&w=3840&q=100)
'When Bumrah bowled that...': Harry Brook reveals the moment England decided to sledge India at Lord's
India and England players were involved in altercations during the Lord's Test. Reuters/PTI
England batter Harry Brook has opened up about the heated moments during the thrilling third Test at Lord's, where England edged India by just 22 runs. Speaking ahead of the must-win fourth Test in Manchester, Brook explained how one fiery over from Jasprit Bumrah sparked England's decision to return the sledging.
Brook was referring to the final over of Day 3, which was bowled by Bumrah to Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett. During that passage of play, India captain Shubman Gill and his teammates got into a war of words with Crawley and Duckett, who appeared to be wasting time by using various tactics, including calling for the physio.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Those lads went hard at Creeps (Zak Crawley) and Ducky (Ben Duckett) that night when Bumrah bowled that single over. We watched that and we reassessed. We thought it was the right time to go back at them,' Brook told reporters during the press conference on Monday.
Brook admits fiery moments were enjoyable
The Lord's Test saw plenty of verbal duels between the two sides, especially during India's tricky run chase of 193 on a difficult pitch. Brook admitted the aggressive approach from England in the field was deliberate after what happened in their innings a day before.
'I've had a lot of compliments. Everyone said it was awesome to watch and it looked like there was 11 versus two out there when we were fielding. It was good fun. It was tiring, but it made fielding a lot more enjoyable,' he said.
"It was good fun" 🤣
Harry Brook reflects on the tension at Lord's between England and India 🍿 pic.twitter.com/dyf6M0CyNV — Sky Sports Cricket (@SkyCricket) July 21, 2025
The final day saw a few heated moments, beginning with Jofra Archer's fiery send-off to Rishabh Pant. But once the match ended, both teams showed great sportsmanship by shaking hands. England players were even seen consoling Mohammed Siraj, whose bizarre dismissal sealed their victory.
The five-match series stands at 2-1 in England's favour, with the fourth Test set to begin at Old Trafford, Manchester, on July 23.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Harmanpreet's Century, Gaud's 6-Fer Helps India Beat England, Clinch Series 2-1
Harmanpreet Kaur's 84-ball 102 and Kranti Gaud's 6/52 helped India beat England by 13 runs in the third ODI, clinching the series 2-1. A splendid 84-ball 102 from skipper Harmanpreet Kaur and a brisk fifty from Jemimah Rodrigues propelled India Women to 318/5 as Kranti Gaud starred with 6/52 to bowl out England by 13 runs in the third and final ODI to clinch the series 2-1 on Tuesday. Harmanpreet's fluent innings featured 14 boundaries and key partnerships, leading to her seventh ODI century overall and third against England. Despite Harmanpreet's efforts, India's score fell short of their highest ODI total against England, 333/5, achieved in September 2022 in Canterbury. What Record's Did Harmanpreet Break? Harmanpreet showcased her skills particularly on the off-side, hitting most of her boundaries there, with a few driven down the ground and one behind the wicket. She formed crucial partnerships, adding 81 runs for the third wicket with Harleen Deol (45) and a rapid 110-run stand off 77 balls with Rodrigues, pushing India past the 300-run mark. Richa Ghosh then provided the finishing touches with a quickfire 38 off 18 balls, including three fours and two sixes, capping off an all-round performance for the visitors, who had earlier won the five-match T20I series. The foundation was laid by a solid 64-run opening stand between Smriti Mandhana and Pratika Rawal. Mandhana played the aggressor, scoring 45 off 54 balls with five fours, while Rawal played a supporting role, making 26 off 33 balls with two boundaries. Mandhana's innings ended when she pulled a short and wide ball from Sophie Ecclestone straight to Sophia Dunkley at midwicket in the 18th over. Rawal was dismissed in the 13th over, edged behind to 'keeper Amy Jones off Charlie Dean, a decision confirmed on review. Rodrigues found her rhythm with three consecutive fours off Dean in the 41st over and two more in the next, but couldn't advance beyond her 45-ball 50, which included seven fours. Harleen Deol appeared set for a significant score before being bounced out by seamer Lauren Bell for 45 off 65 balls, hitting four boundaries. (With inputs form PTI) view comments First Published: July 23, 2025, 01:13 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
'Was Not In The Spirit Of The Game': Shubman Gill Blasts England For 'Time Wasting Tactics' During Lord's Test
India skipper Shubman Gill has slammed England for their time wasting tactics during the third Test at Lord's, while saying that it was not in the spirit of the game. With the series tied at 1-1 ahead of the Lord's Test last week, the closely fought third Test between England and India witnessed plenty of drama on the field. This included an animated flare-up between India skipper Shubman and England openers towards the end of the third day of the Test. After managing to equal England's first innings total of 387, India wanted to squeeze in two overs in the remaining six minutes of play. However, that wasn't possible as the English openers took their time to get ready, and the India captain got involved in a heated discussion with Zak Crawley and then Ben Duckett. Addressing the pre-match press conference, India skipper cleared the air on the incident between him and England openers. "Let me clear the air. We had seven minutes of play left, the English batters were 90 seconds late to bat. Not 10,20 but 90. Yes, we would have also liked to bat less in the same situation but there is a manner to do it. I feel what happened was not in the spirit of the game," said Gill. "It's not something that I am proud of, we had no intention of doing that but there was a build-up to it," he added. The 25-year-old Gill also confirmed that Rishabh Pant will be keeping the wickets in the 4th Test, after an injury saw Dhruv Jurel replace the left-handed batter in the field at Lords. With India now trailing 1-2, many are wondering whether Karun Nair's fairytale has come to an end. In what has been his first series since 2017, the right-hand batter has only amassed 131 runs across six innings with a high score of 40. With both Sai Sudharsan and Abhimanyu Easwaran itching to go, Gill confirmed he is hopeful that Nair will turn around his form and help the team. "We have had conversations, we think Karun is batting well. He did not play at his number in the first game, It is difficult to make a comeback in a series like this. It is about getting that click, you score a 50 and then can go on to make a big score. We are hopeful he will turn it around," said Gill.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Ind vs Eng 4th Test: Can India script an injury-time comeback?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel England don't just hold the 2-1 lead in this series going into the fourth Test at Manchester, they seem to have the rub of the green as least when it comes to injuries. England announced early that they were making only one change to the team that won the third Test, bringing in Liam Dawson , the veteran left-arm spinner, into the eleven in place of Shoaib Bashir, who injured a finger on his left hand while fielding. Dawson will be playing only his fourth Test, at the age of 35, after eight years in the cricketing wilderness. Dawson has had decent returns at the domestic level over the last few seasons and was thought to be the best person to play a role in Bashir's absence. His first three Tests yielded seven wickets at an average of nearly meanwhile, have plenty to think about when it comes to team composition. Shubman Gill, the captain, confirmed that both Arshdeep Singh and Akash Deep were unavailable. Nitish Reddy has already been ruled out of the rest of the meant that Jasprit Bumrah would certainly play — and logic dictated that anyway with the series being on the line — and that Anshul Kamboj, the 24-year-old from Haryana, was likely to make his Test debut. Kamboj has played only 24 first-class matches, but he has 79 wickets at an impressive cost of 22 per scalp and is also handy with the other option was to play Prasidh Krishna, but he has not lived up to the billing thus far and offers little with the bat. India also confirmed that Rishab Pant was fit to keep wickets and Gill backed Karun Nair to come good, suggesting that all he needed was one decent score to turn things England wore a settled look, India were swirling a touch, but it was in similar circumstances that they pulled off victory in the second Test. So, they will not feel hugely disadvantaged. What was a bit unusual, however, was Gill's invoking of the spirit of cricket. Gill is only three Tests old as captain, one of which included his now well publicised exhorting of Zak Crawley for time-wasting tactics.'A lot of people have been talking about this, so let me clear the air for once and for all. The English batters on that day had seven minutes of play left. They were 90 seconds late to come to the crease,' said Gill. 'Not 10, not 20, 90 seconds late. Yes, most of the teams use this tactic. Even if we were in a position, we would have also liked to play fewer overs. But there's a manner to do it. But to be able to come 90 seconds late on the crease is not something that I would think comes in the spirit of the game.'This is a supremely slippery slope to be on. After all, the rules exist for a reason, and umpires are at hand to enforce them, even if perhaps they are not always as proactive or strict as they can be. When Gill says there's a 'manner' to do it, which would be acceptable, this is problematic. Different teams will see different things as acceptable, based on accepted practices growing up playing the game and cultural Gill was only stating his position to get under the skin of the opposition, that's a perfectly legitimate approach. After all, England made it clear that they had engineered a mindset shift of their own in this context. 'It was good fun, ' Harry Brook said of the fracas with Gill. 'We watched the Indians go hard at Creeps (Crawley) and Ducky (Duckett). We had a conversation, we thought it was the perfect opportunity to not be the nice guys that we have been in the past three years, to go out there and put them under more pressure than what they have probably had before.'Brook pointed to how this had come from within the set up. 'He (McCullum) actually said a few days before that we are too nice sometimes, and I brought it up the night before the last day: 'Baz said the other day we're too nice, I think tomorrow is a perfect opportunity to really get stuck into them'.England used this sense of outrage to funnel their aggression in the pointed end of the third Test and it worked for them. But, only because they did so from a place of calm, and as a strategy. If Gill is doing the same, there's no reason India can't be similarly galvanised. But, if he genuinely believes that it is the world against him and his team, it may well become a self-fulfilling prophecy
