logo
Trump increases tariff on Canada to 35% from 25%, cites fentanyl ahead of August 1 deadline

Trump increases tariff on Canada to 35% from 25%, cites fentanyl ahead of August 1 deadline

Economic Times3 days ago
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order raising tariffs on Canadian goods from 25% to 35% for all items outside the USMCA agreement. Canada, which relies heavily on the U.S. market, is expected to respond with countermeasures. Trump has also set new tariffs on 68 other nations and extended negotiations with Mexico. The White House has tied Canada's new rate partly to fentanyl concerns, sparking further friction between Ottawa and Washington as broader trade tensions continue to mount.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Blaming Canada for fentanyl and "retaliation"
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Carney reached out but no talks happened
Canada's response remains divided
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A vulnerable trading partner
Wider global impact: 68 countries affected
Mexico granted a 90-day breather
USMCA under strain as Trump signals shift
Multiple deals in motion
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order late on Thursday raising tariffs on Canadian goods not covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) from 25% to 35%, the White House confirmed.A separate 40% levy will apply to goods that are re-routed through third countries in an effort to dodge the new tariffs, according to a White House fact sheet.The measure came just hours before Trump's self-imposed deadline for nations to strike new trade deals with the United States.The White House has partly linked the decision to what it described as Canada's "continued inaction and retaliation", referencing concerns about fentanyl trafficking. Although Ottawa maintains that only a tiny fraction of the drug entering the U.S. originates from Canadian territory, officials say they've already taken steps to tighten border security.Trump, however, sees it differently. 'Well, they have to pay a fair rate – that's all. It's very simple. They have been charging very, very high tariffs to our farmers, some over 200% and they've been treating our farmers very badly,' he said when asked about the new measures.Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney reportedly reached out before the tariff hike took effect, but no conversation took place.'We haven't spoken to Canada today. He's (Carney) called and we'll, we'll see,' Trump told reporters at the White House just hours before the new rates were made public.Carney's office did not respond to media requests. On Wednesday, he said that while trade talks with Washington had been 'constructive,' a final deal by the deadline was unlikely.He added that a complete rollback of U.S. tariffs was not on the table.With no clear agreement in place, pressure is mounting inside Canada. Carney must coordinate with ten provinces, each pulling in different directions. Some want a strong counter-response, others a more measured approach.Premier Doug Ford of Ontario, Canada's industrial powerhouse and the province most exposed to U.S. trade disruption, pushed hard for retaliation. 'Canada shouldn't settle for anything less than the right deal. Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground,' he said in a post on X.Ford has called for a 50% counter-tariff on U.S. steel and aluminium imports.Carney, speaking in June, warned that if no deal was reached by the August 1 deadline, Canada would likely impose new levies on American steel and aluminium.Canada ships around three-quarters of its exports to the U.S. The country's manufacturing-heavy export sector, including cars, steel, and aluminium, stands to be hit hardest.Roughly 90% of Canadian exports to the U.S. in May qualified under the USMCA, according to government data. But those that don't comply now face steep new tariffs.The figures also show a significant shift: the share of Canadian exports heading to the U.S. dropped by 10 percentage points over the last year, falling to 68%. Analysts say the shift reflects a push to diversify, as some companies seek new markets to avoid the uncertainty of U.S. policy.Despite the tension, economists believe the Canadian economy will avoid a recession, citing unexpected resilience and trade adaptation.Trump's order didn't just target Canada. New tariffs were imposed on 68 nations and the European Union, with a baseline rate of 10% for unlisted countries.Taiwan will now face a 20% tariff, Pakistan 19%, and Lesotho — initially threatened with a 50% levy — will now see a 15% rate. The same 15% tariff applies to imports from Israel, Iceland, Ghana, Ecuador, Fiji and Guyana.A senior U.S. official, speaking anonymously, said the rates were based on each country's trade imbalance with the U.S. and their regional economic weight.Earlier Thursday, Trump held a phone call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Following the conversation, he agreed to a 90-day negotiation window, averting a planned tariff increase to 30%.During this period, Mexico will continue to pay the existing 25% duty on non-USMCA goods.'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Sheinbaum wrote on X.Trump described the call as 'very successful,' saying the leaders had 'got to know each other better.' He said that under the arrangement, U.S.-bound Mexican imports of copper, aluminium and steel will face tariffs of up to 50%. Cars will be taxed at 25%.He also claimed Mexico had agreed to eliminate its 'non-tariff trade barriers' without offering details.Some goods continue to be protected under the USMCA, the three-way deal Trump negotiated during his first term. But he now appears to have cooled on the agreement.The deal is up for renegotiation next year. Trump, in recent comments, indicated frustration with both Mexico and Canada, accusing them of taking advantage of the U.S. on trade.U.S. Census Bureau data shows the trade imbalance with Mexico reached $171.5 billion last year, up sharply from $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump took office.The flurry of tariff activity on Thursday capped days of deal-making. Trump said, 'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' though he declined to name the nations involved.New agreements have reportedly been reached with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Cambodia and Thailand. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News that the deals with Cambodia and Thailand came after both countries agreed to halt a border conflict.European Union officials were still working on the framework for taxing imported vehicles. Meanwhile, Switzerland and Norway were said to still be awaiting clarity on their own rates.Trump's current tariff strategy has evolved quickly. Back in April, a previous round of tariff announcements triggered a stock market slide and recession fears. To contain the fallout, Trump introduced a 90-day negotiating period, but as deadlines passed without enough deals, the White House ramped up pressure again.The unpredictability has rattled markets and governments. While Trump sees tariffs as leverage, economists warn that the costs will eventually filter down to U.S. consumers and businesses. For now, the pressure has shifted to America's biggest trading partners — and they'll need to decide how to respond.(With inputs from Reuters)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet T-14 Armata Tank, super powerful war weapon offered by Russia to India, its features are..., Trump to...
Meet T-14 Armata Tank, super powerful war weapon offered by Russia to India, its features are..., Trump to...

India.com

time10 minutes ago

  • India.com

Meet T-14 Armata Tank, super powerful war weapon offered by Russia to India, its features are..., Trump to...

New Delhi: US President Donald Trump is not happy with India and Russia's friendship and is threatening both countries with tariffs. Amidst this, the two countries are discussing a crucial defence deal that might further enrage Trump. What has Russia offered to India? Russia has offered to sell the next-generation T-14 Armata tanks to India to replace its ageing T-72 tanks with new tanks. Russia's offer includes domestic manufacturing in India under the Make in India programme. Armata tanks are made by the Russian company Uralvagonzavod, and the T-14 Armata is its most advanced tank. Uralvagonzavod has offered to design and develop this tank according to India's needs for its Next Generation Battle Tank (NGMBT) programme. For this, the Russian company has shown interest in partnering with Indian defence companies. What is the crux of the proposal? The proposal includes possible collaboration with India's Combat Vehicle Research and Development Establishment (CVRDE) or other public sector defence units. The proposal is strategically prepared according to India's 'Make-I' procurement category, which aims to increase India's indigenous production. Under this plan, the Government of India provides up to 70% of the funding for developing prototypes, which emphasises domestic manufacturing and technology transfer. Will India buy the advanced T-14 Armata tank? Uralvagonzavod had signed a technology transfer agreement with India for T-90S tanks, which are now manufactured in India as T-90 Bhishma. India uses more than 83 per cent domestic technology in the T-90S tank, including complete localisation of the tank's engine. Russian officials have also expressed their intention to work with India for the local production of the T-14 Armata tank project. Company officials have suggested that the T-14 Armata would be an ideal successor to replace the Indian Army's huge but ageing fleet of T-72 tanks. Why is T-14 Armata considered one of the most advanced tanks in the world? The T-14 Armata is considered one of the most advanced tanks in the world. It has many remotely operated functions, an armoured capsule for the crew, a state-of-the-art digital control system and an active protection system (APS) called 'Afghanit'. This system is capable of destroying the enemy's anti-tank missiles on the way. Three operators can sit inside this tank and destroy the enemy's anti-tank missiles and RPGs in the air. It has a millimetre-wave radar, which provides 360-degree protection. Guided missiles can also be fired from this tank up to 8–10 kilometres. The maximum speed of this tank is 75 to 80 kilometres per hour, and its range is 500 kilometres. The weight of this tank is 55 tonnes, and its cost is around Rs 30 to 42 crore. If it is manufactured in India, its cost will be reduced by at least Rs 10 crore.

No Consensus, Just Conflict: Operation Sindoor Debate Sinks Into Bitter Blame Game Between Govt And Opposition
No Consensus, Just Conflict: Operation Sindoor Debate Sinks Into Bitter Blame Game Between Govt And Opposition

India.com

time10 minutes ago

  • India.com

No Consensus, Just Conflict: Operation Sindoor Debate Sinks Into Bitter Blame Game Between Govt And Opposition

New Delhi: The brief political unity witnessed in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent military conflict with Pakistan seems to have unravelled following the surprise ceasefire announcement on May 10. This week's marathon three-day debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor laid bare the widening gulf between the government and the Opposition. It reinforces the notion that in today's India, consensus is the exception, not the norm. The debate gave an opportunity to the leaders of both the government and the Opposition to show unity against terrorism coming from Pakistan. While many speakers across party lines called for a common stance, their speeches exposed deep divisions. The Opposition left no stone unturned to corner the lawmakers and pressed for answers on critical issues such as security and intelligence lapses preceding the Pahalgam attack, accountability for those failures, losses suffered by the Indian Air Force, and the true nature of US involvement. Notably, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chose not to respond in the Rajya Sabha, delegating the reply to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, which triggered an Opposition walkout. From the government's perspective, the needle moved favourably, for instance, Union Home Minister Amit Shah confirmed the elimination of the Pahalgam terrorists, and Prime Minister Modi asserted that "no global leader" had urged India to halt its military operation. Meanwhile, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar put a full stop to speculations regarding New Delhi's differences with Washington, including issues of deportations, visas, and student concerns, aimed at closing talks around Trump's role in India-Pakistan ceasefire. However, the Opposition remained unsatisfied. Congress MP and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi challenged the Prime Minister to publicly refute US President Donald Trump's claims of brokering the ceasefire, labeling the challenge 'political rhetoric.' While the PM skipped any mention of Trump and his repeated assertions of having brokered the ceasefire, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh sidestepped questions regarding the fighter jets lost on the first day of conflict, instead urging a results-focused perspective, saying, 'In any exam, the result matters. We should see whether a student is getting good marks and not focus on whether his pencil was broken or his pen was lost.' Congress's Nationalist Strategy In an uncharacteristic move, the Congress party adopted a nationalist stance to continue putting pressure on the government. This approach aimed to score political points by portraying the government as weak on defense. However, the tables turned with former Home Minister P. Chidambaram's suggestion that the Pahalgam attackers might have been "homegrown terrorists", rather than Pakistan-backed. This offered the government an opportunity to criticise the grand old party's inconsistent position. Rahul Gandhi's speech was notably combative, alongside his sister, Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra recalled the resignations of Vilasrao Deshmukh as Maharashtra Chief Minister and Shivraj Patil as Union Home Minister after the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, to emphasise government accountability. Gandhi accused the Prime Minister of prioritising his image over the armed forces' freedom to operate, warning that 'the forces should be used with freedom and for the national interest' and urged a decisive military effort to 'defeat terrorism once and for all.' 'It is dangerous at this time for the Prime Minister to use the forces to protect his image. It is dangerous for the country. The forces should only be used in the national interest, and the forces should be used with freedom. If you want them to be used … then go all the way, fight properly and defeat them once and for all," he said. Historical Echoes In Debate The discussion frequently revisited historical parallels. The Congress party members highlighted Indira Gandhi's role in the creation of Bangladesh despite US pressure, contrasting it with the current ceasefire announcement influenced by the US. Meanwhile, the government drew attention to the Congress's perceived failings during critical moments, such as Partition, the wars of 1947–48 and 1965, the Indus Waters Treaty, and the 1962 war with China, to question the Opposition's credibility on national security. While the Congress remains burdened by its political legacy, this debate underscored the broader polarisation within Indian politics. Despite shared concerns over terrorism, the parties remain entrenched in mutual recriminations. With other INDIA bloc parties siding with the Congress in criticism of the government, the opposition front remains fragmented under intense BJP scrutiny.

Trump new tariff rates ‘pretty much set,' says US trade representative
Trump new tariff rates ‘pretty much set,' says US trade representative

First Post

time10 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump new tariff rates ‘pretty much set,' says US trade representative

Speaking on Sunday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the rates, set to take effect on August 7, are 'pretty much set,' defending the president's strategy as both economic and geopolitical. read more US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer gives a live TV interview about tariffs at the White House in Washington, DC, US. Reuters New US tariff rates are 'pretty much set' with no immediate possibility for discussion, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks broadcast Sunday, justifying the president's politically motivated charges against Brazil. Trump, who has used tariffs as an instrument of American economic supremacy, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at 10 to 41 percent starting from August 7, his new hard deadline for the tariffs. In a pre-recorded interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that tariff rates are unlikely to see changes in 'the coming days'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer said. 'These tariff rates are pretty much set.' Undoubtedly some trade ministers 'want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' he added. But 'we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States – albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a 'witch hunt.' Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy,' Greer told CBS. 'It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues.' Trump was 'elected to assess the foreign affairs situation… and take appropriate action,' he added. Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates 'are more or less locked in.' Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show 'Meet the Press with Kristen Welker' if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: 'I would rule it out, because these are the final deals.' Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs arguing he overstepped his authority. An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store