'African ESM' set for imminent launch: IFR
Heads of state are set to approve the launch of an 'African Financing Stability Mechanism' that could save regional sovereigns US$20bn in interest costs over the next decade while heading off refinancing crises.
The vehicle, which will backstop its members as the European Stability Mechanism does for eurozone states, comes as Asian countries consult the ESM on upgrading their Chiang Mai regional financing arrangement.
Leaders are expected to approve the AFSM at the 38th African Union summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on February 17–18. The AU's finance, monetary affairs, economic planning and integration committee endorsed a technical and operational report on it in November after its 15 finance ministers accepted a framework for the vehicle in July.
Further endorsement came from the G20 group of countries. Its 'global financial architecture working group' called in June for the creation of an African emergency finance facility.
Approval by Africa's political leaders would come three years after they first charged the African Development Bank and AU Commission to 'work with all relevant stakeholders to accelerate operationalisation of the mechanism and its growth'.
AfDB president Akinwumi Adesina has been calling for the AFSM even longer. 'It is high time that we set up a homegrown financial stability mechanism where we work together to mutualise our funds and ensure we avoid the spillover effects that come from … external shocks,' he said in March 2021.
'Operationalisation'
Since the AU's instruction in 2022, the AfDB and the commission have collaborated with the union's 55 member states, as well as 'key development stakeholders', on the AFSM, according to Kevin Chika Urama, chief economist and vice-president at the AfDB.
Lion's Head Global Partners is advising AfDB on what Urama calls an 'innovative mechanism … to provide liquidity support on favourable terms to African countries facing debt refinancing challenges'.
He expects the AFSM to 'not only address Africa's immediate debt challenges [but] also establish a strong foundation for long-term fiscal resilience and sustainable economic transformation'.
London-based LHGP called the AFSM 'a groundbreaking initiative aimed at fortifying Africa's capacity to address financial vulnerabilities'. The advisory firm said approval this month would mark 'a pivotal moment in the continent's journey toward sustainable and integrated financial systems'.
Approval 'will trigger the formal operationalisation of the vehicle", said a source with knowledge of the process who described the AFSM as 'an ESM for Africa'.
Africa is the only region without a financial stability mechanism of the type exemplified by the ESM and its temporary forerunner the European Financial Stability Facility. The pair's lending shored up Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain during the eurozone crisis of the early 2010s.
The ESM also later developed 'Pandemic Crisis Support' loans to support member countries in financing healthcare costs due to Covid-19.
'With heightening debt vulnerabilities and default risks, and the escalating scale and frequency of refinancing needs caused by increased expensive and short-term non-concessional debt, the call for [a stability mechanism] to support countries in times of illiquidity cannot be overemphasised,' Urama said in a LinkedIn post.
Redirecting savings
Few operational details of the AFSM have been disclosed, including its membership, capital structure, borrowing and lending capacity and target credit rating, as the initiative is shepherded through the political process of final approval. But Urama said that '[i]f implemented as designed, the AFSM can save African sovereigns approximately US$20bn in debt servicing costs by 2035'.
These savings 'can be redirected toward initiatives that improve the lives and livelihoods of millions across the continent", he said.
Even so, some development finance experts are sceptical. 'I am not holding my breath on this one,' said one, who cited ESM's 'highly rated sovereign backers and strong governance' as enabling its substantial borrowing at low rates.
'An African equivalent could not benefit from those advantages,' the expert said.
While the AFSM's design has not yet been revealed, some sources said multilateral development banks – and possibly also higher-rated donor governments – will credit-enhance the vehicle by taking junior risk positions, which should reinforce its market access to support member states in crisis.
The facility will lend at "concessional" rates in return for borrowers carrying out macroeconomic and fiscal reforms (just as the ESM/EFSF's beneficiaries had to), Adesina told Reuters last week.
Asian exploration
Asian countries are exploring an upgrade of their financing arrangement. Established in 2010, the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization is a pledge-based currency swap network between the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations and China, Japan and South Korea with lending capacity of US$240bn.
'Upgrading the CMIM to a new institutionalised fund system based on paid-in capital should be a top priority,' Bank of Korea governor Rhee Chang-yong told the Financial Times.
He lamented 'serious concerns' over the CMIM while lauding the ESM's 'solid market-tested record'.
The ESM recently discussed Rhee's proposal with the central bank. Its delegation 'was there to exchange their experience … around the idea to build an Asian safety net inspired by the ESM', chief financial officer Kalin Anev Janse said in a recent OMFIF Sovereign Debt Institute roundtable.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
42 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
India's GCC to surpass 300m sqft office leasing in 3-4 years
India is the most mature market for Global Capability Centres (GCCs), with 44 per cent of GCCs transitioning to take on end-to-end portfolio ownership, drive innovation and peer collaboration with global roles. Initially set up to save costs and help organisations with their business functions, Global Capability Centres (GCCs) have significantly made their presence felt in India. Today, the country is home to over 1,950 such centres established by top multinational corporations, to serve the global and regional market with more efficiency, according to JLL survey. According to the JLL survey, there are 245+ million sq ft Grade A stock occupied by GCCs in the top 7 cities, ~75 per cent combined share of manufacturing, IT/ITeS & BFSI. 71 per cent of all GCC demand since 2018 has been from US-headquartered firms. 40 per cent of overall office leasing activity accounted for by GCCs between 2018-2024. Global Capability Centres are set to surpass 300 million sqft in the next 3-4 years, driven by new entries and expansions. 100+ GCCs entered India in the last two years alone. 28 million sq ft of leasing by GCCs in 2024 has been reported, highest ever in a year. The 3/4th share of Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai in space leased by Global Capability Centres in last two years. 75 per cent combined share of manufacturing, IT/ITeS & BFSI 71 per cent of all GCC demand since 2018 from US-headquartered firms. India is home to the largest number of GCCs globally (over 1,950). This is significantly more than other popular destinations like the Philippines, Poland or China. India has developed strong capabilities in digital technologies and their adoption. High impact areas like AI, blockchain, data analytics, cloud computing and cyber security are at the core of GCC operations in India. India's technology industry expanded its 58-lakh strong workforce by 1.2 lakhs in 2024-25, with Global Capability Centres accounting for over 1 lakh of these roles. The rise of new-age technologies will result in more digital-savvy professionals as the tech sector grows on to become $300 billion industry in FY 2025-26. These centres help centralise and standardise certain functions of the parent organisation. They provide several services, like finance, HR, IT, and procurement, at one place, thereby improving efficiency and lowering costs. Focused on research and development, these centres are innovation hubs for new products, technologies, and processes. Normally, R&D centres are oriented towards a particular field where the parent organisation has shown high levels of expertise and specialisation. These centres are meant to help organisations remotely share information. They are responsible for collating and disseminating knowledge within the organisation and across geographies. Focused on creating a hub for ideas, innovation centres foster innovation and creativity with opportunities for collaboration. These centres are where companies can develop new ideas, conduct research, and build prototypes. They offer a range of services to assist customers in any way possible. They are usually responsible for managing customer inquiries, complaints, and feedback. There are several Indian cities that are considered ideal for a GCC due to their strong infrastructure, skilled workforce, and favourable business environment. For example: Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi-NCR, Hyderabad, Mumbai and Pune. Based on the type of GCC companies are looking to establish, service requirements may vary. There is a need to choose services that best match the functions and operations of the centre. Some common services include legal and regulatory compliance, real estate, technology, human resources, financial support, support services and transportation and logistics. In a world driven by cutting-edge technology, it is important for global capability centres to create a truly tech-savvy office space. The innovation hub needs to keep pace with the digital age and set a standard for the future of work. The landscape of global capability centres is rapidly evolving. Today, it's not just about cost efficiency; it's about building resilient, innovative, and talent-centric hubs. My parents gifted me a residential property in Mumbai. I hold another unit besides some equity. How to minimise tax liability if I wish to sell the unit? Sunil Prabhu, Sharjah. Generally, when you sell a residential property, one option is you can reinvest the capital gain amount into another residential unit before one year from the date or sale or within two years. In case it is invest in a project undergoing construction, the period can be extended to three years. If not wished to reinvest, the capital gain upto Rs 50 lakh can be reinvested in designated bonds. As far as equity is concerned, you can invest the entire sale proceeds into a residential property. I am based in Gulf and investing in a project in Bengaluru. Is GST applicable to all types of residential projects? Please clarify. Deepak Sinha, Dubai. The impact of GST on residential property depends on the phase of construction, the location as well as the type of project. For example, GST impact will be observed more in case of new launches as compared to near completion projects. Similarly, projects in suburban areas will be more impacted when compared to city-centre projects.


Arabian Post
4 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Debswana Scales Back Diamond Output Amid Global Market Slump
Debswana Diamond Company, Botswana's premier diamond producer, has initiated a significant reduction in its mining operations, citing sustained global demand weakness and mounting economic pressures. The company, a 50-50 joint venture between the Botswana government and De Beers, announced a temporary halt in production at key sites, including the Jwaneng Cut-9 and Orapa mines, aligning output with the subdued market conditions. This strategic move follows a challenging fiscal year for Debswana, which experienced a 46% decline in sales revenue in 2024 compared to the previous year. Production volumes also saw a downturn, with output dropping by 27% to 17.93 million carats. Looking ahead, the company has set a reduced production target of 15 million carats for 2025, marking a 16% decrease from the previous year's figures. The global diamond industry has been grappling with a confluence of adverse factors since mid-2023. Persistent low demand across the diamond pipeline, exacerbated by US-imposed tariffs, has created additional market pressures. An oversupply of certain diamond categories, particularly smaller and lower-quality stones, coupled with shifting consumer preferences towards lab-grown alternatives, has further disrupted traditional demand dynamics. Economic uncertainties in key markets, including inflationary pressures and changing luxury spending patterns, have compounded these challenges. ADVERTISEMENT In response to these market conditions, Debswana has implemented cost-saving measures, including the suspension of operations at the Letlhakane tailings and Jwaneng Modular plants. The company has emphasized its commitment to avoiding involuntary job cuts, offering voluntary separation packages to employees as part of its cost-control strategy. The downturn in the diamond market has had significant repercussions for Botswana's economy, which is heavily reliant on diamond revenues. Diamonds account for approximately 30% of the nation's revenue and 75% of its foreign exchange earnings. The economic contraction in 2024 was recorded at 3%, with the International Monetary Fund projecting a further 0.4% decline in 2025. The government has revised its 2025 economic growth forecast to near zero, a stark contrast to the 3.3% growth anticipated in its February budget presentation. Debswana's decision to scale back production is part of a broader effort to stabilize the market and manage operational costs. While some capital projects have been slowed down, long-term initiatives like the Jwaneng underground conversion will continue. The company aims to achieve significant cost savings across areas such as fuel and electricity consumption during this period of reduced activity. As Botswana navigates these economic challenges, the government continues to explore avenues for economic diversification. Efforts to boost sectors such as tourism, finance, and the mining of other minerals like copper are ongoing. However, the country's heavy dependence on diamond sales underscores the urgency of these diversification initiatives to mitigate the impact of future market downturns.


Gulf Today
16 hours ago
- Gulf Today
How big of a threat is Asian superpower China really?
Daniel DePetris, Tribune News Service Last June, during an annual security conference in East Asia, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin underscored that the United States was not seeking conflict with China. Maintaining a consistent dialogue with Beijing, he hinted, was just as vital to effective deterrence as ensuring the US military was fully equipped and prepared. Fast-forward a year later and the message from Washington is far different. Unlike his predecessor, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth name-dropped China in his speech to the same security conference multiple times, as if to shame the Asian superpower for running roughshod over the so-called rules-based international order. China, Hegseth warned, was trying to become a hegemon in Asia, where it could dominate its neighbours, exploit the South China Sea's vast natural resources and coerce other countries into accepting Beijing's demands. In Hegseth's words, 'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific.' An invasion of Taiwan, he added, could be 'imminent.' If this all sounds scary, that's because it is. His comments raise the rhetorical gamesmanship to a level US officials weren't comfortable with in the past. The Biden administration was no slouch on China policy, but it still didn't want to inflame things unnecessarily. The Pentagon, for instance, repeatedly emphasized that while China's military drills around Taiwan were aggressive and designed to wear down the island's will to resist, a conflict in the Taiwan Strait was 'neither imminent nor inevitable.' In other words, there was still an opportunity to defuse any tensions before they exploded into a war that could drag the United States in, kill tens of thousands of people and throw a heavy wrench into the global economy. The Trump administration, however, has deployed noticeably sharper words during its first four months. Although the fundamentals of its wider policy in East Asia mimic the Biden administration's own — reinforcing US alliances; engaging in regular freedom of navigation exercises with Japan and the Philippines; and stressing the utility of preserving the status quo in the Taiwan Strait — Trump's advisers aren't afraid of poking Beijing in the eye. If managing the systemic rivalry with Beijing was a core component of Washington's overall strategy throughout Biden's four years, it increasingly looks like the guardrails that were put in place to prevent miscalculations are now eroding. Even so, does the Trump administration have a point? Is a conflict over Taiwan imminent as Hegseth suggests? And how real is the risk of China becoming Asia's hegemon? First, we should acknowledge that China is a threat in certain respects, particularly to its neighbors who have competing jurisdictional claims. The People's Liberation Army, or PLA, is arguably the strongest military in the region today, a consequence of Chinese President Xi Jinping's long-standing policy of pouring money into its coffers to fund a large-scale modernization campaign. China spent $314 billion on defense in 2024, a 7% increase from the year prior and a whopping 59% increase from a decade ago. The PLA boasts the largest ballistic missile arsenal in Asia and continues to invest in hypersonic missiles, which are difficult for conventional air defenses to intercept. The PLA is also throwing out the old rulebook that used to govern affairs in East Asia. As I mentioned last week, the median line that once served as an unofficial boundary separating Chinese and Taiwanese airspace is now imaginary as the Chinese air force flies closer to the self-ruled island to test Taiwan's defenses and wear down morale. Yet the United States would be wise to refrain from overestimating China's military capability and underestimating the capability of its allies like Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and Australia — all of whom have an even greater interest in preventing Chinese hegemony in Asia than Washington does. China is its own worst enemy in this regard: The more it presses its territorial claims, the more incentive its neighbors have to balance Beijing. For the most part, this is exactly what China's neighbours are doing. Japan is the most obvious case study. Traditionally a pacifist country that kept to an artificially low defense budget relative to its wealth, Japan has spent the last three years adding resources to its so-called Self-Defense Forces and buying American weapons off the shelf. Tokyo's latest national security strategy, unveiled in 2022, was a sea-change in how Japan typically talks about its security environment. In that document, China was called out for challenging the international order, partnering with Russia in its war against Ukraine and trying to change the region's status quo by force. Japan's defense budget is set to double by 2027, and with more resources comes a greater capability to preserve the balance of power. The Philippines is another example. While the country can't possibly compete with China in conventional terms, the Philippine government under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has effectively given up on rapprochement with Beijing and thrown in its lot with Washington. China's incessant clashes with Philippine forces in the South China Sea have served as a wake-up call to a country whose previous administration under Rodrigo Duterte (who is now in custody at the Hague for war crimes) drifted into the Chinese camp and took a more suspicious view of US intentions. Today, Manila is not only buttressing its navy and coast guard but also increasingly partnering with countries like Japan and Australia who have a similar threat perception about China.