logo
‘Seems reasonable…': Shashi Tharoor differs with Congress on bills to remove PM, CMs who spend 30 days in jail

‘Seems reasonable…': Shashi Tharoor differs with Congress on bills to remove PM, CMs who spend 30 days in jail

Minta day ago
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday described as 'reasonable' the government's new constitutional amendment bills seeking automatic removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers or ministers if they are detained on serious criminal charges for 30 consecutive days.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, along with two supplementary bills in the Lok Sabha. The proposed legislation lays down that holders of high constitutional office must resign—or else automatically lose office—if they remain in custody for a month on charges carrying at least five years of potential imprisonment.
The legislation covers the Prime Minister, Union ministers, Chief Ministers and state ministers, including those in Union Territories. According to the draft, if such an office-bearer is arrested and detained for 30 consecutive days on serious criminal allegations, he or she must resign on the 31st day.
Failing that, removal will be automatic.
The amendment also provides that in case of the Chief Minister, who for any period of thirty consecutive days during holding the office as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence under any law for the time being in force, which is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or more, shall tender his resignation by the thirty-first day after such arrest and detention, and if he does not tender his resignation, he shall cease to be the Chief Minister, with effect from the day falling thereafter.
It also provides that nothing in this sub-section shall prevent such Chief Minister or Minister from being subsequently appointed as the Chief Minister or a Minister, by the Lieutenant Governor, on his release from custody, as per sub-section (1).
The Narendra Modi-led government's explanatory note contends that allowing ministers accused of grave crimes to remain in office undermines constitutional morality, weakens public trust, and hampers governance.
By codifying automatic removal, the central government claims it is strengthening accountability and ensuring higher ethical standards in public life.
Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday, 20 August remarked 'anyone who does anything wrong should be liable to punishment and should not be holding a high constitutional office'.
Talking to ANI reporters, MP Shashi Tharoor called the constitutional Bills 'reasonable".
'I think that makes sense...', he added.
Talking to NDTV, Tharoor had also said, "If you spend 30 days in jail, can you continue to be a minister? This is a matter of common sense... I don't see anything wrong in this," He said, 'I think it is good for our democracy to have a discussion within the committee... so let's have that discussion.'
While Shashi Tharoor's comments suggest tacit support, the wider Congress party has attacked the legislation. Party general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra called it 'draconian,' warning that it could be misused by ruling parties to dislodge elected leaders on flimsy or politically motivated cases.
'Tomorrow, you can file any case against a Chief Minister, have him/her arrested for 30 days without conviction… and he ceases to be a Chief Minister? It is absolutely anti-constitutional,' Priyanka Gandhi argued.
The three bills introduced by Amit Shah will now be referred to the relevant parliamentary Joint Committee for scrutiny before being taken up for final passage. Given the BJP's parliamentary strength, the legislation is expected to clear the Lok Sabha, though heated debates are anticipated in both Houses.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nuclear energy can help power India's economic growth, private push welcome
Nuclear energy can help power India's economic growth, private push welcome

Business Standard

time4 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Nuclear energy can help power India's economic growth, private push welcome

For decades, state control was justified by concerns over radiation safety, misuse of nuclear material, and strategic security Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article The Union government's plans to end decades-long state monopoly over uranium mining, import, processing, and nuclear-power generation, opening the door for private firms to participate, mark a significant shift in the sector. The policy shift, first signalled in the Union Budget, builds on the country's ambitious goal of scaling up nuclear power capacity to 100 gigawatts (Gw) by 2047. Accordingly, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced a Nuclear Energy Mission with an allocation of ₹20,000 crore, aimed at raising nuclear-power capacity from the current 8.18 Gw. These recent developments mark a belated but necessary recognition of nuclear energy's role

PM expresses disappointment over Opposition's absence from debates over crucial Bills
PM expresses disappointment over Opposition's absence from debates over crucial Bills

The Hindu

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

PM expresses disappointment over Opposition's absence from debates over crucial Bills

At the customary end of session tea held after the conclusion of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (August 21, 2025) noted with disappointment the lack of debates due to disruption, leading to the passage of several Bills amid the Opposition's protests, adding that bright and young MPs of the Congress did not get to participate in discussions due to the 'insecurity' of its leadership. Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow highlights, major updates on August 21, 2025 The customary tea is hosted by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla in his chambers and was attended by leaders of the NDA allies and in the absence of the Opposition. Sources present at the meeting said Mr. Modi did not name Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lower House, who is leading his Congress's agitation against the Election Commission's drive to revise electoral rolls in Bihar, but his remarks were apparently aimed at him. He reportedly said the Monsoon session covered several important Bills and regretted that they could not be discussed in Parliament. Mr. Modi singled out the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which bans all real-money games and was passed by the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha without discussion due to din, for praise and its wide positive implications due to the adverse impact on society by these online games. With Opposition leaders skipping the meeting, one of the leaders present at the get-together remarked that it had become increasingly difficult to bring the Congress on board as few of its leaders, who the government interacts with regularly, can influence the party's decision, the Prime Minister responded to this and said the Opposition had some bright young MPs. They may be making the leadership 'insecure', he said, according to the sources. This is not the first time Mr. Modi had expressed these views while criticising the Gandhi family for putting its own interest above anything else. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, speaking later, added that Congress functionaries who attend the meeting with the government over the business in Parliament often come to some understanding but cannot implement it. They might be facing pressure, he said, in an apparent swipe at Mr. Gandhi.

Have written to EC on preparations for corporation elections: DKS
Have written to EC on preparations for corporation elections: DKS

The Hindu

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Have written to EC on preparations for corporation elections: DKS

Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar announced in the Legislative Council on Thursday that the government had written to the Election Commission of India about preparations for corporation elections. Replying to a question raised by member Jawarayee Gowda T.N. about the implementation of the Greater Bengaluru Authority Act, 2024, he said, 'The delimitation of wards will take place by November 1. This is being handled by a separate team under the leadership of the BBMP Commissioner. We have submitted an affidavit to the court. We will issue a GO for delimitation of wards'. Replying to a member who urged the government to conduct elections early, he said, 'I completely agree with the suggestion.' The Council approved the Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill, which clarifies that the authority will not interfere in the functioning of municipal bodies in violation of the 74th amendment of the Constitution. Replying to queries raised by members - Govindaraju (JD-S), T.A. Saravana (JD-S), and H.S. Gopinath (BJP) - he said the amendment ensures that the government does not have any overbearing power on the corporations. 'Some people have spoken about ward restructuring based on population. As per the 2011 census, there were about 18,000 people in each ward, but now it would be 30,000. We will take members' feedback when we are adding new areas to the corporations,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store