Big Supreme Court Order In 2023 Custodial Torture Case In J&K's Kupwara
In an important ruling against custodial violence this morning, the Supreme Court has ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into the alleged torture of a police constable back in 2023 at a Joint Interrogation Centre (JIC) in Jammu and Kashmir's Kupwara.
The accused officials involved in the alleged custodial violence must be arrested within a month, said a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, drawing up a one-month deadline for the federal agency to complete its probe.
The Jammu and Kashmir administration has also been ordered to pay a compensation of Rs 50 lakh to Khursheed Ahmad Chohan, who had sought legal remedy against custodial torture, for the violation of his fundamental rights.
The court has asked the CBI to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the custodial violence allegedly occurred at the Kupwara JIC during February 23-26, 2023.
The latest ruling reinforces the constitutional safeguards against custodial violence that constitutes violations of fundamental rights. It sets aside a high court ruling that had refused to quash charges under Section 309 (suicide attempt) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against Mr Chohan.
The constable had alleged that he was illegally detained for several days at JIC Kupwara in February 2023, during which he faced inhuman treatment that even included mutilation of his private parts.
Quashing the FIR against Mr Chohan, Justice Mehta wrote in his judgment that continuing criminal proceedings against him under Section 309 (IPC) would be a travesty of justice. The court also ordered the CBI to look into the "systematic issues" at the JIC Kupwara, highlighting the need to assess the causes that led to the custodial abuse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bihar's wanted gangster W Yadav gunned down in Hapur encounter
W Yadav, a resident of Begusarai, had been absconding for several months after being accused of a murder in Bihar. NEW DELHI: A man with an Rs 50,000 bounty on his head, wanted in a murder case from Bihar, was gunned down in an early morning encounter by a joint team of the Uttar Pradesh Special Task Force (UP STF) and Bihar Police in Hapur district's Simbhaoli police station area. W Yadav, a resident of Begusarai, had been absconding for several months after being accused of a murder in Bihar, and law enforcement agencies had been tracking his movements across state lines. Additional superintendent of police (ASP) Vineet Bhatnagar said the operation was carried out based on specific intelligence inputs regarding W Yadav's whereabouts in western Uttar Pradesh. The joint team moved swiftly, laying a trap in the Simbhaoli area on Sunday morning. "On being challenged, the accused opened fire at the police team, prompting retaliatory action. In the brief exchange of fire, Yadav sustained bullet injuries. He was taken to the hospital where doctors declared him brought dead," said ASP Bhatnagar.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Not my child: In Hyderabad, a clinic of lies
NEW DELHI: In a chilling twist to a suspected surrogacy scam, Hyderabad police have arrested eight people — including doctors and agents — for allegedly duping a Rajasthan-based couple by handing them a baby bought from a poor family and passing it off as their own biological child born through IVF. The racket centres around the Universal Srushti Fertility Centre in Secunderabad, run by Dr Athaluri Namratha (64), who is the prime accused. Among those arrested is Dr Nargula Sadanandam (41), an anesthetist at the state-run Gandhi Hospital, along with technicians and agents who allegedly facilitated the baby trade. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad HOW THE SCAM UNFOLDED August 2024 : The couple from Rajasthan approached the Secunderabad clinic for IVF consultation. Advised surrogacy : Dr Namratha allegedly convinced them to go for surrogacy, claiming their embryo would be implanted in a surrogate. Vizag referral : The couple was then asked to visit the Visakhapatnam branch for further procedures. Rs 35 lakh paid : Over the following months, the couple made payments totalling Rs 35 lakh. June 2025 : They were informed that the surrogate had delivered a baby boy via C-section. Rs 2 lakh extra : The clinic allegedly demanded Rs 2 lakh as delivery charges and handed over the baby — along with forged documentation. DNA shocker : Suspicious, the couple had a DNA test conducted in Delhi — which confirmed the baby was not genetically related to them. According to police sources, the clinic had actually bought the baby from a poor family for just Rs 90,000 and presented it as the result of the surrogacy. "The couple were misled into believing the child was theirs. The clinic fabricated the entire surrogacy procedure, and forged papers to hand over a baby purchased from another family," said a senior Hyderabad police officer, adding that more victims may come forward as the investigation progresses. Police have also flagged that Dr Namratha had been previously linked to a 2020 child trafficking case. Further investigation is underway to determine the scale of the operation, the involvement of hospital staff, and how many such 'IVF' babies were in fact trafficked.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands
The National Green Tribunal ( NGT ) issued notice on a plea from The Citizens Foundation, which alleges widespread non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, by manufacturers of gutkha, pan masala, and tobacco products. The petition claims that banned plastic packaging materials are still being used and calls for strict enforcement of existing regulations. This includes the closure of units violating the rules and the recovery of environmental compensation. A judicial bench led by Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member Dr. A. Senthil Vel has issued notices to relevant authorities, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), seeking their responses. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, despite the CPCB's earlier directives, issued on October 22, 2021, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to 25 manufacturers to halt operations unless they adopted eco-friendly packaging, these directives remain unimplemented. The CPCB had instructed the defaulting companies to submit a timeline for switching to sustainable materials and to pay Environmental Compensation (EC) with interest for any delays. The plea highlights violations of Rules 4(f) and 4(i) of the 2016 Rules, which prohibit the use of plastic sachets and specific polymers in packaging gutkha and related products. CPCB's previous reports suggested that such non-compliance could result in stern penalties, including seizure of goods, shutting down of factories, and levies of Rs 5,000 per ton of plastic used. Repeat offences could attract additional fines of up to Rs 20,000 per ton. The applicant also cited a CPCB report from January 2021, which outlines enforcement under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime. According to this, delayed EC payments could be penalised with annual interest ranging from 12 per cent to 24 per cent. Delays exceeding three months could lead to factory closures and criminal prosecution under Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act. Recognising the gravity of the environmental concerns raised, the NGT has scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2025. The applicant must serve notices on the remaining respondents and file an affidavit of service one week prior to the scheduled date, as stated by the Tribunal.
