Petition prompts Yarm parking review call
The Local Democracy Reporting Service said the petition read: "Free parking is crucial for supporting local businesses, encouraging footfall, and helping Yarm's economy thrive. "The council's changes to eliminate one hour free parking risks harming small businesses and deterring shoppers."
'Bustling to struggling'
Paddy Morton, manager of the 170-year-old Strickland & Holt family business on High Street and chair of Yarm Business Forum, said almost all the street's businesses had signed it. He said that the council's current plan to review the charge within a year would be too late for many businesses."Footfall on the high street has already been adversely impacted by the loss of banks, post offices, lifestyle changes since Covid, the growth of online shopping, cost of living increases, inflation. "So we don't need more discouragement."
Councillor Niall Innes, Conservative member for Hartburn, said: "Even a short visit now comes with a cost. "One hour free parking may seem small on paper, but for small businesses it was a difference between a bustling high street and a struggling one."He proposed a motion to send the matter back to cabinet for them to reconsider given the "vast public and business support for scrapping the new parking charges" and consult fully with businesses. The motion, which recommended cabinet reverse the policy and revert to one hour's free parking, was passed unanimously.Councillor Paul Rowling, cabinet member for transport and resources and Labour member for Stockton town centre, said: "We have absolutely no intention of this not coming to cabinet because we feel local views should be heard."Stockton Council is run by a joint Labour and Independent coalition.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
8 minutes ago
- Times
Big rise in UK bosses warning of extreme weather effects
The number of British companies warning of extreme weather has risen twentyfold since 2015. References to 'extreme weather' occurred just 35 times in filings made by companies on the FTSE 350 in 2015, according to an analysis of company records on Factset. In 2024 this figure had risen to 741 mentions, with 560 references to the phrase in filings by the 350 largest listed companies in the UK so far this year. Companies across a variety of industries have pointed to extreme or unusual weather events as a reason for faltering or unexpected sales. Last month Greggs warned that operating profits at the bakery chain could be 'modestly below' 2024 due to the heatwave in June, which boosted demand for cold drinks but reduced overall shopper numbers, causing a slowdown in sales growth in the first half of the year. Rio Tinto said in April that extreme weather events had affected operations at its Pilbara iron ore mine in Western Australia, though it added last month that production had recovered well since. However, the majority of the increase in references to extreme weather in company filings over the past decade came in the form of companies warning of the risks that such events might pose to their businesses in the future. Currys and Watches of Switzerland recently warned of the potential impact of extreme weather events in their full-year results. The luxury watch seller said that their increasing frequency could lead to significant disruption of retail showrooms, offices and distribution centres through flooding and strong winds, while the electricals retailer said extreme weather events could increase footfall for consumers seeking air-conditioning in some regions during heatwaves, but could also lead consumers to shop online more than in stores. The increasing prevalence of warnings about extreme weather is not specific to the UK either. Research by Sara Mahaffy, a managing director at RBC Capital Markets who runs the bank's sustainability strategy research, found that discussions of physical climate risks on earnings calls has hit new highs in 2025 in the US and Asia. She added that the increasing prevalence of references to extreme weather underscored a wider trend occurring across the private sector, in which a premium was increasingly being placed on adapting to climate change and its impacts, rather than just mitigating them. 'What we noticed when we looked at ESG [environmental, social, and governance] debt issuance and green bond issuance, the private sector is increasingly integrating adaptation as part of the eligible criteria,' Mahaffy said. 'For so long, so much of the focus was on mitigation and renewable energy, energy efficiency, but we're starting to see adaptation creep in more. As the private sector is feeling these impacts directly, they are taking the steps themselves to build resilience.'
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Washington ambassador who quit after calling Trump ‘inept' says he was proved right
A former ambassador to the US who quit after calling Donald Trump's administration 'inept' in leaked private emails has said he was proved right. Lord Darroch resigned in 2019 after confidential cables criticising the US president's government were leaked to the media. The long-serving diplomat described Mr Trump's administration as 'dysfunctional', 'inept' and 'divided' in a series of emails from 2017. Mr Trump responded by calling Lord Darroch 'a very stupid guy' triggering a diplomatic row which eventually forced the British ambassador to step down from the post. Lord Darroch doubled down on his comments at an Edinburgh Fringe show on Tuesday, arguing that the subsequent chaos of Mr Trump's premiership proved he was 'right'. He told Ian Dale's All Talk show: 'If you're going to crash and burn on the basis of one piece of reporting that you've done, leaking, please God, make it a piece of reporting where all the predictions are right. 'I would say, if you read back that letter that was leaked, that was written after six months of Donald Trump and had a number of predictions about how the rest of his term would run, then you'd struggle to find anything that didn't turn out the way I had predicted it. 'So if that's the way to go out, it's better than the opposite.' Lord Darroch added that he had 'already' decided to retire when the row broke out. 'I was six months off finishing anyway and I had had an extraordinary, lucky career', he said. In an interview with BBC Newsnight in 2020, Lord Darroch said he knew his position was untenable when the emails became public but defended taking his plain-speaking approach. 'I never regret the terms in which I'd reported,' the former national security adviser said. 'I spent 40 years in the Foreign Office writing in these terms and people hitherto had thought it a strength and an asset. There is nothing unusual in reporting in clear and direct terms.' Speaking at Fringe, he added that it had in fact been Lord Cameron, who appointed him to the post in January 2016, who requested that he write in a more frank manner. He recalled the former prime minister saying: 'I'm fed up of reading all these letters to ambassadors which say, on the one hand, on the other hand, which are written in code. What you have to do is tell it like it is. Be clear and call out what you're seeing.' 'That letter, which was trying to give an accurate summary of how Trump's first six months had gone, was in part a response to Cameron saying tell it like it is. Don't write in code,' said Lord Darroch.
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK to bear transport costs of ‘one in, one out' asylum seeker deal with France
The UK will pay the costs of transporting asylum seekers to and from France under Keir Starmer's 'one in, one out' deal with Emmanuel Macron, it has emerged. The deal will have to be renewed by 11 June next year, and can be ended at a month's notice by either side, documents made public by the government indicate. A copy of the agreement was released on Tuesday as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure to stop boats carrying asylum seekers from crossing the Channel. The deal will allow the UK to return one person who has entered the country by irregular means in return for taking someone in France whose claim for asylum in the UK is expected to have a greater chance of success. It has been trumpeted by ministers as a 'gamechanging' deal but Home Office sources said it will only apply to about 50 asylum seekers at first. 'All transport costs incurred in connection with readmission pursuant to this agreement shall be borne by the United Kingdom,' the documents state. They continue: 'Those accepted for admittance [from France] … shall be provided by the United Kingdom with transport from a designated place to the United Kingdom (at the cost of the United Kingdom).' If people have an outstanding claim for asylum, they cannot be removed, the deal says. France can reject a requested removal if it 'considers that an individual would be a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of any of the Schengen states'. So far in 2025, 25,436 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel in small boats – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48% on this point last year (17,170) and 70% higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel.
