logo
Ministers race to save major fuel factory from closure

Ministers race to save major fuel factory from closure

Telegraph5 hours ago

Ministers are racing to save Britain's largest bioethanol plant after the owner warned it would be forced to close the site without state intervention.
On Thursday, Associated British Foods (ABF) said it had entered into last-ditch talks with the Government about securing support for its Vivergo Fuels business in Hull, which is losing £3m a month.
Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, also confirmed he was engaging 'in good faith' with the company and could commit taxpayer money to a rescue package.
If the negotiations fail, ABF's bosses have threatened to close the factory by Sept 13.
The company has accused ministers of rendering its business unprofitable by awarding subsidies to rival American producers.
Bosses had previously warned they would decide this week whether to close the plant, which makes bioethanol for blending into petrol and employs around 150 people.
But ABF said it had entered 'formal negotiations' about whether the site could be kept going. It is understood that the decision follows an intervention by Mr Reynolds.
The Government's offer to the company remains unclear. But ABF is demanding 'short-term funding of Vivergo's losses' as well as a longer-term deal to put its plant on a profitable footing again.
In a move that piled further pressure on ministers, the company warned: 'Given the outcome of the negotiations is uncertain, Vivergo is simultaneously beginning consultation with employees to effect an orderly wind-down.'
The plant, which can produce 420,000m litres of bioethanol per year, had already stopped ordering wheat feedstock, it added.
Losing the facility would leave the UK more reliant on foreign imports and dent ambitions for domestic production of sustainable aviation fuel.
The chemicals sector is described as one of several 'foundation industries' in the industrial strategy published by ministers on Monday.
A spokesman for the Government said ABF's latest ultimatum was 'disappointing to see', while Mr Reynolds described it as 'premature'.
Mr Reynolds told journalists: 'We have secured a mandate across government to negotiate with them.
'That means we're willing to engage with them and potentially put government money into a restructure to make sure they've got a strong future.
'We have met them many times. We've engaged the consultants and we're well into the process.
'Frankly, I really do regret the Vivergo's decision to start consultations to let the workforce go and close the plant.'
Only two plants in the UK make bioethanol, which is most commonly blended with petrol to make greener fuels such as E5 and E10.
The vast majority of production uses primary feedstocks such as sugar crops or wheat that are processed to yield fermentable sugars that are then converted into ethanol. Because the fuel is made from plants, it is regarded as renewable.
But the Department for Transport has been accused of undermining domestic bioethanol producers by awarding green energy subsidies to American producers that make the chemical from waste, which is seen as more eco-friendly.
ABF and domestic competitor Ensus say ministers then compounded the problem by striking a trade deal with the US that grants American bioethanol producers tariff-free access to the UK market.
The trade deal has not yet taken effect but ABF says its plant in Hull is already unprofitable and cannot be sustained. It has already written £700m off its value.
Ensus, which runs the country's only other bioethanol plant, has similarly warned that its facility in Teesside is at risk.
Previous talks between the companies and the Government had not made serious progress.
But it is understood that Mr Reynolds and Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, met company bosses on Tuesday and that the Government has brought in consultants to examine ABF's proposed rescue package.
ABF is asking for an end to the green energy certificates being awarded to American producers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Commons committee sets out 'concerns' over arms exports to Israel
Commons committee sets out 'concerns' over arms exports to Israel

The National

time9 minutes ago

  • The National

Commons committee sets out 'concerns' over arms exports to Israel

The International Development Committee sent an eight-page letter to Jonathan Reynolds and Foreign Secretary David Lammy over the decision to exempt components for F-35 fighter jets from suspended arms exports to Israel. The committee raised fears that those weapons components could be used in attacks by Israel on aid workers and humanitarian infrastructure on Gaza. Chair Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham, wrote: 'As the Committee identified in its report, there are a number of avenues for accountability in response to violations of IHL (international humanitarian law), including the suspension of arms export licences. READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off over Israel divestment 'I remain concerned that there is a real risk that weapon components, manufactured in the UK, could be used in attacks, including those on aid workers or humanitarian infrastructure.' The MP noted that Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty previously claimed that stopping F-35 exports to Israel would require the 'entire programme' to be suspended as it is 'highly integrated'. However, Champion insisted it was 'fundamental' that the UK Government adheres to international law. 'I am concerned by the decision to exempt F-35 components from the suspension of arms export licences, given your assessment that there are 'clear risks' of serious violations of IHL by Israel in Gaza,' she wrote. The MP then noted the UK's obligations under the Genocide Convention, asking if ministers accepted that the duty to prevent genocide has been triggered. She asked: 'If so, at what point was this duty triggered? If not, why not?' Champion also noted the UK Government's obligations under the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) which states that it is 'strictly prohibited' for a state transferring arms where the transfer would 'violate its relevant international obligations under international agreements to which it is a Party'. Exports are also banned if the arms 'would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes,' Champion added. The MP put several questions to ministers, including if it accepts exporting F-35 components is incompatible with its international legal obligations, and if it accepts Israel is using the components to commit war crimes. Another question asks: 'What legal authority does the Government rely upon to support its position that a positive contribution to peace and security is to be balanced against a clear risk of the arms being used to commit serious violations of IHL/IHRL?' READ MORE: YouGov poll predicts result in every Scottish seat – see the full map Champion asked the ministers to reply by July 11. The UK Government has been contacted for comment. It comes as a legal challenge over the UK's arms exports to Israel is currently underway. We told in January how the Labour Government refused to review Israel's access to F-35 parts exported from the UK despite evidence that the planes have been used to bomb 'safe zones' in Gaza. In September 2024, Labour blocked around 30 of 350 UK arms export licences to Israel after accepting that there existed a 'clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law'. However, parts for F-35 fighter jets were specifically excluded – despite media confirmation that the jets had been used by Israel to bomb the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone in Gaza in July 2024.

Trans books for toddlers are an outrage
Trans books for toddlers are an outrage

Telegraph

time12 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trans books for toddlers are an outrage

But let's move away from the brazen attempts to brainwash little children for just a moment and settle down in the story corner for today's educational tale (with apologies to Eric Carle), The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner. One day a tiny and very publicity-hungry campaigner, who wanted to be a big deal, hatched a plan to recruit pre-school allies. He had guessed, quite rightly, that toddlers were the only demographic likely to believe his guff that anyone can change sex if they just pop on a frock and get furious about pronouns. On the first day, The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner gobbled up one publishing deal. On the second day he wrote two books explaining that girls who play with trains are probably boys and boys who like pink should be taken to a doctor and diagnosed as transgender. On the third day, The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner bullied women writers who did not agree with his crackpot notions. On the fourth day he slapped a great big Stonewall Award sticker on a book about a sister becoming a brother. On the fifth day, he ate a wheelbarrow of oranges and threatened to cancel anyone who said they were not the only fruit. Then on the sixth day, he disseminated a library of kids' books in which gender transitioning turned out to be the twinkly secret of a happy-ever-after. On the seventh day, he devoured every last scrap of bonkers gender ideology he could find and disappeared off to digest it. Some time later, The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner emerged looking like an extra from RuPaul's Drag Race and announced he was now a biological woman. The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner banged on about his lived experience (of about a week). It was tempting to get very cross indeed. But then the Supreme Court decided that references to 'sex', 'man' and 'woman' in the Equality Act referred to biological sex and after that, nobody cared what he said, safe in the knowledge it was now illegal for him to manspread in the ladies' changing room or beat women to a pulp in the Olympics. The End. If only it were. I thought we were done with all this nonsense – Martine Croxall we salute your eye roll at the witless term 'pregnant people' – and I for one have no desire to give Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigners any more of the attention they so desperately crave. Fighting dirty But new research into the publishing industry carried out by UK pressure group Sex Matters and its US equivalent, SEEN in Publishing, has revealed that a 'shiny, sparkly world of trans identities' is being promoted to young readers, with 'many aimed at toddlers'. Now that really is fighting so dirty I have to speak up: how dare publishers literally mess with little children's minds in this way? Here in north London having two mums is commonplace, two dads is no biggie; small kids aren't that interested in their parents' sexual preferences, they are interested in being loved, nurtured and protected. Growing up is hard enough work, which is why it's utterly immoral to draw toddlers, who haven't even mastered the potty, into the adult world of human identity politics. What next? Assisted dying and late-stage abortion? At this age, most of our collective offspring still believe Paw Patrol is real and the moon follows them home, for pity's sake. Sowing the seeds of doubt about their biological sex is outrageous, indefensible and, let's be honest, exceedingly creepy. Let our littlest citizens learn tolerance, fairness (yes even to women) kindness (ditto) and consideration. But they also deserve to know they have the right to ask questions and press for answers – anathema to the militant trans lobby who prefer to shut everyone down in case they bring up uncomfortable truths like biology. This new audit of the publishing industry found that of 21 publishers surveyed, a fifth of their output on transgender-related products was targeted at children, leading the report to raise concerns that the message in the early-reader books was often that becoming transgender will 'resolve bodily hatred and create enduring joy in the form of 'trans euphoria''. Crikey, if that were the case we'd all be at it. But it's not. Take a look at the shouty trans forums online and I've got to say that enduring joy doesn't feature nearly as often as spittle-flecked misogyny.

Trump's US accuses UK of backing ‘state-subsidised suicide' after assisted dying bill passes
Trump's US accuses UK of backing ‘state-subsidised suicide' after assisted dying bill passes

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's US accuses UK of backing ‘state-subsidised suicide' after assisted dying bill passes

The Trump administration criticised the UK's recently passed assisted dying bill, labelling it as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The US State Department 's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour stated that the 'western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death' in response to the legislation. The Terminally Ill Adults Bill, introduced by MP Kim Leadbeater, passed the House of Commons by a narrow margin of 23 votes. The bill would permit terminally ill individuals with less than six months to live to apply for assisted death, pending approval from two doctors and a panel of professionals. The legislation is now advancing to the House of Lords for further review, and this marks the second instance of the US State Department criticising Britain under Sir Keir.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store