House bill eyes mandatory SALN disclosure for President, VP
The proposal was made under House Bill 2897, or the People's Freedom of Information Act of 2025, which also requires disclosure of all information pertaining to official acts, transactions, or decisions, as well as government research data used as a basis for policy development.
'Current inconsistencies and lack of mandatory disclosure highlight the need for a legislated FOI policy. Ang panukalang ito ay isang makapangyarihang sandata laban sa katiwalian, disimpormasyon, at kawalan ng katapatan at pananagutan sa pamahalaan,' House Deputy Minority Leader ML party-list Rep. Leila de Lima, who is one of the bill's authors.
(This measure is a powerful weapon against corruption, disinformation, and lack of honesty and accountability in government.)
Aside from the mandatory disclosure of SALN of the President and Vice President, House Bill 2897 also mandates SALN disclosure of the following officials:
Members of the Cabinet
Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives
Justices of the Supreme Court; the Commissioners of the Constitutional Commissions and other constitutional offices
Officers of the Armed Forces with the rank of general or the equivalent flag rank.
In addition, House Bill 2897 states that Filipino citizens, upon request, have a right to and will be given access to any record under the control of government agencies.
The proposed bill also mandates websites of government agencies to contain a matrix of requests made, their status, and the decision regarding the request. Once the information is released to one party, the information must be accessible to all.
'Katapatan at pananagutan ang dapat maging SOP sa gobyerno. Public office is a public trust. Wala dapat itinatago sa taumbayan na siyang dapat pinanggagalingan ng kapangyarihan sa pamahalaan," de Lima added.
(Honesty and accountability should be the standing operating procedure of the government. The government should not hide in the shadows because all government authority emanates from the people.)
Lawmakers from the Liberal Party bloc in the House pose after filing the People's Freedom of Information Act of 2025 at the House of Representatives on Monday, Aug. 4, 2025. The bill, which covers the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, as well as GOCCs, constitutional commissions, LGUs, SUCs, AFP, and other bodies, aims 'to push for more transparency and accountability sa gobyerno natin,' said ML Party-list Rep. Leila de Lima. Tina Panganiban-Perez/GMA Integrated News
Exemptions
The mandated proposed bill, however, does not include sensitive personal information contained in the SALN such as:
Home address of the SALN declarant
Details of any unmarried children below 18 years of age living in the SALN declarant's household, if any, particularly their names, dates of birth, and ages
Signatures of the SALN declarant and SALN co-declarant.
Likewise, government-issued ID numbers of the SALN declarant and SALN co-declarant will be redacted to protect the dignity, safety, and security of the public officer, provided that all SALNs for previous years shall be archived and kept available to the websites.
House Bill 2897 also limits access to information if it involves sensitive information such as:
Information relating to national security, foreign affairs, internal/external defense, law enforcement procedures, and trade secrets;
Records or minutes of advice given and of opinions expressed during decision-making or policy formulation of the Chief Executive;
Assistance to OFWs, including but not limited to their cases and records on criminal and family cases
The information requested involves records of foreign diplomats on diplomatic and consular missions, their arrival and departure, and other information that could compromise their safety.
The information requested is exempted under a treaty or bilateral agreement to which the Philippines is a party.
The information requested is obtained by either House of Congress, or any committee thereof, in executive session.
Information requested is premature and/or is a mere draft
Matters of privileged communication – as defined in the Rules of Court, and
Information pertaining to personal privacy, and other constitutionally or legally protected information, among other sensitive details and information.
Those protected under or the 'Data Privacy Act of 2012.'
The first FOI bill was filed way back in the 8th Congress by then Camarines Sur Rep. Raul Roco. Several versions of the FOI bill have since been refiled every Congress, but it has never gained significant support in the House and the Senate.
Then President Rodrigo Duterte issued Executive Order (EO) No. 2 in 2016 on FOI, but the EO's coverage only included the executive branch and did not carry sanctions for non-compliance on the part of the government.
But under House Bill 2897, failure to comply will be punished with imprisonment of one to six years and a fine ranging from P100,000 to P1 million.
Caloocan Rep. Edgar Erice, Zamboanga del Norte Rep. Adrian Michael Amatong, Dinagat Islands Rep. Arlene 'Kaka' Bag-ao, Muntinlupa Rep. Jaime Fresnedi, Albay Rep. Cielo Krisel Lagman, and Oriental Mindoro Rep. Alfonso Umali Jr. are the other lawmakers who filed House Bill 2897. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
House leader: Watchdogs at budget talks won't be token participation
'This is about creating a culture of transparency where civil society has a standing invitation to keep the government on its toes,' Tingog party-list Representative Jude Acidre said. The presence of watchdogs and other people's organizations during the deliberations on the proposed 2026 national budget will not be mere token participation, Tingog party-list Representative Jude Acidre said. Last week, Speaker Martin Romualdez said that watchdogs and other civil society observers will be allowed to observe the proposed national budget deliberations, from the committee and plenary level to the bicameral conference committee. On Tuesday Acidre, as chairperson of the House Committee on Higher and Technical Education, held a consultation with civil society leaders on an inclusive, transparent national budget process at the Batasan. Among those present were lawyer Natasha Daphne Sta. Clara Marcelo of the MoveAsOne Coalition; Rene Santiago of the Foundation for Economic Freedom; Eunice Tanilon of the We Solve Foundation; Raul Montemayor of the Federation of Free Farmers; Danica Supnet of the Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities; Adolfo Jose A. Montesa of the People's Budget Coalition; May R. Cinco of ENet Philippines; John Benedict Felices of the Jesse Robredo Institute/La Salle;, Jeck Cantos of Social Watch, Inc.; Ralph Degoncillo of Health Justice; and Sandino J. Soliman and Bryan Ezra Gonzales of CODE-NGO. 'Under the leadership of Speaker Martin Romualdez, we will open the doors to our people for the national budget deliberations. We believe that involving civil society groups at the very start of budget discussions will help us craft a national budget that is more responsive, inclusive, and aligned with the needs of our people. I am encouraged by the energy and the openness that our civil society partners brought to the table today,' Acidre said. 'This is not token participation. Your expertise is recognized and your insights are valued to help shape the decisions we make on public spending,' he added. Also present during the consultations were House Deputy Secretary General Romulo Emmanuel Miral of the Congressional Policy and Budget Research Department and Muel Romero, Head Executive Assistant of the Office of the Speaker. Romualdez and Acidre were among the authors of House Resolution 94, which provides that bona fide people's organizations and NGOs may be granted official non-voting observer status at the public hearings of the appropriations committee on the national budget and all subsequent general appropriations. The same Resolution also states that accredited observers would be invited to attend budget briefings and deliberations, submit position papers and access relevant budget documents necessary to support their participation. Acidre said the consultation was only the start of a series of engagements with civil society groups, including sectoral and regional consultations, to ensure broad representation and participation. 'This is about creating a culture of transparency where civil society has a standing invitation to keep the government on its toes,' Acidre said. 'In the end, a budget is more than just numbers on a spreadsheet: it is a statement of national priorities. If we are serious about making those priorities serve the people, then the people must have a seat in the room where those decisions are made,' Acidre added. — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
8 hours ago
- GMA Network
House lawmakers support call for oral arguments on VP Sara impeachment
Several members of the House of Representatives on Tuesday supported calls for the Supreme Court to hold oral arguments on the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte. The calls came as the House of Representatives filed a motion for reconsideration before the SC, asking it to reverse its ruling that the articles of impeachment filed against Duterte were unconstitutional. "I welcome the call for the SC to issue a status quo ante order and call for oral arguments to explain intricate legal issues and ventilate factual incidents that may be clarified for the appreciation of the Honorable Justices," impeachment prosecutor Joel Chua of Manila's 3rd District told GMA Integrated News. Batangas 2nd District Representative Gerville Luistro, another impeachment prosecutor, agreed, saying the motion for reconsideration must be decided on "with utmost care." "This is a landmark case in impeachment proceedings, thus both parties must be accorded ample opportunity to argue their respective positions. Let us be mindful that these are the very foundations of our democracy: the Constitution, which is the fundamental law of the land; the impeachment, which is the people's redress against erring and abusive public officials; and ultimately, the integrity of the Highest Tribunal which has the exclusive power to interpret laws," she told GMA Integrated News. Tingog Party-list Representative Jude Acidre reiterated that the issue is not Duterte but how the Supreme Court's ruling will impact future impeachment cases. "I think the position of the House is not merely because it's about the Vice President who's at stake here. Also because I think we have to look at precedent. If we allow this particular ruling to prevail, then it will have serious consequences on the way impeachment trials will be done. And possibly, as far as the House is concerned, if we listen to the Speaker yesterday, we're worried it would infringe on the exclusivity of the right of Congress to initiate impeachment cases," he said in an interview. The legislator said he supports calls for the SC to hold oral arguments on the issue—a call echoed by groups such as 1Sambayan. "Kailangan din natin pag-aralan paano magiging epektibong mekanismo sa pag-e-ensure ng accountability ang impeachment process," Acidre said. (We also need to study how the impeachment process can become an effective mechanism to ensure accountability.) "If the impeachment case is dismissed, then we have practically... it's to the country's loss. Kasi ibig sabihin noon, never natin malalaman at never masasagot ang mga katanungan, matagal na natin hinihingi. Katulad ng kung ginamit ba nang tama ang confidential funds, may pananagutan ba ang vice president tungkol sa kanyang pagbabanta sa buhay ng Pangulo, ng unang ginang at ang Speaker ng House." he added. (It would mean that we would never know and never get answers to the questions that we have long been asking. Such as if the confidential funds were used properly, or is the Vice President liable for the threats she made against the President, the First Lady and the Speaker.) "These are issues that need to be answered. These are issues that affect the very core of our democracy. May naman pupwedeng dahil lang sa teknikalidad ay nabalewala na po ito [It could be that these will be dismissed due to a technicality]," he added. While Acidre said he respects whatever the Senate decides to do with the Articles of Impeachment, he stressed he is still hopeful that the impeachment trial will proceed. When asked if the Supreme Court decision effectively removed the third mode of impeachment, which is to immediately transmit to the Senate the Articles of Impeachment if it is signed by at least a third of all members of the House of Representatives, Acidre replied, "I wouldn't say as far as tinanggal [removed]. Siguro radically change. It makes it difficult for congressmen to exercise that. And I think I agree it requires examining whether it is an example of judicial overreach." Akbayan Representative Perci Cendaña, who recently filed a motion to intervene in the impeachment case at the Supreme Court, stressed the importance of holding oral arguments on the issue. "Napakahalaga yung oral arguments para magkaroon din ng fair day in court itong ating motion for reconsideration. And more than that, napakahalaga na madinig ng taumbayan yung katwiran ng parehong panig at na mapaliwanag ng House of Representatives na yung lahat ng ginawa natin ay in compliance with the Constitution at yung sarili nating House rules," he said in an interview. (It is very important to hold oral arguments so that the motion for reconsideration will have a fair day in court. And more than that, it is very important for the Filipino people to hear the reasonings of both sides and for the House of Representatives to explain why everything we have done is in compliance with the Constitution and our own House rules.) He also called on the Senate not to act in haste on the Articles of Impeachment. "Para silang bibiyahe na jeep. Hindi pa puno, gusto nilang umarangkada. At pag umarangkada sila, ang mangyari, ang maiiwan, yung katotohanan, pananagutan, at yung katarungan," Cendaña said. (It's like they're on a jeep that wants to get going even before it's full. And when they leave early, what gets left behind are the truth, accountability, and justice,) "Sa dulo, ang mahalaga dito, dapat marinig ng taumbayan yung dalawang panig at magkaroon ng fair day in court. Kasi nga, pag nangyari yan, pag dismissed na yan na hindi pa final ang process sa Korte Suprema, talo na naman ang taumbayan," he added. Dinagat Islands Rep Kaka Bag-ao also believes that oral arguments in the Supreme Court on the impeachment will make the issues clearer for the public. "Una-una, dapat maintindihan pa nga ng taumbayqn. And I think the only response to that would be an oral argument in Court na puwedeng mabigyan ng pagkakataon yung mga partido to explain ano talaga ang totoong facts doon sa issue," Bag-ao said in an interview. Bag-ao also believes the Senate Impeachment Court should conduct an impeachment trial. "Yung impeachment trial ay dapat din matuloy at dapat maintindihan ng Senado yan, no? Bukod sa hindi pa tapos yung kaso sa Supreme Court, pangungunahan nila. Kahit pa sabihin nilang sila ang may sole authority, ang kailangan pa rin, ang requirement pa rin ay, anuman ang kanilang response, ay magkaroon ng trial. Gusto natin makita ano ba talagang ebidensya laban kay VP? Ano ba talagang depensa ni VP Sara? Tingin ko dapat mas maintindihan ito ng mga tao," Bag-ao said. — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
10 hours ago
- GMA Network
House QuadComm gets new life in 20th Congress
The House of Representatives has reestablished the House Quad Committee (QuadComm) for the 20th Congress. This developed after the House, via voice vote, adopted House Resolution 106 filed by Manila Rep. Benny Abante, which establishes the mega committee 'to conduct a joint inquiry in need of legislation to address emerging and unresolved issues brought forth by the joint investigation of the previous Quad Committee during the 19th Congress.' The "House QuadComm 2.0" will still be composed of the House Committee on Dangerous Drugs, House Committee on Public Order and Safety, House Committee on Human Rights and the House Committee on Accounts. Abante will still be the chairperson of the House Committee on Human Rights, while the House Committee on Dangerous Drugs is chaired by Bukidnon Rep. Jonathan Keith Flores. The House Committee on Accounts is chaired by Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon, while the House Committee on Public Order and Safety is chaired by Rep. Rolando Valeriano. The House QuadComm in the 19th Congress investigated the drug war deaths during the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte and the Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators-related crimes. In pushing for QuadComm 2.0 Abante said there remains a lot to be investigated, including the case of over 30 missing sabungeros or cockfight enthusiasts. 'May nagsasabi na pulitika lang ito (Some say its political). But this is not a partisan crusade, Mr. Speaker. This is a moral one. Because murder knows no color but one: red—the color of blood unjustly spilled,' Abante said. The House QuadComm inquiries resulted in the filing of the proposed Anti-Extrajudicial Killing Act and the Civil Forfeiture Act, which Abante said are important in curbing 'impunity and seizing the ill-gotten wealth of those involved in state-sponsored abuses.' –VAL, GMA Integrated News
