agreement over a price for the drug, which costs an estimated £118,000 per course of treatment. The NHS typically gets discounts, although the level is commercially sensitive. The Nice formula is being discussed after President Trump took a personal interest in the NHS issue. In trade documents between the US and UK, it said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'. US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that sees companies pay revenue back to the NHS if costs rise faster than expected. Drug companies paid £3bn back to the NHS last year. In April, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said he was proud that the UK had kept prices of medicines low. However, he admitted that the UK had become too focused on cost rather than the benefits in some cases. Mr Streeting said: 'We've moved from quite rightly trying to drive a good bargain on the price of drugs and treatment to a position where sometimes people view medicine spend as a dead weight cost'.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Assisted dying: Medical students voice opposition as some MPs urge vote delay
Hundreds of medical students have voiced their opposition to an assisted dying law, as dozens of Labour MPs called for this week's vote on the issue to be delayed. It is currently expected the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will have its third reading on Friday, with MPs voting to either send it through to the House of Lords or to stop it progressing any further. It would be the first vote on the overall Bill to take place since November, when the proposed legislation passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 on a historic day which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. But, days ahead of third reading, a group of Labour MPs opposed to the Bill have written to Commons leader Lucy Powell asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. They added that it 'alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future secretaries of state for health'. They also raised concerns that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. The MPs, including Dame Meg Hiller, wrote: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' Their letter came as medical students sent their own to MPs, citing concerns about the Bill. The student doctors, from universities across the UK, said: 'We do not oppose dignified death – far from it. We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against. Last week, a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Dame Meg, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law was also supported.
