logo
New laws set to protect penalty rates and overtime pay for millions of Aussie workers

New laws set to protect penalty rates and overtime pay for millions of Aussie workers

Daily Mail​19-07-2025
Australian workers who rely on award wages would have their rights to penalty rates and overtime pay protected under one of the new federal parliament's first bills.
The legislation would prohibit award-earning employees from accepting penalty rate reductions in exchange for a higher base rate of pay if it would leave them worse off.
New employment minister Amanda Rishworth earmarked the bill in Canberra on Saturday as the first off the rank for the returning Labor government.
If passed, it will amend the Fair Work Act to provide stronger protections for the roughly 2.6million people whose pay is set by an award.
An award is a legally mandated minimum rate of pay for workers within certain industries or occupations.
People covered by awards are more likely to work on a part-time or casual basis and be women or under 35 years of age.
In justifying the legislation, Rishworth said there were cases before the Fair Work Commission she feared could reduce worker's overall pay.
'What's become clear is there is a number of cases on foot which are trying to roll in penalty rates or reduce penalty rates in an unfair way,' she said.
'And so, what's become clear is that we need added legal protection to make sure penalty rates and overtime are protected in our award system.'
She appeared alongside retail workers who said penalty rates were a crucial component of their overall pay packages.
Retail worker Liarne said she earned about $6.35 an hour in penalty rates, about $7,500 over the course of a year.
'That's really important because it helps me pay for rent, groceries, school fees and the care of my animals, which I love dearly,' she said.
'Penalty rates are really important.'
Another retail worker, Daniel, said his penalty rate earnings - about $85 per week - allowed him to foot the bill for necessities and lifestyle expenses.
'Generally, I find living on six to $700 a week is a struggle, whether you've got a partner to rely on or not,' he said.
'Penalty rates honestly makes a huge difference, and without it, I'd have to work more. See my family less, see my dog less, see my friends less.
'Just not go to the movies, not ever have a holiday. It's a myriad of things that would affect me.'
Rishworth said employers in the retail, clerical and banking sectors had applied to the Fair Work Commission to 'trade away' penalty rates of lower-paid workers.
The announcement could add to the grievances likely to be aired by business groups at the productivity summit to be hosted at Parliament House in August.
Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox told the A ustralian Financial Review there was a 'dark irony' in Labor's attempts to fast-track the bill at a time when productivity talks loomed.
Despite ongoing efforts to negotiate with the government over the proposed reforms, Mr Willox said there was 'obvious concern that it could further reduce workplace flexibility, especially at a time when we are already seeing rising national unemployment and the private sector clearly in job-shedding mode'.
Labor will only need support from the Greens to secure a majority for the bill which it expects to sail through parliament soon after it resumes on Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support
Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support

Rhyl Journal

time20 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support

I once believed that being disabled was something to be ashamed of, often hiding the fact that I had disabilities. When I did disclose I was disabled, I would often face misunderstanding from others and looking back now, bullying over it. Even when I got to a point when I had to face that I had a disability and use a power chair to get around, I still felt ashamed. But looking back, I had no reason. This is me, this is who I am, like it or not. I am proud of myself, disability and all, and I think it has come from being in a community that accepts itself, which has helped me accept myself too. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all. (Newsquest) (Image: Newsquest) July is Disability Pride month. It is a whole month for people with disabilities to celebrate diversity and their achievements. It's a month to celebrate inclusivity and promote equality for the disabled community. However, whilst we celebrate, we do this in the face of adversity. We do this whilst we are up against people who just do not understand. But the problem is, some of the people who do not understand are the people who have our lives in their hands. Is that right? The recent 'Welfare Reform Bill' showed us just how little understanding there is amongst lawmakers in this country. I watched Parliament session after session, as it was implied multiple times that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) was an out-of-work benefit. Whether these MPs intended to suggest this, I cannot comment. However, the fact that it was said, for those who did not know, will now assume that it is. Therefore, they may end up voting on something that is factually untrue. Whilst there have been amendments to the bill and consultations are happening with disabled people and charities, it got me thinking. Is it right that the lawmakers of this land make these rules, having no idea of the facts or the implications that surround them? Yes, consultations are supposed to happen, but often they don't. A committee meeting just days ago, in which Liz Kendell and Steve Darling discussed the fact that the reform for PIP was consulted on, in Parliament only. Had it not been for the 120 rebels, a consultation with disabled people would not be happening. Disability Pride should be a month of celebration, and I, for one, won't let anyone stop me from celebrating my achievements or how far I have come. But when our own government makes us feel like we are not good enough or worthy, how long before people start to break? I would love to sit down with all MPs to find out exactly how much they understood about the bill and what they were voting for. Did they understand the impact, or did they just go by the figures? The impact report, the amount of savings, or just the information being fed by their leaders. I hope that people out there, before they judge, get behind and find out the facts. Look into the true findings, and yes, there are reports out there that are factually untrue. Which is why it needs to come from the source. The people who know about it first-hand. The disabled community, their carers, and charities. Why are we not standing up in Parliament and answering the questions these MPs have? I, for one, would be willing and open to any MP or any member of the public who wants to know more to simply ask. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all.

EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier
EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier

North Wales Chronicle

time30 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier

Taoiseach Micheal Martin also said there is 'much to be negotiated' following what he termed a 'framework agreement'. Speaking to the media in Dublin on Monday, Mr Martin said it 'opens up the prospect of more significant strategic collaboration between the US and Europe on quite a number of issues'. 'It also avoids further escalation, or indeed a trade conflict, which would be very, very damaging to the economies of the United States and of the European Union,' he said. 'It's important to say that Europe never sought tariffs, or never sought to impose tariffs, and fundamentally, we are against tariffs: we believe in an open trading economy.' Mr Martin said it is a very different situation than before April 1. 'New realities are in play and so at a broader level, the stability and predictability that this agreement brings is important for businesses, is important for consumers and indeed patients when it comes to the manufacturing and distribution of medicines,' he said. 'In essence, we have avoided a trade conflict here which would have been ruinous, which would have been very damaging to our economy, and to jobs in particular. 'The challenge now for Europe is to work on its own inefficiencies, to reduce barriers within the single market, to press ahead more ambitiously and more proactively on trade diversification and trade deals with other countries that would facilitate that market diversification that is required. 'Meanwhile, there is much to be negotiated in the aftermath of this framework agreement.' Asked about mixed reactions to the deal in Europe, Mr Martin said: 'Nobody is welcoming tariffs with open arms. 'I think we've been consistent in saying that we don't agree with tariffs, that we prefer if there weren't tariffs, but we have to deal with realities. 'I understand people criticising, but given the balance and the options here… in my view, I would appreciate the work of the (European) Commission in this regard, and the avoidance of a trade war is preferable, in my view, and that's the key issue.'

EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier
EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier

Rhyl Journal

time34 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier

Taoiseach Micheal Martin also said there is 'much to be negotiated' following what he termed a 'framework agreement'. Speaking to the media in Dublin on Monday, Mr Martin said it 'opens up the prospect of more significant strategic collaboration between the US and Europe on quite a number of issues'. 'It also avoids further escalation, or indeed a trade conflict, which would be very, very damaging to the economies of the United States and of the European Union,' he said. 'It's important to say that Europe never sought tariffs, or never sought to impose tariffs, and fundamentally, we are against tariffs: we believe in an open trading economy.' Mr Martin said it is a very different situation than before April 1. 'New realities are in play and so at a broader level, the stability and predictability that this agreement brings is important for businesses, is important for consumers and indeed patients when it comes to the manufacturing and distribution of medicines,' he said. 'In essence, we have avoided a trade conflict here which would have been ruinous, which would have been very damaging to our economy, and to jobs in particular. 'The challenge now for Europe is to work on its own inefficiencies, to reduce barriers within the single market, to press ahead more ambitiously and more proactively on trade diversification and trade deals with other countries that would facilitate that market diversification that is required. 'Meanwhile, there is much to be negotiated in the aftermath of this framework agreement.' Asked about mixed reactions to the deal in Europe, Mr Martin said: 'Nobody is welcoming tariffs with open arms. 'I think we've been consistent in saying that we don't agree with tariffs, that we prefer if there weren't tariffs, but we have to deal with realities. 'I understand people criticising, but given the balance and the options here… in my view, I would appreciate the work of the (European) Commission in this regard, and the avoidance of a trade war is preferable, in my view, and that's the key issue.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store