'I heard a ‘pop' and I hear Officer O scream': Emotional testimony in preliminary hearing in shooting death of Maui police officer
Courtroom packed as suspect in officer's death appears before judge
Today's hearing marked the first time we've heard details of how prosecutors believe the deadly shooting unfolded.
Maui police officer Mousa Kawas responded to the terroristic threatening call in Paia and said he told Officer Suzanne O to check around a concrete block because he couldn't see around it. He broke down on the stand describing the moment he saw his colleague, Officer O, go down.
'I heard a 'pop' and I hear Officer O scream and I turn to face her and she turns around and faces us, grabs her chest and falls to the ground,' said Kawas, stopping several times to catch his breath and wipe away tears.
The officers were responding to the call from Paia Sugar Mill worker Tim Willems, who described his confrontation with Kaneholani.
'He's looking right at me, telling me to turn off the light with his right hand, telling me to turn off the light, turn off the light, fires right at me, looking right directly at the light,' said Willems.
Clembert Kaneholani, dressed in an orange jumpsuit and shackles, kept his eyes down for much of the hearing.
Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news
The 38-year-old is charged with first-degree murder, attempted murder and five firearms offenses for the shooting death of Maui Officer Suzanne O last Friday.
Prosecutors presented the guns Kaneholani allegedly used in the shooting. His public defender argued that the state's case relies heavily on eyewitness statements and circumstantial evidence.
'It was a decent possibility that the person you were illuminating or that area you were illuminating that person could have crawled away and left the property, you thought that was a decent possibility as well?' asked Deputy Public Defender Zachary Raidmae.
'Yes,' responded Willems.
Legal analysts say the charges Kaneholani faces are among the most serious in Hawaii's law.
'This is a police officer involved shooting where the police officer was a victim, and so the charge that applies to this case is murder in the first degree. It's the highest charge that we have in the state of Hawaii. It's punishable by life in prison without the possibility of parole,' said Attorney Megan Kau.
Today's gallery is once again filled with Maui police officers. Officer O is the first Maui officer in 70 years to be killed in the line of duty.
A five-year member of the force, Chief John Pelletier told us earlier this week that his department is still grieving, but determined to see the case through.
'It's not just showing up today. It's showing up each and every day, and we'll continue to do that,' said Chief Pelletier. 'The things I've been talking about for almost four years now – about making sure that you're part of something bigger than just yourself — I think you're gonna see that today. But they're very much wanting to make sure that justice is done for her, and we're gonna be relentless in our pursuit of it, I can assure you of that.'
Check out more news from around Hawaii
The hearing will continue on Friday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
NEW YORK (AP) — An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state's lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.' After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.' Her office had no immediate comment after Thursday's decision. Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider; he still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. He's also appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at Jennifer Peltz And Michael R. Sisak, The Associated Press
Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Wyoming man indicted for allegedly hitting wolf with snowmobile, bringing it to bar and killing it
CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) — A Wyoming man who allegedly hit a wolf with a snowmobile, taped the wounded animal's mouth shut and showed it off in a rural bar before killing it has been indicted on an animal cruelty charge by a grand jury nearly a year and a half after the incident. Cody Roberts last year paid a $250 fine for illegal possession of wildlife but avoided more serious charges as investigators struggled to find cooperative witnesses. Wyoming law gives wide leeway for people to kill wolves and other predators by a variety of means in the vast majority of the state. Even so, the 12-person grand jury found enough evidence over the past two weeks to support the charge of felony animal cruelty, Sublette County Attorney Clayton Melinkovich said in a statement Wednesday. Melinkovich had no further comment on the case. Roberts has not commented on the case and did not have a listed working number, nor an attorney on file in state District Court who might comment on his behalf. If convicted, Roberts faces up to two years in prison and a $5,000 fine. Widely circulated photos showed a man identified as Roberts posing with the wolf, its mouth bound with tape, on Feb. 29, 2024, in a bar near Daniel, a town of about 150 people about 50 miles (80 kilometers) south of Jackson. Video clips showed the same animal lying on a floor, alive but barely moving. The light punishment against Roberts led to calls for a Wyoming tourism boycott, to little apparent effect. Yellowstone National Park had its second-busiest year on record in 2024, up more than 5% from 2023. Grand juries in Wyoming are rare. The last one to get significant attention, in 2019, found that a sheriff's deputy did not commit involuntary manslaughter by killing an unarmed man after a traffic stop. Government-sponsored poisoning, trapping and bounty hunting all but wiped out wolves in the lower 48 states in the 19th and 20th centuries. Starting in the 1990s, a reintroduction program brought them back to Yellowstone and central Idaho, and their numbers have rebounded. Though wolves remain listed as a federally endangered or threatened species in most of the country, they have no such protection in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming, where they can be hunted and trapped. Exceptions include Yellowstone and neighboring Grand Teton National Park, where hunting is prohibited and the wild canines are a major attraction for millions of tourists. In 85% percent of Wyoming, wolves are classified as predators and can be freely killed by virtually any means. The so-called predator zone includes Sublette County, where the wolf was killed. Groups including the Humane Society argued that Wyoming's animal cruelty law could nonetheless apply there.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
A law professor was stalked and killed by hit men. His former mother-in-law is now on trial for the 2014 contract killing
More than a decade after two hit men stalked and killed a law professor in Florida, the alleged mastermind of the murder-for-hire plot is now on trial – the victim's former mother-in-law. Donna Adelson, 75, once accustomed to a life of luxury in Miami, faces a first-degree murder charge as well as conspiracy and solicitation to commit first-degree murder for the 2014 death of Dan Markel, who was fatally shot twice in the head while in his car in his Tallahassee garage. Markel, 41, a Harvard law grad, was a prominent Florida State University professor who shared custody of his two toddlers with his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, in an ongoing custody dispute after their messy 2013 divorce, according to court documents. Donna Adelson's trial comes after four other co-conspirators, including her son, were convicted in the scheme that prosecutors allege the 'overbearing matriarch' put in motion. Adelson has pleaded not guilty to the charges against her, and her attorney indicated in a recent pretrial hearing that she'll take the stand. She faces life in prison if convicted on all counts. The subject of a true-crime podcast and television specials, the complicated case has unfolded over the years in the form of four trials and a plea deal. Adelson's trial is among this summer's criminal cases of intrigue, highlighted by the Karen Read and Diddy verdicts, Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea and the ongoing Luigi Mangione saga. Prosecutors in Adelson's case will seek to prove she tasked her son Charles Adelson with handling the logistics and she helped fund the plot, which cost over $100,000. Adelson counted on Charles to solve problems, including her daughter's ugly custody battle, prosecutors allege. Adelson, who lived with her husband in a luxury Miami condo, had the means to fund a murder plot with their son, who worked with them at the family's thriving dentistry practice, according to court documents. The two hit men who carried out the killing were arrested in 2016, but it took years and an FBI undercover sting operation encircling the Adelson family before Charles Adelson was arrested in 2022. Donna Adelson was arrested in November 2023 on a jetway at the Miami International Airport just days after her son's conviction. Adelson and her husband obtained rushed visas after the conviction and booked one-way tickets to Vietnam – a country without an extradition agreement with the US, according to a probable cause affidavit filed in her case. Shortly before her arrest, she was caught on a recorded jail phone line discussing with Charles her research into countries without extradition agreements, the affidavit says. Wendi and her father have not been charged in connection with Markel's murder. In 2013, after the divorce was finalized, Wendi Adelson, an attorney herself, hoped to relocate her sons to South Florida to be near her brother and parents. But a judge barred her from moving the kids away from Markel, who was based in Tallahassee, according to the affidavit. Florida prosecutors say Donna Adelson was the architect of a plan to remove Markel from the equation, determined to have her daughter and grandsons near her. In emails around the time of the divorce, Donna Adelson suggested that Wendi Adelson offer her ex-husband $1 million to let the kids relocate. Donna said she'd split the cost with Wendi and her brother Charles, who was also willing to chip in, according to records put in evidence at Charles' trial. Wendi testified at the trial that she never offered Markel the money, nor did her family, as far as she knew. About four months before Markel's death, Markel filed a motion in civil court to bar Donna Adelson from having unsupervised visits with her grandsons. Markel claimed that his former mother-in-law 'disparaged' Markel to his kids, writing in the motion that the kids said, 'Grandma says you're stupid … she says you're trying to take her sunshines away from her,' and, 'Grandma says she hates you.' Markel was murdered before the motion could be resolved, and Wendi moved with her kids to South Florida days after his death, according to court records. Wendi told investigators during her initial interview the day Markel was shot that her parents were angry with her ex-husband, court records show. And before Markel's death her brother Charles had joked about hiring a hit man to kill him, she confirmed on the stand during the trial. Prosecutor Georgia Cappleman told the jury at Charles Adelson's trial that he was 'the person that Donna Adelson relied on to solve her problems, and this was a big, big problem for Donna Adelson, and she made it (Charles') problem to solve.' Charles Adelson had an ex-girlfriend he knew had ties to the Latin Kings gang: Katherine Magbanua, who he was dating in 2014, ultimately was convicted in 2022 for her role in facilitating the murder plot. Her children's father, Sigfredo Garcia, was convicted of killing Markel. He had help from his longtime friend Luis Rivera, a known Latin Kings gang member, who took a plea deal in 2016 for charges tied to the murder plot and ultimately helped law enforcement tie Garcia, Magbanua and Charles Adelson to the crime, according to the probable cause affidavit. The night of the murder in July 2014, text message records show Donna Adelson had texted her son, 'outside your house,' the affidavit says. A short time later, Magbanua went to Charles Adelson's home to pick up the money she'd split with Garcia and Rivera. Charles told Magbanua that night that his parents had just dropped off the money before she arrived, according to court records. Magbanua testified at Charles' trial that he told her at the time his mother had 'washed' the money that was still damp and moldy as if it was physically washed. According to financial records, Magbanua received paychecks from the Adelson's family dentistry practice for more than a year after the murder, which were handwritten and signed by Donna Adelson. Magbanua also testified that she never actually worked for the Adelson Institute for Aesthetics & Implant Dentistry, but consistently received those checks until April 2016, around the time the FBI conducted an undercover operation to gather evidence against the Adelson family. The probable cause affidavit against Donna Adelson describes the FBI sting operation when an undercover agent approached her in person and followed up in a mailed letter and by phone, purporting to threaten Adelson with information about the murder-for-hire plot on behalf of Rivera, who was already in prison for another crime. The FBI also tapped phone calls and surveilled meetings of Charles and his mother – who was extremely upset by the confrontation – as well as between Charles and Magbanua, capturing conversations between Charles and the two women in which they'd reference the situation in code and considered whether to pay the person $5,000 for his silence, according to court records. The operation led to Magbanua's arrest in October 2016. Charles wasn't arrested until 2022 when investigators used new technology to clarify surveillance audio of one of his meetings with Magbanua revealing incriminating statements linking him to the murder plot, prosecutors have said. All four convicted co-conspirators – Charles Adelson, Magbanua and the two hired hit men – are expected to testify in the prosecution's case at Donna Adelson's televised trial. Wendi Adelson and her other brother are also expected to testify for the state, according to the witness list, though the judge ruled this week that Wendi won't have to be called by her mother's defense team to testify again in her mother's defense.
